Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Common Carrier Regulation: First Amendment Analysis in NetChoice v. Texas

Reaffirming Common Carrier Regulation: First Amendment Analysis in NetChoice v. Texas

Date: Sep 17, 2022
Reaffirming Common Carrier Regulation: First Amendment Analysis in NetChoice v. Texas Introduction The case of NetChoice, L.L.C. and Computer Communications Industry Association (CCIA) v. Ken Paxton,...
Qualified Immunity Reinforced: Fifth Circuit Upholds Officer Martin's Use of Force

Qualified Immunity Reinforced: Fifth Circuit Upholds Officer Martin's Use of Force

Date: Sep 9, 2022
Qualified Immunity Reinforced: Fifth Circuit Upholds Officer Martin's Use of Force Introduction In the landmark decision of Jacqueline Craig et al. v. William D. Martin, the United States Court of...
Limits of Permit Officer Authority and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Sweetin v. Texas City

Limits of Permit Officer Authority and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Sweetin v. Texas City

Date: Sep 3, 2022
Limits of Permit Officer Authority and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Sweetin v. Texas City Introduction The case of Sweetin; Rebecca Foster v. City of Texas City, Texas; Wendell Wylie (48 F.4th...
Balancing Medicaid Cost Caps and Disability Rights: Harrison v. Young Establishes Limits on Community-Based Care Mandates

Balancing Medicaid Cost Caps and Disability Rights: Harrison v. Young Establishes Limits on Community-Based Care Mandates

Date: Sep 1, 2022
Balancing Medicaid Cost Caps and Disability Rights: Harrison v. Young Establishes Limits on Community-Based Care Mandates Introduction Harrison v. Young, 48 F.4th 331 (2022), is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of the Primacy of 28 U.S.C. §2255 Over §2241 in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Hammoud v. Ma'at

Affirmation of the Primacy of 28 U.S.C. §2255 Over §2241 in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Hammoud v. Ma'at

Date: Sep 1, 2022
Affirmation of the Primacy of 28 U.S.C. §2255 Over §2241 in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Hammoud v. Ma'at Introduction The case of Mohamad Youssef Hammoud v. Warden Serkou Ma'at, adjudicated by the...
5th Circuit Clarifies the Scope of the Transportation Worker Exemption under the Federal Arbitration Act

5th Circuit Clarifies the Scope of the Transportation Worker Exemption under the Federal Arbitration Act

Date: Aug 31, 2022
5th Circuit Clarifies the Scope of the Transportation Worker Exemption under the Federal Arbitration Act Introduction The case of Douglas A. Lopez v. Cintas Corporation (47 F.4th 428) presents a...
NextEra Energy v. Public Utility Commission of Texas: Establishing Dormant Commerce Clause Precedent in Transmission Line Regulation

NextEra Energy v. Public Utility Commission of Texas: Establishing Dormant Commerce Clause Precedent in Transmission Line Regulation

Date: Aug 31, 2022
NextEra Energy v. Public Utility Commission of Texas: Establishing Dormant Commerce Clause Precedent in Transmission Line Regulation Introduction In the landmark case of NextEra Energy Capital...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Fourth Amendment Affidavit Omissions: Laviage v. Fite

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Fourth Amendment Affidavit Omissions: Laviage v. Fite

Date: Aug 30, 2022
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Fourth Amendment Affidavit Omissions: Laviage v. Fite Introduction The case of Dennis Laviage v. Jesse E. Fite (47 F.4th 402) serves as a significant precedent in the...
Affirmation of Permanent Injunction Protecting Religious Organizations from Forced Medical Procedures under RFRA

Affirmation of Permanent Injunction Protecting Religious Organizations from Forced Medical Procedures under RFRA

Date: Aug 27, 2022
Affirmation of Permanent Injunction Protecting Religious Organizations from Forced Medical Procedures under RFRA Introduction In the case of Franciscan Alliance, Incorporated; Christian Medical and...
Kinga v. Baylor University: Defining 'Educational Services' Amidst a Pandemic

Kinga v. Baylor University: Defining 'Educational Services' Amidst a Pandemic

Date: Aug 24, 2022
Kinga v. Baylor University: Defining 'Educational Services' Amidst a Pandemic Introduction In the landmark case of Kingla King v. Baylor University, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Final Agency Action and Arbitrary Decision in ERISA Compliance: Data Marketing Partnership v. DOL

Final Agency Action and Arbitrary Decision in ERISA Compliance: Data Marketing Partnership v. DOL

Date: Aug 18, 2022
Final Agency Action and Arbitrary Decision in ERISA Compliance: Data Marketing Partnership v. Department of Labor Introduction The case of Data Marketing Partnership, LP; LP Management Services, LLC...
Enjoining Executive Actions: Vacating Preliminary Injunction on Oil and Gas Lease Pauses

Enjoining Executive Actions: Vacating Preliminary Injunction on Oil and Gas Lease Pauses

Date: Aug 18, 2022
Enjoining Executive Actions: Vacating Preliminary Injunction on Oil and Gas Lease Pauses Introduction The case titled State of Louisiana; State of Alabama; State of Alaska; State of Arkansas; State...
Fifth Amendment Personal Jurisdiction Mirrors Fourteenth Amendment Standards: Douglass v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha

Fifth Amendment Personal Jurisdiction Mirrors Fourteenth Amendment Standards: Douglass v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha

Date: Aug 17, 2022
Fifth Amendment Personal Jurisdiction Mirrors Fourteenth Amendment Standards: Douglass v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha Introduction In Stephen Douglass v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, the United...
Huskey v. Jones: Clarifying the Unavailability Exception in PLRA Exhaustion Requirements

Huskey v. Jones: Clarifying the Unavailability Exception in PLRA Exhaustion Requirements

Date: Aug 17, 2022
Huskey v. Jones: Clarifying the Unavailability Exception in PLRA Exhaustion Requirements Introduction In Huskey v. Jones et al., 45 F.4th 827 (5th Cir. 2022), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Enhanced Standing Requirements in FDCPA Class Actions: Perez v. MVBA

Enhanced Standing Requirements in FDCPA Class Actions: Perez v. MVBA

Date: Aug 16, 2022
Enhanced Standing Requirements in FDCPA Class Actions: Perez v. MVBA Introduction In Mariela Perez v. McCreary, Veselka, Bragg & Allen, P.C.; MVBA, L.L.C. (45 F.4th 816), the United States Court of...
Fifth Circuit Affirms Lack of Sovereign Immunity in FLSA Retaliation Claims While Addressing Qualified Immunity Standards

Fifth Circuit Affirms Lack of Sovereign Immunity in FLSA Retaliation Claims While Addressing Qualified Immunity Standards

Date: Aug 12, 2022
Fifth Circuit Affirms Lack of Sovereign Immunity in FLSA Retaliation Claims While Addressing Qualified Immunity Standards Introduction In the case of Eva Kristine Stramaski v. Mark Lawley, the United...
Affirmation of Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Trade Secret Misappropriation Case: CAE v. Moov Technologies

Affirmation of Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Trade Secret Misappropriation Case: CAE v. Moov Technologies

Date: Aug 10, 2022
Affirmation of Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Trade Secret Misappropriation Case: CAE v. Moov Technologies Introduction The case of CAE Integrated, L.L.C.; Capital Asset Exchange and Trading,...
Finality of State Court Judgments in Habeas Corpus under AEDPA: Wallace v. State of Mississippi

Finality of State Court Judgments in Habeas Corpus under AEDPA: Wallace v. State of Mississippi

Date: Aug 9, 2022
Finality of State Court Judgments in Habeas Corpus under AEDPA: Wallace v. State of Mississippi Introduction Reginald Desmond Wallace, a Mississippi state prisoner, appealed a dismissal of his...
Application of §242B vs. §242(b) in Immigration Proceedings: Calle-Yanza v. Garland

Application of §242B vs. §242(b) in Immigration Proceedings: Calle-Yanza v. Garland

Date: Aug 9, 2022
Application of §242B vs. §242(b) in Immigration Proceedings: Calle-Yanza v. Garland Introduction Parties Involved: Miguel Angel Calle-Yanza, Petitioner, versus Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General,...
Validating Subsequent Notices in Notice to Appear: Insights from Castillo-Gutierrez v. Garland

Validating Subsequent Notices in Notice to Appear: Insights from Castillo-Gutierrez v. Garland

Date: Aug 6, 2022
Validating Subsequent Notices in Notice to Appear: Insights from Castillo-Gutierrez v. Garland Introduction The case of Jesus Humberto Castillo-Gutierrez v. Merrick Garland, decided by the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert