Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhanced Consideration of Country Conditions in Convention Against Torture Claims: Insights from Mostafa and Alsaf v. Ashcroft

Enhanced Consideration of Country Conditions in Convention Against Torture Claims: Insights from Mostafa and Alsaf v. Ashcroft

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Enhanced Consideration of Country Conditions in Convention Against Torture Claims: Insights from Mostafa and Alsaf v. Ashcroft Introduction The case of Hoda Mostafa and Abdolmajid Alsaf v. John...
Affirmation of OMVI Per Se Conviction: Limitations on Challenging Breathalyzer Reliability Upheld

Affirmation of OMVI Per Se Conviction: Limitations on Challenging Breathalyzer Reliability Upheld

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Affirmation of OMVI Per Se Conviction: Limitations on Challenging Breathalyzer Reliability Upheld Introduction The case of Traci Miskel v. James A. Karnes and Dwayne Maynard revolves around the...
Ensuring Ex Post Facto Compliance: Analysis of U.S. v. Davis and Sentencing Guidelines Post-Booker

Ensuring Ex Post Facto Compliance: Analysis of U.S. v. Davis and Sentencing Guidelines Post-Booker

Date: Jan 22, 2005
Ensuring Ex Post Facto Compliance: Analysis of United States v. Davis and Sentencing Guidelines Post-Booker Introduction United States of America v. William J. Davis, 397 F.3d 340 (6th Cir. 2005),...
Affirmation of Employer Liability in Sexual Harassment Under Title VII and Ohio Law

Affirmation of Employer Liability in Sexual Harassment Under Title VII and Ohio Law

Date: Jan 20, 2005
Affirmation of Employer Liability in Sexual Harassment Under Title VII and Ohio Law Introduction The case of Amber McCombs v. Meijer, Inc. (395 F.3d 346) adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Refinement of Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel Claims: Strickland Replaces Sullivan in Successive Representation Cases

Refinement of Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel Claims: Strickland Replaces Sullivan in Successive Representation Cases

Date: Jan 20, 2005
Strickland Supersedes Sullivan in Successive Representation Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Maurice Whiting v. Sherry Burt, decided by the United States Court of...
Establishing an Actual Innocence Exception to AEDPA's One-Year Limitations Period: Souter v. Jones

Establishing an Actual Innocence Exception to AEDPA's One-Year Limitations Period: Souter v. Jones

Date: Jan 19, 2005
Establishing an Actual Innocence Exception to AEDPA's One-Year Limitations Period: Souter v. Jones Introduction The case of Larry Pat Souter v. Kurt Jones, Warden, decided by the United States Court...
Complete Preemption Doctrine Under the Railway Labor Act: Analysis of Roddy v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Complete Preemption Doctrine Under the Railway Labor Act: Analysis of Roddy v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Date: Jan 15, 2005
Complete Preemption Doctrine Under the Railway Labor Act: Analysis of Roddy v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad 1. Introduction The case of James T. Roddy v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated et...
Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in Police Arrest of Tenant for Burglary: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent

Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in Police Arrest of Tenant for Burglary: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent

Date: Jan 15, 2005
Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in Police Arrest of Tenant for Burglary: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Geoffrey M. Radvansky v. City of Olmsted Falls et...
Qualified Immunity Reinforced in Hale v. Kart: A New Precedent for Search Warrant Challenges

Qualified Immunity Reinforced in Hale v. Kart: A New Precedent for Search Warrant Challenges

Date: Jan 14, 2005
Qualified Immunity Reinforced in Hale v. Kart: A New Precedent for Search Warrant Challenges Introduction The case of Leonard Hale, Individually and as Next Friend of Sean Lysher and Shanna Lysher v....
Tumblebus Inc. v. Cranmer: Upholding Service Mark Protection and Refining Trade Dress Injunction Standards

Tumblebus Inc. v. Cranmer: Upholding Service Mark Protection and Refining Trade Dress Injunction Standards

Date: Jan 14, 2005
Tumblebus Inc. v. Meredith Cranmer: Upholding Service Mark Protection and Refining Trade Dress Injunction Standards Introduction In the landmark case of Tumblebus Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v....
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Webster v. United Auto Workers: Implications for Union Discipline and Retaliation Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Webster v. United Auto Workers: Implications for Union Discipline and Retaliation Claims

Date: Jan 13, 2005
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Webster v. United Auto Workers: Implications for Union Discipline and Retaliation Claims Introduction The case of Richard Webster v. United Auto Workers, Local 51,...
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Fraudulent Inducement Claims: Glazer v. Lehman Brothers, 394 F.3d 444 (6th Cir. 2005)

Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Fraudulent Inducement Claims: Glazer v. Lehman Brothers, 394 F.3d 444 (6th Cir. 2005)

Date: Jan 13, 2005
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Fraudulent Inducement Claims: Glazer v. Lehman Brothers, 394 F.3d 444 (6th Cir. 2005) Introduction In the landmark case of Samuel Glazer v. Lehman Brothers,...
Complete Preemption Doctrine in Copyright Disputes: Kid Rock v. Williams Group

Complete Preemption Doctrine in Copyright Disputes: Kid Rock v. Williams Group

Date: Jan 12, 2005
Complete Preemption Doctrine in Copyright Disputes: Kid Rock v. Williams Group Introduction The case of Robert Ritchie, known professionally as Kid Rock; Top Dog Records, Inc., and Kid Rock...
Confidential Policymaking Employees and First Amendment Protections: Insights from Latham v. Ohio AG

Confidential Policymaking Employees and First Amendment Protections: Insights from Latham v. Ohio AG

Date: Jan 11, 2005
Confidential Policymaking Employees and First Amendment Protections: Insights from Latham v. Office of the Attorney General of Ohio Introduction The case of Mary Patrick Latham v. Office of the...
Affirmation of Non-Willful FMLA Violation in HOFFMAN v. PROFESSIONAL MED TEAM

Affirmation of Non-Willful FMLA Violation in HOFFMAN v. PROFESSIONAL MED TEAM

Date: Jan 8, 2005
Affirmation of Non-Willful FMLA Violation in HOFFMAN v. PROFESSIONAL MED TEAM Introduction The case of Lynn Hoffman, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Professional Med Team (PMT), Defendant-Appellee revolves...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Failure to Investigate Defense Witness: Parrish v. Da

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Failure to Investigate Defense Witness: Parrish v. Da

Date: Jan 8, 2005
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Failure to Investigate Defense Witness: Parrish v. Da Introduction Parrish v. Da is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Clarifying Hobbs Act Extortion Applicability and RICO Conspiracy Standards: Insights from United States v. Saadey

Clarifying Hobbs Act Extortion Applicability and RICO Conspiracy Standards: Insights from United States v. Saadey

Date: Jan 6, 2005
Clarifying Hobbs Act Extortion Applicability and RICO Conspiracy Standards: Insights from United States v. Saadey Introduction The case of United States v. Russell J. Saadey, Jr. (393 F.3d 669, 6th...
Reaffirming the Corroboration Requirement in Asylum Claims: Ganna Romani v. A Dorosh

Reaffirming the Corroboration Requirement in Asylum Claims: Ganna Romani v. A Dorosh

Date: Dec 21, 2004
Reaffirming the Corroboration Requirement in Asylum Claims: Ganna Romani v. A Dorosh Introduction Ganna Romanivna Dorosh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General; Immigration and Naturalization Service is...
Harper v. AutoAlliance: Affirming Removal of Retaliatory Discharge Claims Under State Public Policy

Harper v. AutoAlliance: Affirming Removal of Retaliatory Discharge Claims Under State Public Policy

Date: Dec 17, 2004
Harper v. AutoAlliance: Affirming Removal of Retaliatory Discharge Claims Under State Public Policy Introduction In the case of Derrick E. Harper v. AutoAlliance International, Inc., adjudicated by...
Dixon v. Ashcroft: Affirming Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Retaliation Claims under Title VII in Federal Employment Discrimination

Dixon v. Ashcroft: Affirming Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Retaliation Claims under Title VII in Federal Employment Discrimination

Date: Dec 17, 2004
Dixon v. Ashcroft: Affirming Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Retaliation Claims under Title VII in Federal Employment Discrimination Introduction In James Dixon, Jr. v. John Ashcroft, the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.