Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Elrod/Branti Exceptions Clarified in Public Employment Retaliation Case

Elrod/Branti Exceptions Clarified in Public Employment Retaliation Case

Date: Mar 30, 2002
Elrod/Branti Exceptions Clarified in Public Employment Retaliation Case Introduction Hager v. Pike County Board of Education is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Limitations on Habeas Relief for Self-Defense Jury Instructions: Taylor v. Withrow

Limitations on Habeas Relief for Self-Defense Jury Instructions: Taylor v. Withrow

Date: Mar 29, 2002
Limitations on Habeas Relief for Self-Defense Jury Instructions: Taylor v. Withrow Introduction Eric W. Taylor, the petitioner-appellee, was convicted of second-degree murder in Michigan in 1995....
Limits on Sua Sponte Dismissal of Habeas Petitions under AEDPA: Scott v. Collins

Limits on Sua Sponte Dismissal of Habeas Petitions under AEDPA: Scott v. Collins

Date: Mar 26, 2002
Limits on Sua Sponte Dismissal of Habeas Petitions under AEDPA: Scott v. Collins Introduction In the landmark case Scott v. Collins, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit addressed...
Enhanced Protections for Private Employees Under the Tennessee Handicap Act: Chandler v. Specialty Tires of America

Enhanced Protections for Private Employees Under the Tennessee Handicap Act: Chandler v. Specialty Tires of America

Date: Mar 26, 2002
Enhanced Protections for Private Employees Under the Tennessee Handicap Act: Chandler v. Specialty Tires of America Introduction Chandler v. Specialty Tires of America (Tennessee), Inc., 283 F.3d 818...
ERISA Preemption and Removal Breakdown in Age Discrimination: Peters v. Lincoln Electric

ERISA Preemption and Removal Breakdown in Age Discrimination: Peters v. Lincoln Electric

Date: Mar 22, 2002
ERISA Preemption and Removal Breakdown in Age Discrimination: Peters v. Lincoln Electric Introduction Peters v. Lincoln Electric Company (285 F.3d 456, June 23, 1998) is a pivotal case addressing the...
Duty to Defend in Patent Infringement Under Insurance Policies: Weiss v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

Duty to Defend in Patent Infringement Under Insurance Policies: Weiss v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

Date: Mar 19, 2002
Duty to Defend in Patent Infringement Under Insurance Policies: Weiss v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Introduction The case of Weiss v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company ([283...
Shareholder Standing and Intervention in Bankruptcy: Analysis of In re Troutman Enterprises, Inc. Decision

Shareholder Standing and Intervention in Bankruptcy: Analysis of In re Troutman Enterprises, Inc. Decision

Date: Mar 16, 2002
Shareholder Standing and Intervention in Bankruptcy: Analysis of In re Troutman Enterprises, Inc. Decision Introduction The case of In re Troutman Enterprises, Inc., Debtor involves a complex...
Res Judicata and Judicial Estoppel in ESOP Litigation: Browning et al. v. Saul Levy et al.

Res Judicata and Judicial Estoppel in ESOP Litigation: Browning et al. v. Saul Levy et al.

Date: Mar 13, 2002
Res Judicata and Judicial Estoppel in ESOP Litigation: Browning et al. v. Saul Levy et al. Introduction The case of Christopher Browning; Jeffrey Rademan; Nationwise Automotive Inc. Employee Stock...
Establishing Prima Facie Personal Jurisdiction in Internet Commerce: Neogen Corp. v. Neo Gen Screening, Inc.

Establishing Prima Facie Personal Jurisdiction in Internet Commerce: Neogen Corp. v. Neo Gen Screening, Inc.

Date: Mar 7, 2002
Establishing Prima Facie Personal Jurisdiction in Internet Commerce: Neogen Corp. v. Neo Gen Screening, Inc. Introduction Neogen Corporation, a Michigan-based entity engaged in the development and...
Affirming Rule 60(a) for Correcting Clerical Errors in Judicial Orders

Affirming Rule 60(a) for Correcting Clerical Errors in Judicial Orders

Date: Mar 5, 2002
Affirming Rule 60(a) for Correcting Clerical Errors in Judicial Orders Introduction The case In re Anna Marie Walter, Debtor. Jerry Pruzinsky, Defendant-Appellant, v. Silvio Gianetti; Gianetti...
Upholding Habeas Corpus Standards: Comprehensive Analysis of Lawrence Dell v. Dennis Straub

Upholding Habeas Corpus Standards: Comprehensive Analysis of Lawrence Dell v. Dennis Straub

Date: Mar 1, 2002
Upholding Habeas Corpus Standards: Comprehensive Analysis of Lawrence Dell v. Dennis Straub Introduction Lawrence Eugene Dell, the petitioner, challenged his conviction and sentence on multiple...
Enhancing Consumer Protection: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent on TILA Disclosure Variance

Enhancing Consumer Protection: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent on TILA Disclosure Variance

Date: Feb 27, 2002
Enhancing Consumer Protection: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent on TILA Disclosure Variance Introduction The case of LaTonya INGE and Jody Holman v. Rock Financial Corporation addressed critical...
Establishing Prima Facie Case under McDonnell Douglas: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Title VII Racial Discrimination Claim

Establishing Prima Facie Case under McDonnell Douglas: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Title VII Racial Discrimination Claim

Date: Feb 27, 2002
Establishing Prima Facie Case under McDonnell Douglas: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Title VII Racial Discrimination Claim 1. Introduction In Anthony Clayton v. Meijer, Incorporated, the...
Eleventh Amendment Immunity and ADA Title II Enforcement: Comprehensive Analysis of Tre v. R Carten

Eleventh Amendment Immunity and ADA Title II Enforcement: Comprehensive Analysis of Tre v. R Carten

Date: Feb 26, 2002
Eleventh Amendment Immunity and ADA Title II Enforcement: Comprehensive Analysis of Tre v. R Carten Introduction The landmark case of Tre v. R Carten, decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Procedural Default in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims under AEDPA: Monzo v. Edwards

Affirmation of Procedural Default in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims under AEDPA: Monzo v. Edwards

Date: Feb 23, 2002
Affirmation of Procedural Default in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims under AEDPA: Monzo v. Edwards Introduction Thomas D. Monzo, the petitioner-appellant, sought habeas corpus relief...
Admissibility of Lifestyle Evidence in Fraud Cases: United States v. Jackson-Randolph

Admissibility of Lifestyle Evidence in Fraud Cases: United States v. Jackson-Randolph

Date: Feb 23, 2002
Admissibility of Lifestyle Evidence in Fraud Cases: United States v. Jackson-Randolph Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Marie Antoinette Jackson-Randolph, the United States Court...
Strict Interpretation of Rule 404(b): Sixth Circuit Reverses Haywood’s Conviction

Strict Interpretation of Rule 404(b): Sixth Circuit Reverses Haywood’s Conviction

Date: Feb 22, 2002
Strict Interpretation of Rule 404(b): Sixth Circuit Reverses Haywood’s Conviction Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Elmer J. Haywood, the United States Court of Appeals...
Reversal of Summary Judgment in Arnett v. Myers: New Precedents on First Amendment Retaliation and Ripeness

Reversal of Summary Judgment in Arnett v. Myers: New Precedents on First Amendment Retaliation and Ripeness

Date: Feb 22, 2002
Reversal of Summary Judgment in Arnett v. Myers: New Precedents on First Amendment Retaliation and Ripeness Introduction The case of Gary Arnett, et al. v. Gary T. Myers, et al. presents a...
Affirmation of the Functionality Doctrine in Trade Dress Law: Abercrombie Fitch v. American Eagle Outfitters

Affirmation of the Functionality Doctrine in Trade Dress Law: Abercrombie Fitch v. American Eagle Outfitters

Date: Feb 16, 2002
Affirmation of the Functionality Doctrine in Trade Dress Law: Abercrombie Fitch v. American Eagle Outfitters Introduction The case of Abercrombie Fitch Stores, Inc. v. American Eagle Outfitters,...
Reaffirming Sentencing Accuracy in Money Laundering Cases: United States v. Chilingirian

Reaffirming Sentencing Accuracy in Money Laundering Cases: United States v. Chilingirian

Date: Feb 14, 2002
Reaffirming Sentencing Accuracy in Money Laundering Cases: United States v. Chilingirian Introduction United States v. Jack Chilingirian, 280 F.3d 704 (6th Cir. 2002), is a significant appellate...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert