Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

No Extension for § 2255 Motion Pre-Filing: Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent

No Extension for § 2255 Motion Pre-Filing: Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent

Date: Jan 12, 2016
No Extension for § 2255 Motion Pre-Filing: Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent Introduction The case of United States of America v. Mario Jay Asakevich, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Balancing Particularity and Scope in Digital Evidence Searches: United States v. Rarick

Balancing Particularity and Scope in Digital Evidence Searches: United States v. Rarick

Date: Jan 8, 2016
Balancing Particularity and Scope in Digital Evidence Searches: United States v. Rarick Introduction United States v. Christopher D. Rarick is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Excessive Force: Low Courts Uphold 6th Circuit's Ruling in Kent v. Oakland County

Affirmation of Excessive Force: Low Courts Uphold 6th Circuit's Ruling in Kent v. Oakland County

Date: Jan 7, 2016
Affirmation of Excessive Force: Low Courts Uphold 6th Circuit's Ruling in Kent v. Oakland County Introduction In the landmark case Michael G. Kent v. Oakland County, the United States Court of...
Retroactive Application of Johnson v. United States in Successive Habeas Petitions under §2255: Analysis of In re Windy Watkins

Retroactive Application of Johnson v. United States in Successive Habeas Petitions under §2255: Analysis of In re Windy Watkins

Date: Dec 18, 2015
Retroactive Application of Johnson v. United States in Successive Habeas Petitions under §2255: Analysis of In re Windy Watkins Introduction In re Windy Watkins, 810 F.3d 375 (6th Cir. 2015), is a...
Enhancing Violent Felony Definitions: Insights from United States v. Donald Priddy

Enhancing Violent Felony Definitions: Insights from United States v. Donald Priddy

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Enhancing Violent Felony Definitions: Insights from United States v. Donald Priddy Introduction The case of United States of America v. Donald Eugene Priddy, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
New Precedent on FDA Preemption and the Learned Intermediary Doctrine in Yates v. Johnson & Johnson

New Precedent on FDA Preemption and the Learned Intermediary Doctrine in Yates v. Johnson & Johnson

Date: Dec 12, 2015
New Precedent on FDA Preemption and the Learned Intermediary Doctrine in Yates v. Johnson & Johnson Introduction The case of Stephanie Yates, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Ortho–McNeil–Janssen...
Enforcement of Contractual Limitations on Tort Claims in Products Liability Actions

Enforcement of Contractual Limitations on Tort Claims in Products Liability Actions

Date: Dec 12, 2015
Enforcement of Contractual Limitations on Tort Claims in Products Liability Actions Introduction The case of MASCO CABINETRY MIDDLEFIELD, LLC v. CEFLA NORTH AMERICA, INC. presents a pivotal...
Immunities and Jurisdiction: Insights from Global Technology Inc. v. Yubei Power Steering System Co. Ltd.

Immunities and Jurisdiction: Insights from Global Technology Inc. v. Yubei Power Steering System Co. Ltd.

Date: Dec 8, 2015
Immunities and Jurisdiction: Insights from Global Technology Inc. v. Yubei Power Steering System Co. Ltd. Introduction The case of Global Technology, Inc. v. Yubei (Xiangxiang) Power Steering System...
State University Immunity under the False Claims Act: Kreipke v. Wayne State University

State University Immunity under the False Claims Act: Kreipke v. Wayne State University

Date: Dec 5, 2015
State University Immunity under the False Claims Act: Kreipke v. Wayne State University Introduction The case of Christian Kreipke versus Wayne State University (WSU), adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of Immunity Protections for Social Workers in Child Protective Proceedings

Affirmation of Immunity Protections for Social Workers in Child Protective Proceedings

Date: Dec 3, 2015
Affirmation of Immunity Protections for Social Workers in Child Protective Proceedings Introduction The case of James Barber, Indi v. Miller (809 F.3d 840) adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Enhancing Habeas Corpus Accessibility Post-Resentencing: Insights from King v. Morgan

Enhancing Habeas Corpus Accessibility Post-Resentencing: Insights from King v. Morgan

Date: Dec 2, 2015
Enhancing Habeas Corpus Accessibility Post-Resentencing: Insights from King v. Morgan Introduction Delawrence King v. Donald Morgan, Warden, 807 F.3d 154 (6th Cir. 2015), represents a pivotal moment...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Cyranek v. Mullins: A Comprehensive Analysis

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Cyranek v. Mullins: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Nov 10, 2015
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Cyranek v. Mullins: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction In the case of Leona Mullins, Indi v. Cyranek, decided on November 9, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals...
Sixth Circuit Establishes Liability for Inadequate Training of LPN Nurses in Correctional Facilities

Sixth Circuit Establishes Liability for Inadequate Training of LPN Nurses in Correctional Facilities

Date: Nov 7, 2015
Sixth Circuit Establishes Liability for Inadequate Training of LPN Nurses in Correctional Facilities Introduction In the landmark decision of Shadrick v. Hopkins County, Kentucky, the United States...
No Heckler's Veto: Protecting Free Speech Against Mob Suppression

No Heckler's Veto: Protecting Free Speech Against Mob Suppression

Date: Oct 29, 2015
No Heckler's Veto: Protecting Free Speech Against Mob Suppression Introduction In the landmark case Bible Believers; Ruben Chavez v. Wayne County, cited as 805 F.3d 228, the United States Court of...
Trimble v. Da: The Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Juror Impartiality in Capital Sentencing

Trimble v. Da: The Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Juror Impartiality in Capital Sentencing

Date: Oct 23, 2015
Trimble v. Da: The Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Juror Impartiality in Capital Sentencing Introduction Trimble v. Da, 804 F.3d 767 (6th Cir. 2015), is a pivotal case in the Sixth Circuit...
Scope of Domestic-Relations and Probate Exceptions in Federal Diversity Jurisdiction

Scope of Domestic-Relations and Probate Exceptions in Federal Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: Oct 2, 2015
Scope of Domestic-Relations and Probate Exceptions in Federal Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction In the case of Caroline Chevalier v. Estate of Kimberly Barnhart, the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Class Certification in Probiotic False Advertising Case: Rikos v. Procter & Gamble

Affirmation of Class Certification in Probiotic False Advertising Case: Rikos v. Procter & Gamble

Date: Sep 30, 2015
Affirmation of Class Certification in Probiotic False Advertising Case: Rikos v. Procter & Gamble Introduction In the case of Dino Rikos et al. v. The Procter & Gamble Company, the United States...
Application of Law of the Case Doctrine and Enhanced Back-Pay Calculation in Howe v. City of Akron

Application of Law of the Case Doctrine and Enhanced Back-Pay Calculation in Howe v. City of Akron

Date: Sep 18, 2015
Application of Law of the Case Doctrine and Enhanced Back-Pay Calculation in Howe v. City of Akron Introduction Howe v. City of Akron is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Establishing Standing in Constitutional Claims: The Juggalos Case

Establishing Standing in Constitutional Claims: The Juggalos Case

Date: Sep 18, 2015
Establishing Standing in Constitutional Claims: The Juggalos Case Introduction The case of Mark Parsons et al. v. United States Department of Justice; Federal Bureau of Investigation (801 F.3d 701)...
Bridges v. United States: Affirming Reasonable Suspicion Standards in High Crime Areas

Bridges v. United States: Affirming Reasonable Suspicion Standards in High Crime Areas

Date: Sep 15, 2015
Bridges v. United States: Affirming Reasonable Suspicion Standards in High Crime Areas Introduction Bridges v. United States is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert