Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Direct Evidence of Age-Based Animus Creates Triable Issue in ADEA Claims: Scheick v. Tecumseh Public Schools

Direct Evidence of Age-Based Animus Creates Triable Issue in ADEA Claims: Scheick v. Tecumseh Public Schools

Date: Sep 3, 2014
Direct Evidence of Age-Based Animus Creates Triable Issue in ADEA Claims: Scheick v. Tecumseh Public Schools Introduction In the case of Robert Scheick v. Tecumseh Public Schools; Professional...
Expanding First Amendment Protections: Standing in Pre-Enforcement Challenges - Kiser v. Reitz

Expanding First Amendment Protections: Standing in Pre-Enforcement Challenges - Kiser v. Reitz

Date: Aug 28, 2014
Expanding First Amendment Protections: Standing in Pre-Enforcement Challenges - Kiser v. Reitz Introduction In Kiser v. Reitz, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit addressed a...
6th Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on Ballot Access Laws: Green Party v. Hargett

6th Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on Ballot Access Laws: Green Party v. Hargett

Date: Aug 23, 2014
6th Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on Ballot Access Laws: Green Party v. Hargett Introduction The case of Green Party of Tennessee and Constitution Party of Tennessee v. Tre Hargett addresses...
Ensuring Proper Notice under FMLA: Insights from Wallace v. FedEx Corp.

Ensuring Proper Notice under FMLA: Insights from Wallace v. FedEx Corp.

Date: Aug 23, 2014
Ensuring Proper Notice under FMLA: Insights from Wallace v. FedEx Corp. Introduction Wallace v. FedEx Corporation (764 F.3d 571), adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Absolute Judicial Immunity Reinforced in Bright v. Gallia County

Absolute Judicial Immunity Reinforced in Bright v. Gallia County

Date: Aug 23, 2014
Absolute Judicial Immunity Reinforced in Bright v. Gallia County Introduction Bright v. Gallia County is a landmark case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on August...
Good Faith Exception Upholds Conviction Despite Probable Cause Challenges: Analysis of United States v. Neal

Good Faith Exception Upholds Conviction Despite Probable Cause Challenges: Analysis of United States v. Neal

Date: Aug 19, 2014
Good Faith Exception Upholds Conviction Despite Probable Cause Challenges: Analysis of United States v. Neal Introduction United States v. Merrell Neal, 577 F. App'x 434 (6th Cir. 2014), serves as a...
Establishing Private Contractors as State Actors in Prison Healthcare: Carl v. Muskegon County

Establishing Private Contractors as State Actors in Prison Healthcare: Carl v. Muskegon County

Date: Aug 16, 2014
Establishing Private Contractors as State Actors in Prison Healthcare: Carl v. Muskegon County Introduction Carl v. Muskegon County, 763 F.3d 592 (6th Cir. 2014), is a pivotal case addressing the...
6th Circuit Clarifies Ohio Statutory Immunity in Negligent Supervision of Morgue Employee

6th Circuit Clarifies Ohio Statutory Immunity in Negligent Supervision of Morgue Employee

Date: Aug 16, 2014
6th Circuit Clarifies Ohio Statutory Immunity in Negligent Supervision of Morgue Employee Introduction In the case of RANGE et al. v. DOUGLAS et al. (12–3857, 12–4190 & 12–4192), the United States...
6th Circuit Establishes RLUIPA Does Not Permit Monetary Damages Against Prison Officials

6th Circuit Establishes RLUIPA Does Not Permit Monetary Damages Against Prison Officials

Date: Aug 16, 2014
6th Circuit Establishes RLUIPA Does Not Permit Monetary Damages Against Prison Officials Introduction In the landmark case Randy Haight v. Ladonna Thompson, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
United States v. Fields et al.: Affirming RICO Convictions and Government Discretion in Plea Agreements

United States v. Fields et al.: Affirming RICO Convictions and Government Discretion in Plea Agreements

Date: Aug 14, 2014
United States v. Fields et al.: Affirming RICO Convictions and Government Discretion in Plea Agreements Introduction In United States v. Demetrius Fields, Clinton Lewis, and Martin Lewis (13–5150,...
Glenn v. Commissioner of Social Security: Reversal of EAJA Attorney's Fees Denial

Glenn v. Commissioner of Social Security: Reversal of EAJA Attorney's Fees Denial

Date: Aug 14, 2014
Glenn v. Commissioner of Social Security: Reversal of EAJA Attorney's Fees Denial Introduction The case of Salena Glenn v. Commissioner of Social Security addresses the denial of Glenn's application...
Establishing Causation in Retaliation Claims through Temporal Proximity: Montell v. Diversified Clinical Services

Establishing Causation in Retaliation Claims through Temporal Proximity: Montell v. Diversified Clinical Services

Date: Aug 14, 2014
Establishing Causation in Retaliation Claims through Temporal Proximity: Montell v. Diversified Clinical Services Introduction The case of Marla Montell v. Diversified Clinical Services, Inc....
Noble v. United States: Reevaluating Reasonable Suspicion in Traffic Frisk Scenarios

Noble v. United States: Reevaluating Reasonable Suspicion in Traffic Frisk Scenarios

Date: Aug 9, 2014
Noble v. United States: Reevaluating Reasonable Suspicion in Traffic Frisk Scenarios Introduction The case of United States v. Noble, Adkins, and Brooks (13–6056, 13–6057, 13–6156) adjudicated by the...
Invalid Judgment Lien as Unfair Debt Collection Practice under FDCPA

Invalid Judgment Lien as Unfair Debt Collection Practice under FDCPA

Date: Aug 9, 2014
Invalid Judgment Lien as Unfair Debt Collection Practice under FDCPA Introduction The case of Roslyn Currier v. First Resolution Investment Corp. (762 F.3d 529, 6th Cir. 2014) marks a significant...
Enforcement of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Requirements Post-Alleyne: Insights from United States v. DaQuann Hackett

Enforcement of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Requirements Post-Alleyne: Insights from United States v. DaQuann Hackett

Date: Aug 8, 2014
Enforcement of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Requirements Post-Alleyne: Insights from United States v. DaQuann Hackett Introduction United States v. DaQuann Hackett, 762 F.3d 493 (6th Cir. 2014), is a...
Griffith v. Commissioner of Social Security: Reinforcing the Standards for Medically Determinable Mental Impairments

Griffith v. Commissioner of Social Security: Reinforcing the Standards for Medically Determinable Mental Impairments

Date: Aug 8, 2014
Griffith v. Commissioner of Social Security: Reinforcing the Standards for Medically Determinable Mental Impairments Introduction Griffith v. Commissioner of Social Security is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in McMullan v. Booker: Implications for Jury Instructions and Counsel Effectiveness

Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in McMullan v. Booker: Implications for Jury Instructions and Counsel Effectiveness

Date: Aug 6, 2014
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in McMullan v. Booker: Implications for Jury Instructions and Counsel Effectiveness Introduction The case of Angelo McMullan v. Raymond Booker, adjudicated by the...
Negligence in Data Preservation: Automated Solutions Corp. v. Paragon Data Systems, Inc.

Negligence in Data Preservation: Automated Solutions Corp. v. Paragon Data Systems, Inc.

Date: Aug 1, 2014
Negligence in Data Preservation: Automated Solutions Corp. v. Paragon Data Systems, Inc. Introduction The case of Automated Solutions Corporation (ASC) v. Paragon Data Systems, Inc., adjudicated by...
Clarifying Immunity Protections for Social Workers in Child Custody Proceedings: Insights from Young v. Vega

Clarifying Immunity Protections for Social Workers in Child Custody Proceedings: Insights from Young v. Vega

Date: Jul 31, 2014
Clarifying Immunity Protections for Social Workers in Child Custody Proceedings: Insights from Young v. Vega Introduction In the case of Gary Dale Young v. Patricia Vega, decided by the United States...
Qualified Immunity and Procedural Due Process: Distinguishing from the Parratt Doctrine in Daily Services, LLC v. Valentino et al.

Qualified Immunity and Procedural Due Process: Distinguishing from the Parratt Doctrine in Daily Services, LLC v. Valentino et al.

Date: Jul 31, 2014
Qualified Immunity and Procedural Due Process: Distinguishing from the Parratt Doctrine in Daily Services, LLC v. Valentino et al. Introduction The case of Daily Services, LLC v. Tracy Valentino et...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert