Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Constructive Possession of Ammunition by a Convicted Felon: De Leon v. United States

Constructive Possession of Ammunition by a Convicted Felon: De Leon v. United States

Date: Mar 18, 1999
Constructive Possession of Ammunition by a Convicted Felon: De Leon v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Thomas De Leon (170 F.3d 494), the United States...
Mayabb v. Johnson: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Dismissal under Brecht Standard

Mayabb v. Johnson: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Dismissal under Brecht Standard

Date: Mar 18, 1999
Mayabb v. Johnson: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Dismissal under Brecht Standard Introduction Mayabb v. Johnson is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Impact of Burlington/Faragher on the Fifth Circuit: Watts v. Kroger Establishes Modified Standards for Sexual Harassment Claims

Impact of Burlington/Faragher on the Fifth Circuit: Watts v. Kroger Establishes Modified Standards for Sexual Harassment Claims

Date: Mar 18, 1999
Impact of Burlington/Faragher on the Fifth Circuit: Watts v. Kroger Establishes Modified Standards for Sexual Harassment Claims Introduction Watts v. Kroger (170 F.3d 505) is a pivotal case decided...
Defining "Ultimate Employment Decision" in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Stancu v. Gables Residential Services

Defining "Ultimate Employment Decision" in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Stancu v. Gables Residential Services

Date: Mar 17, 1999
Defining "Ultimate Employment Decision" in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Stancu v. Gables Residential Services Introduction The case of Stancu v. Gables Residential Services (168 F.3d...
Milton Evans v. Ball and Steadman: Clarifying Standards for Malicious Prosecution and Qualified Immunity

Milton Evans v. Ball and Steadman: Clarifying Standards for Malicious Prosecution and Qualified Immunity

Date: Mar 13, 1999
Milton Evans v. Ball and Steadman: Clarifying Standards for Malicious Prosecution and Qualified Immunity Introduction Milton Evans, a Forest Service employee, filed a lawsuit against William S. Ball...
Recusal Standards and Judicial Impartiality: Analysis of Trevino v. Johnson

Recusal Standards and Judicial Impartiality: Analysis of Trevino v. Johnson

Date: Mar 10, 1999
Recusal Standards and Judicial Impartiality: Analysis of Trevino v. Johnson Introduction Trevino v. Johnson, 168 F.3d 173 (5th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case addressing the standards for judicial...
Mandatory Physical Presence at Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Navarro & Edmondson

Mandatory Physical Presence at Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Navarro & Edmondson

Date: Mar 9, 1999
Mandatory Physical Presence at Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Navarro & Edmondson Introduction The case of United States of America v. Salvador Vargas Navarro and Samuel Pasqual Edmondson...
Affirming Sanctions and Attorney's Fees Under §1988 and §1927 in Frivolous §1983 Claims: A 5th Circuit Precedent

Affirming Sanctions and Attorney's Fees Under §1988 and §1927 in Frivolous §1983 Claims: A 5th Circuit Precedent

Date: Mar 6, 1999
Affirming Sanctions and Attorney's Fees Under §1988 and §1927 in Frivolous §1983 Claims: A 5th Circuit Precedent Introduction The case of Eddie Walker et al. v. City of Bogalusa et al., adjudicated...
Standard of Review for ERISA Benefit Determinations Affirmed in Meditrust v. Sterling Chemicals

Standard of Review for ERISA Benefit Determinations Affirmed in Meditrust v. Sterling Chemicals

Date: Mar 5, 1999
Standard of Review for ERISA Benefit Determinations Affirmed in Meditrust v. Sterling Chemicals Introduction The case Meditrust Financial Services Corporation, New Medico Associates, Incorporated,...
Enhanced Standards for Disability Claims of Near-Retirement Age: McQueen v. Apfel

Enhanced Standards for Disability Claims of Near-Retirement Age: McQueen v. Apfel

Date: Mar 5, 1999
Enhanced Standards for Disability Claims of Near-Retirement Age: McQueen v. Apfel Introduction The case of Orie W. McQueen v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security (168 F.3d 152, 5th Cir....
Fifth Circuit Establishes Limits on Recoverable Damages Under FMLA and ERISA in Nero v. Industrial Molding Corporation

Fifth Circuit Establishes Limits on Recoverable Damages Under FMLA and ERISA in Nero v. Industrial Molding Corporation

Date: Mar 3, 1999
Fifth Circuit Establishes Limits on Recoverable Damages Under FMLA and ERISA in Nero v. Industrial Molding Corporation Introduction Nero v. Industrial Molding Corporation, 167 F.3d 921 (5th Cir....
Clarifying Service of Process and Damages under ERISA: Analysis of Rogers v. Hartford Life and Disability Plan

Clarifying Service of Process and Damages under ERISA: Analysis of Rogers v. Hartford Life and Disability Plan

Date: Mar 3, 1999
Clarifying Service of Process and Damages under ERISA: Analysis of Rogers v. Hartford Life and Disability Plan Introduction The case of Glynn W. Rogers v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance...
AEDPA's Impact on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from GRAHAM v. JOHNSON

AEDPA's Impact on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from GRAHAM v. JOHNSON

Date: Feb 27, 1999
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act's Impact on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: An Analysis of GRAHAM v. JOHNSON Introduction Graham Graham, now known as Shaka Sankofa, a Texas death...
Limitations on Federal Court Abstention: Murphy v. Uncle Ben's, Inc.

Limitations on Federal Court Abstention: Murphy v. Uncle Ben's, Inc.

Date: Feb 26, 1999
Limitations on Federal Court Abstention: Murphy v. Uncle Ben's, Inc. Introduction Murphy v. Uncle Ben's, Inc., 168 F.3d 734 (5th Cir. 1999), presents a pivotal examination of the discretionary power...
United States v. Powers: Affirmation of Fraud and Money Laundering Convictions Based on Intrinsic Evidence and Sentencing Enhancements

United States v. Powers: Affirmation of Fraud and Money Laundering Convictions Based on Intrinsic Evidence and Sentencing Enhancements

Date: Feb 26, 1999
United States v. Powers: Affirmation of Fraud and Money Laundering Convictions Based on Intrinsic Evidence and Sentencing Enhancements Introduction United States of America v. John Brian Powers, 168...
Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in Hazing Incidents: Alton v. Texas A&M University

Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in Hazing Incidents: Alton v. Texas A&M University

Date: Feb 23, 1999
Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in Hazing Incidents: Alton v. Texas A&M University Introduction Alton v. Texas A&M University is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Qualified Immunity and Eleventh Amendment: A Landmark Fifth Circuit Decision

Qualified Immunity and Eleventh Amendment: A Landmark Fifth Circuit Decision

Date: Feb 18, 1999
Qualified Immunity and Eleventh Amendment: A Landmark Fifth Circuit Decision Introduction In Ramiro Reyes; Florentino Martinez; Elizabeth Martinez v. Carl Sazan, et al., the United States Court of...
Reaffirming Fourth Amendment Protections in Traffic Stops and Vehicle Searches: United States v. Castro

Reaffirming Fourth Amendment Protections in Traffic Stops and Vehicle Searches: United States v. Castro

Date: Feb 13, 1999
Reaffirming Fourth Amendment Protections in Traffic Stops and Vehicle Searches: United States v. Castro Introduction The case of United States of America v. Edgar Castro examined critical issues...
Ex Post Facto Clause and Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from United States v. Kimler

Ex Post Facto Clause and Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from United States v. Kimler

Date: Feb 12, 1999
Ex Post Facto Clause and Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from United States v. Kimler Introduction United States v. Kenneth Karl Kimler, 167 F.3d 889 (5th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case that explores...
Fifth Circuit Establishes Limits on District Courts’ Jurisdiction to Set Restitution Payment Schedules

Fifth Circuit Establishes Limits on District Courts’ Jurisdiction to Set Restitution Payment Schedules

Date: Feb 10, 1999
Fifth Circuit Establishes Limits on District Courts’ Jurisdiction to Set Restitution Payment Schedules Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Stephen F. Hatten, adjudicated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert