Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Limits on Bankruptcy Courts' Jurisdiction Over Third-Party Actions: Zale Corp v. Feld & NUFIC

Limits on Bankruptcy Courts' Jurisdiction Over Third-Party Actions: Zale Corp v. Feld & NUFIC

Date: Sep 8, 1995
Limits on Bankruptcy Courts' Jurisdiction Over Third-Party Actions: Zale Corp v. Feld & NUFIC Introduction The case of Zale Corporation, Debtor, et al. v. Alan D. Feld and National Union Fire...
Affirmation of District Court's Denial of Rule 60(b) and Rule 59(a) Motions: GFS One LP v. Peyton Place, Inc.

Affirmation of District Court's Denial of Rule 60(b) and Rule 59(a) Motions: GFS One LP v. Peyton Place, Inc.

Date: Sep 8, 1995
Affirmation of District Court's Denial of Rule 60(b) and Rule 59(a) Motions: GFS One LP v. Peyton Place, Inc. Introduction In the appellate case of Government Financial Services One Limited...
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing and Jury Selection Standards in Garza and Flores v. United States

Affirmation of Capital Sentencing and Jury Selection Standards in Garza and Flores v. United States

Date: Sep 2, 1995
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing and Jury Selection Standards in Garza and Flores v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Manuel Flores and Juan Raul Garza,...
Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Rogers: Establishing Excusable Neglect Standards in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Rogers: Establishing Excusable Neglect Standards in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Date: Sep 2, 1995
Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Rogers: Establishing Excusable Neglect Standards in Bankruptcy Proceedings Introduction In the appellate decision Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al. vs. Donna Rogers, et al. (62...
Aggregation of Punitive Damages in Diversity Jurisdiction: Allen v. R H Oil Gas Co. et al.

Aggregation of Punitive Damages in Diversity Jurisdiction: Allen v. R H Oil Gas Co. et al.

Date: Aug 30, 1995
Aggregation of Punitive Damages in Diversity Jurisdiction: Allen v. R H Oil Gas Co. et al. Introduction In the landmark case Barbara Allen, et al. v. R H Oil Gas Company, Farrar Oilfield Service and...
Establishing Precedent in Mail Fraud Conspiracy: United States v. Sneed et al.

Establishing Precedent in Mail Fraud Conspiracy: United States v. Sneed et al.

Date: Aug 25, 1995
Establishing Precedent in Mail Fraud Conspiracy: United States v. Sneed et al. Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Paula Sneed, Norris Louis McGraw, Patrick Johnson, and...
Cumulative Circumstantial Evidence in Establishing Conspiracy: Insights from Dean v. United States

Cumulative Circumstantial Evidence in Establishing Conspiracy: Insights from Dean v. United States

Date: Aug 24, 1995
Cumulative Circumstantial Evidence in Establishing Conspiracy: Insights from Dean v. United States Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. George Dean, James Earl Cofer, Kenneth...
Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Review: Analysis of Sones v. Hargett

Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Review: Analysis of Sones v. Hargett

Date: Aug 22, 1995
Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Review: Analysis of Sones v. Hargett Establishing the Boundaries of Collateral Relief and Procedural Barriers in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction Glendle Ray...
Enforcement of Indemnity Agreements: Insights from Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Paul R. Avenell

Enforcement of Indemnity Agreements: Insights from Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Paul R. Avenell

Date: Aug 18, 1995
Enforcement of Indemnity Agreements: Insights from Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Paul R. Avenell Introduction The case of Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Paul R. Avenell, adjudicated by the United...
Vuong v. Texas: Upholding the Eighth Amendment Constitutionality of Texas' Special Issues in Capital Sentencing

Vuong v. Texas: Upholding the Eighth Amendment Constitutionality of Texas' Special Issues in Capital Sentencing

Date: Aug 17, 1995
Vuong v. Texas: Upholding the Eighth Amendment Constitutionality of Texas' Special Issues in Capital Sentencing Introduction In Hai Hai Vuong v. Wayne Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Retaliation Claims: Woods v. Smith

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Retaliation Claims: Woods v. Smith

Date: Aug 16, 1995
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Retaliation Claims: Woods v. Smith Introduction The case of Claude E. Woods v. Larry Smith et al. (60 F.3d 1161) presents a critical examination of qualified...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: The Teague v. Scott Case Analysis

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: The Teague v. Scott Case Analysis

Date: Aug 16, 1995
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: The Teague v. Scott Case Analysis Introduction Edward L. Teague v. Wayne Scott is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Refined Scope of §1983 Claims in Parole Procedures: Orellana v. Kyle

Refined Scope of §1983 Claims in Parole Procedures: Orellana v. Kyle

Date: Aug 12, 1995
Refined Scope of §1983 Claims in Parole Procedures: Orellana v. Kyle Introduction In the landmark case Samuel Orellana v. Jack Kyle, Chairman, Board of Pardons and Parole, decided by the United...
Limitation of Judicial Review in Veterans' Benefits Determinations: Insights from Zuspann v. Brown

Limitation of Judicial Review in Veterans' Benefits Determinations: Insights from Zuspann v. Brown

Date: Aug 12, 1995
Limitation of Judicial Review in Veterans' Benefits Determinations: Insights from Zuspann v. Brown Introduction Gary Zuspann, a former Navy cook, filed a lawsuit against Jesse Brown, Secretary of the...
ERISA Plan Classification Affirmed in McDonald v. Provident Indemnity Life Insurance Company

ERISA Plan Classification Affirmed in McDonald v. Provident Indemnity Life Insurance Company

Date: Aug 10, 1995
ERISA Plan Classification Affirmed in McDonald v. Provident Indemnity Life Insurance Company Introduction The case of Nathan and Sharyl McDonald, Individually and as Next Friend and Guardians of...
COATS v. PENROD DRILLING CORPoration: Upholding Traditional Joint and Several Liability in Maritime Law

COATS v. PENROD DRILLING CORPoration: Upholding Traditional Joint and Several Liability in Maritime Law

Date: Aug 9, 1995
COATS v. PENROD DRILLING CORPoration: Upholding Traditional Joint and Several Liability in Maritime Law Introduction COATS v. PENROD DRILLING CORPoration, 61 F.3d 1113 (5th Cir. 1995), marks a...
Affirmation of Texas Contemporaneous Objection Rule's Adequacy in Habeas Corpus Review

Affirmation of Texas Contemporaneous Objection Rule's Adequacy in Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Aug 8, 1995
Affirmation of Texas Contemporaneous Objection Rule's Adequacy in Habeas Corpus Review Introduction The case Bernard Eugene Amos v. Wayne Scott, Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice...
Intentional Handicap Discrimination Required for Reasonable Accommodation Claims: Kelly v. Boeing Petroleum Services, Inc.

Intentional Handicap Discrimination Required for Reasonable Accommodation Claims: Kelly v. Boeing Petroleum Services, Inc.

Date: Aug 8, 1995
Intentional Handicap Discrimination Required for Reasonable Accommodation Claims: Kelly v. Boeing Petroleum Services, Inc. Introduction In Peter J. Kelly v. Boeing Petroleum Services, Inc., 61 F.3d...
Establishing Standards for Fraudulent Joinder in Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Burden v. General Dynamics

Establishing Standards for Fraudulent Joinder in Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Burden v. General Dynamics

Date: Aug 5, 1995
Establishing Standards for Fraudulent Joinder in Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Burden v. General Dynamics Introduction In the landmark case of Burden v. General Dynamics Corporation, et al.,...
Affirmation of Limited Liability for Independent Drug Testing Laboratories Under Texas Law: WILLIS v. ROCHE BIOMEDICAL LABORATORIES, INC.

Affirmation of Limited Liability for Independent Drug Testing Laboratories Under Texas Law: WILLIS v. ROCHE BIOMEDICAL LABORATORIES, INC.

Date: Aug 3, 1995
Affirmation of Limited Liability for Independent Drug Testing Laboratories Under Texas Law: WILLIS v. ROCHE BIOMEDICAL LABORATORIES, INC. Introduction In Robert E. WILLIS v. ROCHE BIOMEDICAL...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert