Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Summary Judgment Standards in Civil Rights Litigation: Bickerstaff v. Lucarelli et al.

Affirmation of Summary Judgment Standards in Civil Rights Litigation: Bickerstaff v. Lucarelli et al.

Date: Jul 22, 2016
Affirmation of Summary Judgment Standards in Civil Rights Litigation: Bickerstaff v. Lucarelli et al. Introduction In the case of Brenda Bickerstaff v. Vincent Lucarelli; Dennis Hill; Michael Legg;...
Affirming Rigorous Standards for Gang-Expert Testimony and RICO Sentencing Enhancements in United States v. Rios & Casillas

Affirming Rigorous Standards for Gang-Expert Testimony and RICO Sentencing Enhancements in United States v. Rios & Casillas

Date: Jul 22, 2016
Affirming Rigorous Standards for Gang-Expert Testimony and RICO Sentencing Enhancements in United States v. Rios & Casillas Introduction In the landmark appellate decision United States of America v....
Federal Supremacy in Collective Bargaining Agreements: Sixth Circuit Reinforces Arbitration Obligations

Federal Supremacy in Collective Bargaining Agreements: Sixth Circuit Reinforces Arbitration Obligations

Date: Jul 19, 2016
Federal Supremacy in Collective Bargaining Agreements: Sixth Circuit Reinforces Arbitration Obligations Introduction The case of Sheet Metal Employers Industry Promotion Fund; Sheet Metal Employers...
Rafidi v. United States: Affirmation of §924(c) Enhancement for §111(b) as a Crime of Violence

Rafidi v. United States: Affirmation of §924(c) Enhancement for §111(b) as a Crime of Violence

Date: Jul 12, 2016
Rafidi v. United States: Affirmation of §924(c) Enhancement for §111(b) as a Crime of Violence Introduction In United States v. Rafidi, 829 F.3d 437 (6th Cir. 2016), the United States Court of...
Shuti v. Lynch: Void-for-Vagueness in INA's Residual "Crime of Violence" Clause Declared Unconstitutional

Shuti v. Lynch: Void-for-Vagueness in INA's Residual "Crime of Violence" Clause Declared Unconstitutional

Date: Jul 8, 2016
Shuti v. Lynch: Void-for-Vagueness in INA's Residual "Crime of Violence" Clause Declared Unconstitutional Introduction The case of Altin Bashkim Shuti v. Loretta E. Lynch, heard by the United States...
Establishing New Standards for Partial Resentencing in Habeas Corpus Petitions: In re: Michael Stansell

Establishing New Standards for Partial Resentencing in Habeas Corpus Petitions: In re: Michael Stansell

Date: Jul 2, 2016
Establishing New Standards for Partial Resentencing in Habeas Corpus Petitions: In re: Michael Stansell Introduction The case of In re: Michael Stansell, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Nexus Requirement Strengthened in Home Search Warrants: United States v. Brown

Nexus Requirement Strengthened in Home Search Warrants: United States v. Brown

Date: Jun 28, 2016
Nexus Requirement Strengthened in Home Search Warrants: United States v. Brown Introduction United States v. Ricky Brown, 828 F.3d 375 (6th Cir. 2016), presents a pivotal moment in the interpretation...
Affirmation of Procedural Defaults and Strict Standards for Certificate of Appealability in Kissner v. Palmer

Affirmation of Procedural Defaults and Strict Standards for Certificate of Appealability in Kissner v. Palmer

Date: Jun 24, 2016
Affirmation of Procedural Defaults and Strict Standards for Certificate of Appealability in Kissner v. Palmer Introduction Donald Kissner, a pro se inmate from Michigan, sought to overturn his...
Reaffirmation of the Monette Five-Element Test for ADA Indirect Discrimination Claims: Ferrari v. Ford Motor Company

Reaffirmation of the Monette Five-Element Test for ADA Indirect Discrimination Claims: Ferrari v. Ford Motor Company

Date: Jun 24, 2016
Reaffirmation of the Monette Five-Element Test for ADA Indirect Discrimination Claims: Ferrari v. Ford Motor Company Introduction The case of Gianni–Paolo Ferrari v. Ford Motor Company, adjudicated...
Assessment of Fibromyalgia and Psychological Impairments in SSI Claims: Luukkonen v. Commissioner of Social Security

Assessment of Fibromyalgia and Psychological Impairments in SSI Claims: Luukkonen v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Jun 23, 2016
Assessment of Fibromyalgia and Psychological Impairments in SSI Claims: Luukkonen v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction In Luukkonen v. Commissioner of Social Security, the United States...
Affirming Proper Pleading Standards and Valid Acceptance of Rule 68 Offers: Da v. d Agema

Affirming Proper Pleading Standards and Valid Acceptance of Rule 68 Offers: Da v. d Agema

Date: Jun 17, 2016
Affirming Proper Pleading Standards and Valid Acceptance of Rule 68 Offers: Da v. d Agema Introduction In the landmark case of David Agema, Elizabeth Griffin, Mark Gurley, and Willis Sage...
Standing and ADA Compliance: Insights from Binno v. American Bar Association

Standing and ADA Compliance: Insights from Binno v. American Bar Association

Date: Jun 17, 2016
Standing and ADA Compliance: Insights from Binno v. American Bar Association Introduction Binno v. American Bar Association is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirming the Authority to Sanction Attorneys for Vexatious Conduct in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In Re Royal Manor Management, Inc.

Affirming the Authority to Sanction Attorneys for Vexatious Conduct in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In Re Royal Manor Management, Inc.

Date: Jun 16, 2016
Affirming the Authority to Sanction Attorneys for Vexatious Conduct in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In Re Royal Manor Management, Inc. Introduction The case In Re Royal Manor Management,...
Oral Promises and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Plea Agreements: Insights from Ewing v. United States

Oral Promises and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Plea Agreements: Insights from Ewing v. United States

Date: Jun 8, 2016
Oral Promises and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Plea Agreements: Insights from Ewing v. United States Introduction Darrell R. Ewing v. United States of America is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Ensuring Transparency in Class Action Settlements: Sixth Circuit Vacates Blue Cross Price-Fixing Settlement

Ensuring Transparency in Class Action Settlements: Sixth Circuit Vacates Blue Cross Price-Fixing Settlement

Date: Jun 8, 2016
Ensuring Transparency in Class Action Settlements: Sixth Circuit Vacates Blue Cross Price-Fixing Settlement Introduction The case of Shane Group, Inc., et al. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan...
Reaffirming Constructive Possession and Miranda Waiver Standards: 6th Circuit Rules in United States v. Crumpton

Reaffirming Constructive Possession and Miranda Waiver Standards: 6th Circuit Rules in United States v. Crumpton

Date: Jun 3, 2016
Reaffirming Constructive Possession and Miranda Waiver Standards: 6th Circuit Rules in United States v. Crumpton Introduction In United States v. Crumpton, 824 F.3d 593 (6th Cir. 2016), the United...
Res Judicata and Standing in Mortgage Rescission: Insights from GMAC Mortgage v. McKeever

Res Judicata and Standing in Mortgage Rescission: Insights from GMAC Mortgage v. McKeever

Date: Jun 3, 2016
Res Judicata and Standing in Mortgage Rescission: Insights from GMAC Mortgage v. McKeever Introduction The case GMAC Mortgage, LLC, et al. v. Heather McKeever, et al., decided by the United States...
Complete Preemption of State-Law Claims under ERISA: Hogan v. Jacobson & Lockhart

Complete Preemption of State-Law Claims under ERISA: Hogan v. Jacobson & Lockhart

Date: May 24, 2016
Complete Preemption of State-Law Claims under ERISA: Hogan v. Jacobson & Lockhart Introduction In the landmark case Violet Hogan, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Jo Ellen Jacobson; Kem Alan Lockhart,...
Standing Requirements in Electronic Device Prohibitions: McKay v. Federspiel and Pfau

Standing Requirements in Electronic Device Prohibitions: McKay v. Federspiel and Pfau

Date: May 21, 2016
Standing Requirements in Electronic Device Prohibitions: McKay v. Federspiel and Pfau Introduction Robert McKay, a resident of Tuscola County, challenged an administrative order issued by the chief...
Constructive Knowledge of Overtime Hours under FLSA: Insights from Craig v. Bridges Bros. Trucking

Constructive Knowledge of Overtime Hours under FLSA: Insights from Craig v. Bridges Bros. Trucking

Date: May 20, 2016
Constructive Knowledge of Overtime Hours under FLSA: Insights from Craig v. Bridges Bros. Trucking Introduction The case of Donna Craig v. Bridges Bros. Trucking LLC; Michael Bridges, adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert