Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Compulsory Counterclaims and Diversity Removal in Federal Interpleader Actions: New York Life v. June G. Smith

Compulsory Counterclaims and Diversity Removal in Federal Interpleader Actions: New York Life v. June G. Smith

Date: Jun 2, 1998
Compulsory Counterclaims and Diversity Removal in Federal Interpleader Actions: New York Life v. June G. Smith Introduction The case of New York Life Insurance Company v. June G. Smith serves as a...
De Novo Review and Supplemental Evidence: Fifth Circuit’s Decision in Freeman v. County of Bexar

De Novo Review and Supplemental Evidence: Fifth Circuit’s Decision in Freeman v. County of Bexar

Date: May 30, 1998
De Novo Review and Supplemental Evidence: Fifth Circuit’s Decision in Freeman v. County of Bexar Introduction Freeman v. County of Bexar is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Scope of Arbitration Clauses under TGAA: Limitations on Arbitrating Legally Independent Claims

Scope of Arbitration Clauses under TGAA: Limitations on Arbitrating Legally Independent Claims

Date: May 30, 1998
Scope of Arbitration Clauses under TGAA: Limitations on Arbitrating Legally Independent Claims Introduction The case of Kenneth Ford, Dr., Plaintiff-Appellee v. NYLCare Health Plans of the Gulf...
Walker v. Texas Regents: Clarifying Removal Procedures, Qualified Immunity Standards, and Bankruptcy Debt Discharge Post-Seminole

Walker v. Texas Regents: Clarifying Removal Procedures, Qualified Immunity Standards, and Bankruptcy Debt Discharge Post-Seminole

Date: May 29, 1998
Walker v. Texas Regents: Clarifying Removal Procedures, Qualified Immunity Standards, and Bankruptcy Debt Discharge Post-Seminole Introduction Walker v. Texas Regents is a seminal case decided by the...
Reversal of Municipal Liability in James Snyder v. Sidney Trepagnier: Qualified Immunity Affirmed

Reversal of Municipal Liability in James Snyder v. Sidney Trepagnier: Qualified Immunity Affirmed

Date: May 28, 1998
Reversal of Municipal Liability in James Snyder v. Sidney Trepagnier: Qualified Immunity Affirmed Introduction James Snyder v. Sidney Trepagnier, et al. is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
Elvis Presley Enterprises v. Capece: Impact of Advertising and Parody on Trademark Confusion

Elvis Presley Enterprises v. Capece: Impact of Advertising and Parody on Trademark Confusion

Date: May 28, 1998
Elvis Presley Enterprises v. Capece: Impact of Advertising and Parody on Trademark Confusion Introduction The case of Elvis Presley Enterprises, Incorporated (EPE) versus Barry Capece and associated...
Affirmation of Garcia Abrego's Conviction: CCE and Pinkerton Liability Uphold Drug and Money Laundering Charges

Affirmation of Garcia Abrego's Conviction: CCE and Pinkerton Liability Uphold Drug and Money Laundering Charges

Date: May 27, 1998
Affirmation of Garcia Abrego's Conviction: CCE and Pinkerton Liability Uphold Drug and Money Laundering Charges Introduction The case of United States of America v. Juan Garcia Abrego, 141 F.3d 142...
Establishing the Viability of Hostile Environment Claims Under the Continuing Violation Doctrine in Title VII Cases

Establishing the Viability of Hostile Environment Claims Under the Continuing Violation Doctrine in Title VII Cases

Date: May 23, 1998
Establishing the Viability of Hostile Environment Claims Under the Continuing Violation Doctrine in Title VII Cases Introduction HUCKABAY v. MOORE, Jefferson County, Texas is a seminal case...
Narrow Interpretation of 'Interest Covered' in Employee Dishonesty Insurance: Lynch Properties Inc. v. Potomac Insurance Co.

Narrow Interpretation of 'Interest Covered' in Employee Dishonesty Insurance: Lynch Properties Inc. v. Potomac Insurance Co.

Date: May 20, 1998
Narrow Interpretation of 'Interest Covered' in Employee Dishonesty Insurance: Lynch Properties Inc. v. Potomac Insurance Co. Introduction The case Lynch Properties Inc. v. Potomac Insurance Company...
Admissibility of Late-Designated Experts and Former NTSB Testimony: Insights from Campbell v. Keystone

Admissibility of Late-Designated Experts and Former NTSB Testimony: Insights from Campbell v. Keystone

Date: May 20, 1998
Admissibility of Late-Designated Experts and Former NTSB Testimony: Insights from Campbell v. Keystone Introduction The case of Campbell v. Keystone Aerial Surveys, Incorporated, adjudicated by the...
Comprehensive Analysis of Spicer v. Collins: Establishing Standards for Inmate Civil Rights Claims under Section 1983

Comprehensive Analysis of Spicer v. Collins: Establishing Standards for Inmate Civil Rights Claims under Section 1983

Date: May 15, 1998
Comprehensive Analysis of Spicer v. Collins: Establishing Standards for Inmate Civil Rights Claims under Section 1983 Introduction In the landmark case Rickey Gene Spicer v. James A. Collins, et al.,...
Affirming Broad Arbitration Clauses in Joint Operating Agreements: Ramco v. Pennzoil Sets Precedent

Affirming Broad Arbitration Clauses in Joint Operating Agreements: Ramco v. Pennzoil Sets Precedent

Date: May 14, 1998
Affirming Broad Arbitration Clauses in Joint Operating Agreements: Ramco v. Pennzoil Sets Precedent Introduction Ramco Energy Limited and Pennzoil Exploration and Production Company were embroiled in...
Treating Rule 60(b) Motions as Successive §2255 Applications: Insights from UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT RICH

Treating Rule 60(b) Motions as Successive §2255 Applications: Insights from UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT RICH

Date: May 14, 1998
Treating Rule 60(b) Motions as Successive §2255 Applications: Insights from United States of America v. Robert Rich Introduction UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT RICH, 141 F.3d 550 (5th Cir. 1998),...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from McDonald v. Johnson

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from McDonald v. Johnson

Date: May 12, 1998
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from McDonald v. Johnson Introduction The case of Sidney Andre McDonald v. Gary L. Johnson, decided by the United States Court of...
Pre-AEDPA Standards for Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Castillo v. Johnson

Pre-AEDPA Standards for Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Castillo v. Johnson

Date: May 12, 1998
Pre-AEDPA Standards for Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Castillo v. Johnson Introduction Castillo v. Johnson, 141 F.3d 218 (5th Cir. 1998), is a pivotal appellate decision that underscores the...
Qualified Immunity and Official Capacity in Federal Civil Rights Claims: Insights from Da v. d JONES

Qualified Immunity and Official Capacity in Federal Civil Rights Claims: Insights from Da v. d JONES

Date: May 9, 1998
Qualified Immunity and Official Capacity in Federal Civil Rights Claims: Insights from Da v. d JONES Introduction In the landmark case of Da v. d JONES (4 F. Supp. 2d 606), the United States District...
Time-Bar of Title VII Claims and Requirements for Quid Pro Quo and Retaliation: Analysis of Webb v. Cardiothoracic Surgery Associates

Time-Bar of Title VII Claims and Requirements for Quid Pro Quo and Retaliation: Analysis of Webb v. Cardiothoracic Surgery Associates

Date: May 1, 1998
Time-Bar of Title VII Claims and Requirements for Quid Pro Quo and Retaliation: Analysis of Webb v. Cardiothoracic Surgery Associates Introduction Webb v. Cardiothoracic Surgery Associates of North...
Utility Holds and Municipal Contracts: Insights from Hidden Oaks v. City of Austin

Utility Holds and Municipal Contracts: Insights from Hidden Oaks v. City of Austin

Date: Apr 30, 1998
Utility Holds and Municipal Contracts: Insights from Hidden Oaks Limited v. City of Austin Introduction The case of Hidden Oaks Limited et al. v. City of Austin, reported at 138 F.3d 1036 (5th Cir....
Affirming Arbitration Over Third-Party Rights in Development Agreements: Nauru Phosphate Royalties v. Drago Daic Interests

Affirming Arbitration Over Third-Party Rights in Development Agreements: Nauru Phosphate Royalties v. Drago Daic Interests

Date: Apr 30, 1998
Affirming Arbitration Over Third-Party Rights in Development Agreements: Nauru Phosphate Royalties v. Drago Daic Interests Introduction The case of Nauru Phosphate Royalties, Incorporated, (Texas) v....
ADA Jurisprudence Reinforced: Pryor v. Trane Company Sets Clear Standards for Disability Determination

ADA Jurisprudence Reinforced: Pryor v. Trane Company Sets Clear Standards for Disability Determination

Date: Apr 25, 1998
ADA Jurisprudence Reinforced: Pryor v. Trane Company Sets Clear Standards for Disability Determination Introduction The case of Ora Lee Pryor v. Trane Company, a Division of American Standard, Inc....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert