Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Directed Verdict and Remittitur in Civil Rights Litigation: Gregory v. Shelby County

Directed Verdict and Remittitur in Civil Rights Litigation: Gregory v. Shelby County

Date: Jul 13, 2000
Directed Verdict and Remittitur in Civil Rights Litigation: Gregory v. Shelby County Introduction In the landmark case of Gregory v. Shelby County, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Protected Activity under the False Claims Act: McKenzie v. BellSouth Telecommunications Inc.

Protected Activity under the False Claims Act: McKenzie v. BellSouth Telecommunications Inc.

Date: Jul 13, 2000
Protected Activity under the False Claims Act: McKenzie v. BellSouth Telecommunications Inc. Introduction Mary C. McKenzie v. BellSouth Telecommunications Inc. is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Carter v. Bell

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Carter v. Bell

Date: Jul 8, 2000
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Carter v. Bell Introduction Carter v. Bell, 218 F.3d 581 (6th Cir. 2000), is a landmark case that addresses the critical issue of ineffective...
Affirming Daubert's Gatekeeping Role: Reliability of Expert Testimony in Product Liability – Pride v. BIC

Affirming Daubert's Gatekeeping Role: Reliability of Expert Testimony in Product Liability – Pride v. BIC

Date: Jul 8, 2000
Affirming Daubert's Gatekeeping Role: Reliability of Expert Testimony in Product Liability – Pride v. BIC Introduction Pride v. BIC Corporation is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Affirmation of Dismissal Without Prejudice Under the Speedy Trial Act: An Analysis of United States v. Howard

Affirmation of Dismissal Without Prejudice Under the Speedy Trial Act: An Analysis of United States v. Howard

Date: Jul 7, 2000
Affirmation of Dismissal Without Prejudice Under the Speedy Trial Act: An Analysis of United States v. Howard Introduction United States of America v. Jerry Lee Howard, 218 F.3d 556, adjudicated by...
Enforcing AEDPA's Exhaustion Requirement: Rockwell v. Yukins

Enforcing AEDPA's Exhaustion Requirement: Rockwell v. Yukins

Date: Jun 30, 2000
Enforcing AEDPA's Exhaustion Requirement: Rockwell v. Yukins Introduction In the landmark case of Rockwell v. Yukins, 217 F.3d 421 (6th Cir. 2000), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Due Process Affirmed in Sixth Circuit's Ruling on Insanity Defense Procedures – Mackey v. Dutton

Due Process Affirmed in Sixth Circuit's Ruling on Insanity Defense Procedures – Mackey v. Dutton

Date: Jun 29, 2000
Due Process Affirmed in Sixth Circuit's Ruling on Insanity Defense Procedures – Mackey v. Dutton Introduction The case of Andrew Mackey v. Michael Dutton, Warden, decided by the United States Court...
Establishing Design Defect Liability in Automotive Product Liability and Expert Testimony Standards: Clay v. Ford Motor Company

Establishing Design Defect Liability in Automotive Product Liability and Expert Testimony Standards: Clay v. Ford Motor Company

Date: Jun 29, 2000
Establishing Design Defect Liability in Automotive Product Liability and Expert Testimony Standards: Clay v. Ford Motor Company Introduction Case: Dolores Clay, et al. v. Ford Motor Company Court:...
Enforcement of the Prison Litigation Reform Act and Due Process in Inmate Litigation: Miller v. Campbell

Enforcement of the Prison Litigation Reform Act and Due Process in Inmate Litigation: Miller v. Campbell

Date: Jun 28, 2000
Enforcement of the Prison Litigation Reform Act and Due Process in Inmate Litigation: Miller v. Campbell Introduction In the landmark case Carol L. Miller v. Donal Campbell, et al., adjudicated on...
Affirmation of the "Consent Once Removed" Doctrine in Warrantless Searches

Affirmation of the "Consent Once Removed" Doctrine in Warrantless Searches

Date: Jun 16, 2000
Affirmation of the "Consent Once Removed" Doctrine in Warrantless Searches Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Jerry Pollard and Eddie Rodriguez (215 F.3d 643, 2000), the...
Affirmation of Prejudgment Interest in Joint and Several Liability: Conte v. General Housewares Corp. and Dayton Power Light Co.

Affirmation of Prejudgment Interest in Joint and Several Liability: Conte v. General Housewares Corp. and Dayton Power Light Co.

Date: Jun 15, 2000
Affirmation of Prejudgment Interest in Joint and Several Liability: Conte v. General Housewares Corp. and Dayton Power Light Co. Introduction Conte v. General Housewares Corporation and Dayton Power...
Affirming Religious Institution Exemption under Title VII: Hall v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation

Affirming Religious Institution Exemption under Title VII: Hall v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation

Date: Jun 14, 2000
Affirming Religious Institution Exemption under Title VII: Hall v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation Introduction In Glynda L. Hall v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation (215 F.3d 618,...
Tax Injunction Act Applied to Disabled Parking Placard Fees in Hedgepeth v. Tennessee

Tax Injunction Act Applied to Disabled Parking Placard Fees in Hedgepeth v. Tennessee

Date: Jun 13, 2000
Tax Injunction Act Applied to Disabled Parking Placard Fees in Hedgepeth v. Tennessee Introduction Hedgepeth et al. v. State of Tennessee is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Constructive Knowledge in 42 U.S.C. §1983 Actions: Hughes v. Vanderbilt University

Constructive Knowledge in 42 U.S.C. §1983 Actions: Hughes v. Vanderbilt University

Date: Jun 8, 2000
Constructive Knowledge in 42 U.S.C. §1983 Actions: Hughes v. Vanderbilt University Introduction In the landmark case of Ernestine Carter Hughes v. Vanderbilt University et al., adjudicated by the...
Reaffirming Res Judicata and Strict RICO Pleading Standards: Begala v. PNC Bank

Reaffirming Res Judicata and Strict RICO Pleading Standards: Begala v. PNC Bank

Date: Jun 8, 2000
Reaffirming Res Judicata and Strict RICO Pleading Standards: Begala v. PNC Bank Introduction Begala, Borchers, Edwards v. PNC Bank is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for State-Affiliated Agencies in Parental Rights Termination: Bartell v. Multiple Defendants

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for State-Affiliated Agencies in Parental Rights Termination: Bartell v. Multiple Defendants

Date: Jun 8, 2000
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for State-Affiliated Agencies in Parental Rights Termination: Bartell v. Multiple Defendants Introduction In the case of Bartell v. Multiple Defendants, decided by...
Establishing Qualified Immunity in Police Use of Deadly Force: Boyd v. Baeppler & Wilsman

Establishing Qualified Immunity in Police Use of Deadly Force: Boyd v. Baeppler & Wilsman

Date: Jun 7, 2000
Establishing Qualified Immunity in Police Use of Deadly Force: Boyd v. Baeppler & Wilsman Introduction Bertha Boyd, acting as the administratrix of the estate of the late Adolph Boyd, Jr., filed a...
Sixth Circuit Upholds Money Laundering Convictions in Fraudulent Bankruptcy Investment Scheme

Sixth Circuit Upholds Money Laundering Convictions in Fraudulent Bankruptcy Investment Scheme

Date: Jun 2, 2000
Sixth Circuit Upholds Money Laundering Convictions in Fraudulent Bankruptcy Investment Scheme Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. John R. Prince and Tony White, the United...
Expansion of Protected Status under Title VII and §1981: Retaliation Protections for Affirmative Action Officials

Expansion of Protected Status under Title VII and §1981: Retaliation Protections for Affirmative Action Officials

Date: Jun 2, 2000
Expansion of Protected Status under Title VII and §1981: Retaliation Protections for Affirmative Action Officials Introduction In the landmark case John B. Johnson v. University of Cincinnati, Joseph...
Strict Scrutiny Applied to Racial Preferences in Public Contracting: Associated General Contractors v. Drabik

Strict Scrutiny Applied to Racial Preferences in Public Contracting: Associated General Contractors v. Drabik

Date: Jun 2, 2000
Strict Scrutiny Applied to Racial Preferences in Public Contracting: Associated General Contractors v. Drabik Introduction The case of Associated General Contractors of Ohio, Inc. v. Drabik (214 F.3d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert