Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Collateral Estoppel: McCORMICK v. BRAVERMAN

Clarifying Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Collateral Estoppel: McCORMICK v. BRAVERMAN

Date: Jun 21, 2006
Clarifying Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Collateral Estoppel: McCORMICK v. BRAVERMAN Introduction The case of Linda McCormick v. Eric A. Braverman, et al.; Citizens Insurance Company of America, et al....
Enhancing Habeas Corpus Accessibility: Sixth Circuit Vacates Docket Dismissal in DiCenzi v. Rose Over Appeal Right Notification and Timeliness under AEDPA

Enhancing Habeas Corpus Accessibility: Sixth Circuit Vacates Docket Dismissal in DiCenzi v. Rose Over Appeal Right Notification and Timeliness under AEDPA

Date: Jun 17, 2006
Enhancing Habeas Corpus Accessibility: Sixth Circuit Vacates Docket Dismissal in DiCenzi v. Rose Over Appeal Right Notification and Timeliness under AEDPA Introduction The case of Alfred L. DiCenzi...
Reinforcing Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Slaughter v. Parker Commentary

Reinforcing Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Slaughter v. Parker Commentary

Date: Jun 14, 2006
Reinforcing Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Slaughter v. Parker Commentary Introduction In the landmark case of James Earl Slaughter v. Phil Parker, 450 F.3d 224...
Continental Casualty Co. v. Smith: Establishing Standards for Full and Fair ERISA Disability Reviews

Continental Casualty Co. v. Smith: Establishing Standards for Full and Fair ERISA Disability Reviews

Date: Jun 14, 2006
Continental Casualty Co. v. Smith: Establishing Standards for Full and Fair ERISA Disability Reviews Introduction The case of Jennifer Lee Smith v. Continental Casualty Company addresses critical...
Enforcement of Anti-Cybersquatting and Trademark Protections: Ford Motor Co. v. Allen Cross

Enforcement of Anti-Cybersquatting and Trademark Protections: Ford Motor Co. v. Allen Cross

Date: Jun 10, 2006
Enforcement of Anti-Cybersquatting and Trademark Protections: Ford Motor Co. v. Allen Cross Introduction Ford Motor Company v. Allen Cross is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States District...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Maritime Defendants: Viken Ship Management v. Fortis Corporate Insurance

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Maritime Defendants: Viken Ship Management v. Fortis Corporate Insurance

Date: Jun 9, 2006
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Maritime Defendants: Viken Ship Management v. Fortis Corporate Insurance Introduction The case of Fortis Corporate Insurance v. Viken Ship Management...
Establishing Partial Exhaustion for §1983 Claims in Mixed Prisoner Complaints: Spencer v. Bouchard et al.

Establishing Partial Exhaustion for §1983 Claims in Mixed Prisoner Complaints: Spencer v. Bouchard et al.

Date: Jun 7, 2006
Establishing Partial Exhaustion for §1983 Claims in Mixed Prisoner Complaints: Spencer v. Bouchard et al. Introduction In Spencer v. Bouchard et al. (449 F.3d 721, 6th Cir. 2006), the United States...
Qualified Immunity and Retaliation Claims under §1983: Insights from Barnes v. Wright

Qualified Immunity and Retaliation Claims under §1983: Insights from Barnes v. Wright

Date: Jun 3, 2006
Qualified Immunity and Retaliation Claims under §1983: Insights from Barnes v. Wright Introduction In the landmark case Barnes v. Wright, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Clarifying Qualified and Sovereign Immunity in Employment Termination Cases: Be v. Miller

Clarifying Qualified and Sovereign Immunity in Employment Termination Cases: Be v. Miller

Date: May 24, 2006
Clarifying Qualified and Sovereign Immunity in Employment Termination Cases: Be v. Miller Introduction Beverly L. Miller, the Plaintiff-Appellant, was employed for over 24 years as the jury-pool...
Heightened Deference to Domestic Plaintiffs in Forum Non Conveniens: Duha v. Agrium, Inc.

Heightened Deference to Domestic Plaintiffs in Forum Non Conveniens: Duha v. Agrium, Inc.

Date: May 24, 2006
Heightened Deference to Domestic Plaintiffs in Forum Non Conveniens: Duha v. Agrium, Inc. Introduction Duha v. Agrium, Inc., 448 F.3d 867 (6th Cir. 2006) is a significant appellate decision from the...
Commission Payment Termination in Aerel v. PCC Airfoils: Clarifying Contractual Obligations

Commission Payment Termination in Aerel v. PCC Airfoils: Clarifying Contractual Obligations

Date: May 24, 2006
Commission Payment Termination in Aerel v. PCC Airfoils: Clarifying Contractual Obligations Introduction The case of Aerel, S.R.L. v. PCC Airfoils, L.L.C. (448 F.3d 899) adjudicated by the United...
Enhancing Remand Protocols and Waiver Validity in Social Security Appeals: Insights from Hollon v. SSA

Enhancing Remand Protocols and Waiver Validity in Social Security Appeals: Insights from Hollon v. SSA

Date: May 23, 2006
Enhancing Remand Protocols and Waiver Validity in Social Security Appeals: Insights from Hollon v. SSA Introduction Hollon v. Commissioner of Social Security, 447 F.3d 477 (6th Cir. 2006), is a...
Affirmation of Rooker-Feldman and Younger Abstention in Federal Takings Claims: Coles v. Granville et al.

Affirmation of Rooker-Feldman and Younger Abstention in Federal Takings Claims: Coles v. Granville et al.

Date: May 23, 2006
Affirmation of Rooker-Feldman and Younger Abstention in Federal Takings Claims: Coles v. Granville et al. Introduction The case of Edwin M. Coles et al. v. Jonathan Granville et al. (448 F.3d 853,...
Establishing Indemnification Obligations in Bank-Facilitated Derivative Transactions: Power Telephone Supply Co. v. SunTrust Banks, Inc.

Establishing Indemnification Obligations in Bank-Facilitated Derivative Transactions: Power Telephone Supply Co. v. SunTrust Banks, Inc.

Date: May 18, 2006
Establishing Indemnification Obligations in Bank-Facilitated Derivative Transactions: Power Telephone Supply Company, Inc. v. SunTrust Banks, Inc. Introduction The appellate case of Power Telephone...
Strict Adherence to Federal Rule 9(b) in False Claims Act Litigation: Insights from Sanderson v. HCA

Strict Adherence to Federal Rule 9(b) in False Claims Act Litigation: Insights from Sanderson v. HCA

Date: May 13, 2006
Strict Adherence to Federal Rule 9(b) in False Claims Act Litigation: Insights from Sanderson v. HCA Introduction The case of Philip H. Sanderson v. HCA-The Healthcare Company (447 F.3d 873, 6th Cir....
At-Will Employment Essential for Ohio Public Policy Wrongful Discharge Claims: Kusens v. Pascal Company

At-Will Employment Essential for Ohio Public Policy Wrongful Discharge Claims: Kusens v. Pascal Company

Date: May 10, 2006
At-Will Employment Essential for Ohio Public Policy Wrongful Discharge Claims: Kusens v. Pascal Company Introduction In the case of Gary Kusens v. Pascal Company, Inc., Gary Kusens, the plaintiff,...
Enhanced Venue Jurisdiction Under LMRA and ERISA: Insights from Moore v. Morton

Enhanced Venue Jurisdiction Under LMRA and ERISA: Insights from Moore v. Morton

Date: Apr 27, 2006
Enhanced Venue Jurisdiction Under LMRA and ERISA: Insights from Moore v. Morton Introduction In the landmark case of Moore v. Morton, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Clarifying Conflict-Free Representation and Cumulative Errors in Habeas Corpus: Gillard v. Mitchell

Clarifying Conflict-Free Representation and Cumulative Errors in Habeas Corpus: Gillard v. Mitchell

Date: Apr 27, 2006
Clarifying Conflict-Free Representation and Cumulative Errors in Habeas Corpus: Gillard v. Mitchell Introduction In the landmark case of John GILLARD v. Betty MITCHELL, 445 F.3d 883 (6th Cir. 2006),...
Rule 60(b) Motion: Significance of Timeliness and Waiver

Rule 60(b) Motion: Significance of Timeliness and Waiver

Date: Apr 27, 2006
Rule 60(b) Motion: Significance of Timeliness and Waiver Introduction In the case of DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. Bharat Patel, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...
Enhancing Maritime Workplace Safety: Churchwell v. Bluegrass Marine Establishes Crucial Precedents in Unseaworthiness and Jones Act Claims

Enhancing Maritime Workplace Safety: Churchwell v. Bluegrass Marine Establishes Crucial Precedents in Unseaworthiness and Jones Act Claims

Date: Apr 22, 2006
Enhancing Maritime Workplace Safety: Churchwell v. Bluegrass Marine Establishes Crucial Precedents in Unseaworthiness and Jones Act Claims Introduction The case of Glenda Churchwell versus Bluegrass...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert