Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Sixth Circuit Reverses Privity Requirement for Implied-Warranty Claims under Michigan Law

Sixth Circuit Reverses Privity Requirement for Implied-Warranty Claims under Michigan Law

Date: Jan 6, 2006
Sixth Circuit Reverses Privity Requirement for Implied-Warranty Claims under Michigan Law Introduction In the landmark case Al v. Ry PACK, 434 F.3d 810 (6th Cir. 2006), the United States Court of...
Strict Adherence to Appellate Deadlines Affirmed in Bowles v. Russell

Strict Adherence to Appellate Deadlines Affirmed in Bowles v. Russell

Date: Dec 29, 2005
Strict Adherence to Appellate Deadlines Affirmed in Bowles v. Russell Introduction Keith Bowles v. Harry Russell (432 F.3d 668), adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Absence of Agency Relationship and Procedural Compliance: Brainard v. ASLAC

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Absence of Agency Relationship and Procedural Compliance: Brainard v. ASLAC

Date: Dec 29, 2005
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Absence of Agency Relationship and Procedural Compliance: Brainard v. ASLAC Introduction The case of Timothy Brainard, et al. v. American Skandia Life Assurance...
Affirmation of First-to-File Bar in False Claims Act Qui Tam Action: Walburn v. Lockheed Martin

Affirmation of First-to-File Bar in False Claims Act Qui Tam Action: Walburn v. Lockheed Martin

Date: Dec 21, 2005
Affirmation of First-to-File Bar in False Claims Act Qui Tam Action: Walburn v. Lockheed Martin Introduction In Jeff Walburn v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Denial for Substitute Counsel and Upholding Admissibility of Identification Evidence in Sullivan v. United States

Affirmation of Denial for Substitute Counsel and Upholding Admissibility of Identification Evidence in Sullivan v. United States

Date: Dec 21, 2005
Affirmation of Denial for Substitute Counsel and Upholding Admissibility of Identification Evidence in Sullivan v. United States Introduction Sullivan v. United States, 431 F.3d 976 (6th Cir. 2005),...
TriHealth v. Board of Commissioners: Affirming Rational Basis in Equal Protection and Due Process Claims

TriHealth v. Board of Commissioners: Affirming Rational Basis in Equal Protection and Due Process Claims

Date: Dec 15, 2005
TriHealth v. Board of Commissioners: Affirming Rational Basis in Equal Protection and Due Process Claims Introduction In the landmark case TriHealth, Inc., et al. v. Board of Commissioners, Hamilton...
Establishing the Unconstitutionality of Patronage Dismissals: Caudill v. Hollan

Establishing the Unconstitutionality of Patronage Dismissals: Caudill v. Hollan

Date: Dec 15, 2005
Establishing the Unconstitutionality of Patronage Dismissals: Caudill v. Hollan Introduction In Caudill, et al. v. Hollan, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit addressed critical...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Police Use of Deadly Force: Romeo v. Untalan

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Police Use of Deadly Force: Romeo v. Untalan

Date: Dec 8, 2005
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Police Use of Deadly Force: Romeo v. Untalan Introduction Romeo v. Untalan is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Heightened Scrutiny of Juror Impartiality in Death Penalty Sentencing: White v. Mitchell

Heightened Scrutiny of Juror Impartiality in Death Penalty Sentencing: White v. Mitchell

Date: Dec 8, 2005
Heightened Scrutiny of Juror Impartiality in Death Penalty Sentencing: White v. Mitchell Introduction The case of Maxwell D. White, Jr. v. Betty Mitchell, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Navigating the Confrontation Clause and Hearsay Exceptions: Analysis of United States v. Hadley

Navigating the Confrontation Clause and Hearsay Exceptions: Analysis of United States v. Hadley

Date: Dec 7, 2005
Navigating the Confrontation Clause and Hearsay Exceptions: Analysis of United States v. Hadley Introduction In the case of United States v. Jerome Hadley (431 F.3d 484), the United States Court of...
Good Faith Exception Reinforced in Warrant-Related Searches: United States v. Ke

Good Faith Exception Reinforced in Warrant-Related Searches: United States v. Ke

Date: Dec 3, 2005
Good Faith Exception Reinforced in Warrant-Related Searches: United States v. Ke Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Ke (444 F.3d 556), the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases: Smith v. Cupp

Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases: Smith v. Cupp

Date: Dec 3, 2005
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases: Smith v. Cupp Introduction In the landmark case of Smith v. Cupp, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit addressed critical...
Constructive Entry and Warrantless Arrest: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Thomas

Constructive Entry and Warrantless Arrest: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Thomas

Date: Dec 2, 2005
Constructive Entry and Warrantless Arrest: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Thomas Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Christopher Todd Thomas, adjudicated by the United...
Clarifying Dual Offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): Savoires v. United States

Clarifying Dual Offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): Savoires v. United States

Date: Dec 1, 2005
Clarifying Dual Offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): Savoires v. United States Introduction UNITED STATES of America v. Jermaine Savoires, 430 F.3d 376 (6th Cir. 2005), presents a pivotal appellate...
Establishing Evident Partiality Standards for Arbitration Vacatur under the Federal Arbitration Act

Establishing Evident Partiality Standards for Arbitration Vacatur under the Federal Arbitration Act

Date: Nov 30, 2005
Establishing Evident Partiality Standards for Arbitration Vacatur under the Federal Arbitration Act Introduction The case of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Home Insurance Company, adjudicated...
Procedural Due Process in Prisoners' Visitation Rights: Insights from BAZZETTA v. McGINNIS

Procedural Due Process in Prisoners' Visitation Rights: Insights from BAZZETTA v. McGINNIS

Date: Nov 29, 2005
Procedural Due Process in Prisoners' Visitation Rights: Insights from BAZZETTA v. McGINNIS Introduction The legal landscape surrounding prisoners' rights, particularly visitation privileges, has been...
Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections in Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Ke

Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections in Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Ke

Date: Nov 23, 2005
Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections in Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Ke Introduction United States v. Ke (430 F.3d 345) is a pivotal judgment delivered by the United States...
Palkow v. CSX Transportation: Defining the Boundaries of Removal Jurisdiction in Collateral Federal Challenges

Palkow v. CSX Transportation: Defining the Boundaries of Removal Jurisdiction in Collateral Federal Challenges

Date: Nov 19, 2005
Palkow v. CSX Transportation: Defining the Boundaries of Removal Jurisdiction in Collateral Federal Challenges Introduction In Palkow v. CSX Transportation, Inc., Harry Crawford and Diane Ta, 431...
Qualified Immunity Upheld in EMTs' Duty of Care Case

Qualified Immunity Upheld in EMTs' Duty of Care Case

Date: Nov 19, 2005
Qualified Immunity Upheld in EMTs' Duty of Care Case Introduction The case of Patricia Jackson v. Andreas Schultz and Richard Cadoura (429 F.3d 586) presents a significant examination of qualified...
Admissibility of Anonymous Coconspirator Statements and Resentencing under Booker: United States v. Martinez et al.

Admissibility of Anonymous Coconspirator Statements and Resentencing under Booker: United States v. Martinez et al.

Date: Nov 18, 2005
Admissibility of Anonymous Coconspirator Statements and Resentencing under Booker: United States v. Martinez et al. Introduction In United States of America v. Martinez, Henderson, Harris, and...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert