Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Enforceability of Non-Compete Agreements: Stryker Corporation v. Christopher Ridgeway

Enforceability of Non-Compete Agreements: Stryker Corporation v. Christopher Ridgeway

Date: May 25, 2017
Enforceability of Non-Compete Agreements: Stryker Corporation v. Christopher Ridgeway Introduction The case of Stone Surgical, LLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Stryker Corporation; Howmedica Osteonics...
Determining Applicable State Law for Statute of Limitations: Insights from K-Tex, LLC v. Cintas Corporation

Determining Applicable State Law for Statute of Limitations: Insights from K-Tex, LLC v. Cintas Corporation

Date: May 23, 2017
Determining Applicable State Law for Statute of Limitations: Insights from K-Tex, LLC v. Cintas Corporation Introduction In the landmark case of K-Tex, LLC v. Cintas Corporation, the United States...
Affirming Non-Confusion in Trademark Infringement: Progressive Distribution Services v. UPS

Affirming Non-Confusion in Trademark Infringement: Progressive Distribution Services v. UPS

Date: May 4, 2017
Affirming Non-Confusion in Trademark Infringement: Progressive Distribution Services v. UPS Introduction The case of Progressive Distribution Services, Inc. (Progressive) versus United Parcel...
Appellate Waiver and Sentencing in United States v. Griffin

Appellate Waiver and Sentencing in United States v. Griffin

Date: Apr 27, 2017
Appellate Waiver and Sentencing in United States v. Griffin Case: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Nikita Griffin, Defendant–Appellant. Citation: 854 F.3d 911 (6th Cir. 2017) Court:...
Reversing the Local Controversy Exception: Implications of Davenport v. Veolia on CAFA Jurisdiction

Reversing the Local Controversy Exception: Implications of Davenport v. Veolia on CAFA Jurisdiction

Date: Apr 26, 2017
Reversing the Local Controversy Exception: Implications of Davenport v. Veolia on CAFA Jurisdiction Introduction The case of Davenport v. Veolia Water North America Operating Services, LLC addresses...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over International Defendants: Insights from MAG Holdings v. Schmückle

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over International Defendants: Insights from MAG Holdings v. Schmückle

Date: Apr 22, 2017
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over International Defendants: Insights from MAG Holdings v. Schmückle Introduction The case of MAG IAS Holdings, Inc.; MAG US Holdings, LLC v. Rainer Schmückle...
Affirmation of Cat's Paw Theory in FMLA Retaliation Claims: Gloria Marshall v. The Rawlings Company LLC

Affirmation of Cat's Paw Theory in FMLA Retaliation Claims: Gloria Marshall v. The Rawlings Company LLC

Date: Apr 21, 2017
Affirmation of Cat's Paw Theory in FMLA Retaliation Claims: Gloria Marshall v. The Rawlings Company LLC Introduction In the case of Gloria Marshall v. The Rawlings Company LLC, reported at 854 F.3d...
Qualified Immunity Standards Reinforced Post-Mullenix in Middaugh v. City of Three Rivers

Qualified Immunity Standards Reinforced Post-Mullenix in Middaugh v. City of Three Rivers

Date: Mar 30, 2017
Qualified Immunity Standards Reinforced Post-Mullenix in Middaugh v. City of Three Rivers Introduction Middaugh v. City of Three Rivers is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Sixth Circuit Reinforces Malicious Prosecution Standards: Implications for §1983 Claims and Qualified Immunity

Sixth Circuit Reinforces Malicious Prosecution Standards: Implications for §1983 Claims and Qualified Immunity

Date: Mar 28, 2017
Sixth Circuit Reinforces Malicious Prosecution Standards: Implications for §1983 Claims and Qualified Immunity Introduction In the landmark case of Susan Jean King v. Todd Harwood et al., the United...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity Where Fourth Amendment Deprivation of Liberty is Absent in Malicious Prosecution Claim

Sixth Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity Where Fourth Amendment Deprivation of Liberty is Absent in Malicious Prosecution Claim

Date: Mar 25, 2017
Sixth Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity Where Fourth Amendment Deprivation of Liberty is Absent in Malicious Prosecution Claim Introduction The case of Thomas D. Noonan v. County of Oakland, et al....
6th Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment on ADA Disability Discrimination: Essential Job Functions and Credible Evidence

6th Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment on ADA Disability Discrimination: Essential Job Functions and Credible Evidence

Date: Mar 24, 2017
6th Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment on ADA Disability Discrimination: Essential Job Functions and Credible Evidence Introduction In the case of Donald Bush v. Compass Group USA, Inc., the plaintiff,...
Amending Complaints Under PLRA Exhaustion Requirements: Insights from Mattox v. Edelman

Amending Complaints Under PLRA Exhaustion Requirements: Insights from Mattox v. Edelman

Date: Mar 16, 2017
Amending Complaints Under PLRA Exhaustion Requirements: Insights from Mattox v. Edelman Introduction The case of Todd Mattox v. Adam Edelman, M.D.; Corizon Health, Inc. serves as a pivotal reference...
Hobbs Act Robbery Affirmed as a Crime of Violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3) – United States v. Gooch

Hobbs Act Robbery Affirmed as a Crime of Violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3) – United States v. Gooch

Date: Mar 3, 2017
Hobbs Act Robbery Affirmed as a Crime of Violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3) – United States v. Gooch Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Eric Gooch, 850 F.3d 285 (6th Cir....
Qualified Immunity and the Absence of Clearly Established Law: Arrington-Bey v. City of Bedford Heights

Qualified Immunity and the Absence of Clearly Established Law: Arrington-Bey v. City of Bedford Heights

Date: Feb 25, 2017
Qualified Immunity and the Absence of Clearly Established Law: Arrington-Bey v. City of Bedford Heights Introduction In the case of Arrington-Bey v. City of Bedford Heights, the United States Court...
Remand with Dismissal: Federal Jurisdiction in Takings Claims under the GPTA

Remand with Dismissal: Federal Jurisdiction in Takings Claims under the GPTA

Date: Feb 11, 2017
Remand with Dismissal: Federal Jurisdiction in Takings Claims under the GPTA Introduction In Wayside Church et al. v. Van Buren County et al., 847 F.3d 812 (6th Cir. 2017), the United States Court of...
Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Prior Bad Acts in Sexual Assault Cases: Insights from United States v. Lavictor

Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Prior Bad Acts in Sexual Assault Cases: Insights from United States v. Lavictor

Date: Feb 4, 2017
Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Prior Bad Acts in Sexual Assault Cases: Insights from United States v. Lavictor Introduction The case of United States of America v. Lynn Michael Lavictor (848...
AT&T Mobility Services LLC v. Williams: Affirming the Essentiality of Regular Attendance Under the ADA

AT&T Mobility Services LLC v. Williams: Affirming the Essentiality of Regular Attendance Under the ADA

Date: Jan 28, 2017
AT&T Mobility Services LLC v. Williams: Affirming the Essentiality of Regular Attendance Under the ADA Introduction The case of Kirsten Williams v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC (847 F.3d 384)...
Reaffirmation of Mandatory Life Imprisonment for Drug Conspiracy Under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846: Analysis of US v. Young et al.

Reaffirmation of Mandatory Life Imprisonment for Drug Conspiracy Under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846: Analysis of US v. Young et al.

Date: Jan 27, 2017
Reaffirmation of Mandatory Life Imprisonment for Drug Conspiracy Under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846: Analysis of US v. Young et al. Introduction In the case of UNITED STATES of America,...
Affirmation of Procedural Default in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Kelly v. Lazaroff

Affirmation of Procedural Default in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Kelly v. Lazaroff

Date: Jan 21, 2017
Affirmation of Procedural Default in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Kelly v. Lazaroff Introduction Ronald Kelly was convicted in 2010 of felony murder, felonious assault, and assault in...
Clarifying State Action in §1983 Seizure Cases: Partin v. Davis Analysis

Clarifying State Action in §1983 Seizure Cases: Partin v. Davis Analysis

Date: Jan 14, 2017
Clarifying State Action in §1983 Seizure Cases: Partin v. Davis Analysis Introduction In Partin v. Davis et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit addressed pivotal issues...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert