Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Within-Guidelines Sentencing: United States v. Ming Liou

Affirmation of Within-Guidelines Sentencing: United States v. Ming Liou

Date: Jul 21, 2007
Affirmation of Within-Guidelines Sentencing: United States v. Ming Liou Introduction In the appellate case United States v. Ming Liou, 491 F.3d 334 (6th Cir. 2007), the United States Court of Appeals...
Comprehensive Commentary on John Doe, XIV v. Michigan Department of State Police: Upholding Sex Offender Registration Requirements for Youthful Trainees

Comprehensive Commentary on John Doe, XIV v. Michigan Department of State Police: Upholding Sex Offender Registration Requirements for Youthful Trainees

Date: Jul 19, 2007
Upholding Sex Offender Registration Requirements for Youthful Trainees: A Detailed Analysis of John Doe, XIV v. Michigan Department of State Police Introduction The case of John Doe, XIV,...
Effective Assistance of Counsel During Mitigation: Haliym v. Mitchell

Effective Assistance of Counsel During Mitigation: Haliym v. Mitchell

Date: Jul 14, 2007
Effective Assistance of Counsel During Mitigation: Haliym v. Mitchell Introduction In the case of Abdul Haliym, also known as Wayne Frazier, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...
Application of 'Shocks the Conscience' Standard in Police Pursuit Cases: Meals v. City of Memphis

Application of 'Shocks the Conscience' Standard in Police Pursuit Cases: Meals v. City of Memphis

Date: Jul 12, 2007
Application of 'Shocks the Conscience' Standard in Police Pursuit Cases: Meals v. City of Memphis Introduction The case of Meals v. City of Memphis addresses the critical issue of police...
Affirmation of HARTMAN v. BAGLEY: Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jury Instructions in Capital Cases

Affirmation of HARTMAN v. BAGLEY: Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jury Instructions in Capital Cases

Date: Jul 11, 2007
Affirmation of HARTMAN v. BAGLEY: Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jury Instructions in Capital Cases Introduction HARTMAN v. BAGLEY, 492 F.3d 347 (6th Cir. 2007), is a pivotal...
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations and Judicial Immunity in §1983 Claims: DIXON v. CLEM

Affirmation of Statute of Limitations and Judicial Immunity in §1983 Claims: DIXON v. CLEM

Date: Jul 11, 2007
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations and Judicial Immunity in §1983 Claims: DIXON v. CLEM Introduction In DIXON v. CLEM, 492 F.3d 665 (6th Cir. 2007), the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Reliability of Co-conspirator Statements and Sentencing Enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1: United States v. Moncivais

Reliability of Co-conspirator Statements and Sentencing Enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1: United States v. Moncivais

Date: Jul 11, 2007
Reliability of Co-conspirator Statements and Sentencing Enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1: United States v. Moncivais 1. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Alberto Moncivais (492...
ACLU v. NSA: Standing and the Limits of Executive Power in Surveillance

ACLU v. NSA: Standing and the Limits of Executive Power in Surveillance

Date: Jul 7, 2007
ACLU v. NSA: Standing and the Limits of Executive Power in Surveillance Introduction In the landmark case of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al. (493 F.3d 644,...
Logsdon v. Hains and McShane: Strengthening Fourth and First Amendment Protections in Arrests

Logsdon v. Hains and McShane: Strengthening Fourth and First Amendment Protections in Arrests

Date: Jul 7, 2007
Logsdon v. Hains and McShane: Strengthening Fourth and First Amendment Protections in Arrests Introduction In the seminal case of Joseph Michael Logsdon v. Charles Hains and Daniel McShane, decided...
Evaluation of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: West v. SSA

Evaluation of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: West v. SSA

Date: Jul 6, 2007
Evaluation of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: West v. SSA Introduction James T. West, a plaintiff-appellant, sought supplemental security income (SSI) benefits from the...
Narrow Interpretation of Fiduciary Capacity under §523(a)(4): In re Charles S. Bucci

Narrow Interpretation of Fiduciary Capacity under §523(a)(4): In re Charles S. Bucci

Date: Jul 4, 2007
Narrow Interpretation of Fiduciary Capacity under §523(a)(4): In re Charles S. Bucci Introduction The case In re Charles S. Bucci, Debtor et al., reported in 493 F.3d 635, presents pivotal questions...
Failure to Promote and National Origin Discrimination: In re Rodriguez v. FedEx Freight East, Inc.

Failure to Promote and National Origin Discrimination: In re Rodriguez v. FedEx Freight East, Inc.

Date: Jun 28, 2007
Failure to Promote and National Origin Discrimination: Insights from In re Rodriguez v. FedEx Freight East, Inc. Introduction The case of In re Jose Antonio Rodriguez, Debtor v. FedEx Freight East,...
Equitable Estoppel and COBRA’s Numerical Threshold: Insights from Sil v. Thomas

Equitable Estoppel and COBRA’s Numerical Threshold: Insights from Sil v. Thomas

Date: Jun 28, 2007
Equitable Estoppel and COBRA’s Numerical Threshold: Insights from Sil v. Thomas Introduction Silvia J. Thomas v. Chancey Miller and Elmwood Cemetery is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Implications of Habeas Petition Dismissal: Clark v. Waller Analysis

Implications of Habeas Petition Dismissal: Clark v. Waller Analysis

Date: Jun 26, 2007
Implications of Habeas Petition Dismissal: Clark v. Waller Analysis Based on the judgment from Johnny O. Clark v. Robert Waller, 490 F.3d 551 (6th Cir. 2007) Introduction Johnny O. Clark v. Robert...
Clarification of Mail Fraud Elements and Use of Fire Under 18 U.S.C. § 844(h): United States v. McAuliffe

Clarification of Mail Fraud Elements and Use of Fire Under 18 U.S.C. § 844(h): United States v. McAuliffe

Date: Jun 23, 2007
Clarification of Mail Fraud Elements and Use of Fire Under 18 U.S.C. § 844(h): United States v. McAuliffe Introduction In the case of United States v. McAuliffe, 490 F.3d 526 (6th Cir. 2007), the...
Waiver of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Challenge Through Amended Complaint under Magnuson-Moss Act: Gentek v. Sherwin-Williams

Waiver of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Challenge Through Amended Complaint under Magnuson-Moss Act: Gentek v. Sherwin-Williams

Date: Jun 21, 2007
Waiver of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Challenge Through Amended Complaint under Magnuson-Moss Act: Gentek v. Sherwin-Williams Introduction In the case of Gentek Building Products, Inc. v....
Clarifying the 'Sole Reason' Requirement in Disability Discrimination Under the Rehabilitation Act: Jones v. Potter

Clarifying the 'Sole Reason' Requirement in Disability Discrimination Under the Rehabilitation Act: Jones v. Potter

Date: Jun 21, 2007
Clarifying the 'Sole Reason' Requirement in Disability Discrimination Under the Rehabilitation Act: Jones v. Potter Introduction In Eric Jones v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, the United States...
ADA Barred Against Individual Government Officials: An Analysis of Williams v. McLemore

ADA Barred Against Individual Government Officials: An Analysis of Williams v. McLemore

Date: Jun 20, 2007
ADA Barred Against Individual Government Officials: An Analysis of Williams v. McLemore Introduction In the landmark case Williams v. McLemore, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Strickland Revisited: Enhancing the Duty of Defense Counsel in Witness Investigation

Strickland Revisited: Enhancing the Duty of Defense Counsel in Witness Investigation

Date: Jun 19, 2007
Strickland Revisited: Enhancing the Duty of Defense Counsel in Witness Investigation Introduction The case of Patrico Ramonez v. Mary Berghuis, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmation of Criminal Convictions and Clarification on Jury Taint and Ineffective Assistance Standards in Cross v. Stovall

Affirmation of Criminal Convictions and Clarification on Jury Taint and Ineffective Assistance Standards in Cross v. Stovall

Date: Jun 15, 2007
Affirmation of Criminal Convictions and Clarification on Jury Taint and Ineffective Assistance Standards in Cross v. Stovall Introduction Barbara Jean Cross appealed her convictions for conspiracy to...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert