Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Carter v. Mitchell

Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Carter v. Mitchell

Date: Sep 7, 2012
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Carter v. Mitchell Introduction Cedric Carter v. Betty Mitchell, Warden is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. § 1519: Sixth Circuit Affirms No Nexus Requirement

Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. § 1519: Sixth Circuit Affirms No Nexus Requirement

Date: Sep 1, 2012
Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. § 1519: Sixth Circuit Affirms No Nexus Requirement Introduction The case of United States of America v. John E. Gray examines critical aspects of federal statutes...
Strengthening Pleading Standards for Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Okolo v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville

Strengthening Pleading Standards for Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Okolo v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville

Date: Aug 31, 2012
Strengthening Pleading Standards for Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Okolo v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville Introduction Oranefo Okolo, the plaintiff, initiated a...
6th Circuit Upholds Employer's Progressive Discipline in Retaliation Suit – Tingle v. Arbors at Hilliard

6th Circuit Upholds Employer's Progressive Discipline in Retaliation Suit – Tingle v. Arbors at Hilliard

Date: Aug 30, 2012
6th Circuit Upholds Employer's Progressive Discipline in Retaliation Suit – Tingle v. Arbors at Hilliard Introduction In the case of Carole A. Tingle v. Arbors at Hilliard; Hilliard Care, LLC; and...
Enhanced Fair Cross-Section in Jury Selection: AMBROSE v. BOOKER Analysis

Enhanced Fair Cross-Section in Jury Selection: AMBROSE v. BOOKER Analysis

Date: Aug 30, 2012
Enhanced Fair Cross-Section in Jury Selection: AMBROSE v. BOOKER Analysis Introduction AMBROSE v. BOOKER is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on...
Affirmation of AEDPA Deference and Guilty Plea Waiver of Self-Representation Rights in Werth v. Bell

Affirmation of AEDPA Deference and Guilty Plea Waiver of Self-Representation Rights in Werth v. Bell

Date: Aug 29, 2012
Affirmation of AEDPA Deference and Guilty Plea Waiver of Self-Representation Rights in Werth v. Bell Introduction In Gerald L. Werth v. Thomas Bell, 692 F.3d 486 (6th Cir. 2012), the United States...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed When Conduct Does Not Constitute an Affirmative Act of Obstruction

Qualified Immunity Affirmed When Conduct Does Not Constitute an Affirmative Act of Obstruction

Date: Aug 25, 2012
Qualified Immunity Affirmed When Conduct Does Not Constitute an Affirmative Act of Obstruction Introduction The case of Judi Patrizi v. Scott W. Huff, Thomas W. Connole, decided by the United States...
Expansion of Cat's Paw Liability in Racial Discrimination Cases under Title VII

Expansion of Cat's Paw Liability in Racial Discrimination Cases under Title VII

Date: Aug 24, 2012
Expansion of Cat's Paw Liability in Racial Discrimination Cases under Title VII Introduction In the case of Everett Chattman v. Toho Tenax America, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Probable Cause and Execution Timing in Search Warrants: Insights from Archibald v. United States

Probable Cause and Execution Timing in Search Warrants: Insights from Archibald v. United States

Date: Aug 23, 2012
Probable Cause and Execution Timing in Search Warrants: Insights from Archibald v. United States Introduction In the appellate case United States of America v. Robert Lee Archibald, Jr., aka Chan;...
False Representation in Mortgage Foreclosure: Sixth Circuit Reverses Dismissal under FDCPA

False Representation in Mortgage Foreclosure: Sixth Circuit Reverses Dismissal under FDCPA

Date: Aug 23, 2012
False Representation in Mortgage Foreclosure: Sixth Circuit Reverses Dismissal under FDCPA Introduction The case of Betty Wallace v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.; Wells Fargo Bank N.A.; Lerner,...
Reversing Summary Judgment in Title VII Race-Discrimination Case: Griffin v. Finkbeiner

Reversing Summary Judgment in Title VII Race-Discrimination Case: Griffin v. Finkbeiner

Date: Aug 21, 2012
Reversing Summary Judgment in Title VII Race-Discrimination Case: Griffin v. Finkbeiner Introduction In the landmark case of Perlean Griffin; Dwayne Morehead, Plaintiffs, Gary L. Daugherty,...
Class-of-One Equal Protection Claim in Zoning Ordinances: Loesel v. City of Frankenmuth

Class-of-One Equal Protection Claim in Zoning Ordinances: Loesel v. City of Frankenmuth

Date: Aug 21, 2012
Class-of-One Equal Protection Claim in Zoning Ordinances: Loesel v. City of Frankenmuth Introduction The case of Ronald Loesel et al. v. City of Frankenmuth (692 F.3d 452, 6th Cir. 2012) presents a...
First Amendment Retaliation in Correctional Facilities: Establishing Accountability in Ke v. KING

First Amendment Retaliation in Correctional Facilities: Establishing Accountability in Ke v. KING

Date: Aug 17, 2012
First Amendment Retaliation in Correctional Facilities: Establishing Accountability in Ke v. KING Introduction Ke v. KING, (680 F.3d 686), is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals...
6th Circuit Reinforces Sufficiency of Evidence Standard in Extortion Convictions – NALI v. PHILLIPS

6th Circuit Reinforces Sufficiency of Evidence Standard in Extortion Convictions – NALI v. PHILLIPS

Date: Aug 17, 2012
6th Circuit Reinforces Sufficiency of Evidence Standard in Extortion Convictions – NALI v. PHILLIPS Introduction The case of Frank Nali v. Thomas Phillips (681 F.3d 837, 6th Cir. 2012) presents a...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Denial of Fair Use Defense and Upholds Copyright Infringement in Bosley v. Larry Flynt Publications

Sixth Circuit Affirms Denial of Fair Use Defense and Upholds Copyright Infringement in Bosley v. Larry Flynt Publications

Date: Aug 17, 2012
Sixth Circuit Affirms Denial of Fair Use Defense and Upholds Copyright Infringement in Bosley v. Larry Flynt Publications Introduction In the case of Catherine Balsley (a/k/a Catherine Bosley) and...
No Fourth Amendment Violation in GPS Cell Phone Tracking: Analysis of United States v. Skinner

No Fourth Amendment Violation in GPS Cell Phone Tracking: Analysis of United States v. Skinner

Date: Aug 15, 2012
No Fourth Amendment Violation in GPS Cell Phone Tracking: Analysis of United States v. Skinner Introduction United States v. Skinner, 690 F.3d 772 (6th Cir. 2012), addresses the critical intersection...
Green v. Throckmorton: Establishing Standards for Reasonable Suspicion and Qualified Immunity in DUI Arrests

Green v. Throckmorton: Establishing Standards for Reasonable Suspicion and Qualified Immunity in DUI Arrests

Date: Aug 14, 2012
Green v. Throckmorton: Establishing Standards for Reasonable Suspicion and Qualified Immunity in DUI Arrests Introduction In Green v. Throckmorton, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Enhanced First Amendment Protections for Public Employees: Insights from Mosholder v. Barnhardt

Enhanced First Amendment Protections for Public Employees: Insights from Mosholder v. Barnhardt

Date: Aug 11, 2012
Enhanced First Amendment Protections for Public Employees: Insights from Mosholder v. Barnhardt Introduction Mosholder v. Barnhardt is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Establishing Mixed-Motive Discrimination Claims: Ondricko v. MGM Grand Detroit

Establishing Mixed-Motive Discrimination Claims: Ondricko v. MGM Grand Detroit

Date: Aug 9, 2012
Establishing Mixed-Motive Discrimination Claims: Ondricko v. MGM Grand Detroit Introduction In the seminal case of Kimberly C. Ondricko v. MGM Grand Detroit, LLC, decided by the United States Court...
Affirmation of Denial of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Case: Austin v. Redford Township Police Department

Affirmation of Denial of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Case: Austin v. Redford Township Police Department

Date: Aug 9, 2012
Affirmation of Denial of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Case: Austin v. Redford Township Police Department Introduction In the appellate case Charles Fitzgerald Austin v. Redford Township...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert