Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Inclusion of Attorney's Fees in Amount in Controversy for Louisiana Class Actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Inclusion of Attorney's Fees in Amount in Controversy for Louisiana Class Actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Date: Oct 12, 2002
Inclusion of Attorney's Fees in Amount in Controversy for Louisiana Class Actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Introduction The case of Elaine F. Grant; Alfred Grant; Jacqueline Leary v. Chevron Phillips...
Broad Enforcement of General Releases Covering ERISA Claims: Insights from Chaplin v. NationsCredit

Broad Enforcement of General Releases Covering ERISA Claims: Insights from Chaplin v. NationsCredit

Date: Oct 9, 2002
Broad Enforcement of General Releases Covering ERISA Claims: Insights from Chaplin v. NationsCredit Introduction In the landmark case of Veronica Chaplin, Thomas Hall, Frank Illing, Stephen Kendall,...
Fifth Circuit Establishes Requirements for Reciprocal Indemnity under OCSLA in Diamond Offshore v. AB Builders

Fifth Circuit Establishes Requirements for Reciprocal Indemnity under OCSLA in Diamond Offshore v. AB Builders

Date: Oct 3, 2002
Fifth Circuit Establishes Requirements for Reciprocal Indemnity under OCSLA in Diamond Offshore v. AB Builders Introduction In the landmark case of Diamond Offshore Company v. AB Builders, Inc., the...
Mandatory Liquidated Damages Under the ADEA: Insights from Tyler v. Union Oil Company of California

Mandatory Liquidated Damages Under the ADEA: Insights from Tyler v. Union Oil Company of California

Date: Oct 3, 2002
Mandatory Liquidated Damages Under the ADEA: Insights from Tyler v. Union Oil Company of California Introduction The case of Tyler v. Union Oil Company of California serves as a pivotal precedent in...
Certificate of Appealability Denied in Woods v. Cockrell: Implications for Federal Habeas Corpus Standards in Capital Cases

Certificate of Appealability Denied in Woods v. Cockrell: Implications for Federal Habeas Corpus Standards in Capital Cases

Date: Sep 25, 2002
Certificate of Appealability Denied in Woods v. Cockrell: Implications for Federal Habeas Corpus Standards in Capital Cases Introduction Bobby Wayne Woods v. Janie Cockrell, Director, Texas...
Enforcement of Waivers in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: United States v. White

Enforcement of Waivers in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: United States v. White

Date: Sep 24, 2002
Enforcement of Waivers in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: United States v. White Introduction The case of United States v. Kevin White delineates critical boundaries concerning the...
Eleventh Amendment Immunity Applied to Educational Service Centers in Perez v. Region 20

Eleventh Amendment Immunity Applied to Educational Service Centers in Perez v. Region 20

Date: Sep 21, 2002
Eleventh Amendment Immunity Applied to Educational Service Centers in Perez v. Region 20 Introduction Daniel M. Perez v. Region 20 Education Service Center, 307 F.3d 318 (5th Cir. 2002), is a seminal...
Res Judicata vs. Personal Jurisdiction: Rule 60(b)(4) Reaffirmed in Fratelli Tanfoglio Case

Res Judicata vs. Personal Jurisdiction: Rule 60(b)(4) Reaffirmed in Fratelli Tanfoglio Case

Date: Sep 18, 2002
Res Judicata vs. Personal Jurisdiction: Rule 60(b)(4) Reaffirmed in Fratelli Tanfoglio Case Introduction In the landmark case of Arnold Jackson; Linda Jackson; and Brian Jackson v. FIE Corporation;...
Denial of Certificate of Appealability in Johnson v. Cockrell: Implications for Death Penalty Appeals

Denial of Certificate of Appealability in Johnson v. Cockrell: Implications for Death Penalty Appeals

Date: Sep 18, 2002
Denial of Certificate of Appealability in Johnson v. Cockrell: Implications for Death Penalty Appeals Introduction In the landmark case of Michael Dewayne Johnson v. Janie Cockrell, heard by the...
Reaffirming the "Solely Because Of" Causation Standard in Rehabilitation Act Claims

Reaffirming the "Solely Because Of" Causation Standard in Rehabilitation Act Claims

Date: Sep 13, 2002
Reaffirming the "Solely Because Of" Causation Standard in Rehabilitation Act Claims Introduction The case of Jose A. Soledad v. United States Department of Treasury (304 F.3d 500) adjudicated by the...
Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont: Clarifying Habeas Corpus Petition Standards under §2241

Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont: Clarifying Habeas Corpus Petition Standards under §2241

Date: Sep 6, 2002
Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont: Clarifying Habeas Corpus Petition Standards under §2241 Introduction In Thomas Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont, TX, Warden, 305 F.3d 343 (5th Cir. 2002),...
Establishing Limits on Qualified Immunity: McCLENDON v. CITY OF COLUMBIA and the State-Created Danger Theory

Establishing Limits on Qualified Immunity: McCLENDON v. CITY OF COLUMBIA and the State-Created Danger Theory

Date: Sep 6, 2002
Establishing Limits on Qualified Immunity: McCLENDON v. CITY OF COLUMBIA and the State-Created Danger Theory Introduction McCLENDON v. CITY OF COLUMBIA, 305 F.3d 314 (5th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal...
Apprendi Rule Not Retroactively Applicable to Initial §2255 Motions: Affirmation in Brown v. USA

Apprendi Rule Not Retroactively Applicable to Initial §2255 Motions: Affirmation in Brown v. USA

Date: Sep 6, 2002
Apprendi Rule Not Retroactively Applicable to Initial §2255 Motions: Affirmation in Brown v. USA Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Thomas Charles Brown, adjudicated by the...
Substantial Evidence and Credibility Assessments in Disability Claims: Masterson v. Barnhart

Substantial Evidence and Credibility Assessments in Disability Claims: Masterson v. Barnhart

Date: Sep 5, 2002
Substantial Evidence and Credibility Assessments in Disability Claims: Masterson v. Barnhart Introduction Case: John F. Masterson, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of...
AUDITING THE ADA: Affirmation of Disability Discrimination Claims Against Public Entities Without Policy Requirements

AUDITING THE ADA: Affirmation of Disability Discrimination Claims Against Public Entities Without Policy Requirements

Date: Sep 4, 2002
Affirmation of ADA and RA Claims Without Mandatory Policymaker Identification Introduction The case of Aubary Delano-Pyle v. Victoria County, Texas explores significant aspects of disability...
Enforceability of 'Reasonable Best Efforts' Clauses under Texas Law: Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.

Enforceability of 'Reasonable Best Efforts' Clauses under Texas Law: Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.

Date: Sep 4, 2002
Enforceability of 'Reasonable Best Efforts' Clauses under Texas Law: Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies Inc. Introduction The case of Herrmann Holdings Ltd.; Annem Investments Ltd.;...
Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Strong Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and Limits Judicial Oversight of Arbitrator Selection under FAA

Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Strong Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and Limits Judicial Oversight of Arbitrator Selection under FAA

Date: Aug 31, 2002
Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Strong Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and Limits Judicial Oversight of Arbitrator Selection under FAA Introduction The case of Gulf Guaranty Life Insurance Company v....
Interpreting "Used for a Commercial Activity" Under FSIA § 1610(a): An In-Depth Analysis of Connecticut Bank of Commerce v. Republic of Congo

Interpreting "Used for a Commercial Activity" Under FSIA § 1610(a): An In-Depth Analysis of Connecticut Bank of Commerce v. Republic of Congo

Date: Aug 30, 2002
Interpreting "Used for a Commercial Activity" Under FSIA § 1610(a): An In-Depth Analysis of Connecticut Bank of Commerce v. Republic of Congo Introduction In the landmark case of Connecticut Bank of...
Establishing Limits on Fiduciary Duties in Collateral Mortgage Agreements under Louisiana Law: Lifemark Hospitals v. Liljeberg Enterprises

Establishing Limits on Fiduciary Duties in Collateral Mortgage Agreements under Louisiana Law: Lifemark Hospitals v. Liljeberg Enterprises

Date: Aug 29, 2002
Establishing Limits on Fiduciary Duties in Collateral Mortgage Agreements under Louisiana Law: Lifemark Hospitals v. Liljeberg Enterprises Introduction The case of Lifemark Hospitals, Inc. v....
Arbitration of Contract Capacity Defenses under the Federal Arbitration Act: Primerica Life Insurance Co. v. Catherine E. Brown

Arbitration of Contract Capacity Defenses under the Federal Arbitration Act: Primerica Life Insurance Co. v. Catherine E. Brown

Date: Aug 29, 2002
Arbitration of Contract Capacity Defenses under the Federal Arbitration Act: Primerica Life Insurance Co. v. Catherine E. Brown Introduction Primerica Life Insurance Co.; et al. v. Catherine E. Brown...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert