Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Personal Changes Do Not Constitute 'Changed Circumstances' for Reopening Removal Proceedings: Haddad v. Gonzales

Personal Changes Do Not Constitute 'Changed Circumstances' for Reopening Removal Proceedings: Haddad v. Gonzales

Date: Feb 10, 2006
Personal Changes Do Not Constitute 'Changed Circumstances' for Reopening Removal Proceedings: Haddad v. Gonzales Introduction Hanan Haddad v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, 437 F.3d 515 (6th...
Narrowing Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Kroger v. Malease Foods

Narrowing Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Kroger v. Malease Foods

Date: Feb 10, 2006
Narrowing Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Kroger Corp. v. Malease Foods Corp. Introduction The case of The Kroger Company v. Malease Foods Corporation (437 F.3d 506) adjudicated by the United...
Re-evaluating "Crime of Violence" Classification: United States v. Marco Eugene Foreman

Re-evaluating "Crime of Violence" Classification: United States v. Marco Eugene Foreman

Date: Feb 9, 2006
Re-evaluating "Crime of Violence" Classification: United States v. Marco Eugene Foreman Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Marco Eugene Foreman, 436 F.3d 638 (6th Cir. 2006), the...
Clarifying Deliberate Indifference and Qualified Immunity in Prisoners’ Eighth Amendment Claims: Clark-Murphy v. Foreback

Clarifying Deliberate Indifference and Qualified Immunity in Prisoners’ Eighth Amendment Claims: Clark-Murphy v. Foreback

Date: Feb 7, 2006
Clarifying Deliberate Indifference and Qualified Immunity in Prisoners’ Eighth Amendment Claims: Clark-Murphy v. Foreback Introduction The case of Bonita Clark-Murphy, as Personal Representative of...
Limitation on Rule 23(b)(2) Class Certification in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Analysis of Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Limitation on Rule 23(b)(2) Class Certification in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Analysis of Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Date: Jan 25, 2006
Limitation on Rule 23(b)(2) Class Certification in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Analysis of Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction Introduction The case of Rachel REEB, et al. v....
Expanding the Scope of 'Intent to Deceive' under 18 U.S.C. § 513(a): Sixth Circuit Affirms Broad Interpretation

Expanding the Scope of 'Intent to Deceive' under 18 U.S.C. § 513(a): Sixth Circuit Affirms Broad Interpretation

Date: Jan 25, 2006
Expanding the Scope of 'Intent to Deceive' under 18 U.S.C. § 513(a): Sixth Circuit Affirms Broad Interpretation Introduction In the landmark case of UNITED STATES of America v. George William Blood...
UnumProvident’s Arbitrary Termination of LTD Benefits: A Comprehensive Analysis of Evans v. UnumProvident Corporation

UnumProvident’s Arbitrary Termination of LTD Benefits: A Comprehensive Analysis of Evans v. UnumProvident Corporation

Date: Jan 21, 2006
UnumProvident’s Arbitrary Termination of LTD Benefits: A Comprehensive Analysis of Evans v. UnumProvident Corporation Introduction Evans v. UnumProvident Corporation, 434 F.3d 866 (6th Cir. 2006), is...
Establishing Probable Cause Standards in Search Warrants: Insights from United States v. Coffee

Establishing Probable Cause Standards in Search Warrants: Insights from United States v. Coffee

Date: Jan 21, 2006
Establishing Probable Cause Standards in Search Warrants: Insights from United States v. Coffee Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. John Joseph Coffee, Jr., 434 F.3d 887 (6th Cir....
Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions Post-Austin and Cowherd: An Analysis of In re: Edward O'Neal Bowen

Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions Post-Austin and Cowherd: An Analysis of In re: Edward O'Neal Bowen

Date: Jan 21, 2006
Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions Post-Austin and Cowherd: An Analysis of In re: Edward O'Neal Bowen Introduction The case of In re: Edward O'Neal Bowen (436 F.3d 699) decided by the...
Affirmation of Probate Exception and Collateral Estoppel in Breach of Trust Claims: Evans v. Pearson Enterprises

Affirmation of Probate Exception and Collateral Estoppel in Breach of Trust Claims: Evans v. Pearson Enterprises

Date: Jan 20, 2006
Affirmation of Probate Exception and Collateral Estoppel in Breach of Trust Claims: Evans v. Pearson Enterprises Introduction Case: Jane P. Evans v. Pearson Enterprises, Incorporated, et al. Court:...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case Reinforces Employer's Use of Subjective Evaluation Criteria

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case Reinforces Employer's Use of Subjective Evaluation Criteria

Date: Jan 20, 2006
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case Reinforces Employer's Use of Subjective Evaluation Criteria Introduction In the case of David R. Browning v. Department of the Army, the...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Section 1983 Case: Lack of State Action and Familial Association Rights

Affirmation of Dismissal in Section 1983 Case: Lack of State Action and Familial Association Rights

Date: Jan 19, 2006
Affirmation of Dismissal in Section 1983 Case: Lack of State Action and Familial Association Rights Introduction The case of Marlena H. Kottmyer and Robert D. Kottmyer v. Aimee Maas; Cincinnati...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and APA Standing in Spousal Immigration Petitions: Analysis of Bangura v. Hansen

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and APA Standing in Spousal Immigration Petitions: Analysis of Bangura v. Hansen

Date: Jan 19, 2006
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and APA Standing in Spousal Immigration Petitions: Analysis of Bangura v. Hansen Introduction The case of Abass Bangura et al. v. Mark Hansen et al. (434 F.3d...
Affirming the Requirement for Unequivocal Refusal in Compelling Arbitration under the NLRA

Affirming the Requirement for Unequivocal Refusal in Compelling Arbitration under the NLRA

Date: Jan 19, 2006
Affirming the Requirement for Unequivocal Refusal in Compelling Arbitration under the NLRA Introduction The case of International Union et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Cummins, Inc.,...
Affirmation of Vested Lifetime Retiree Health Benefits and Successor Liability

Affirmation of Vested Lifetime Retiree Health Benefits and Successor Liability

Date: Jan 18, 2006
Affirmation of Vested Lifetime Retiree Health Benefits and Successor Liability Introduction The case of Gladys YOLTON, Wilbur Montgomery, Elsie Teas, Robert Betker, Edward Maynard, and Gary Halsted,...
Kyle Ciminillo v. Streicher: Reaffirming Fourth Amendment Protections in Excessive Force Claims

Kyle Ciminillo v. Streicher: Reaffirming Fourth Amendment Protections in Excessive Force Claims

Date: Jan 18, 2006
Kyle Ciminillo v. Streicher: Reaffirming Fourth Amendment Protections in Excessive Force Claims Introduction The case of Kyle Ciminillo v. Thomas Streicher et al. adjudicated by the United States...
Clarifying Sentencing Reasonableness Post-Booker: United States v. McBride

Clarifying Sentencing Reasonableness Post-Booker: United States v. McBride

Date: Jan 18, 2006
Clarifying Sentencing Reasonableness Post-Booker: United States v. McBride Introduction United States v. James Thomas McBride, 434 F.3d 470 (6th Cir. 2006), is a pivotal case in the realm of federal...
Affirmation of Denial of Absolute Immunity in FDCPA Garnishment Actions

Affirmation of Denial of Absolute Immunity in FDCPA Garnishment Actions

Date: Jan 14, 2006
Affirmation of Denial of Absolute Immunity in FDCPA Garnishment Actions Introduction The case of Robert Todd, et al. v. Weltman, Weinberg Reis Co., L.P.A., et al. revolves around the Fair Debt...
Establishing Excusable Neglect Standards in Default Judgments: CWA Local 4310 v. Burrell

Establishing Excusable Neglect Standards in Default Judgments: CWA Local 4310 v. Burrell

Date: Jan 13, 2006
Establishing Excusable Neglect Standards in Default Judgments: CWA Local 4310 v. Burrell Introduction The case of Teresa F. Burrell v. Margaret Henderson et al., Communication Workers of America,...
Affirming Validity of Waiver of Counsel Through Conduct and Written Waivers: King v. Da

Affirming Validity of Waiver of Counsel Through Conduct and Written Waivers: King v. Da

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Affirming Validity of Waiver of Counsel Through Conduct and Written Waivers: King v. Da Introduction Samuel King, the petitioner-appellant, appealed the denial of his habeas corpus petition by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert