Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Armed Career Criminal Enhancement and Constructive Amendment Considerations in United States v. Nance

Affirmation of Armed Career Criminal Enhancement and Constructive Amendment Considerations in United States v. Nance

Date: Apr 7, 2007
Affirmation of Armed Career Criminal Enhancement and Constructive Amendment Considerations in United States v. Nance Introduction In United States v. Elton Nance, 481 F.3d 882 (6th Cir. 2007), the...
Fielden v. CSX Transportation: Clarifying Expert Report Requirements for Treating Physicians under Rule 26(a)(2)(B)

Fielden v. CSX Transportation: Clarifying Expert Report Requirements for Treating Physicians under Rule 26(a)(2)(B)

Date: Apr 7, 2007
Fielden v. CSX Transportation: Clarifying Expert Report Requirements for Treating Physicians under Rule 26(a)(2)(B) Introduction The case of Jesse A. Fielden v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 482 F.3d 866...
Limits on Habeas Corpus Review: Establishing Boundaries on Post-Conviction Claims and Actual Innocence in Cress v. Palmer

Limits on Habeas Corpus Review: Establishing Boundaries on Post-Conviction Claims and Actual Innocence in Cress v. Palmer

Date: Apr 6, 2007
Limits on Habeas Corpus Review: Establishing Boundaries on Post-Conviction Claims and Actual Innocence in Cress v. Palmer Introduction Cress v. Palmer (484 F.3d 844, United States Court of Appeals,...
Summary Judgment and Judicial Recusal Standards in FCA Retaliation Cases: Insights from Scott v. Metropolitan Health Corp.

Summary Judgment and Judicial Recusal Standards in FCA Retaliation Cases: Insights from Scott v. Metropolitan Health Corp.

Date: Apr 4, 2007
Summary Judgment and Judicial Recusal Standards in FCA Retaliation Cases: Insights from Scott v. Metropolitan Health Corp. Introduction The case of Mary Scott v. Metropolitan Health Corporation,...
Qualified Immunity in Mistaken Police Seizure: Analyzing Humphrey v. Mabry

Qualified Immunity in Mistaken Police Seizure: Analyzing Humphrey v. Mabry

Date: Apr 3, 2007
Qualified Immunity in Mistaken Police Seizure: Analyzing Humphrey v. Mabry Introduction Humphrey v. Mabry is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on...
Habeas Exception Does Not Bar Prisoner §1983 Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Thomas v. Eby

Habeas Exception Does Not Bar Prisoner §1983 Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Thomas v. Eby

Date: Mar 31, 2007
Habeas Exception Does Not Bar Prisoner §1983 Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Thomas v. Eby Introduction In the landmark case of Thomas v. Eby, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Jury Verdict in Maday v. Public Libraries of Saginaw: Implications for Attorney Conduct and Evidentiary Standards

Affirmation of Jury Verdict in Maday v. Public Libraries of Saginaw: Implications for Attorney Conduct and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Mar 29, 2007
Affirmation of Jury Verdict in Maday v. Public Libraries of Saginaw: Implications for Attorney Conduct and Evidentiary Standards Introduction Maday v. Public Libraries of Saginaw (480 F.3d 815),...
Discharge of Debt and Tax Refund Claims: Alpert v. United States - A New Precedent

Discharge of Debt and Tax Refund Claims: Alpert v. United States - A New Precedent

Date: Mar 24, 2007
Discharge of Debt and Tax Refund Claims: Alpert v. United States - A New Precedent Introduction The case of Martin Alpert and Carolyn Alpert v. United States of America, decided by the United States...
Welshans v. Aetna: Upholding Federal Jurisdiction Through Statutory Attorney's Fees and Granting Summary Judgment

Welshans v. Aetna: Upholding Federal Jurisdiction Through Statutory Attorney's Fees and Granting Summary Judgment

Date: Mar 23, 2007
Welshans v. Aetna: Upholding Federal Jurisdiction Through Statutory Attorney's Fees and Granting Summary Judgment Introduction In Welshans v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, the plaintiffs, Peggy...
Strict Adherence to 60-Day Filing Deadline in Social Security Appeals Confirmed in Cook v. SSA

Strict Adherence to 60-Day Filing Deadline in Social Security Appeals Confirmed in Cook v. SSA

Date: Mar 22, 2007
Strict Adherence to 60-Day Filing Deadline in Social Security Appeals Confirmed in Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction The case of Elbridge Cook, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social...
NSMIA Preemption Requires Valid Federal Exemption: Brown v. Earthboard Sports USA

NSMIA Preemption Requires Valid Federal Exemption: Brown v. Earthboard Sports USA

Date: Mar 17, 2007
NSMIA Preemption Requires Valid Federal Exemption: Brown v. Earthboard Sports USA Introduction In Clinton D. Brown v. Earthboard Sports USA, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Affirmation of Equitable Tolling in Retaliation Claim: Dixon v. Gonzales et al.

Affirmation of Equitable Tolling in Retaliation Claim: Dixon v. Gonzales et al.

Date: Mar 15, 2007
Affirmation of Equitable Tolling in Retaliation Claim: Dixon v. Gonzales et al. Introduction In the case of James Dixon, Jr. v. Alberto Gonzales, U.S. Attorney General, and Robert S. Mueller, III,...
Boykin v. Van Buren Township: Reassessing Probable Cause in Retail Fraud Arrests

Boykin v. Van Buren Township: Reassessing Probable Cause in Retail Fraud Arrests

Date: Mar 15, 2007
Boykin v. Van Buren Township: Reassessing Probable Cause in Retail Fraud Arrests Introduction In the landmark case Jeffrey Boykin et al. v. Van Buren Township et al., the United States Court of...
Ensuring Procedural Compliance in Social Security Disability Appeals: Da v. Bowen

Ensuring Procedural Compliance in Social Security Disability Appeals: Da v. Bowen

Date: Mar 10, 2007
Ensuring Procedural Compliance in Social Security Disability Appeals: Da v. Bowen Introduction Da v. Bowen, 478 F.3d 742 (6th Cir. 2007), is a pivotal case in the realm of Social Security disability...
Validating the Integrity of Plea Agreements: Insights from U.S. v. Dixon

Validating the Integrity of Plea Agreements: Insights from U.S. v. Dixon

Date: Mar 9, 2007
Validating the Integrity of Plea Agreements: Insights from United States v. Dixon Introduction The case of United States of America v. Ronnie Joe Dixon, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Proper §1983 Mandates: Defendant Identification and Municipal Liability Standards

Affirmation of Proper §1983 Mandates: Defendant Identification and Municipal Liability Standards

Date: Mar 7, 2007
Affirmation of Proper §1983 Mandates: Defendant Identification and Municipal Liability Standards Introduction The case of Sherman Petty v. County of Franklin, Ohio, et al. (478 F.3d 341, Sixth...
Corrigan v. United States Steel and Kobe Steel: Upholding Ohio’s Standards for Piercing the Corporate Veil in Employment Discrimination and Benefit Claims

Corrigan v. United States Steel and Kobe Steel: Upholding Ohio’s Standards for Piercing the Corporate Veil in Employment Discrimination and Benefit Claims

Date: Mar 6, 2007
Corrigan v. United States Steel and Kobe Steel: Upholding Ohio’s Standards for Piercing the Corporate Veil in Employment Discrimination and Benefit Claims Introduction In the landmark case James T....
Affirmation of Substantial Downward Departure for Extraordinary Family Circumstances Under U.S.S.G. §5H1.6 in United States v. Husein

Affirmation of Substantial Downward Departure for Extraordinary Family Circumstances Under U.S.S.G. §5H1.6 in United States v. Husein

Date: Mar 3, 2007
Affirmation of Substantial Downward Departure for Extraordinary Family Circumstances Under U.S.S.G. §5H1.6 in United States v. Husein Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Fadya...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Strict Compliance with Title III: No Good-Faith Exception for Wiretap Warrants

Sixth Circuit Affirms Strict Compliance with Title III: No Good-Faith Exception for Wiretap Warrants

Date: Mar 3, 2007
Sixth Circuit Affirms Strict Compliance with Title III: No Good-Faith Exception for Wiretap Warrants Introduction In United States of America v. Reginald Shantez Rice et al., the United States Court...
Accrual Date for § 1983 Method-of-Execution Claims: Insights from Cooley v. Strickland

Accrual Date for § 1983 Method-of-Execution Claims: Insights from Cooley v. Strickland

Date: Mar 3, 2007
Accrual Date for § 1983 Method-of-Execution Claims: Insights from Cooley v. Strickland Introduction In the landmark case Richard Wade Cooley, II v. Ted Strickland, the United States Court of Appeals...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert