Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Deference in Reviewing Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from United States v. Sherry Washington

Deference in Reviewing Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from United States v. Sherry Washington

Date: May 15, 2013
Deference in Reviewing Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from United States v. Sherry Washington Introduction United States v. Sherry Washington, 715 F.3d 975 (6th Cir. 2013), is a pivotal case that...
PLIVA Inc. v. Fulgenzi: Establishing Exceptions to Preemption in Generic Drug Liability

PLIVA Inc. v. Fulgenzi: Establishing Exceptions to Preemption in Generic Drug Liability

Date: May 14, 2013
PLIVA Inc. v. Fulgenzi: Establishing Exceptions to Preemption in Generic Drug Liability Introduction In Eleanor Fulgenzi v. PLIVA, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...
Career Offender Status Precludes Sentence Reduction Under §3582(c)(2) Following Guideline Amendments

Career Offender Status Precludes Sentence Reduction Under §3582(c)(2) Following Guideline Amendments

Date: May 7, 2013
Career Offender Status Precludes Sentence Reduction Under §3582(c)(2) Following Guideline Amendments Introduction The case of United States of America v. Keith Thompson, Jr. (714 F.3d 946) serves as...
Enhancement Under USSG § 2G2.2(b)(5) and Resentencing Vindictiveness: United States v. Johnson, Jr.

Enhancement Under USSG § 2G2.2(b)(5) and Resentencing Vindictiveness: United States v. Johnson, Jr.

Date: May 4, 2013
Enhancement Under USSG § 2G2.2(b)(5) and Resentencing Vindictiveness: United States v. Johnson, Jr. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Robert T. Johnson, Jr. (715 F.3d 179) examines...
Reinforcing the Weight of Treating-Source Medical Opinions in Social Security Disability Claims: Gayheart v. Commissioner of Social Security

Reinforcing the Weight of Treating-Source Medical Opinions in Social Security Disability Claims: Gayheart v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: May 3, 2013
Reinforcing the Weight of Treating-Source Medical Opinions in Social Security Disability Claims: Gayheart v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction In the case of Charles Gayheart v....
Uniform Fiduciaries Act’s Affirmative Defense in Fiduciary Misconduct Cases

Uniform Fiduciaries Act’s Affirmative Defense in Fiduciary Misconduct Cases

Date: May 1, 2013
Uniform Fiduciaries Act’s Affirmative Defense in Fiduciary Misconduct Cases Introduction The case Estate of William R. Barney, Jr. v. PNC Bank, National Association (714 F.3d 920) addresses the...
Strict Deference Under AEDPA Affirmed in MOORE v. MITCHELL

Strict Deference Under AEDPA Affirmed in MOORE v. MITCHELL

Date: Apr 25, 2013
Strict Deference Under AEDPA Affirmed in MOORE v. MITCHELL Introduction MOORE v. MITCHELL, 708 F.3d 760 (6th Cir. 2013), serves as a pivotal case in understanding the boundaries of federal habeas...
Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent on Fairness and Adequacy in Class Action Settlements

Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent on Fairness and Adequacy in Class Action Settlements

Date: Apr 20, 2013
Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent on Fairness and Adequacy in Class Action Settlements Introduction In the landmark case Martha Vassalle et al. v. Midland Funding LLC et al., the United States Court of...
Establishing Nexus in Search Warrants: Insights from United States v. Kenneth Rose

Establishing Nexus in Search Warrants: Insights from United States v. Kenneth Rose

Date: Apr 19, 2013
Establishing Nexus in Search Warrants: Insights from United States v. Kenneth Rose Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Kenneth Rose, decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Retaliation Claims in Employment Disputes: Insights from Fuhr v. Hazel Park School District

Retaliation Claims in Employment Disputes: Insights from Fuhr v. Hazel Park School District

Date: Apr 13, 2013
Retaliation Claims in Employment Disputes: Insights from Fuhr v. Hazel Park School District Introduction The case of Geraldine A. Fuhr v. Hazel Park School District (710 F.3d 668) adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Warf v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Establishes Standards for Hostile Work Environment Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Warf v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Establishes Standards for Hostile Work Environment Claims

Date: Apr 12, 2013
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Warf v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Establishes Standards for Hostile Work Environment Claims Introduction Warf v. United States Department of Veterans...
Setting Aside Foreclosure Sales: High Standards Post-Redemption Period Lapse

Setting Aside Foreclosure Sales: High Standards Post-Redemption Period Lapse

Date: Apr 11, 2013
Setting Aside Foreclosure Sales: High Standards Post-Redemption Period Lapse Introduction The case of Michael J. Conlin v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) addresses critical...
Affirmation of Excessive Force Liability in Police Arrest: Martin v. City of Broadview Heights

Affirmation of Excessive Force Liability in Police Arrest: Martin v. City of Broadview Heights

Date: Apr 10, 2013
Affirmation of Excessive Force Liability in Police Arrest: Martin v. City of Broadview Heights 1. Introduction The case of Tanya A. Martin, Administratrix of the Estate of William Parker Martin,...
Reinforcing Securities Regulations in Reverse Merger Schemes: SEC v. Sierra Brokerage Services, Inc.

Reinforcing Securities Regulations in Reverse Merger Schemes: SEC v. Sierra Brokerage Services, Inc.

Date: Apr 5, 2013
Reinforcing Securities Regulations in Reverse Merger Schemes: SEC v. Sierra Brokerage Services, Inc. Introduction The case of United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. Sierra...
Reaffirming Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Reaffirming Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Apr 5, 2013
Reaffirming Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction The case of Dwayne Ballinger, Jr. v. John Prelesnik (709 F.3d 558) presents significant...
Retaliation Claims and Adverse Actions: Insights from A.C. v. Shelby County Board of Education

Retaliation Claims and Adverse Actions: Insights from A.C. v. Shelby County Board of Education

Date: Apr 2, 2013
Retaliation Claims and Adverse Actions: Insights from A.C. v. Shelby County Board of Education Introduction In the landmark case of A.C., by her next friend and mother, J.C., and father, B.C.; J.C....
Federal Habeas Corpus Relief Granted in Lovins v. Parker Based on Blakely Violation

Federal Habeas Corpus Relief Granted in Lovins v. Parker Based on Blakely Violation

Date: Mar 29, 2013
Federal Habeas Corpus Relief Granted in Lovins v. Parker Based on Blakely Violation Introduction In the case of Derry Lovins v. Tony Parker (712 F.3d 283, 6th Cir. 2013), the United States Court of...
Coley v. Bagley: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Judicial Impartiality in Federal Habeas Corpus Appeals

Coley v. Bagley: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Judicial Impartiality in Federal Habeas Corpus Appeals

Date: Mar 29, 2013
Coley v. Bagley: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Judicial Impartiality in Federal Habeas Corpus Appeals Introduction In Coley v. Bagley, the United States...
Total and Permanent Disability Standards under ERISA: Sixth Circuit Affirms MetLife's Denial in Thomas Judge Case

Total and Permanent Disability Standards under ERISA: Sixth Circuit Affirms MetLife's Denial in Thomas Judge Case

Date: Mar 26, 2013
Total and Permanent Disability Standards under ERISA: Sixth Circuit Affirms MetLife's Denial in Thomas Judge Case Introduction The case of Thomas Judge v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (710...
Perceived Political Affiliation Retaliation in Employment: Analysis of Dye v. Office of the Racing Commission

Perceived Political Affiliation Retaliation in Employment: Analysis of Dye v. Office of the Racing Commission

Date: Mar 20, 2013
Perceived Political Affiliation Retaliation in Employment: Analysis of Dye v. Office of the Racing Commission Introduction In the case of Jeff Dye, Tammie Erskine, Patrick Hall, and Eric Perttunen v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert