Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Limits of §1981 in Retail Transactions: Arguello v. Conoco Establishes Necessity of Tangible Contract Interference

Limits of §1981 in Retail Transactions: Arguello v. Conoco Establishes Necessity of Tangible Contract Interference

Date: May 6, 2003
Limits of §1981 in Retail Transactions: Arguello v. Conoco Establishes Necessity of Tangible Contract Interference Introduction ARGUELLO v. CONOCO, INC. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Finality of Stay Orders in Arbitration Proceedings: Insights from Apache Bohai Corp. v. Texaco China

Finality of Stay Orders in Arbitration Proceedings: Insights from Apache Bohai Corp. v. Texaco China

Date: May 3, 2003
Finality of Stay Orders in Arbitration Proceedings: Insights from Apache Bohai Corp. v. Texaco China Introduction The case of Apache Bohai Corporation, LDC (referred to as "Apache Bohai") versus...
Establishing Direct Evidence in Retaliation Claims: Fabela v. Socorro Independent School District

Establishing Direct Evidence in Retaliation Claims: Fabela v. Socorro Independent School District

Date: Apr 25, 2003
Establishing Direct Evidence in Retaliation Claims: Fabela v. Socorro Independent School District Introduction The case of Alicia Fabela v. Socorro Independent School District (329 F.3d 409)...
Applicability of Louisiana Repurchase Act to Parts-Only Dealership Agreements: Lake Charles Diesel, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.

Applicability of Louisiana Repurchase Act to Parts-Only Dealership Agreements: Lake Charles Diesel, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.

Date: Apr 15, 2003
Applicability of Louisiana Repurchase Act to Parts-Only Dealership Agreements: Lake Charles Diesel, Inc. v. General Motors Corp. Introduction The case of Lake Charles Diesel, Inc. (LCD) versus...
Establishing Precedent on Pooling Rights and Royalty Calculations in Oil and Gas Leases

Establishing Precedent on Pooling Rights and Royalty Calculations in Oil and Gas Leases

Date: Apr 9, 2003
Establishing Precedent on Pooling Rights and Royalty Calculations in Oil and Gas Leases Introduction The case of HS Resources, Inc. v. Jim R. Wingate, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Equitable Exceptions to the One-Year Removal Limit: Insights from Tedford v. Warner-Lambert

Equitable Exceptions to the One-Year Removal Limit: Insights from Tedford v. Warner-Lambert

Date: Apr 8, 2003
Equitable Exceptions to the One-Year Removal Limit: Insights from Tedford v. Warner-Lambert Introduction In the landmark case of Jeretta Kay Tedford v. Warner-Lambert Co., adjudicated by the United...
Forum Non Conveniens and the Relitigation Exception: Insights from Vasquez v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

Forum Non Conveniens and the Relitigation Exception: Insights from Vasquez v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

Date: Apr 5, 2003
Forum Non Conveniens and the Relitigation Exception: Insights from Vasquez v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Maria O. Vasquez, et al. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.,...
Judicial Estoppel in Diversity Jurisdiction: Clifton Hall v. GE Plastic Pacific and General Electric Company

Judicial Estoppel in Diversity Jurisdiction: Clifton Hall v. GE Plastic Pacific and General Electric Company

Date: Apr 4, 2003
Judicial Estoppel in Diversity Jurisdiction: Clifton Hall v. GE Plastic Pacific and General Electric Company Introduction In the case of Clifton Hall, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GE Plastic Pacific PTE...
Substantial Limitation Requirement in ADA Disability Claims Affirmed – Waldri v. GE

Substantial Limitation Requirement in ADA Disability Claims Affirmed – Waldri v. GE

Date: Apr 2, 2003
Substantial Limitation Requirement in ADA Disability Claims Affirmed – Waldri v. GE Introduction The case of William R. Waldri v. General Electric Company, decided by the United States Court of...
Defining Successiveness in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Crone v. Cockrell

Defining Successiveness in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Crone v. Cockrell

Date: Apr 2, 2003
Defining Successiveness in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Crone v. Cockrell Introduction In the landmark case of Burtis Jackson Crone, Jr. v. Janie Cockrell, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Defining Materiality under the False Claims Act: Insights from Southland Management Corp. v. United States

Defining Materiality under the False Claims Act: Insights from Southland Management Corp. v. United States

Date: Apr 2, 2003
Defining Materiality under the False Claims Act: Insights from Southland Management Corp. v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of Southland Management Corp. v. United States, the United...
Clarifying the Standard for Fraudulent Joinder under Diversity Jurisdiction: TRAVIS v. IRBY

Clarifying the Standard for Fraudulent Joinder under Diversity Jurisdiction: TRAVIS v. IRBY

Date: Mar 29, 2003
Clarifying the Standard for Fraudulent Joinder under Diversity Jurisdiction: TRAVIS v. IRBY Introduction In the landmark case of Mary Travis, Individually, as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael...
Establishing Regular Rate and Overtime Calculations for Firefighters Under FLSA: Insights from Singer v. City of Waco

Establishing Regular Rate and Overtime Calculations for Firefighters Under FLSA: Insights from Singer v. City of Waco

Date: Mar 28, 2003
Establishing Regular Rate and Overtime Calculations for Firefighters Under FLSA: Insights from Singer v. City of Waco Introduction The case of Joseph Singer, Individually and on Behalf of Others...
Establishing the Requirement for Sustained Employment Capacity in Disability Claims: Commentary on E v. Lyn Frank

Establishing the Requirement for Sustained Employment Capacity in Disability Claims: Commentary on E v. Lyn Frank

Date: Mar 26, 2003
Establishing the Requirement for Sustained Employment Capacity in Disability Claims: Commentary on E v. Lyn Frank Introduction In Evelyn Frank v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security,...
Affirmation of Arbitration Award in Prestige Ford v. Ford Dealer Computer Services: A Comprehensive Analysis

Affirmation of Arbitration Award in Prestige Ford v. Ford Dealer Computer Services: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Mar 26, 2003
Affirmation of Arbitration Award in Prestige Ford v. Ford Dealer Computer Services: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction Prestige Ford, an automobile dealership based in Garland, Texas, entered into...
Reclassification of Weapon Possession under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43): Implications from United States v. Medina-Anicacio

Reclassification of Weapon Possession under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43): Implications from United States v. Medina-Anicacio

Date: Mar 25, 2003
Reclassification of Weapon Possession under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43): Implications from United States v. Medina-Anicacio Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Santiago Medina-Anicacio,...
Affirmation of Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity in Advocacy-Related Misconduct: Shareef Cousin v. Small et al.

Affirmation of Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity in Advocacy-Related Misconduct: Shareef Cousin v. Small et al.

Date: Mar 25, 2003
Affirmation of Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity in Advocacy-Related Misconduct: Shareef Cousin v. Small et al. Introduction The case of Shareef Cousin v. Anthony Small, et al., decided by the United...
Affirming Specific Jurisdiction and Trademark Licensing Rights: Insights from ICEE Distributors v. JJ Snack Foods

Affirming Specific Jurisdiction and Trademark Licensing Rights: Insights from ICEE Distributors v. JJ Snack Foods

Date: Mar 22, 2003
Affirming Specific Jurisdiction and Trademark Licensing Rights: Insights from ICEE Distributors v. JJ Snack Foods Introduction The case of ICEE Distributors, Inc. v. JJ Snack Foods Corp., Wal-Mart...
Harmless Error in the Context of Involuntary Confessions: Insights from Hopkins v. Cockrell

Harmless Error in the Context of Involuntary Confessions: Insights from Hopkins v. Cockrell

Date: Mar 21, 2003
Harmless Error in the Context of Involuntary Confessions: Insights from Hopkins v. Cockrell Introduction Bobby Ray Hopkins v. Janie Cockrell is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Establishing Substantial Similarity in Copyright Infringement:
    Lessons from Bridgmon v. Array Systems

Establishing Substantial Similarity in Copyright Infringement: Lessons from Bridgmon v. Array Systems

Date: Mar 21, 2003
Establishing Substantial Similarity in Copyright Infringement: Lessons from Bridgmon v. Array Systems Introduction The case of George A. Bridgmon, doing business as ICUS Technologies Corporation,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert