Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Burden of Proof in Wrongful Seizure Counterclaims under the Lanham Act: Martin's Herendi Imports v. Diamond Gem Trading

Reaffirming Burden of Proof in Wrongful Seizure Counterclaims under the Lanham Act: Martin's Herendi Imports v. Diamond Gem Trading

Date: Nov 10, 1999
Reaffirming Burden of Proof in Wrongful Seizure Counterclaims under the Lanham Act: Martin's Herendi Imports v. Diamond Gem Trading Introduction The case of Martin's Herendi Imports, Inc., and...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in International Fraud Cases: Wien Air Alaska, Inc. v. Gerald I. Brandt

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in International Fraud Cases: Wien Air Alaska, Inc. v. Gerald I. Brandt

Date: Nov 6, 1999
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in International Fraud Cases: Wien Air Alaska, Inc. v. Gerald I. Brandt Introduction In the case of Wien Air Alaska, Inc. v. Gerald I. Brandt, adjudicated by the...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Doyle Violations in Habeas Review – Chavez v. United States

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Doyle Violations in Habeas Review – Chavez v. United States

Date: Nov 3, 1999
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Doyle Violations in Habeas Review – Chavez v. United States Introduction Chavez v. United States, 193 F.3d 375 (5th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal appellate case that...
Affirmation of Denial Due to Non-Material Brady Violations in Capital Sentencing: Jackson v. Johnson

Affirmation of Denial Due to Non-Material Brady Violations in Capital Sentencing: Jackson v. Johnson

Date: Oct 30, 1999
Affirmation of Denial Due to Non-Material Brady Violations in Capital Sentencing: Jackson v. Johnson Introduction Jackson v. Johnson (194 F.3d 641, 5th Cir. 1999) is a pivotal case in the realm of...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Prejudice in Capital Habeas Corpus: MOORE v. JOHNSON

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Prejudice in Capital Habeas Corpus: MOORE v. JOHNSON

Date: Oct 28, 1999
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Prejudice in Capital Habeas Corpus: MOORE v. JOHNSON Introduction In the landmark case of Bobbbie James Moore v. Gary L. Johnson, the United States Court of...
Establishing the Limits of §2244(d)(2): The Fifth Circuit's Affirmation in Ott v. Johnson

Establishing the Limits of §2244(d)(2): The Fifth Circuit's Affirmation in Ott v. Johnson

Date: Oct 22, 1999
Establishing the Limits of §2244(d)(2): The Fifth Circuit's Affirmation in Ott v. Johnson Introduction The case of Gregory Arthur Ott v. Gary L. Johnson, decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Qualified Immunity and Eighth Amendment Protections: Insights from Devlin R. Palmer v. Johnson et al.

Qualified Immunity and Eighth Amendment Protections: Insights from Devlin R. Palmer v. Johnson et al.

Date: Oct 20, 1999
Qualified Immunity and Eighth Amendment Protections: Insights from Devlin R. Palmer v. Johnson et al. Introduction The case of Devlin R. Palmer v. Gary L. Johnson et al., adjudicated by the United...
5th Circuit Upholds Conventional Subrogation and Policy Limit Stacking in UM Insurance Claims

5th Circuit Upholds Conventional Subrogation and Policy Limit Stacking in UM Insurance Claims

Date: Oct 20, 1999
5th Circuit Upholds Conventional Subrogation and Policy Limit Stacking in UM Insurance Claims Introduction In the landmark case of VIRGINIA WOODFIELD, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE...
60-Day Appeal Period in Non-Intervened Qui Tam Actions Established by Russell v. Epic Healthcare Management Group

60-Day Appeal Period in Non-Intervened Qui Tam Actions Established by Russell v. Epic Healthcare Management Group

Date: Oct 15, 1999
60-Day Appeal Period in Non-Intervened Qui Tam Actions Established by Russell v. Epic Healthcare Management Group Introduction Russell v. Epic Healthcare Management Group is a pivotal case decided by...
A Comprehensive Commentary on Willie Berry, Jr. v. Joseph Brady: Affirmation of Standards for § 1983 Claims in Prison Conditions

A Comprehensive Commentary on Willie Berry, Jr. v. Joseph Brady: Affirmation of Standards for § 1983 Claims in Prison Conditions

Date: Oct 9, 1999
Affirmation of Standards for § 1983 Claims in Prison Conditions: Willie Berry, Jr. v. Joseph Brady Introduction The case of Willie Berry, Jr. v. Joseph Brady, adjudicated by the United States Court...
Establishing the Claimant's Burden of Proof in SSI Disability Claims Involving Substance Abuse: Brown v. Apfel

Establishing the Claimant's Burden of Proof in SSI Disability Claims Involving Substance Abuse: Brown v. Apfel

Date: Oct 8, 1999
Establishing the Claimant's Burden of Proof in SSI Disability Claims Involving Substance Abuse: Brown v. Apfel Introduction Carmen Brown, the plaintiff-appellant, filed for Supplemental Security...
Affirmation of Procedural Default and Barriers to Habeas Relief in Capital Murder Cases: Hughes v. Johnson

Affirmation of Procedural Default and Barriers to Habeas Relief in Capital Murder Cases: Hughes v. Johnson

Date: Oct 6, 1999
Affirmation of Procedural Default and Barriers to Habeas Relief in Capital Murder Cases: Hughes v. Johnson Introduction Hughes v. Johnson, 191 F.3d 607 (5th Cir. 1999), is a seminal case addressing...
Shackelford v. Deloitte Touche: Evidentiary Standards for Retaliation Claims under Title VII

Shackelford v. Deloitte Touche: Evidentiary Standards for Retaliation Claims under Title VII

Date: Oct 5, 1999
Shackelford v. Deloitte Touche: Evidentiary Standards for Retaliation Claims under Title VII Introduction Shackelford v. Deloitte Touche, LLP, 190 F.3d 398 (5th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case in...
Fundamental Miscarriage of Justice Overcomes Procedural Defaults: Fairman v. Anderson

Fundamental Miscarriage of Justice Overcomes Procedural Defaults: Fairman v. Anderson

Date: Sep 29, 1999
Fundamental Miscarriage of Justice Overcomes Procedural Defaults: Fairman v. Anderson Introduction Fairman v. Anderson, 188 F.3d 635 (5th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal appellate case in the United States...
Reaffirming the Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases: Kitchens v. Johnson

Reaffirming the Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases: Kitchens v. Johnson

Date: Sep 29, 1999
Reaffirming the Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases: Kitchens v. Johnson Introduction Kitchens v. Johnson (190 F.3d 698, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth...
Qualified Immunity Upholds Dismissal of ADA Claims Against Prison Medical Staff in Hall v. Thomas

Qualified Immunity Upholds Dismissal of ADA Claims Against Prison Medical Staff in Hall v. Thomas

Date: Sep 29, 1999
Qualified Immunity Upholds Dismissal of ADA Claims Against Prison Medical Staff in Hall v. Thomas Introduction In Robert Arthur Hall v. Tommy B. Thomas, Sheriff; et al., the United States Court of...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in Internet-Based Business: Mink v. AAAA Development

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in Internet-Based Business: Mink v. AAAA Development

Date: Sep 18, 1999
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in Internet-Based Business: Mink v. AAAA Development Introduction The case of David Mink v. AAAA Development LLC et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Unconstitutionality of Louisiana's Act 825: Implications for Abortion Providers and Women's Rights

Affirmation of Unconstitutionality of Louisiana's Act 825: Implications for Abortion Providers and Women's Rights

Date: Sep 18, 1999
Affirmation of Unconstitutionality of Louisiana's Act 825: Implications for Abortion Providers and Women's Rights Introduction In the landmark case of Ifeanyi Charles Anthony Okpalobi v. Mike Foster,...
Jones v. Greninger: Affirmation of Strict Standards for Prisoner Retaliation and Eighth Amendment Claims under PLRA

Jones v. Greninger: Affirmation of Strict Standards for Prisoner Retaliation and Eighth Amendment Claims under PLRA

Date: Sep 18, 1999
Jones v. Greninger: Affirmation of Strict Standards for Prisoner Retaliation and Eighth Amendment Claims under PLRA Introduction In Jones v. Greninger et al., decided by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Title VII Discrimination Claim: SUHA SREERAM v. LSUMC-S Decision

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Title VII Discrimination Claim: SUHA SREERAM v. LSUMC-S Decision

Date: Sep 17, 1999
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Title VII Discrimination Claim: SUHA SREERAM v. LSUMC-S Decision Introduction In the appellate case of SUHA SREERAM, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Louisiana State...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert