Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Failure-to-Train Liability Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Insights from Harvey v. Campbell County

Failure-to-Train Liability Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Insights from Harvey v. Campbell County

Date: May 11, 2011
Failure-to-Train Liability Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Insights from Harvey v. Campbell County Introduction Harvey v. Campbell County is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
United States v. Galaviz: Interpretation of Fourth Amendment Exceptions and Sentencing Guidelines in Criminal History Calculation

United States v. Galaviz: Interpretation of Fourth Amendment Exceptions and Sentencing Guidelines in Criminal History Calculation

Date: May 7, 2011
United States v. Galaviz: Interpretation of Fourth Amendment Exceptions and Sentencing Guidelines in Criminal History Calculation Introduction United States v. Jose Galaviz is a pivotal case decided...
Rational Basis Review Upholds Kentucky's Presumptive Abandonment Period for Traveler's Checks

Rational Basis Review Upholds Kentucky's Presumptive Abandonment Period for Traveler's Checks

Date: May 6, 2011
Rational Basis Review Upholds Kentucky's Presumptive Abandonment Period for Traveler's Checks Introduction The case of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. v. Commonwealth of...
Application of Mootness Doctrine in Disability Accommodation: Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University

Application of Mootness Doctrine in Disability Accommodation: Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University

Date: May 5, 2011
Application of Mootness Doctrine in Disability Accommodation: Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Introduction The case of Micah Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees revolves...
ERISA Plan Language Precludes Consideration of External Claims: Farhner v. United Transportation Union (6th Cir. 2011)

ERISA Plan Language Precludes Consideration of External Claims: Farhner v. United Transportation Union (6th Cir. 2011)

Date: May 4, 2011
ERISA Plan Language Precludes Consideration of External Claims: Farhner v. United Transportation Union Discipline Income Protection Program (6th Cir. 2011) Introduction In Mark Farhner v. United...
Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Application of Ohio Rule 5(A) in Stone v. Moore

Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Application of Ohio Rule 5(A) in Stone v. Moore

Date: Apr 30, 2011
Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Application of Ohio Rule 5(A) in Stone v. Moore Introduction In the case of Jackie Stone v. Ernie Moore, 644 F.3d 342 (6th Cir. 2011), the United States Court of...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Habeas Corpus: BRAY v. ANDREWS (6th Cir. 2011)

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Habeas Corpus: BRAY v. ANDREWS (6th Cir. 2011)

Date: Apr 27, 2011
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Habeas Corpus: BRAY v. ANDREWS (6th Cir. 2011) Introduction Court: United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Date: April 26, 2011 Sabrina Bray was convicted...
Khozhaynova v. Holder: Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries for Timely Asylum Applications

Khozhaynova v. Holder: Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries for Timely Asylum Applications

Date: Apr 21, 2011
Khozhaynova v. Holder: Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries for Timely Asylum Applications Introduction The case of Valentia Sergeiyevna Khozhaynova and Alexander Khozhaynova v. Eric H. Holder,...
Braswell v. Corrections Corporation of America: Defining Availability of Administrative Remedies and Corporate Policies in §1983 Eighth Amendment Claims

Braswell v. Corrections Corporation of America: Defining Availability of Administrative Remedies and Corporate Policies in §1983 Eighth Amendment Claims

Date: Apr 16, 2011
Braswell v. Corrections Corporation of America: Defining Availability of Administrative Remedies and Corporate Policies in §1983 Eighth Amendment Claims Introduction Braswell v. Corrections...
Reynolds-Bey v. Harris-Spicer: Clarifying PLRA Exhaustion and Judicial Immunity in Prisoner Retaliation Claims

Reynolds-Bey v. Harris-Spicer: Clarifying PLRA Exhaustion and Judicial Immunity in Prisoner Retaliation Claims

Date: Apr 14, 2011
Reynolds-Bey v. Harris-Spicer: Clarifying PLRA Exhaustion and Judicial Immunity in Prisoner Retaliation Claims Introduction Reynolds-Bey v. Harris-Spicer, 428 F. App'x 493 (6th Cir. 2011), is a...
Affirmation of Accessory After the Fact and Misprision Convictions in United States v. Boyd

Affirmation of Accessory After the Fact and Misprision Convictions in United States v. Boyd

Date: Apr 8, 2011
Affirmation of Accessory After the Fact and Misprision Convictions in United States v. Boyd Introduction The case of United States of America v. Eric Dewayne Boyd, 640 F.3d 657 (6th Cir. 2011),...
Reversing the Favorable Termination Rule: Taylor v. Lantagne and Its Implications on §1983 Retaliation Claims

Reversing the Favorable Termination Rule: Taylor v. Lantagne and Its Implications on §1983 Retaliation Claims

Date: Apr 6, 2011
Reversing the Favorable Termination Rule: Taylor v. Lantagne and Its Implications on §1983 Retaliation Claims Introduction The case of Ricky A. Taylor v. C. Lantagne addresses pivotal issues...
Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security: Mandating Comprehensive Impairment Analysis in Disability Determinations

Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security: Mandating Comprehensive Impairment Analysis in Disability Determinations

Date: Apr 2, 2011
Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security: Mandating Comprehensive Impairment Analysis in Disability Determinations Introduction In the case of Maryanne Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security,...
Affirmation of Managerial Role Enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(b) in Drug Conspiracy Sentencing

Affirmation of Managerial Role Enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(b) in Drug Conspiracy Sentencing

Date: Mar 31, 2011
Affirmation of Managerial Role Enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(b) in Drug Conspiracy Sentencing Introduction The case of United States of America v. Lindell Brown (417 F. App'x 488) adjudicated by...
Affirmation of the "Sole Reason" Standard in ADA Employment Discrimination: Whitfield v. Tennessee Department of Mental Health

Affirmation of the "Sole Reason" Standard in ADA Employment Discrimination: Whitfield v. Tennessee Department of Mental Health

Date: Mar 26, 2011
Affirmation of the "Sole Reason" Standard in ADA Employment Discrimination: Whitfield v. Tennessee Department of Mental Health Introduction Whitfield v. Tennessee Department of Mental Health is a...
Kennedy v. City of Villa Hills: Sixth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity for Retaliatory and Wrongful Arrest Claims

Kennedy v. City of Villa Hills: Sixth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity for Retaliatory and Wrongful Arrest Claims

Date: Mar 25, 2011
Kennedy v. City of Villa Hills: Sixth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity for Retaliatory and Wrongful Arrest Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Kennedy v. City of Villa Hills, the United...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under PLRA: Risher v. Har

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under PLRA: Risher v. Har

Date: Mar 22, 2011
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under PLRA: Risher v. Har Introduction Richard Carlton Risher v. Harvey Lappin, 639 F.3d 236 (6th Cir. 2011), is a notable case addressing the procedural...
Reinterpreting 'Proceeds' for Money Laundering Charges: United States v. Darrell Crosgrove

Reinterpreting 'Proceeds' for Money Laundering Charges: United States v. Darrell Crosgrove

Date: Mar 19, 2011
Reinterpreting 'Proceeds' for Money Laundering Charges: United States v. Darrell Crosgrove Introduction In United States v. Darrell Crosgrove (637 F.3d 646), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Residual Functional Capacity and Substantial Evidence: Sixth Circuit Affirms SSA Disability Denial in Oliver v. Commissioner

Residual Functional Capacity and Substantial Evidence: Sixth Circuit Affirms SSA Disability Denial in Oliver v. Commissioner

Date: Mar 18, 2011
Residual Functional Capacity and Substantial Evidence: Sixth Circuit Affirms SSA Disability Denial in Oliver v. Commissioner Introduction Belinda A. Oliver, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commissioner of...
Reinforcement of the Substantial Evidence Standard and Treatment of Conflicting Medical Opinions in Social Security Disability Evaluations

Reinforcement of the Substantial Evidence Standard and Treatment of Conflicting Medical Opinions in Social Security Disability Evaluations

Date: Mar 17, 2011
Reinforcement of the Substantial Evidence Standard and Treatment of Conflicting Medical Opinions in Social Security Disability Evaluations Introduction The case of Darrell C. Francis v. Commissioner...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert