Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

At-Will Employment Essential for Ohio Public Policy Wrongful Discharge Claims: Kusens v. Pascal Company

At-Will Employment Essential for Ohio Public Policy Wrongful Discharge Claims: Kusens v. Pascal Company

Date: May 10, 2006
At-Will Employment Essential for Ohio Public Policy Wrongful Discharge Claims: Kusens v. Pascal Company Introduction In the case of Gary Kusens v. Pascal Company, Inc., Gary Kusens, the plaintiff,...
Enhanced Venue Jurisdiction Under LMRA and ERISA: Insights from Moore v. Morton

Enhanced Venue Jurisdiction Under LMRA and ERISA: Insights from Moore v. Morton

Date: Apr 27, 2006
Enhanced Venue Jurisdiction Under LMRA and ERISA: Insights from Moore v. Morton Introduction In the landmark case of Moore v. Morton, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Clarifying Conflict-Free Representation and Cumulative Errors in Habeas Corpus: Gillard v. Mitchell

Clarifying Conflict-Free Representation and Cumulative Errors in Habeas Corpus: Gillard v. Mitchell

Date: Apr 27, 2006
Clarifying Conflict-Free Representation and Cumulative Errors in Habeas Corpus: Gillard v. Mitchell Introduction In the landmark case of John GILLARD v. Betty MITCHELL, 445 F.3d 883 (6th Cir. 2006),...
Rule 60(b) Motion: Significance of Timeliness and Waiver

Rule 60(b) Motion: Significance of Timeliness and Waiver

Date: Apr 27, 2006
Rule 60(b) Motion: Significance of Timeliness and Waiver Introduction In the case of DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. Bharat Patel, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...
Enhancing Maritime Workplace Safety: Churchwell v. Bluegrass Marine Establishes Crucial Precedents in Unseaworthiness and Jones Act Claims

Enhancing Maritime Workplace Safety: Churchwell v. Bluegrass Marine Establishes Crucial Precedents in Unseaworthiness and Jones Act Claims

Date: Apr 22, 2006
Enhancing Maritime Workplace Safety: Churchwell v. Bluegrass Marine Establishes Crucial Precedents in Unseaworthiness and Jones Act Claims Introduction The case of Glenda Churchwell versus Bluegrass...
Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security: Establishing Prevailing Party Status Under EAJA

Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security: Establishing Prevailing Party Status Under EAJA

Date: Apr 19, 2006
Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security: Establishing Prevailing Party Status Under EAJA Introduction In Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security, 444 F.3d 837 (6th Cir. 2006), the United...
Enhancing Sixth Amendment Protections: Confrontation Clause Violation in Fulcher v. Motley

Enhancing Sixth Amendment Protections: Confrontation Clause Violation in Fulcher v. Motley

Date: Apr 19, 2006
Enhancing Sixth Amendment Protections: Confrontation Clause Violation in Fulcher v. Motley Introduction The case of Elem Ray Fulcher versus John Motley, Warden (444 F.3d 791, Sixth Circuit, 2006)...
Salary Basis Compliance under FLSA: Analysis of James ACS v. Detroit Edison Company

Salary Basis Compliance under FLSA: Analysis of James ACS v. Detroit Edison Company

Date: Apr 15, 2006
Salary Basis Compliance under FLSA: Analysis of James ACS v. Detroit Edison Company Introduction In the case of James ACS, et al. v. The Detroit Edison Company, adjudicated by the United States Court...
Establishing Fiduciary Responsibility in ERISA: Fine Family vs. PHP

Establishing Fiduciary Responsibility in ERISA: Fine Family vs. PHP

Date: Apr 14, 2006
Establishing Fiduciary Responsibility in ERISA: Fine Family vs. PHP Introduction In the landmark case of William Briscoe et al. v. Allan H. Fine et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Expanding §1983 Liability: Sixth Circuit's Landmark Ruling on Police Conduct and Municipal Responsibility

Expanding §1983 Liability: Sixth Circuit's Landmark Ruling on Police Conduct and Municipal Responsibility

Date: Apr 12, 2006
Expanding §1983 Liability: Sixth Circuit's Landmark Ruling on Police Conduct and Municipal Responsibility Introduction In the pivotal case of William Thomas Gregory v. City of Louisville, adjudicated...
Invalid Good-Faith Reliance on Defective Search Warrant: United States v. Hython

Invalid Good-Faith Reliance on Defective Search Warrant: United States v. Hython

Date: Apr 7, 2006
Invalid Good-Faith Reliance on Defective Search Warrant: United States v. Hython Introduction In United States v. Andre Hython, 443 F.3d 480 (6th Cir. 2006), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Reaffirmation of AEDPA Standards in Habeas Corpus Review: Carter v. Mitchell

Reaffirmation of AEDPA Standards in Habeas Corpus Review: Carter v. Mitchell

Date: Apr 7, 2006
Reaffirmation of AEDPA Standards in Habeas Corpus Review: Carter v. Mitchell Introduction The case of Clarence Carter v. Betty Mitchell, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Affirmation of FMLA Termination Based on Employee's Inability to Return to Work

Affirmation of FMLA Termination Based on Employee's Inability to Return to Work

Date: Apr 7, 2006
Affirmation of FMLA Termination Based on Employee's Inability to Return to Work Introduction In the case of Gale EdGAR v. JAC Products, Inc., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Protected Speech Standards in Public Employment: Nair v. Oakland County Community Mental Health Authority

Protected Speech Standards in Public Employment: Nair v. Oakland County Community Mental Health Authority

Date: Apr 5, 2006
Protected Speech Standards in Public Employment: Nair v. Oakland County Community Mental Health Authority Introduction In D. Sreedharan Nair v. Oakland County Community Mental Health Authority and...
Reinforcing Strickland Standards for Ineffective Assistance in §2255 Motions: Pough v. United States Analysis

Reinforcing Strickland Standards for Ineffective Assistance in §2255 Motions: Pough v. United States Analysis

Date: Apr 1, 2006
Reinforcing Strickland Standards for Ineffective Assistance in §2255 Motions: Pough v. United States Analysis Introduction Lance Pough, a federal inmate, initially pleaded guilty to federal drug...
Amgen v. Plaintiffs: Sixth Circuit Affirms Limits on Clinical Trial Sponsors' Obligations

Amgen v. Plaintiffs: Sixth Circuit Affirms Limits on Clinical Trial Sponsors' Obligations

Date: Mar 30, 2006
Amgen v. Plaintiffs: Sixth Circuit Affirms Limits on Clinical Trial Sponsors' Obligations Introduction The case of Edward Abney et al. v. Amgen, Inc. (443 F.3d 540) adjudicated by the United States...
Chambers v. United States: Affirming Child Pornography Convictions and Clarifying Interstate Commerce Jurisdiction

Chambers v. United States: Affirming Child Pornography Convictions and Clarifying Interstate Commerce Jurisdiction

Date: Mar 24, 2006
Chambers v. United States: Affirming Child Pornography Convictions and Clarifying Interstate Commerce Jurisdiction Introduction Chambers v. United States, 441 F.3d 438 (6th Cir. 2006), addressed...
Conditional Certification under FLSA § 216(b) Affirmed in White v. MPW Industrial Services

Conditional Certification under FLSA § 216(b) Affirmed in White v. MPW Industrial Services

Date: Mar 22, 2006
Conditional Certification under FLSA § 216(b) Affirmed in White v. MPW Industrial Services Introduction In Steven White, Frank Baker, Ivan Phillips, and Antonio Phillips v. MPW Industrial Services,...
Affirmation of Procedural Default and Standards for Brady Violations: Insights from Romell Broom v. Betty Mitchell

Affirmation of Procedural Default and Standards for Brady Violations: Insights from Romell Broom v. Betty Mitchell

Date: Mar 18, 2006
Affirmation of Procedural Default and Standards for Brady Violations: Insights from Romell Broom v. Betty Mitchell Introduction Romell Broom v. Betty Mitchell, 441 F.3d 392 (6th Cir. 2006), is a...
Equal Pay Act: Affirmative Defense Requires Evidence of Legitimate Factors Beyond Statutory Pay Scales – Beck-Wilson v. Principi

Equal Pay Act: Affirmative Defense Requires Evidence of Legitimate Factors Beyond Statutory Pay Scales – Beck-Wilson v. Principi

Date: Mar 18, 2006
Equal Pay Act: Affirmative Defense Requires Evidence of Legitimate Factors Beyond Statutory Pay Scales – Beck-Wilson v. Principi Introduction In the landmark case of Beck-Wilson et al. v. Principi,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert