Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Fifth Circuit Clarifies Ripeness Requirements for Declaratory Judgments under the Endangered Species Act

Fifth Circuit Clarifies Ripeness Requirements for Declaratory Judgments under the Endangered Species Act

Date: Apr 27, 2002
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Ripeness Requirements for Declaratory Judgments under the Endangered Species Act Introduction In the landmark case John H. Shields; Hunter Schuehle v. Gale Norton, Secretary,...
Affirming Good Faith in Title VII Sexual Harassment Claims and Denial of Punitive Damages: Green v. Tulane Educational Fund

Affirming Good Faith in Title VII Sexual Harassment Claims and Denial of Punitive Damages: Green v. Tulane Educational Fund

Date: Apr 27, 2002
Affirming Good Faith in Title VII Sexual Harassment Claims and Denial of Punitive Damages: Green v. Tulane Educational Fund Introduction Cathryn Green v. The Administrators of the Tulane Educational...
Defining Employer Status Under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act: Calbillo v. Cavender Oldsmobile

Defining Employer Status Under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act: Calbillo v. Cavender Oldsmobile

Date: Apr 26, 2002
Defining Employer Status Under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act: Calbillo v. Cavender Oldsmobile Introduction Calbillo v. Cavender Oldsmobile is a landmark case decided by the United States...
Arbitration of Probationary Employee Discharges Not Mandated Under CBA: Insight into Baton Rouge Oil and Chemical Workers Union v. ExxonMobil

Arbitration of Probationary Employee Discharges Not Mandated Under CBA: Insight into Baton Rouge Oil and Chemical Workers Union v. ExxonMobil

Date: Apr 24, 2002
Arbitration of Probationary Employee Discharges Not Mandated Under CBA: Insight into Baton Rouge Oil and Chemical Workers Union v. ExxonMobil Introduction The case of Baton Rouge Oil and Chemical...
Enhanced Protection Against Retaliatory Law Enforcement Actions: Keenan & Przybylski v. Tejeda et al.

Enhanced Protection Against Retaliatory Law Enforcement Actions: Keenan & Przybylski v. Tejeda et al.

Date: Apr 24, 2002
Enhanced Protection Against Retaliatory Law Enforcement Actions: Keenan & Przybylski v. Tejeda et al. Introduction The case of Keenan & Przybylski v. Tejeda et al., 290 F.3d 252 (5th Cir. 2002),...
Limits on Legal Actions Against EEOC: Insights from Newsome v. EEOC

Limits on Legal Actions Against EEOC: Insights from Newsome v. EEOC

Date: Apr 23, 2002
Limits on Legal Actions Against EEOC: Insights from Newsome v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Introduction In the case of Vogel Denise Newsome v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission...
Establishing Causal Link in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Sidna B. GEE v. Anthony PRINCIPI

Establishing Causal Link in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Sidna B. GEE v. Anthony PRINCIPI

Date: Apr 19, 2002
Establishing Causal Link in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Sidna B. GEE v. Anthony PRINCIPI Introduction The case of Sidna B. GEE v. Anthony PRINCIPI, adjudicated by the United States...
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Daubert Standards and Redhibition Limitations in Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc.

Fifth Circuit Clarifies Daubert Standards and Redhibition Limitations in Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc.

Date: Apr 19, 2002
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Daubert Standards and Redhibition Limitations in Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Thomas Pipitone and Bonnie Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc., 288...
Runyan v. United States: Balancing Fourth Amendment Protections and Interstate Commerce in Child Pornography Convictions

Runyan v. United States: Balancing Fourth Amendment Protections and Interstate Commerce in Child Pornography Convictions

Date: Apr 19, 2002
Runyan v. United States: Balancing Fourth Amendment Protections and Interstate Commerce in Child Pornography Convictions Introduction In United States of America v. Robert Beam Runyan, the United...
Affirmation of Firearm Possession Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g): Good-Faith Exception and Interstate Commerce Nexus Established

Affirmation of Firearm Possession Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g): Good-Faith Exception and Interstate Commerce Nexus Established

Date: Apr 13, 2002
Affirmation of Firearm Possession Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g): Good-Faith Exception and Interstate Commerce Nexus Established Introduction The case of United States of America v. Jose Alberto...
Interpretation of Insurance Exclusions and Vicarious Liability under Louisiana Law in KNOE v. General Star Indemnity Co.

Interpretation of Insurance Exclusions and Vicarious Liability under Louisiana Law in KNOE v. General Star Indemnity Co.

Date: Apr 10, 2002
Interpretation of Insurance Exclusions and Vicarious Liability under Louisiana Law in KNOE v. General Star Indemnity Co. Introduction The case of BOSTON OLD COLONY INSURANCE CO. v. General Star...
Coffel v. Stryker Corporation: Reinforcing Standards for Fraud Claims under Rule 50(b)

Coffel v. Stryker Corporation: Reinforcing Standards for Fraud Claims under Rule 50(b)

Date: Apr 10, 2002
Coffel v. Stryker Corporation: Reinforcing Standards for Fraud Claims under Rule 50(b) Introduction In Kenneth L. Coffel v. Stryker Corporation, 284 F.3d 625 (5th Cir. 2002), the United States Court...
Singletary Standard Applied to Physical Disabilities in Social Security Disability Claims

Singletary Standard Applied to Physical Disabilities in Social Security Disability Claims

Date: Apr 9, 2002
Singletary Standard Applied to Physical Disabilities in Social Security Disability Claims Introduction In the case of Donna Watson v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security, the United...
Clarifying Timeliness Standards for Federal Court Removal: Insights from Bosky v. Kroger Texas

Clarifying Timeliness Standards for Federal Court Removal: Insights from Bosky v. Kroger Texas

Date: Apr 9, 2002
Clarifying Timeliness Standards for Federal Court Removal: Insights from Bosky v. Kroger Texas Introduction In the landmark case of Jeanne Bosky v. Kroger Texas, LP; Kroger Limited Partnership I, the...
Reaffirmation of Sentencing Guidelines in Conspiracy to Encourage Illegal Immigration: Insights from United States v. Cabrera (2002)

Reaffirmation of Sentencing Guidelines in Conspiracy to Encourage Illegal Immigration: Insights from United States v. Cabrera (2002)

Date: Apr 4, 2002
Reaffirmation of Sentencing Guidelines in Conspiracy to Encourage Illegal Immigration: Insights from United States v. Cabrera (2002) Introduction In the landmark case United States v. Cabrera (288...
5th Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment in Title VII Hostile Work Environment Claim: Ramsey v. Henderson

5th Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment in Title VII Hostile Work Environment Claim: Ramsey v. Henderson

Date: Mar 30, 2002
5th Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment in Title VII Hostile Work Environment Claim: Ramsey v. Henderson Introduction In the case of Shirley A. RAMSEY v. William J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, heard...
Affirmation of Eighth Amendment Adequacy of Prison Medical Care: Lawson v. Dallas County

Affirmation of Eighth Amendment Adequacy of Prison Medical Care: Lawson v. Dallas County

Date: Mar 29, 2002
Affirmation of Eighth Amendment Adequacy of Prison Medical Care: Lawson v. Dallas County Introduction The case of Brent Lawson v. Dallas County addresses the critical issue of adequate medical care...
United States v. Louis Jones: Upholding Appellate Standards in Death Penalty Sentencing

United States v. Louis Jones: Upholding Appellate Standards in Death Penalty Sentencing

Date: Mar 28, 2002
United States v. Louis Jones: Upholding Appellate Standards in Death Penalty Sentencing Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Louis Jones, decided by the United States Court of...
Broad Interpretation of "Relates To" Under 9 U.S.C. § 205 in Arbitration-Related Removal Cases

Broad Interpretation of "Relates To" Under 9 U.S.C. § 205 in Arbitration-Related Removal Cases

Date: Mar 20, 2002
Broad Interpretation of "Relates To" Under 9 U.S.C. § 205 in Arbitration-Related Removal Cases Introduction The case of Fred E. Beiser, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ibolya Weyler et al. (284 F.3d 665)...
LPLA's Exclusive Remedy Provision Affirmed: Insights from Stahl v. Novartis

LPLA's Exclusive Remedy Provision Affirmed: Insights from Stahl v. Novartis

Date: Mar 16, 2002
LPLA's Exclusive Remedy Provision Affirmed: Insights from Stahl v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. 1. Introduction Case: Joseph B. Stahl v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. Court: United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert