Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Lucas v. Johnson: Upholding Federal Habeas Principles and the Limited Role of Actual Innocence Claims

Lucas v. Johnson: Upholding Federal Habeas Principles and the Limited Role of Actual Innocence Claims

Date: Jan 10, 1998
Lucas v. Johnson: Upholding Federal Habeas Principles and the Limited Role of Actual Innocence Claims Introduction Henry Lee Lucas v. Gary L. Johnson is a seminal case adjudicated by the United...
Judicial Estoppel and ADA Claims: Insights from McConathy v. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up Corp

Judicial Estoppel and ADA Claims: Insights from McConathy v. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up Corp

Date: Jan 8, 1998
Judicial Estoppel and ADA Claims: Insights from McConathy v. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up Corp. Introduction McConathy v. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up Corporation is a significant case adjudicated by the United States...
Affirmation of Death Penalty under the Federal Death Penalty Act: United States v. Jones

Affirmation of Death Penalty under the Federal Death Penalty Act: United States v. Jones

Date: Jan 6, 1998
Affirmation of Death Penalty under the Federal Death Penalty Act: United States v. Jones Introduction United States v. Louis Jones, Jr. is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals...
MUNIZ v. JOHNSON: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Miranda Rights under AEDPA

MUNIZ v. JOHNSON: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Miranda Rights under AEDPA

Date: Jan 3, 1998
MUNIZ v. JOHNSON: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Miranda Rights under AEDPA Introduction MUNIZ v. JOHNSON, 132 F.3d 214 (5th Cir. 1998), is a significant case decided by the United States Court of...
Limitation Periods and Fiduciary Duties in Bankruptcy Fraud Recovery: Askanase v. Fatjo

Limitation Periods and Fiduciary Duties in Bankruptcy Fraud Recovery: Askanase v. Fatjo

Date: Dec 24, 1997
Limitation Periods and Fiduciary Duties in Bankruptcy Fraud Recovery: Askanase v. Fatjo Introduction Askanase v. Fatjo is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Frank v. Bear Stearns: Restricting Federal Question Jurisdiction in Third-Party Beneficiary Claims Involving Federally Chartered Enterprises

Frank v. Bear Stearns: Restricting Federal Question Jurisdiction in Third-Party Beneficiary Claims Involving Federally Chartered Enterprises

Date: Dec 20, 1997
Frank v. Bear Stearns: Restricting Federal Question Jurisdiction in Third-Party Beneficiary Claims Involving Federally Chartered Enterprises Introduction In Robert S. Frank v. Bear Stearns Co., 128...
Defining Employer under ADA Title I and ADA Title III's Scope: Bexar County v. Bloom Commentary

Defining Employer under ADA Title I and ADA Title III's Scope: Bexar County v. Bloom Commentary

Date: Dec 20, 1997
Defining Employer under ADA Title I and ADA Title III's Scope: Bexar County v. Bloom Commentary Introduction Helen R. Bloom, a court reporter employed full-time by Bexar County, Texas, filed a...
Exclusive State Court Jurisdiction Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act: A Comprehensive Analysis

Exclusive State Court Jurisdiction Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Dec 16, 1997
Exclusive State Court Jurisdiction Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction In the landmark case Chair King, Inc., et al. v. Houston Cellular Corporation, et...
Revisiting Fourth Amendment Protections: The Spiller v. Texas City Decision

Revisiting Fourth Amendment Protections: The Spiller v. Texas City Decision

Date: Dec 16, 1997
Revisiting Fourth Amendment Protections: The Spiller v. Texas City Decision Introduction The case of Johnnie Faye Spiller v. City of Texas City, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Presumption of Correctness and Burden of Proof in Federal Habeas Corpus: CARTER v. JOHNSON

Presumption of Correctness and Burden of Proof in Federal Habeas Corpus: CARTER v. JOHNSON

Date: Dec 13, 1997
Presumption of Correctness and Burden of Proof in Federal Habeas Corpus: CARTER v. JOHNSON Introduction Parties Involved: Petitioner-Appellant: Robert Anthony Carter Respondent-Appellee: Gary L....
Procedural Bar and Harmless Error: Insights from Hogue v. Johnson

Procedural Bar and Harmless Error: Insights from Hogue v. Johnson

Date: Dec 13, 1997
Procedural Bar and Harmless Error: Insights from Hogue v. Johnson Introduction Jerry Lee Hogue, the petitioner-appellant, appealed the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition...
Affirmative Action and Employment Discrimination: Fifth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Messer v. Texas Education Agency

Affirmative Action and Employment Discrimination: Fifth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Messer v. Texas Education Agency

Date: Dec 12, 1997
Affirmative Action and Employment Discrimination: Fifth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Messer v. Texas Education Agency Introduction The case of Karen Hanson Messer v. Texas Education Agency...
Interpretation of "Overtime and Extra Compensation" in ERISA Disability Benefits: Wegner v. Standard Insurance

Interpretation of "Overtime and Extra Compensation" in ERISA Disability Benefits: Wegner v. Standard Insurance

Date: Dec 10, 1997
Interpretation of "Overtime and Extra Compensation" in ERISA Disability Benefits: Wegner v. Standard Insurance Introduction Wegner v. Standard Insurance Company, 129 F.3d 814 (5th Cir. 1997), is a...
Bankruptcy Exemptions for Causes of Action: Analysis of In re Swift Decision

Bankruptcy Exemptions for Causes of Action: Analysis of In re Swift Decision

Date: Dec 9, 1997
Bankruptcy Exemptions for Causes of Action: Analysis of In re Swift Decision Introduction The case In re: David Marvin Swift (129 F.3d 792) addresses a pivotal issue in bankruptcy law: the ownership...
Affirmed Limited Liability of Parent Corporation for Subsidiary's Employment Discrimination Under ADEA in Lusk v. FoxMeyer Health Corporation

Affirmed Limited Liability of Parent Corporation for Subsidiary's Employment Discrimination Under ADEA in Lusk v. FoxMeyer Health Corporation

Date: Dec 5, 1997
Affirmed Limited Liability of Parent Corporation for Subsidiary's Employment Discrimination Under ADEA in Lusk v. FoxMeyer Health Corporation Introduction The case of Lusk v. FoxMeyer Health...
Intervening Causes and Garde Interpretation in Louisiana Products Liability: Pickett v. RTS Helicopter

Intervening Causes and Garde Interpretation in Louisiana Products Liability: Pickett v. RTS Helicopter

Date: Nov 27, 1997
Intervening Causes and Garde Interpretation in Louisiana Products Liability: Pickett v. RTS Helicopter 1. Introduction The case Margie A. Pickett et al. v. RTS Helicopter et al., decided by the...
Procedural Default and Habeas Corpus: Insights from Glover v. Cain

Procedural Default and Habeas Corpus: Insights from Glover v. Cain

Date: Nov 21, 1997
Procedural Default and Habeas Corpus: Insights from Glover v. Cain Introduction In the landmark case Ronald Glover v. Burl Cain, Warden, and Richard Ieyoub, Attorney General, State of Louisiana,...
Establishing Qualified Immunity in Police Use of Deadly Force Cases: Barnhart v. Colston

Establishing Qualified Immunity in Police Use of Deadly Force Cases: Barnhart v. Colston

Date: Nov 20, 1997
Establishing Qualified Immunity in Police Use of Deadly Force Cases: Barnhart v. Colston Introduction Barnhart v. Colston, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in 1997,...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the Privacy Act: Insights from Taylor v. IRS

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the Privacy Act: Insights from Taylor v. IRS

Date: Nov 13, 1997
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the Privacy Act: Insights from Taylor v. IRS Introduction Taylor v. United States Treasury Department, Internal Revenue Service (127 F.3d 470) is a...
Reevaluation of Napue Violation Standards: United States v. O'Keefe et al. (5th Cir. 1997)

Reevaluation of Napue Violation Standards: United States v. O'Keefe et al. (5th Cir. 1997)

Date: Nov 12, 1997
Reevaluation of Napue Violation Standards: United States v. O'Keefe et al. (5th Cir. 1997) Introduction In United States of America v. Michael O'Keefe, Sr. et al., 128 F.3d 885 (5th Cir. 1997), the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert