Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Alleyne v. United States: Implications on Successive § 2255 Petitions

Alleyne v. United States: Implications on Successive § 2255 Petitions

Date: Jun 25, 2014
Alleyne v. United States: Implications on Successive § 2255 Petitions Introduction In In re Anthony Mazzio, Movant. (756 F.3d 487), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit addressed...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Neileigh Regets v. City of Plymouth

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Neileigh Regets v. City of Plymouth

Date: Jun 11, 2014
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Neileigh Regets v. City of Plymouth Introduction The case of Neileigh Regets v. City of Plymouth revolves around allegations made by Neileigh Regets against the...
Establishing Immunity Boundaries in Fabrication and Concealment Claims: LeFever v. Ferguson

Establishing Immunity Boundaries in Fabrication and Concealment Claims: LeFever v. Ferguson

Date: Jun 7, 2014
Establishing Immunity Boundaries in Fabrication and Concealment Claims: LeFever v. Ferguson Introduction In the landmark case of ALEX LEFEVER, Plaintiff-Appellee, VIRGINIA LEFEVER, Plaintiff-Appellee...
Affirmation of Distinct Distinctions Between 'Extend' and 'Renew' Options in Ohio Oil and Gas Leases

Affirmation of Distinct Distinctions Between 'Extend' and 'Renew' Options in Ohio Oil and Gas Leases

Date: Jun 7, 2014
Affirmation of Distinct Distinctions Between 'Extend' and 'Renew' Options in Ohio Oil and Gas Leases Introduction In the landmark case of Eastham v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C., cited as 754 F.3d...
Liberty Coins v. Goodman: Reaffirming Rational Basis in Business Regulation

Liberty Coins v. Goodman: Reaffirming Rational Basis in Business Regulation

Date: Jun 6, 2014
Liberty Coins v. Goodman: Reaffirming Rational Basis in Business Regulation Introduction In Liberty Coins, LLC; John Michael Tomaso v. Goodman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Reevaluation of Mandatory Minimums under the Modified Categorical Approach: Insights from United States v. Davis

Reevaluation of Mandatory Minimums under the Modified Categorical Approach: Insights from United States v. Davis

Date: May 29, 2014
Reevaluation of Mandatory Minimums under the Modified Categorical Approach: Insights from United States v. Davis Introduction United States v. Kevin A. Davis (751 F.3d 769, 6th Cir. 2014) is a...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Sixth Circuit's Decision on Operation Turnaround Civil Rights Claims

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Sixth Circuit's Decision on Operation Turnaround Civil Rights Claims

Date: May 29, 2014
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Sixth Circuit's Decision on Operation Turnaround Civil Rights Claims Introduction The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case of Johnny Robertson et al. v. Lee...
Affirmation of Conspiracy and Mail Fraud Convictions: Insights from United States v. Smith (6th Cir. 2014)

Affirmation of Conspiracy and Mail Fraud Convictions: Insights from United States v. Smith (6th Cir. 2014)

Date: May 21, 2014
Affirmation of Conspiracy and Mail Fraud Convictions: Insights from United States v. Smith (6th Cir. 2014) 1. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Christopher Cello Smith and Michael...
Sixth Circuit Upholds Princess Lida Doctrine in Trust Administration Dispute

Sixth Circuit Upholds Princess Lida Doctrine in Trust Administration Dispute

Date: May 17, 2014
Sixth Circuit Upholds Princess Lida Doctrine in Trust Administration Dispute Introduction In Alan C. Cartwright v. Alan L. Garner et al., 751 F.3d 752 (6th Cir. 2014), the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Legitimate Business Need for Consumer Reports under FCRA: Bickley v. Dish Network

Affirmation of Legitimate Business Need for Consumer Reports under FCRA: Bickley v. Dish Network

Date: May 14, 2014
Affirmation of Legitimate Business Need for Consumer Reports under FCRA: Bickley v. Dish Network Introduction Gregory Bickley v. Dish Network, LLC is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States...
Limitations on Rule 60(b) Motions in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: TYLER v. ANDERSON

Limitations on Rule 60(b) Motions in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: TYLER v. ANDERSON

Date: May 14, 2014
Limitations on Rule 60(b) Motions in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: TYLER v. ANDERSON Introduction Arthur Tyler, an Ohio inmate sentenced to death for the 1983 murder of Sander Leach, sought...
6th Circuit Holds FECA Does Not Preempt State Fraud and Larceny Convictions in Campaign Fund Misuse

6th Circuit Holds FECA Does Not Preempt State Fraud and Larceny Convictions in Campaign Fund Misuse

Date: May 10, 2014
6th Circuit Holds FECA Does Not Preempt State Fraud and Larceny Convictions in Campaign Fund Misuse Introduction In Jerome Westfield Dewald v. Gene Wriggelsworth, 748 F.3d 295 (6th Cir. 2014), the...
Establishing Municipal Liability under Brady Obligations: An Analysis of D'Ambrosio v. Marino

Establishing Municipal Liability under Brady Obligations: An Analysis of D'Ambrosio v. Marino

Date: May 9, 2014
Establishing Municipal Liability under Brady Obligations: An Analysis of D'Ambrosio v. Marino Introduction In the landmark case Joe D'Ambrosio v. Carmen Marino, et al., the United States Court of...
6th Circuit Establishes Enhanced Scrutiny for Preliminary Injunctions in Municipal Benefit Reduction Cases

6th Circuit Establishes Enhanced Scrutiny for Preliminary Injunctions in Municipal Benefit Reduction Cases

Date: May 6, 2014
6th Circuit Establishes Enhanced Scrutiny for Preliminary Injunctions in Municipal Benefit Reduction Cases Introduction In the case of City of Pontiac Retired Employees Association et al. v....
Establishing the Weight of Direct and Circumstantial Evidence in Employment Discrimination: Brewer v. New Era, Inc.

Establishing the Weight of Direct and Circumstantial Evidence in Employment Discrimination: Brewer v. New Era, Inc.

Date: Apr 30, 2014
Establishing the Weight of Direct and Circumstantial Evidence in Employment Discrimination: Brewer v. New Era, Inc. Introduction In Brewer v. New Era, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
6th Circuit Sets Precedent on First Amendment Retaliation in Prison Administrative Actions

6th Circuit Sets Precedent on First Amendment Retaliation in Prison Administrative Actions

Date: Apr 22, 2014
6th Circuit Sets Precedent on First Amendment Retaliation in Prison Administrative Actions Introduction In the case of Randle Griffin v. Mary K. Berghuis, et al., the United States Court of Appeals...
Substantial Justification in EAJA Attorney Fee Awards: DeLong v. SSA

Substantial Justification in EAJA Attorney Fee Awards: DeLong v. SSA

Date: Apr 10, 2014
Substantial Justification in EAJA Attorney Fee Awards: DeLong v. SSA Introduction The case of Berniece J. DeLong v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (748 F.3d 723) adjudicated by the...
Treating Diversionary Pleas as Prior Convictions under 21 U.S.C. § 841: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Pritchett et al.

Treating Diversionary Pleas as Prior Convictions under 21 U.S.C. § 841: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Pritchett et al.

Date: Apr 10, 2014
Treating Diversionary Pleas as Prior Convictions under 21 U.S.C. § 841: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Pritchett et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Harry Allen...
Judicial Discretion in Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of United States v. Kamper and Head

Judicial Discretion in Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of United States v. Kamper and Head

Date: Apr 10, 2014
Judicial Discretion in Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of United States v. Kamper and Head Introduction The case of United States of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Glenn Kamper and Joe Head,...
Reaffirming Subjective Knowledge in Deliberate Indifference Claims: Rouster v. County of Saginaw

Reaffirming Subjective Knowledge in Deliberate Indifference Claims: Rouster v. County of Saginaw

Date: Apr 10, 2014
Reaffirming Subjective Knowledge in Deliberate Indifference Claims: Rouster v. County of Saginaw Introduction The case of Daniel Rouster, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jerry Rouster,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert