Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Visteon v. Walton: Clarifying Employer Notification Requirements Under FMLA

Visteon v. Walton: Clarifying Employer Notification Requirements Under FMLA

Date: Sep 29, 2005
Visteon v. Walton: Clarifying Employer Notification Requirements Under FMLA Introduction The case of Terry D. Walton v. Ford Motor Company; Visteon Corporation (424 F.3d 481, 6th Cir. 2005) serves as...
Establishing Causation in Maritime Asbestos Products Liability: Sixth Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment

Establishing Causation in Maritime Asbestos Products Liability: Sixth Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment

Date: Sep 29, 2005
Establishing Causation in Maritime Asbestos Products Liability: Sixth Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment Introduction In the landmark case Rolf L. Lindstrom, Plaintiff, Willard E. Bartel and Da v. C....
Municipal Attorney-Client Privilege Upheld Despite Individual Officials' Assertions: ROSS v. CITY OF MEMPHIS

Municipal Attorney-Client Privilege Upheld Despite Individual Officials' Assertions: ROSS v. CITY OF MEMPHIS

Date: Sep 15, 2005
Municipal Attorney-Client Privilege Upheld Despite Individual Officials' Assertions: ROSS v. CITY OF MEMPHIS Introduction Herlancer ROSS v. CITY OF MEMPHIS is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Equal Pay Act and Attorneys' Fees: Insights from Balmer v. HCA, Inc.

Equal Pay Act and Attorneys' Fees: Insights from Balmer v. HCA, Inc.

Date: Sep 15, 2005
Equal Pay Act and Attorneys' Fees: Insights from Balmer v. HCA, Inc. Introduction The case of Shannon Balmer v. HCA, Inc., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on...
Automatic Stay Enforcement in Bankruptcy: Insights from In re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.

Automatic Stay Enforcement in Bankruptcy: Insights from In re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.

Date: Sep 14, 2005
Automatic Stay Enforcement in Bankruptcy: Insights from In re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc. Introduction The case of In re: National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc., decided by the...
AEDPA §2254(i) Precludes Rule 60(b) Relief in Habeas Proceedings: An Analysis of Post v. Bradshaw

AEDPA §2254(i) Precludes Rule 60(b) Relief in Habeas Proceedings: An Analysis of Post v. Bradshaw

Date: Sep 14, 2005
AEDPA §2254(i) Precludes Rule 60(b) Relief in Habeas Proceedings: An Analysis of Post v. Bradshaw Introduction Ronald Post filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 after being convicted...
Impact of Procedural Defaults and Habeas Corpus Standards: Biros v. Bagley

Impact of Procedural Defaults and Habeas Corpus Standards: Biros v. Bagley

Date: Sep 10, 2005
Impact of Procedural Defaults and Habeas Corpus Standards: Biros v. Bagley Introduction Biros v. Bagley (422 F.3d 379) is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Actual Innocence Claims Do Not Imply Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege: Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent

Actual Innocence Claims Do Not Imply Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege: Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent

Date: Sep 10, 2005
Actual Innocence Claims Do Not Imply Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege: Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent Introduction The case of In re: Gregory LOTT, Petitioner (424 F.3d 446) represents a pivotal...
Reaffirmation of the Substantial Evidence Standard in Adverse Credibility Determinations in Asylum Cases

Reaffirmation of the Substantial Evidence Standard in Adverse Credibility Determinations in Asylum Cases

Date: Sep 9, 2005
Reaffirmation of the Substantial Evidence Standard in Adverse Credibility Determinations in Asylum Cases Introduction The case of Ilir Shkabari; Orjeta Shkabari; Klidis Shkabari v. Alberto Gonzales,...
Good Faith Exception and Affidavit Completeness in Search Warrant Cases: United States v. Frazier

Good Faith Exception and Affidavit Completeness in Search Warrant Cases: United States v. Frazier

Date: Sep 7, 2005
Good Faith Exception and Affidavit Completeness in Search Warrant Cases: United States v. Frazier Introduction United States v. Christopher Frazier, 423 F.3d 526 (6th Cir. 2005), centers on the...
Confirming Stewart's Standard on Downward Departure Review Post-Booker: Analysis of Puckett v. United States

Confirming Stewart's Standard on Downward Departure Review Post-Booker: Analysis of Puckett v. United States

Date: Sep 7, 2005
Confirming Stewart's Standard on Downward Departure Review Post-Booker: Analysis of Puckett v. United States Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Martece Puckett, the United States...
Harrison v. McDonald's Corp.: Clarifying Evidentiary Standards for Collective Actions under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b)

Harrison v. McDonald's Corp.: Clarifying Evidentiary Standards for Collective Actions under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b)

Date: Sep 3, 2005
Harrison v. McDonald's Corp.: Clarifying Evidentiary Standards for Collective Actions under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) Introduction In Harrison v. McDonald's Corp., 411 F. Supp. 2d 862 (S.D. Ohio 2005), the...
Enforcing the FTCA Judgment Bar: Bivens Claims Against Federal Employees Barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2676

Enforcing the FTCA Judgment Bar: Bivens Claims Against Federal Employees Barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2676

Date: Sep 3, 2005
Enforcing the FTCA Judgment Bar: Bivens Claims Against Federal Employees Barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2676 Introduction The case of Ronnie Harris v. United States of America (422 F.3d 322) adjudicated by...
Defining "Occurrence" in Insurance Policies: State Farm v. McGowan

Defining "Occurrence" in Insurance Policies: State Farm v. McGowan

Date: Sep 1, 2005
Defining "Occurrence" in Insurance Policies: State Farm v. McGowan Introduction The case of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. James McGowan addresses critical issues surrounding insurance...
Affirmation of SEC's Ponzi Scheme Enforcement: Key Legal Principles Established

Affirmation of SEC's Ponzi Scheme Enforcement: Key Legal Principles Established

Date: Aug 31, 2005
Affirmation of SEC's Ponzi Scheme Enforcement: Key Legal Principles Established Introduction The case of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. Allen George et al. revolves around allegations of...
Estates of Riddle Clarifies Duty of Good Faith in Conditional Receipt Life Insurance Claims

Estates of Riddle Clarifies Duty of Good Faith in Conditional Receipt Life Insurance Claims

Date: Aug 27, 2005
Estates of Riddle Clarifies Duty of Good Faith in Conditional Receipt Life Insurance Claims Introduction The case of Estates of Kenneth Stewart Riddle v. Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company...
Ensuring Fair Notice in Failure to Prosecute Dismissals: Wu v. T.W. Wang, Inc.

Ensuring Fair Notice in Failure to Prosecute Dismissals: Wu v. T.W. Wang, Inc.

Date: Aug 27, 2005
Ensuring Fair Notice in Failure to Prosecute Dismissals: Wu v. T.W. Wang, Inc. Introduction Wu v. T.W. Wang, Inc., 420 F.3d 641 (6th Cir. 2005), is a pivotal case addressing the standards and...
Reaffirming Standards for Harmless Error Analysis in Death Penalty Cases under AEDPA

Reaffirming Standards for Harmless Error Analysis in Death Penalty Cases under AEDPA

Date: Aug 26, 2005
Reaffirming Standards for Harmless Error Analysis in Death Penalty Cases under AEDPA Introduction The case of Mika'eel Abdullah Abdus-Samad v. Ricky Bell (420 F.3d 614) presents a significant...
Affirmation of Denial to Intervene in Treaty Rights Litigation: United States v. Michigan

Affirmation of Denial to Intervene in Treaty Rights Litigation: United States v. Michigan

Date: Aug 25, 2005
Affirmation of Denial to Intervene in Treaty Rights Litigation: United States v. Michigan Introduction The case of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Bay Mills Indian Community; Sault Ste....
Liquidated Damages Clauses as Unenforceable Penalties Under Texas Law: Insights from IN RE DOW CORNING CORP. Appeal

Liquidated Damages Clauses as Unenforceable Penalties Under Texas Law: Insights from IN RE DOW CORNING CORP. Appeal

Date: Aug 23, 2005
Liquidated Damages Clauses as Unenforceable Penalties Under Texas Law: Insights from IN RE DOW CORNING CORP. Appeal Introduction The appellate case, In re: Dow Corning Corp., Debtor. Bear Stearns...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert