Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Antitrust Claims Lacking Cognizable Injury: Expert Masonry, Inc. v. Boone County

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Antitrust Claims Lacking Cognizable Injury: Expert Masonry, Inc. v. Boone County

Date: Mar 9, 2006
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Antitrust Claims Lacking Cognizable Injury: Expert Masonry, Inc. v. Boone County Introduction In the case of Expert Masonry, Inc. v. Boone County, Kentucky, Fiscal...
Implied Private Cause of Action and Discrimination Claims in Employment Law: A Comprehensive Analysis of McCLAIN v. NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER

Implied Private Cause of Action and Discrimination Claims in Employment Law: A Comprehensive Analysis of McCLAIN v. NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER

Date: Mar 7, 2006
Implied Private Cause of Action and Discrimination Claims in Employment Law: A Comprehensive Analysis of McCLAIN v. NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER Introduction Case: Lena McClain,...
Qualified Immunity in Civil Service Termination: Silberstein v. City of Dayton

Qualified Immunity in Civil Service Termination: Silberstein v. City of Dayton

Date: Mar 4, 2006
Qualified Immunity in Civil Service Termination: Silberstein v. City of Dayton Introduction The case of Susan Fisler Silberstein v. City of Dayton (440 F.3d 306) addressed significant issues...
Affidavit Use and Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege: Powerhouse Licensing v. Venice Renaissance

Affidavit Use and Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege: Powerhouse Licensing v. Venice Renaissance

Date: Mar 3, 2006
Affidavit Use and Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege: Powerhouse Licensing v. Venice Renaissance Introduction The case of Powerhouse Licensing, LLC et al. v. Venice Renaissance, LLC, adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Lack of Personal Jurisdiction under Ohio's Long-Arm Statute in Brunner v. Hampson

Affirmation of Lack of Personal Jurisdiction under Ohio's Long-Arm Statute in Brunner v. Hampson

Date: Mar 1, 2006
Affirmation of Lack of Personal Jurisdiction under Ohio's Long-Arm Statute in Brunner v. Hampson Introduction In the case of Paul Brunner, Karen Brunner, and Douglas Otte v. Pamela Hampson, Executor...
Reaffirming DeShaney: Police Inaction in Private Drag Race Does Not Constitute Due Process Violation

Reaffirming DeShaney: Police Inaction in Private Drag Race Does Not Constitute Due Process Violation

Date: Feb 28, 2006
Reaffirming DeShaney: Police Inaction in Private Drag Race Does Not Constitute Due Process Violation Introduction In the case of Dorothy JONES, as Personal Representative v. Aaron REYNOLDS et al.,...
Establishing Identity through Prior Robberies: Insights from United States v. Perry

Establishing Identity through Prior Robberies: Insights from United States v. Perry

Date: Feb 25, 2006
Establishing Identity through Prior Robberies: Insights from United States v. Perry Introduction United States v. Oceanus Perry, 438 F.3d 642 (6th Cir. 2006), is a significant appellate decision...
Procedural Due Process and Undue Burden in Abortion Clinic Licensing: The Sixth Circuit's Ruling in Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Baird

Procedural Due Process and Undue Burden in Abortion Clinic Licensing: The Sixth Circuit's Ruling in Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Baird

Date: Feb 18, 2006
Procedural Due Process and Undue Burden in Abortion Clinic Licensing: The Sixth Circuit's Ruling in Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Baird Introduction The case of Women's Medical...
Affirmation of Bank Fraud Convictions with Remand for Resentencing in Abboud v. United States

Affirmation of Bank Fraud Convictions with Remand for Resentencing in Abboud v. United States

Date: Feb 18, 2006
Affirmation of Bank Fraud Convictions with Remand for Resentencing in Abboud v. United States Introduction In the case of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elie F. Abboud and Michel...
Retaliatory Employment Discharge Claims and Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Eastman v. Marine Mechanical Corporation

Retaliatory Employment Discharge Claims and Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Eastman v. Marine Mechanical Corporation

Date: Feb 16, 2006
Retaliatory Employment Discharge Claims and Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Eastman v. Marine Mechanical Corporation Introduction The case of John T. Eastman v. Marine Mechanical Corporation,...
Preemption of State Tort Claims in Railroad Crossing Safety: Nye v. CSX Transportation

Preemption of State Tort Claims in Railroad Crossing Safety: Nye v. CSX Transportation

Date: Feb 15, 2006
Preemption of State Tort Claims in Railroad Crossing Safety: Nye v. CSX Transportation 1. Introduction In the case of Joshua Nye and Judy Ramirez v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (437 F.3d 556), the...
Reaffirming the Use of Career Offender Designations in Sentencing Post-Booker: United States v. Richardson

Reaffirming the Use of Career Offender Designations in Sentencing Post-Booker: United States v. Richardson

Date: Feb 14, 2006
Reaffirming the Use of Career Offender Designations in Sentencing Post-Booker: United States v. Richardson Introduction United States v. Richardson is a significant appellate decision from the United...
Mandate for Comprehensive Transcript Review in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Nash v. Eberlin

Mandate for Comprehensive Transcript Review in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Nash v. Eberlin

Date: Feb 11, 2006
Mandate for Comprehensive Transcript Review in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Nash v. Eberlin Introduction Darell Nash, Sr. v. Michelle Eberlin, 437 F.3d 519 (6th Cir. 2006), is a pivotal case in the...
Sigley v. City of Parma Heights: Reevaluating Excessive Force Standards

Sigley v. City of Parma Heights: Reevaluating Excessive Force Standards

Date: Feb 11, 2006
Sigley v. City of Parma Heights: Reevaluating Excessive Force Standards Introduction Sigley v. City of Parma Heights, 437 F.3d 527 (6th Cir. 2006), is a pivotal case that addresses the critical issue...
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations and Beneficiary Standing under ERISA: Morrison v. Marsh McLennan Companies

Affirmation of Statute of Limitations and Beneficiary Standing under ERISA: Morrison v. Marsh McLennan Companies

Date: Feb 11, 2006
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations and Beneficiary Standing under ERISA: Morrison v. Marsh McLennan Companies Introduction The case of Christine Morrison v. Marsh McLennan Companies, Inc.,...
Personal Changes Do Not Constitute 'Changed Circumstances' for Reopening Removal Proceedings: Haddad v. Gonzales

Personal Changes Do Not Constitute 'Changed Circumstances' for Reopening Removal Proceedings: Haddad v. Gonzales

Date: Feb 10, 2006
Personal Changes Do Not Constitute 'Changed Circumstances' for Reopening Removal Proceedings: Haddad v. Gonzales Introduction Hanan Haddad v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, 437 F.3d 515 (6th...
Narrowing Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Kroger v. Malease Foods

Narrowing Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Kroger v. Malease Foods

Date: Feb 10, 2006
Narrowing Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Kroger Corp. v. Malease Foods Corp. Introduction The case of The Kroger Company v. Malease Foods Corporation (437 F.3d 506) adjudicated by the United...
Re-evaluating "Crime of Violence" Classification: United States v. Marco Eugene Foreman

Re-evaluating "Crime of Violence" Classification: United States v. Marco Eugene Foreman

Date: Feb 9, 2006
Re-evaluating "Crime of Violence" Classification: United States v. Marco Eugene Foreman Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Marco Eugene Foreman, 436 F.3d 638 (6th Cir. 2006), the...
Clarifying Deliberate Indifference and Qualified Immunity in Prisoners’ Eighth Amendment Claims: Clark-Murphy v. Foreback

Clarifying Deliberate Indifference and Qualified Immunity in Prisoners’ Eighth Amendment Claims: Clark-Murphy v. Foreback

Date: Feb 7, 2006
Clarifying Deliberate Indifference and Qualified Immunity in Prisoners’ Eighth Amendment Claims: Clark-Murphy v. Foreback Introduction The case of Bonita Clark-Murphy, as Personal Representative of...
Limitation on Rule 23(b)(2) Class Certification in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Analysis of Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Limitation on Rule 23(b)(2) Class Certification in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Analysis of Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Date: Jan 25, 2006
Limitation on Rule 23(b)(2) Class Certification in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Analysis of Reeb v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction Introduction The case of Rachel REEB, et al. v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert