Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reversing Summary Judgment: Vielma v. Eureka Company and the Interpretation of TCHRA's Filing Period

Reversing Summary Judgment: Vielma v. Eureka Company and the Interpretation of TCHRA's Filing Period

Date: Jul 21, 2000
Reversing Summary Judgment: Vielma v. Eureka Company and the Interpretation of TCHRA's Filing Period Introduction Vielma v. Eureka Company is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Establishing Personal Liability of Sole Shareholders Under PACA: Golman-Hayden Co., Inc. v. Tomaneng

Establishing Personal Liability of Sole Shareholders Under PACA: Golman-Hayden Co., Inc. v. Tomaneng

Date: Jul 18, 2000
Establishing Personal Liability of Sole Shareholders Under PACA: Golman-Hayden Co., Inc. v. Tomaneng Introduction The case Golman-Hayden Co., Inc.; Ideal Sales Inc. v. Tomaneng, adjudicated by the...
Redefining 'Agent' and Nexus Requirements under 18 U.S.C. § 666: Insights from the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Phillips & Newman

Redefining 'Agent' and Nexus Requirements under 18 U.S.C. § 666: Insights from the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Phillips & Newman

Date: Jul 14, 2000
Redefining 'Agent' and Nexus Requirements under 18 U.S.C. § 666: Insights from the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Phillips & Newman Introduction The case of United States of America v. Chaney L....
Combined Impairment Evaluation in Disability Claims Reiterated in Loza v. Apfel

Combined Impairment Evaluation in Disability Claims Reiterated in Loza v. Apfel

Date: Jul 14, 2000
Combined Impairment Evaluation in Disability Claims Reiterated in Loza v. Apfel Introduction Parties Involved: Porter G. Loza (Plaintiff-Appellant) vs. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social...
De Minimis Exception in Rule 50 Motions: Insights from Taylor Publishing Co. v. Jostens Inc.

De Minimis Exception in Rule 50 Motions: Insights from Taylor Publishing Co. v. Jostens Inc.

Date: Jul 13, 2000
De Minimis Exception in Rule 50 Motions: Insights from Taylor Publishing Co. v. Jostens Inc. Introduction Taylor Publishing Company v. Jostens Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Establishing Boundaries on Collateral Attacks in Deportation Proceedings - Lara v. Trominski

Establishing Boundaries on Collateral Attacks in Deportation Proceedings - Lara v. Trominski

Date: Jul 11, 2000
Establishing Boundaries on Collateral Attacks in Deportation Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Francisco R. Lara v. E.M. Trominski Introduction The case of Francisco R. Lara v. E.M. Trominski,...
Limitation on Habeas Corpus Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241: Insights from James David Pack v. Yusuff

Limitation on Habeas Corpus Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241: Insights from James David Pack v. Yusuff

Date: Jul 11, 2000
Limitation on Habeas Corpus Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241: Insights from James David Pack v. Yusuff Introduction James David Pack v. Khurshid Z. Yusuff is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Proper Filing and Tolling under AEDPA: Williams v. Cain Analysis

Proper Filing and Tolling under AEDPA: Williams v. Cain Analysis

Date: Jul 7, 2000
Proper Filing and Tolling under AEDPA: Williams v. Cain Analysis Introduction Elmore J. Williams v. Burl Cain, 217 F.3d 303 (5th Cir. 2000), addresses critical issues surrounding the timeliness of...
Fifth Circuit Limits Punitive Damages in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Rubinstein v. Tulane Educational Fund

Fifth Circuit Limits Punitive Damages in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Rubinstein v. Tulane Educational Fund

Date: Jul 7, 2000
Fifth Circuit Limits Punitive Damages in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Rubinstein v. Tulane Educational Fund Introduction Rubinstein v. Tulane Educational Fund, 218 F.3d 392 (5th Cir. 2000), is a...
Defining 'Possession in Furtherance' Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i): Insights from United States of America v. Javier Ceballos-Torres

Defining 'Possession in Furtherance' Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i): Insights from United States of America v. Javier Ceballos-Torres

Date: Jul 7, 2000
Defining 'Possession in Furtherance' Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i): Insights from United States of America v. Javier Ceballos-Torres Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America...
Title VII Retaliation and Statute of Limitations: The Fifth Circuit's Decision in Vadie v. Mississippi State University

Title VII Retaliation and Statute of Limitations: The Fifth Circuit's Decision in Vadie v. Mississippi State University

Date: Jul 6, 2000
Title VII Retaliation and Statute of Limitations: The Fifth Circuit's Decision in Vadie v. Mississippi State University Introduction In the landmark case of Ahmad A. Vadie, Doctor v. Mississippi...
Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Piazza v. Mayne

Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Piazza v. Mayne

Date: Jun 30, 2000
Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Piazza v. Mayne Introduction Piazza v. Mayne, 217 F.3d 239 (5th Cir. 2000), addresses the complex interplay between malicious...
Balancing Trademark Rights and First Amendment Protections in Magazine Titles: Westchester Media v. PRL USA Holdings

Balancing Trademark Rights and First Amendment Protections in Magazine Titles: Westchester Media v. PRL USA Holdings

Date: Jun 28, 2000
Balancing Trademark Rights and First Amendment Protections in Magazine Titles: Westchester Media v. PRL USA Holdings Introduction The case of Westchester Media; Navasota Holding Co., L.L.C. v. PRL...
Affirmation of ERISA Preemption: Clancy v. Employers Health Insurance Co. Reinforces Exclusive Remedy Principle Under §502(a)

Affirmation of ERISA Preemption: Clancy v. Employers Health Insurance Co. Reinforces Exclusive Remedy Principle Under §502(a)

Date: Jun 27, 2000
Affirmation of ERISA Preemption: Clancy v. Employers Health Insurance Co. Reinforces Exclusive Remedy Principle Under §502(a) Introduction In Shawn S. Clancy v. Employers Health Insurance Company,...
Limited Preemption of State Law Claims under Pilot Records Sharing Act: JOHNSON v. BAYLOR UNIVERSITY

Limited Preemption of State Law Claims under Pilot Records Sharing Act: JOHNSON v. BAYLOR UNIVERSITY

Date: Jun 23, 2000
Limited Preemption of State Law Claims under Pilot Records Sharing Act: JOHNSON v. BAYLOR UNIVERSITY Introduction Vernon G. JOHNSON v. BAYLOR UNIVERSITY, 214 F.3d 630 (5th Cir. 2000), addresses the...
ERISA Compliance and Timely Claim Filing Upheld in Bratton v. National Union Fire Insurance Company

ERISA Compliance and Timely Claim Filing Upheld in Bratton v. National Union Fire Insurance Company

Date: Jun 21, 2000
ERISA Compliance and Timely Claim Filing Upheld in Bratton v. National Union Fire Insurance Company Introduction The case of Estate of Larry M. Bratton v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of...
State Habeas Applications Toll AEDPA Limitation Period: Dilworth v. Johnson

State Habeas Applications Toll AEDPA Limitation Period: Dilworth v. Johnson

Date: Jun 20, 2000
State Habeas Applications Toll AEDPA Limitation Period: Dilworth v. Johnson Introduction Rodney James Dilworth v. Gary L. Johnson is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Claims: Mendenhall v. Riser (2000)

Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Claims: Mendenhall v. Riser (2000)

Date: Jun 20, 2000
Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Claims: Mendenhall v. Riser (2000) 1. Introduction Mendenhall v. Riser, 213 F.3d 226 (5th Cir. 2000), is a significant appellate decision addressing the doctrine of...
Hernandez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice: Establishing Standards for Certificate of Appealability in Death Penalty Cases

Hernandez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice: Establishing Standards for Certificate of Appealability in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Jun 17, 2000
Hernandez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice: Establishing Standards for Certificate of Appealability in Death Penalty Cases Introduction Hernandez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 213...
Limited Estoppel Remedy Recognized for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies in ERISA Claims: Bourgeois v. Sante Fe International Corporation

Limited Estoppel Remedy Recognized for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies in ERISA Claims: Bourgeois v. Sante Fe International Corporation

Date: Jun 15, 2000
Limited Estoppel Remedy Recognized for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies in ERISA Claims: Bourgeois v. Sante Fe International Corporation Introduction Bourgeois v. Sante Fe International...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert