Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Affirmation of Armed Career Criminal Enhancement and Constructive Amendment Considerations in United States v. Nance Introduction In United States v. Elton Nance, 481 F.3d 882 (6th Cir. 2007), the...
Fielden v. CSX Transportation: Clarifying Expert Report Requirements for Treating Physicians under Rule 26(a)(2)(B) Introduction The case of Jesse A. Fielden v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 482 F.3d 866...
Limits on Habeas Corpus Review: Establishing Boundaries on Post-Conviction Claims and Actual Innocence in Cress v. Palmer Introduction Cress v. Palmer (484 F.3d 844, United States Court of Appeals,...
Summary Judgment and Judicial Recusal Standards in FCA Retaliation Cases: Insights from Scott v. Metropolitan Health Corp. Introduction The case of Mary Scott v. Metropolitan Health Corporation,...
Qualified Immunity in Mistaken Police Seizure: Analyzing Humphrey v. Mabry Introduction Humphrey v. Mabry is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on...
Habeas Exception Does Not Bar Prisoner §1983 Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Thomas v. Eby Introduction In the landmark case of Thomas v. Eby, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Jury Verdict in Maday v. Public Libraries of Saginaw: Implications for Attorney Conduct and Evidentiary Standards Introduction Maday v. Public Libraries of Saginaw (480 F.3d 815),...
Discharge of Debt and Tax Refund Claims: Alpert v. United States - A New Precedent Introduction The case of Martin Alpert and Carolyn Alpert v. United States of America, decided by the United States...
Welshans v. Aetna: Upholding Federal Jurisdiction Through Statutory Attorney's Fees and Granting Summary Judgment Introduction In Welshans v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, the plaintiffs, Peggy...
Strict Adherence to 60-Day Filing Deadline in Social Security Appeals Confirmed in Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction The case of Elbridge Cook, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social...
NSMIA Preemption Requires Valid Federal Exemption: Brown v. Earthboard Sports USA Introduction In Clinton D. Brown v. Earthboard Sports USA, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Affirmation of Equitable Tolling in Retaliation Claim: Dixon v. Gonzales et al. Introduction In the case of James Dixon, Jr. v. Alberto Gonzales, U.S. Attorney General, and Robert S. Mueller, III,...
Boykin v. Van Buren Township: Reassessing Probable Cause in Retail Fraud Arrests Introduction In the landmark case Jeffrey Boykin et al. v. Van Buren Township et al., the United States Court of...
Ensuring Procedural Compliance in Social Security Disability Appeals: Da v. Bowen Introduction Da v. Bowen, 478 F.3d 742 (6th Cir. 2007), is a pivotal case in the realm of Social Security disability...
Validating the Integrity of Plea Agreements: Insights from United States v. Dixon Introduction The case of United States of America v. Ronnie Joe Dixon, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Proper §1983 Mandates: Defendant Identification and Municipal Liability Standards Introduction The case of Sherman Petty v. County of Franklin, Ohio, et al. (478 F.3d 341, Sixth...
Corrigan v. United States Steel and Kobe Steel: Upholding Ohio’s Standards for Piercing the Corporate Veil in Employment Discrimination and Benefit Claims Introduction In the landmark case James T....
Affirmation of Substantial Downward Departure for Extraordinary Family Circumstances Under U.S.S.G. §5H1.6 in United States v. Husein Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Fadya...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Strict Compliance with Title III: No Good-Faith Exception for Wiretap Warrants Introduction In United States of America v. Reginald Shantez Rice et al., the United States Court...
Accrual Date for § 1983 Method-of-Execution Claims: Insights from Cooley v. Strickland Introduction In the landmark case Richard Wade Cooley, II v. Ted Strickland, the United States Court of Appeals...