Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Procedural Barriers to Habeas Corpus Relief: Insights from Lott v. Hargett

Procedural Barriers to Habeas Corpus Relief: Insights from Lott v. Hargett

Date: Apr 17, 1996
Procedural Barriers to Habeas Corpus Relief: Insights from Lott v. Hargett Introduction The case of John Lott v. Edward M. Hargett, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Exclusive Rights of Federally Indebted Rural Water Associations Under 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b): An Analysis of North Alamo Water Supply Corp. v. City of San Juan

Exclusive Rights of Federally Indebted Rural Water Associations Under 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b): An Analysis of North Alamo Water Supply Corp. v. City of San Juan

Date: Apr 16, 1996
Exclusive Rights of Federally Indebted Rural Water Associations Under 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b): An Analysis of North Alamo Water Supply Corp. v. City of San Juan Introduction The case of North Alamo Water...
Qualified Immunity Upholds Dismissal of Fair Housing Act Claims Against Municipal Officials in Meadowbriar v. Gunn

Qualified Immunity Upholds Dismissal of Fair Housing Act Claims Against Municipal Officials in Meadowbriar v. Gunn

Date: Apr 12, 1996
Qualified Immunity Upholds Dismissal of Fair Housing Act Claims Against Municipal Officials in Meadowbriar v. Gunn Introduction In the landmark case Meadowbriar Home for Children, Inc. v. G.B. Gunn...
Control of Prosecution in the Use of Special Prosecutors: Faulder v. Johnson Analysis

Control of Prosecution in the Use of Special Prosecutors: Faulder v. Johnson Analysis

Date: Apr 11, 1996
Control of Prosecution in the Use of Special Prosecutors: Faulder v. Johnson Analysis Introduction Faulder v. Johnson, 81 F.3d 515 (5th Cir. 1996), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Freeman v. United States: Upholding Conspiracy Conviction in Wildlife Smuggling

Freeman v. United States: Upholding Conspiracy Conviction in Wildlife Smuggling

Date: Apr 9, 1996
Freeman v. United States: Upholding Conspiracy Conviction in Wildlife Smuggling Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Noemi Duarte Freeman, decided on April 8, 1996, the...
Upholding Summary Judgment Standards in Employment Discrimination: Wallace v. Texas Tech University

Upholding Summary Judgment Standards in Employment Discrimination: Wallace v. Texas Tech University

Date: Apr 6, 1996
Upholding Summary Judgment Standards in Employment Discrimination: Wallace v. Texas Tech University Introduction In the landmark case of Phillip A. Wallace v. Texas Tech University, adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions in United States v. Broussard et al.

Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions in United States v. Broussard et al.

Date: Apr 5, 1996
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions in United States v. Broussard et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Ursula Bernardette Broussard and others involves significant legal...
Strict Adherence to Rule 9(b) Mandates Particularity in Scienter Allegations in Securities Fraud Cases

Strict Adherence to Rule 9(b) Mandates Particularity in Scienter Allegations in Securities Fraud Cases

Date: Apr 3, 1996
Strict Adherence to Rule 9(b) Mandates Particularity in Scienter Allegations in Securities Fraud Cases Introduction In Lovelace v. Software Spectrum, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Expanding Intervention Rights in Title VII Discrimination Litigation: EDWARDS v. CITY OF HOUSTON

Expanding Intervention Rights in Title VII Discrimination Litigation: EDWARDS v. CITY OF HOUSTON

Date: Apr 2, 1996
Expanding Intervention Rights in Title VII Discrimination Litigation: EDWARDS v. CITY OF HOUSTON Introduction In the landmark case of EDWARDS v. CITY OF HOUSTON, the United States Court of Appeals...
Defendant's Burden in Safety Valve Provisions: Insights from United States v. Flanagan

Defendant's Burden in Safety Valve Provisions: Insights from United States v. Flanagan

Date: Mar 30, 1996
Defendant's Burden in Safety Valve Provisions: Insights from United States v. Flanagan Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. George Woodrow Flanagan, decided by the United...
Deliberate Indifference in Inmate Medical Care: Insights from Jolly v. Klein

Deliberate Indifference in Inmate Medical Care: Insights from Jolly v. Klein

Date: Mar 30, 1996
Deliberate Indifference in Inmate Medical Care: Insights from Jolly v. Klein Introduction In the landmark case of Thaddeus Michael Jolly v. Donald Klein, Duane Ray Boyd, Richard Hendell, and Johnny...
Affirmation of Capital Convictions in Spence v. Johnson: Upholding Brady and Perjury Standards

Affirmation of Capital Convictions in Spence v. Johnson: Upholding Brady and Perjury Standards

Date: Mar 30, 1996
Affirmation of Capital Convictions in Spence v. Johnson: Upholding Brady and Perjury Standards Introduction Spence v. Johnson, 80 F.3d 989 (5th Cir. 1996), represents a pivotal appellate decision...
Appellate Forfeiture Rule Clarified: Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association

Appellate Forfeiture Rule Clarified: Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association

Date: Mar 29, 1996
Appellate Forfeiture Rule Clarified: Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association Introduction In the landmark case of Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, decided by the...
Affirmation of Discrimination Verdict in Polanco v. City of Austin: Standards for Judgment as a Matter of Law

Affirmation of Discrimination Verdict in Polanco v. City of Austin: Standards for Judgment as a Matter of Law

Date: Mar 29, 1996
Affirmation of Discrimination Verdict in Polanco v. City of Austin: Standards for Judgment as a Matter of Law Introduction In the landmark case Hector Polanco v. City of Austin (78 F.3d 968), the...
Defining 'Entry' Under Immigration Law: Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS

Defining 'Entry' Under Immigration Law: Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS

Date: Mar 28, 1996
Defining 'Entry' Under Immigration Law: Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS Introduction The case of Carlos Alberto Carbajal-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), adjudicated by the United...
Perillo v. Johnson: Affirming the Right to Discovery and Evidentiary Hearings in Cases of Attorney Conflict of Interest

Perillo v. Johnson: Affirming the Right to Discovery and Evidentiary Hearings in Cases of Attorney Conflict of Interest

Date: Mar 22, 1996
Perillo v. Johnson: Affirming the Right to Discovery and Evidentiary Hearings in Cases of Attorney Conflict of Interest Introduction Perillo v. Johnson is a landmark decision by the United States...
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Materiality Standards in 18 U.S.C. §1006 False Entry Convictions

Fifth Circuit Clarifies Materiality Standards in 18 U.S.C. §1006 False Entry Convictions

Date: Mar 12, 1996
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Materiality Standards in 18 U.S.C. §1006 False Entry Convictions Introduction The case of United States of America v. Hal Pettigrew, Craig Walker, and Chad Powell represents a...
Strict Enforcement of Qualified Immunity in Section 1983 Claims: Morin & Young v. Caire

Strict Enforcement of Qualified Immunity in Section 1983 Claims: Morin & Young v. Caire

Date: Mar 8, 1996
Strict Enforcement of Qualified Immunity in Section 1983 Claims: Morin & Young v. Caire Introduction The case of Ralph Morin; Larry Keith Young v. Randy Caire, City of Slidell, adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. §2119 as a Valid Exercise of the Commerce Clause in USA v. Coleman

Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. §2119 as a Valid Exercise of the Commerce Clause in USA v. Coleman

Date: Mar 6, 1996
Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. §2119 as a Valid Exercise of the Commerce Clause in USA v. Coleman Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Donald Ray Coleman, the United States...
Reaffirming Vicarious Liability and Jury Trial Rights: Bennett v. Pippin

Reaffirming Vicarious Liability and Jury Trial Rights: Bennett v. Pippin

Date: Mar 2, 1996
Reaffirming Vicarious Liability and Jury Trial Rights: Bennett v. Pippin Introduction The case ELLEN GAIL BENNETT v. PRESLEY PIPPIN JR. is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert