Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Requiring Substantial Evidence in Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Chaney v. New Orleans Public Facility Management

Requiring Substantial Evidence in Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Chaney v. New Orleans Public Facility Management

Date: Jun 18, 1999
Requiring Substantial Evidence in Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Chaney v. New Orleans Public Facility Management Introduction Chaney v. New Orleans Public Facility Management, Inc. is a pivotal...
Redefining Fixture Classification under Commercial Insurance Policies: Prytania Park Hotel v. General Star Indemnity Co.

Redefining Fixture Classification under Commercial Insurance Policies: Prytania Park Hotel v. General Star Indemnity Co.

Date: Jun 18, 1999
Redefining Fixture Classification under Commercial Insurance Policies: Prytania Park Hotel v. General Star Indemnity Co. Introduction In the landmark case of The Prytania Park Hotel, Limited; Alvin...
Enhancing the Interactive Process in ADA Accommodations: Insights from Loulseged v. Akzo Nobel

Enhancing the Interactive Process in ADA Accommodations: Insights from Loulseged v. Akzo Nobel

Date: Jun 17, 1999
Enhancing the Interactive Process in ADA Accommodations: Insights from Loulseged v. Akzo Nobel Introduction Case Citation: Hermela Loulseged v. Akzo Nobel Incorporated, et al., No. 97-20864 (5th Cir....
Reliability of Tanner Scale Analysis in Child Pornography Cases: A Daubert Standard Application

Reliability of Tanner Scale Analysis in Child Pornography Cases: A Daubert Standard Application

Date: Jun 15, 1999
Reliability of Tanner Scale Analysis in Child Pornography Cases: A Daubert Standard Application Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Arnold Katz, adjudicated by the United States...
Limiting the Good-Faith Exception: Reasonable Suspicion in Border Vehicular Stops

Limiting the Good-Faith Exception: Reasonable Suspicion in Border Vehicular Stops

Date: Jun 2, 1999
Limiting the Good-Faith Exception: Reasonable Suspicion in Border Vehicular Stops Introduction United States of America v. Sonia Luz Lopez-Valdez, 178 F.3d 282 (5th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case...
Enforcement of No-Damages-for-Delay Clauses and Sovereign Immunity in Public Construction Contracts: PYCA Industries v. Harrison County Waste Water Management District

Enforcement of No-Damages-for-Delay Clauses and Sovereign Immunity in Public Construction Contracts: PYCA Industries v. Harrison County Waste Water Management District

Date: May 28, 1999
Enforcement of No-Damages-for-Delay Clauses and Sovereign Immunity in Public Construction Contracts: PYCA Industries v. Harrison County Waste Water Management District Introduction The case of PYCA...
Reassignment Obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act: Analysis of Burch v. City of Nacogdoches

Reassignment Obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act: Analysis of Burch v. City of Nacogdoches

Date: May 27, 1999
Reassignment Obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act: Analysis of Burch v. City of Nacogdoches Introduction The case of Gene A. Burch v. City of Nacogdoches revolves around allegations...
Affirmation of Preliminary Injunction against CarMax: Clarifying Privity and the Anti-Injunction Act in Blue Law Enforcement

Affirmation of Preliminary Injunction against CarMax: Clarifying Privity and the Anti-Injunction Act in Blue Law Enforcement

Date: May 27, 1999
Affirmation of Preliminary Injunction against CarMax: Clarifying Privity and the Anti-Injunction Act in Blue Law Enforcement Introduction The case of Harris County, Texas v. CarMax Auto Superstores...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Affirmation of Summary Judgment: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: May 27, 1999
Affirmation of Summary Judgment: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of James Beathard v. Gary Johnson,...
Invalid Transfer of 'SUGARBUSTERS' Service Mark and Unfair Competition Considerations: Sugar Busters LLC v. Brennan

Invalid Transfer of 'SUGARBUSTERS' Service Mark and Unfair Competition Considerations: Sugar Busters LLC v. Brennan

Date: May 26, 1999
Invalid Transfer of 'SUGARBUSTERS' Service Mark and Unfair Competition Considerations: Sugar Busters LLC v. Brennan Introduction In the landmark case Sugar Busters LLC v. Brennan, the United States...
Deliberate Indifference and Minimal Liberty Interests in Eighth Amendment Claims: Harper v. Mississippi Department of Corrections

Deliberate Indifference and Minimal Liberty Interests in Eighth Amendment Claims: Harper v. Mississippi Department of Corrections

Date: May 25, 1999
Deliberate Indifference and Minimal Liberty Interests in Eighth Amendment Claims: Harper v. Mississippi Department of Corrections Introduction Harper v. Mississippi Department of Corrections is a...
Current Drug Use Exclusion under the ADA Affirmed in At-Will Employment: Zenor v. Columbia Medical Center-East

Current Drug Use Exclusion under the ADA Affirmed in At-Will Employment: Zenor v. Columbia Medical Center-East

Date: May 25, 1999
Current Drug Use Exclusion under the ADA Affirmed in At-Will Employment: Zenor v. Columbia Medical Center-East Introduction The case of Tom Zenor v. El Paso Healthcare System, Ltd., d/b/a Columbia...
Purposeful Availment and Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Electrosource Inc. v. Horizon Battery Technologies, Limited

Purposeful Availment and Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Electrosource Inc. v. Horizon Battery Technologies, Limited

Date: May 25, 1999
Purposeful Availment and Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Electrosource Inc. v. Horizon Battery Technologies, Limited Introduction The case of Electrosource, Inc. v. Horizon Battery Technologies...
Fisher v. Johnson: Defining the Boundaries of Equitable Tolling under AEDPA

Fisher v. Johnson: Defining the Boundaries of Equitable Tolling under AEDPA

Date: May 25, 1999
Fisher v. Johnson: Defining the Boundaries of Equitable Tolling under AEDPA Introduction In the landmark case Fisher v. Johnson, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Affirmation of Procedural Bars in Federal Habeas Corpus: JOHNSON v. MISSISSIPPI

Affirmation of Procedural Bars in Federal Habeas Corpus: JOHNSON v. MISSISSIPPI

Date: May 21, 1999
Affirmation of Procedural Bars in Federal Habeas Corpus: JOHNSON v. MISSISSIPPI Introduction Samuel Rice Johnson appealed the denial of his habeas corpus application by the United States Court of...
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Toxic Tort Cases: Dixon v. MS Petroleum

Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Toxic Tort Cases: Dixon v. MS Petroleum

Date: May 21, 1999
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Toxic Tort Cases: Dixon v. MS Petroleum Introduction In the landmark case of Dixon v. MS Petroleum, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit...
Strict Enforcement of Notice Requirements in Claims-Made Insurance Policies: MATADOR PETROLEUM CORP. v. ST PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE CO.

Strict Enforcement of Notice Requirements in Claims-Made Insurance Policies: MATADOR PETROLEUM CORP. v. ST PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE CO.

Date: May 15, 1999
Strict Enforcement of Notice Requirements in Claims-Made Insurance Policies Introduction In the case of Matador Petroleum Corporation v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company, decided by the...
Eleventh Amendment Immunity and the Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office: A Comprehensive Analysis

Eleventh Amendment Immunity and the Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: May 14, 1999
Eleventh Amendment Immunity and the Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of Keith Hudson v. City of New Orleans; District Attorney's Office; Susan...
Lemoine v. New Horizons Ranch: Redefining Qualified Immunity in Substantive Due Process Claims

Lemoine v. New Horizons Ranch: Redefining Qualified Immunity in Substantive Due Process Claims

Date: May 13, 1999
Lemoine v. New Horizons Ranch: Redefining Qualified Immunity in Substantive Due Process Claims Introduction The case of Lemoine v. New Horizons Ranch and Center, Inc. (174 F.3d 629) adjudicated by...
Clarifying Actual Damages Calculation in Limited Partnership Derivative Actions: Thomas v. Barton Lodge II, Ltd.

Clarifying Actual Damages Calculation in Limited Partnership Derivative Actions: Thomas v. Barton Lodge II, Ltd.

Date: May 13, 1999
Clarifying Actual Damages Calculation in Limited Partnership Derivative Actions: Thomas v. Barton Lodge II, Ltd. Introduction The case of Thomas v. Barton Lodge II, Ltd. (174 F.3d 636) adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert