Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Court Reinforces Strict Standards for Fraudulent Joinder to Uphold Diversity Jurisdiction: Ford v. Elsbury

Court Reinforces Strict Standards for Fraudulent Joinder to Uphold Diversity Jurisdiction: Ford v. Elsbury

Date: Oct 21, 1994
Court Reinforces Strict Standards for Fraudulent Joinder to Uphold Diversity Jurisdiction: Ford v. Elsbury Introduction Undray D. Ford, etc., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Ernie Elsbury, etc.,...
Refining the Plain Error Doctrine in Criminal Sentencing Appeals: U.S. v. CALVERLEY

Refining the Plain Error Doctrine in Criminal Sentencing Appeals: U.S. v. CALVERLEY

Date: Oct 21, 1994
Refining the Plain Error Doctrine in Criminal Sentencing Appeals: U.S. v. CALVERLEY Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Timothy Lynn Calverley, decided on October 20,...
Bowling v. Shalala: Establishing Standards for Hypothetical Questions in Disability Claims

Bowling v. Shalala: Establishing Standards for Hypothetical Questions in Disability Claims

Date: Oct 19, 1994
Bowling v. Shalala: Establishing Standards for Hypothetical Questions in Disability Claims 1. Introduction The case of Elbert L. Bowling v. Donna E. Shalala addresses pivotal issues in the...
Jurisdictional Limitations in Agency Investigations: Veldhoen & Broekhoven v. U.S. Coast Guard

Jurisdictional Limitations in Agency Investigations: Veldhoen & Broekhoven v. U.S. Coast Guard

Date: Oct 18, 1994
Jurisdictional Limitations in Agency Investigations: Veldhoen & Broekhoven v. U.S. Coast Guard Introduction In the landmark case of Paul Veldhoen and Arnoldus Broekhoven v. United States Coast Guard...
Appellate Reversal of Rule 11 and §1927 Sanctions Against FDIC in FDIC v. Calhoun

Appellate Reversal of Rule 11 and §1927 Sanctions Against FDIC in FDIC v. Calhoun

Date: Oct 18, 1994
Appellate Reversal of Rule 11 and §1927 Sanctions Against FDIC in FDIC v. Calhoun Introduction In the landmark case Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Calhoun, the United States Court of...
Case Commentary: Establishing Population Caps to Uphold Constitutional Jail Conditions

Case Commentary: Establishing Population Caps to Uphold Constitutional Jail Conditions

Date: Oct 14, 1994
Establishing Population Caps to Uphold Constitutional Jail Conditions Introduction The case of Bobby Harris, et al. v. Angelina County, Texas (31 F.3d 331) addressed critical issues surrounding the...
Defining False Arrest and Emotional Distress in Security-Police Collaborations: Analysis of Halbert v. BPS Guard Services

Defining False Arrest and Emotional Distress in Security-Police Collaborations: Analysis of Halbert v. BPS Guard Services

Date: Oct 1, 1994
Defining False Arrest and Emotional Distress in Security-Police Collaborations: Analysis of Halbert v. BPS Guard Services Introduction Halbert v. BPS Guard Services, Inc., 33 F.3d 526 (5th Cir....
Employer Determination under Title VII and Scope of Whistleblower Protections: Nowlin v. Resolution Trust Corp. [33 F.3d 498]

Employer Determination under Title VII and Scope of Whistleblower Protections: Nowlin v. Resolution Trust Corp. [33 F.3d 498]

Date: Sep 30, 1994
Employer Determination under Title VII and Scope of Whistleblower Protections: Nowlin v. Resolution Trust Corp. [33 F.3d 498] Introduction The case of Jolene Nowlin, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v....
Mootness Doctrine in Bankruptcy Appeals: Insights from Clinton Manges Case

Mootness Doctrine in Bankruptcy Appeals: Insights from Clinton Manges Case

Date: Sep 28, 1994
Mootness Doctrine in Bankruptcy Appeals: Insights from Clinton Manges Case Introduction The case of Clinton Manges et al. v. Seattle-First National Bank and Seafirst American Corporation serves as a...
Whistleblower Protection under the False Claims Act: Insights from Robertson v. Bell Helicopter Textron

Whistleblower Protection under the False Claims Act: Insights from Robertson v. Bell Helicopter Textron

Date: Sep 27, 1994
Whistleblower Protection under the False Claims Act: Insights from Robertson v. Bell Helicopter Textron Introduction Robertson v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 32 F.3d 948 (5th Cir. 1994), is a...
Qualified Immunity in Mistaken Identity Arrests: Blackwell v. Barton

Qualified Immunity in Mistaken Identity Arrests: Blackwell v. Barton

Date: Sep 24, 1994
Qualified Immunity in Mistaken Identity Arrests: Blackwell v. Barton Introduction Mindy Michelle Blackwell (Plaintiff-Appellee) initiated a lawsuit against Benny Barton (Defendant-Appellant), an...
Establishing Limits on Constructive Possession: Crain v. United States – Fifth Circuit 1994

Establishing Limits on Constructive Possession: Crain v. United States – Fifth Circuit 1994

Date: Sep 20, 1994
Establishing Limits on Constructive Possession: Crain v. United States – Fifth Circuit 1994 Introduction Crain v. United States, 33 F.3d 480 (5th Cir. 1994), presents a pivotal appellate decision...
Qualified Immunity Upholds Police Actions in Public Intoxication Arrests: Analysis of Babb v. Dorman and City of Richardson

Qualified Immunity Upholds Police Actions in Public Intoxication Arrests: Analysis of Babb v. Dorman and City of Richardson

Date: Sep 20, 1994
Qualified Immunity Upholds Police Actions in Public Intoxication Arrests: Analysis of Babb v. Dorman and City of Richardson Introduction The case of William Babb v. David Anthony Dorman and City of...
Application of Retroactive Sentencing Guidelines and Discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2): United States v. Patricia Ann Shaw

Application of Retroactive Sentencing Guidelines and Discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2): United States v. Patricia Ann Shaw

Date: Sep 16, 1994
Application of Retroactive Sentencing Guidelines and Discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2): United States v. Patricia Ann Shaw Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Patricia Ann...
Procedural Default and the Admissibility of Hearsay: Analysis of Cupit v. Whitley

Procedural Default and the Admissibility of Hearsay: Analysis of Cupit v. Whitley

Date: Sep 13, 1994
Procedural Default and the Admissibility of Hearsay: Analysis of Cupit v. Whitley Introduction Milton Eugene Cupit, petitioner-appellee, appealed the decision in his federal habeas corpus petition...
Comprehensive Analysis of ANDERSON v. DOUGLAS LOMASON CO.: Upholding Disparate Treatment Claims Under Title VII

Comprehensive Analysis of ANDERSON v. DOUGLAS LOMASON CO.: Upholding Disparate Treatment Claims Under Title VII

Date: Sep 10, 1994
Comprehensive Analysis of ANDERSON v. DOUGLAS LOMASON CO.: Upholding Disparate Treatment Claims Under Title VII Introduction ANDERSON v. DOUGLAS LOMASON CO. is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Rational Basis Affirmed for Employment Policies Excluding Convicted Felons in Public Schools

Rational Basis Affirmed for Employment Policies Excluding Convicted Felons in Public Schools

Date: Sep 9, 1994
Rational Basis Affirmed for Employment Policies Excluding Convicted Felons in Public Schools Introduction The case of Charles E. Hilliard v. Barbara Ferguson et al. (30 F.3d 649, United States Court...
Reversal of Qualified Immunity in Denial of Access to Courts: Foster v. City of Lake Jackson

Reversal of Qualified Immunity in Denial of Access to Courts: Foster v. City of Lake Jackson

Date: Sep 8, 1994
Reversal of Qualified Immunity in Denial of Access to Courts: Foster v. City of Lake Jackson Introduction The case of Larry Wayne Foster, et al. v. City of Lake Jackson, et al. (28 F.3d 425, 1994)...
Admissibility of Age-Related Remarks in Employment Discrimination Cases: EEOC v. Manville Sales Corporation

Admissibility of Age-Related Remarks in Employment Discrimination Cases: EEOC v. Manville Sales Corporation

Date: Sep 7, 1994
Admissibility of Age-Related Remarks in Employment Discrimination Cases: EEOC v. Manville Sales Corporation Introduction In the case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Manville...
Affirmation of Right of First Refusal Protections in Corporate Transactions

Affirmation of Right of First Refusal Protections in Corporate Transactions

Date: Sep 3, 1994
Affirmation of Right of First Refusal Protections in Corporate Transactions Introduction The case of Capital Parks, Inc. v. Southeastern Advertising and Sales System, Inc. (30 F.3d 627, United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert