Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Qualified Immunity Denied in Cases of Deliberate Indifference to Detainee's Serious Medical Needs

Qualified Immunity Denied in Cases of Deliberate Indifference to Detainee's Serious Medical Needs

Date: May 28, 2005
Qualified Immunity Denied in Cases of Deliberate Indifference to Detainee's Serious Medical Needs Introduction The case of ESTATE OF Tori Carter; Brenda Chambers v. CITY OF DETROIT, et al. addresses...
Requirement for Articulated Reasoning in Sentencing Departures Post-Booker: United States v. Jackson

Requirement for Articulated Reasoning in Sentencing Departures Post-Booker: United States v. Jackson

Date: May 25, 2005
Requirement for Articulated Reasoning in Sentencing Departures Post-Booker: United States v. Jackson Introduction The case of United States of America v. Michael E. Jackson, 408 F.3d 301 (6th Cir....
Affirmation of Regional Water District's Discretion: No Protected Property Interest for Tenants in Utility Service Accounts

Affirmation of Regional Water District's Discretion: No Protected Property Interest for Tenants in Utility Service Accounts

Date: May 25, 2005
Affirmation of Regional Water District's Discretion: No Protected Property Interest for Tenants in Utility Service Accounts Introduction In the case of Brian Midkiff; Monica Midkiff v. Adams County...
Reversing Arbitrary Denial: Calvert v. Firstar Finance Establishes Enhanced Scrutiny for ERISA Claims

Reversing Arbitrary Denial: Calvert v. Firstar Finance Establishes Enhanced Scrutiny for ERISA Claims

Date: May 18, 2005
Reversing Arbitrary Denial: Calvert v. Firstar Finance Establishes Enhanced Scrutiny for ERISA Claims Introduction The case of Linda Gail Calvert v. Firstar Finance, Inc. (409 F.3d 286) adjudicated...
Karkoukli's, Inc. v. Dohany: Enhancing Due Process in Tax Foreclosure Procedures

Karkoukli's, Inc. v. Dohany: Enhancing Due Process in Tax Foreclosure Procedures

Date: May 18, 2005
Karkoukli's, Inc. v. Dohany: Enhancing Due Process in Tax Foreclosure Procedures Introduction Karkoukli's, Inc. v. Dohany, Oakland County Treasurer, and Waterford Township (409 F.3d 279) is a...
Good Faith Exception Refused Where Affidavit Lacks Probative Nexus in Sixth Circuit

Good Faith Exception Refused Where Affidavit Lacks Probative Nexus in Sixth Circuit

Date: May 18, 2005
Good Faith Exception Refused Where Affidavit Lacks Probative Nexus in Sixth Circuit Introduction The case of United States of America v. James Howard Laughton, adjudicated by the United States Court...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Claims: Hill v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Claims: Hill v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan

Date: May 14, 2005
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Claims: Hill v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan Introduction The case of John L. Hill, et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of...
Admission of Dismissed Defendant's Negligence in Comparative Fault Cases: Insights from McDonald v. Petree and Hudspeth

Admission of Dismissed Defendant's Negligence in Comparative Fault Cases: Insights from McDonald v. Petree and Hudspeth

Date: May 14, 2005
Admission of Dismissed Defendant's Negligence in Comparative Fault Cases: Insights from McDonald v. Petree and Hudspeth Introduction The case of Frances McDonald and Joy McDonald v. Nancy Petree and...
Strict Procedural Compliance Reinforced in Tucker v. UNITE: Implications for Promissory Estoppel Claims at Summary Judgment

Strict Procedural Compliance Reinforced in Tucker v. UNITE: Implications for Promissory Estoppel Claims at Summary Judgment

Date: May 11, 2005
Strict Procedural Compliance Reinforced in Tucker v. UNITE: Implications for Promissory Estoppel Claims at Summary Judgment Introduction Tucker v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial, and Textile...
Sixth Circuit Establishes Rigorous Standards for Asylum Eligibility in Gilaj Case

Sixth Circuit Establishes Rigorous Standards for Asylum Eligibility in Gilaj Case

Date: May 10, 2005
Sixth Circuit Establishes Rigorous Standards for Asylum Eligibility in Gilaj v. Gonzales Introduction The landmark case of Luce Gilaj and Luigj Gilaj v. Alberto Gonzales (408 F.3d 275) adjudicated by...
Qualified Immunity and the Use of Deadly Force: Insights from Christopher Sample v. Jason Bailey

Qualified Immunity and the Use of Deadly Force: Insights from Christopher Sample v. Jason Bailey

Date: May 10, 2005
Qualified Immunity and the Use of Deadly Force: Insights from Christopher Sample v. Jason Bailey Introduction The case of Christopher Sample v. Jason Bailey represents a significant judicial...
Reversing Dismissals: Enhancing Class Action Protections under Rule 23(e)

Reversing Dismissals: Enhancing Class Action Protections under Rule 23(e)

Date: May 6, 2005
Reversing Dismissals: Enhancing Class Action Protections under Rule 23(e) Introduction The case of John Doe et al. v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government (407 F.3d 755) represents a pivotal...
Pugh v. United States: Strengthening the Confrontation Clause in Criminal Convictions

Pugh v. United States: Strengthening the Confrontation Clause in Criminal Convictions

Date: May 4, 2005
Pugh v. United States: Strengthening the Confrontation Clause in Criminal Convictions Introduction In United States v. Walter Meade Pugh, Jr. and Tyreese Pugh (405 F.3d 390), the United States Court...
Procedural Default and Brady Violations in Federal Habeas Corpus: Harbison v. Bell

Procedural Default and Brady Violations in Federal Habeas Corpus: Harbison v. Bell

Date: Apr 30, 2005
Procedural Default and Brady Violations in Federal Habeas Corpus: Harbison v. Bell Introduction In the landmark case of Edward Jerome Harbison v. Ricky Bell, decided by the United States Court of...
Reopening Deportation Proceedings: Insights from Akhtar v. Gonzales

Reopening Deportation Proceedings: Insights from Akhtar v. Gonzales

Date: Apr 30, 2005
Reopening Deportation Proceedings: Insights from Akhtar v. Gonzales Introduction The case of Syed Kashif Akhtar v. Alberto Gonzales, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Eyewitness Identification Reliability under AEDPA: Howard v. Bouchard

Eyewitness Identification Reliability under AEDPA: Howard v. Bouchard

Date: Apr 29, 2005
Eyewitness Identification Reliability under AEDPA: Howard v. Bouchard Introduction The case of Frank Howard v. Barbara Bouchard, Warden, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Deliberate Indifference to Detainee’s Medical Needs: Garretson v. City of Madison Heights

Deliberate Indifference to Detainee’s Medical Needs: Garretson v. City of Madison Heights

Date: Apr 28, 2005
Deliberate Indifference to Detainee’s Medical Needs: Garretson v. City of Madison Heights Introduction Garretson v. City of Madison Heights, 407 F.3d 789, is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Sixth Circuit Establishes Total Exhaustion Requirement for §1983 Claims Under PLRA

Sixth Circuit Establishes Total Exhaustion Requirement for §1983 Claims Under PLRA

Date: Apr 28, 2005
Sixth Circuit Establishes Total Exhaustion Requirement for §1983 Claims Under PLRA Introduction In the case of Lamar William Jones Bey v. Kelly Johnson and Wayne Trierweiler, the United States Court...
Saroli v. Automation Modular Components: Establishing Key Precedents in FMLA and Civil Rights Discrimination

Saroli v. Automation Modular Components: Establishing Key Precedents in FMLA and Civil Rights Discrimination

Date: Apr 27, 2005
Saroli v. Automation Modular Components: Establishing Key Precedents in FMLA and Civil Rights Discrimination Introduction The case of Marria Saroli and Richard Saroli v. Automation Modular...
Reasonable Suspicion and Consent in Terry Stops: United States v. Hudson

Reasonable Suspicion and Consent in Terry Stops: United States v. Hudson

Date: Apr 23, 2005
Reasonable Suspicion and Consent in Terry Stops: United States v. Hudson Introduction United States of America v. Scotty Lee Hudson, 405 F.3d 425 (6th Cir. 2005) is a pivotal case that explores the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert