Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Indigent Defendants Lacking Choice-of-Counsel Right: Insights from Daniels v. Laffler

Indigent Defendants Lacking Choice-of-Counsel Right: Insights from Daniels v. Laffler

Date: Sep 6, 2007
Indigent Defendants Lacking Choice-of-Counsel Right: Insights from Daniels v. Laffler Introduction Daniels v. Laffler is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Sixth Amendment Defense Rights and Habeas Corpus: FERENSIC v. BIRKETT Establishes Critical Precedent

Sixth Amendment Defense Rights and Habeas Corpus: FERENSIC v. BIRKETT Establishes Critical Precedent

Date: Sep 5, 2007
Sixth Amendment Defense Rights and Habeas Corpus: FERENSIC v. BIRKETT Establishes Critical Precedent Introduction FERENSIC v. BIRKETT (501 F.3d 469) is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
Affirmation of Arbitration Award: Strict Standards for Proving Fraud Under FAA §10(a) in Ty Ke v. Carty Company, Inc.

Affirmation of Arbitration Award: Strict Standards for Proving Fraud Under FAA §10(a) in Ty Ke v. Carty Company, Inc.

Date: Sep 5, 2007
Affirmation of Arbitration Award: Strict Standards for Proving Fraud Under FAA §10(a) in Ty Ke v. Carty Company, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Ty Kevin Bauer v. Carty Company, Inc., the...
Reaffirming Burden-Shifting and Evidence Standards in Title VII Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Olin Clay v. UPS, Sixth Circuit, 501 F.3d 695

Reaffirming Burden-Shifting and Evidence Standards in Title VII Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Olin Clay v. UPS, Sixth Circuit, 501 F.3d 695

Date: Sep 1, 2007
Reaffirming Burden-Shifting and Evidence Standards in Title VII Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Olin Clay v. UPS, Sixth Circuit, 501 F.3d 695 Introduction The case of Olin Clay, Marie Moss, Marcus...
Sixth Circuit Reinforces First Amendment Protections for Exotic Performers in Liquor-Licensed Establishments

Sixth Circuit Reinforces First Amendment Protections for Exotic Performers in Liquor-Licensed Establishments

Date: Aug 31, 2007
Sixth Circuit Reinforces First Amendment Protections for Exotic Performers in Liquor-Licensed Establishments Introduction In the landmark case of Hamilton's Bogarts, Inc.; Kathleen Polzin v. State of...
Affirming §1983 Jurisprudence for Procedural Rights in Indigency Hearings: Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender Commission

Affirming §1983 Jurisprudence for Procedural Rights in Indigency Hearings: Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender Commission

Date: Aug 30, 2007
Affirming §1983 Jurisprudence for Procedural Rights in Indigency Hearings: Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender Commission Introduction In Michael Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies §3553(a)(6): National Uniformity Over Co-Defendant Disparities in Sentencing

Sixth Circuit Clarifies §3553(a)(6): National Uniformity Over Co-Defendant Disparities in Sentencing

Date: Aug 30, 2007
Sixth Circuit Clarifies §3553(a)(6): National Uniformity Over Co-Defendant Disparities in Sentencing Introduction The case of United States of America v. Kossie Lamon Simmons (501 F.3d 620)...
Direct Effect Requirement in FSIA's Commercial Activity Exception Affirmed

Direct Effect Requirement in FSIA's Commercial Activity Exception Affirmed

Date: Aug 30, 2007
Direct Effect Requirement in FSIA's Commercial Activity Exception Affirmed Introduction The case of American Telecom Co., L.L.C.; American Telecom Group-USA, L.L.C. v. Republic of Lebanon addresses...
Affirmation of Rational Basis Scrutiny in Tennessee's Driver License Law: LULAC v. Bredesen

Affirmation of Rational Basis Scrutiny in Tennessee's Driver License Law: LULAC v. Bredesen

Date: Aug 29, 2007
Affirmation of Rational Basis Scrutiny in Tennessee's Driver License Law: LULAC v. Bredesen Introduction The case of League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. Bredesen explores the...
Application of the Schlup Standard for Equitable Tolling in Habeas Corpus Petitions: McCray v. Vasbinder

Application of the Schlup Standard for Equitable Tolling in Habeas Corpus Petitions: McCray v. Vasbinder

Date: Aug 29, 2007
Application of the Schlup Standard for Equitable Tolling in Habeas Corpus Petitions: McCray v. Vasbinder Introduction The case of Oyd Collins McCray v. David Vasbinder navigates the intricate...
Sixth Circuit Determines One-Day In-School Suspension as De Minimis, Negating Due Process Claim

Sixth Circuit Determines One-Day In-School Suspension as De Minimis, Negating Due Process Claim

Date: Aug 29, 2007
Sixth Circuit Determines One-Day In-School Suspension as De Minimis, Negating Due Process Claim Introduction In the case of William Laney, indi v. Dually (501 F.3d 577, 6th Cir. 2007), the United...
Affirmation of Garcetti: Employee Speech Pursuant to Official Duties Not Protected Under First Amendment

Affirmation of Garcetti: Employee Speech Pursuant to Official Duties Not Protected Under First Amendment

Date: Aug 25, 2007
Affirmation of Garcetti: Employee Speech Pursuant to Official Duties Not Protected Under First Amendment Introduction In the case of Denise Weisbarth v. Geauga Park District, the United States Court...
State Action and First Amendment Access Claims: Insights from S.H.A.R.K. v. Metro Parks

State Action and First Amendment Access Claims: Insights from S.H.A.R.K. v. Metro Parks

Date: Aug 25, 2007
State Action and First Amendment Access Claims: Insights from S.H.A.R.K. v. Metro Parks Introduction S.H.A.R.K.; Stephen Hindi v. Metro Parks Serving Summit County, 499 F.3d 553 (6th Cir. 2007), is a...
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in O'Hara v. Brigano: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Standards for Brady Violations

Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in O'Hara v. Brigano: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Standards for Brady Violations

Date: Aug 22, 2007
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in O'Hara v. Brigano: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Standards for Brady Violations Introduction The case of Henry O'Hara v. Anthony Brigano, Warden (499 F.3d...
Substantial-Federal-Question Doctrine in MIKULSKI v. CENTERIOR ENERGY CORP.

Substantial-Federal-Question Doctrine in MIKULSKI v. CENTERIOR ENERGY CORP.

Date: Aug 22, 2007
Substantial-Federal-Question Doctrine in MIKULSKI v. CENTERIOR ENERGY CORP. (2007) Introduction MIKULSKI v. CENTERIOR ENERGY CORP. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Substantial Evidence and Remand Standards in SSDI Appeals: Paul W. Bass II v. McMahon

Substantial Evidence and Remand Standards in SSDI Appeals: Paul W. Bass II v. McMahon

Date: Aug 22, 2007
Substantial Evidence and Remand Standards in SSDI Appeals: Paul W. Bass II v. McMahon Introduction In the landmark case of Paul W. Bass II v. Linda S. McMahon (499 F.3d 506), adjudicated by the...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for FMLA Retaliation Claims: Reversing Summary Judgment in Bryson v. Regis Corp.

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for FMLA Retaliation Claims: Reversing Summary Judgment in Bryson v. Regis Corp.

Date: Aug 17, 2007
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for FMLA Retaliation Claims: Reversing Summary Judgment in Bryson v. Regis Corp. Introduction In the landmark case Karen Bryson v. Regis Corp., the United States...
Affirmation of Dismissal: Subject Matter Jurisdiction and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Davis v. United States

Affirmation of Dismissal: Subject Matter Jurisdiction and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Davis v. United States

Date: Aug 17, 2007
Affirmation of Dismissal: Subject Matter Jurisdiction and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Davis v. United States Introduction In the case of John J. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States of...
Affirmation of District Court's Evidentiary Rulings in United States v. Cody: Implications for Joinder and Evidence Admissibility

Affirmation of District Court's Evidentiary Rulings in United States v. Cody: Implications for Joinder and Evidence Admissibility

Date: Aug 17, 2007
Affirmation of District Court's Evidentiary Rulings in United States v. Cody: Implications for Joinder and Evidence Admissibility Introduction In United States of America v. Talmadge Cody, 498 F.3d...
Speedy Trial Rights Affirmed in United States v. Brown

Speedy Trial Rights Affirmed in United States v. Brown

Date: Aug 17, 2007
Speedy Trial Rights Affirmed in United States v. Brown 1. Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Clarence Howard Brown, 498 F.3d 523 (6th Cir. 2007), the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert