Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Attribution of Drug Quantities in Conspiracy Cases Post-Apprendi: Insights from United States v. Turner

Attribution of Drug Quantities in Conspiracy Cases Post-Apprendi: Insights from United States v. Turner

Date: Jan 28, 2003
Attribution of Drug Quantities in Conspiracy Cases Post-Apprendi: Insights from United States v. Turner Introduction The case of United States v. John Turner (319 F.3d 716, 5th Cir. 2003) presents a...
Affirmation of Controlled Substance Possession Standards Post-Apprendi: United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez

Affirmation of Controlled Substance Possession Standards Post-Apprendi: United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez

Date: Jan 28, 2003
Affirmation of Controlled Substance Possession Standards Post-Apprendi: United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez Introduction The case of United States of America v. Jose Alberto Gamez-Gonzalez (319 F.3d 695)...
Finality of Convictions for Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. §2244(d)(1): Comprehensive Analysis of Floyd Cal v. Roberts

Finality of Convictions for Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. §2244(d)(1): Comprehensive Analysis of Floyd Cal v. Roberts

Date: Jan 25, 2003
Finality of Convictions for Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. §2244(d)(1): Comprehensive Analysis of Floyd Cal v. Roberts Introduction Floyd Calvin Roberts, an inmate from Rosharon, Texas, challenged the...
Establishing Substantial Justification for Government Positions under the EAJA and Clarifying Interest Entitlement under the Prompt Payment Act

Establishing Substantial Justification for Government Positions under the EAJA and Clarifying Interest Entitlement under the Prompt Payment Act

Date: Jan 23, 2003
Establishing Substantial Justification for Government Positions under the EAJA and Clarifying Interest Entitlement under the Prompt Payment Act Introduction In Charles Davidson, doing business as...
Willful Infringement as a Prerequisite for Accounting of Profits in Trademark Cases

Willful Infringement as a Prerequisite for Accounting of Profits in Trademark Cases

Date: Jan 21, 2003
Willful Infringement as a Prerequisite for Accounting of Profits in Trademark Cases Introduction The case Quick Technologies, Inc. v. The Sage Group PLC and Sage US Holdings, Inc. (313 F.3d 338)...
Ambiguity in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1): Limiting Multiple Firearm Convictions in the Fifth Circuit

Ambiguity in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1): Limiting Multiple Firearm Convictions in the Fifth Circuit

Date: Jan 16, 2003
Ambiguity in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1): Limiting Multiple Firearm Convictions in the Fifth Circuit Introduction In the case of UNITED STATES of America v. Michael Shane Phipps and Dean Rayburn Gilley,...
Strengthening Summary Judgment Standards: Guerin et al. v. Pointe Coupee Parish Nursing Home

Strengthening Summary Judgment Standards: Guerin et al. v. Pointe Coupee Parish Nursing Home

Date: Jan 11, 2003
Strengthening Summary Judgment Standards: Guerin et al. v. Pointe Coupee Parish Nursing Home Introduction The case of Thelma M. Guerin, Doris J. Tircuit, and Geraldine Simmons v. Pointe Coupee Parish...
Strict Adherence to Federal Rule 16(b) in Amending Pleadings: Implications from SW Enterprises v. SouthTrust Bank

Strict Adherence to Federal Rule 16(b) in Amending Pleadings: Implications from SW Enterprises v. SouthTrust Bank

Date: Jan 7, 2003
Strict Adherence to Federal Rule 16(b) in Amending Pleadings: Implications from SW Enterprises v. SouthTrust Bank Introduction The appellate case SW Enterprises, L.L.C. v. SouthTrust Bank of Alabama,...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in FCI USA, Inc. v. Regina White: Implications for Amount in Controversy and Wrongful Termination Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in FCI USA, Inc. v. Regina White: Implications for Amount in Controversy and Wrongful Termination Claims

Date: Jan 4, 2003
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in FCI USA, Inc. v. Regina White: Implications for Amount in Controversy and Wrongful Termination Claims Introduction The case of Regina White v. FCI USA, Inc.,...
Personal Jurisdiction and Internet Bulletin Boards: Insights from Oli v. Revell

Personal Jurisdiction and Internet Bulletin Boards: Insights from Oli v. Revell

Date: Jan 1, 2003
Personal Jurisdiction and Internet Bulletin Boards: Insights from Oli v. Revell Introduction Oli v. Revell, 317 F.3d 467 (5th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case addressing the complexities of personal...
Equitable Tolling and Counsel Errors in 28 U.S.C. §2255 Motions: United States v. Riggs

Equitable Tolling and Counsel Errors in 28 U.S.C. §2255 Motions: United States v. Riggs

Date: Dec 31, 2002
Equitable Tolling and Counsel Errors in 28 U.S.C. §2255 Motions: United States v. Riggs Introduction United States of America v. Kevin Riggs, 314 F.3d 796 (5th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case...
Conflict-Free Counsel and Effective Assistance: Insights from United States v. Newell & Gianakos

Conflict-Free Counsel and Effective Assistance: Insights from United States v. Newell & Gianakos

Date: Dec 20, 2002
Conflict-Free Counsel and Effective Assistance: Insights from United States v. Newell & Gianakos Introduction The case of United States of America v. Clifford D. Newell; Kim Gianakos (315 F.3d 510)...
U.S. v. Bass: Defining Managerial Control in §848(c) CCE Convictions

U.S. v. Bass: Defining Managerial Control in §848(c) CCE Convictions

Date: Dec 20, 2002
U.S. v. Bass: Defining Managerial Control in §848(c) CCE Convictions Introduction United States of America v. Kerry L. Bass, 310 F.3d 321 (5th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Fraudulent Misjoinder of Plaintiffs Does Not Entitle Mandamus Relief to Challenge Diversity Jurisdiction

Fraudulent Misjoinder of Plaintiffs Does Not Entitle Mandamus Relief to Challenge Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: Dec 19, 2002
Fraudulent Misjoinder of Plaintiffs Does Not Entitle Mandamus Relief to Challenge Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction The case In re: Benjamin Moore Co., decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Qualified Immunity in Racial Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Felton v. Carter, 315 F.3d 470 (5th Cir. 2002)

Qualified Immunity in Racial Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Felton v. Carter, 315 F.3d 470 (5th Cir. 2002)

Date: Dec 18, 2002
Qualified Immunity in Racial Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Felton v. Carter, 315 F.3d 470 (5th Cir. 2002) Introduction The case of Felton v. Carter addresses critical issues surrounding racial...
Exclusion of Billing Services from Title II and Consumer Standing under DTPA Upheld – Brittan Communications v. Southwestern Bell

Exclusion of Billing Services from Title II and Consumer Standing under DTPA Upheld – Brittan Communications v. Southwestern Bell

Date: Dec 17, 2002
Exclusion of Billing Services from Title II and Consumer Standing under DTPA Upheld – Brittan Communications v. Southwestern Bell Introduction In the case of Brittan Communications International...
Reaffirmation of Defendant's Right to Testify: United States v. Mullins

Reaffirmation of Defendant's Right to Testify: United States v. Mullins

Date: Dec 17, 2002
Reaffirmation of Defendant's Right to Testify: United States v. Mullins Introduction The case of United States of America v. Michael John Mullins (315 F.3d 449) represents a significant appellate...
Julian v. City of Houston: ADEA Suit Initiation without EEOC Right-to-Sue Notice and Front Pay Eligibility

Julian v. City of Houston: ADEA Suit Initiation without EEOC Right-to-Sue Notice and Front Pay Eligibility

Date: Dec 12, 2002
Julian v. City of Houston: ADEA Suit Initiation without EEOC Right-to-Sue Notice and Front Pay Eligibility Introduction In Julian v. City of Houston, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Liability of Financial Advisors in Class Actions: An Analysis of GREAT PLAINS TRUST COMPANY v. MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER CO.

Liability of Financial Advisors in Class Actions: An Analysis of GREAT PLAINS TRUST COMPANY v. MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER CO.

Date: Dec 10, 2002
Liability of Financial Advisors in Class Actions: An Analysis of GREAT PLAINS TRUST COMPANY v. MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER CO. Introduction The case of Great Plains Trust Company and Kornitzer Capital...
Affirmation of IRS Classification of Tax Liabilities and Procedural Requirements in Quiet-Title Actions: Perez v. United States

Affirmation of IRS Classification of Tax Liabilities and Procedural Requirements in Quiet-Title Actions: Perez v. United States

Date: Nov 28, 2002
Affirmation of IRS Classification of Tax Liabilities and Procedural Requirements in Quiet-Title Actions: Perez v. United States Introduction Jose A. Perez, a pro se plaintiff, initiated a legal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert