Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Rule 11(b)(1) Sanctions for Improper Purpose in Execution of Judgment: Whitehead v. Kmart

Affirmation of Rule 11(b)(1) Sanctions for Improper Purpose in Execution of Judgment: Whitehead v. Kmart

Date: Jul 18, 2003
Affirmation of Rule 11(b)(1) Sanctions for Improper Purpose in Execution of Judgment: Whitehead v. Kmart Introduction Whitehead v. Kmart Corporation is a pivotal appellate decision from the United...
RILEY v. COCKRELL: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases

RILEY v. COCKRELL: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases

Date: Jul 17, 2003
RILEY v. COCKRELL: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases Introduction RILEY v. COCKRELL is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Defining Judicial Recusal Standards: Insights from Andrade et al. v. United States

Defining Judicial Recusal Standards: Insights from Andrade et al. v. United States

Date: Jul 15, 2003
Defining Judicial Recusal Standards: Insights from Andrade et al. v. United States Introduction In the landmark case Isabel G. Andrade et al. v. United States, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Complete Preemption under ERISA §502(a)(1)(B) Affirms Federal Jurisdiction – Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan

Complete Preemption under ERISA §502(a)(1)(B) Affirms Federal Jurisdiction – Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan

Date: Jul 11, 2003
Complete Preemption under ERISA §502(a)(1)(B) Affirms Federal Jurisdiction – Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan Introduction Julio C. ARANA v. OCHSNER HEALTH PLAN, INC. is a pivotal case decided by the...
Fifth Circuit Establishes Limits on Direct Liability of Third-Party Defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 14(c) in Maritime Contract Disputes

Fifth Circuit Establishes Limits on Direct Liability of Third-Party Defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 14(c) in Maritime Contract Disputes

Date: Jul 10, 2003
Fifth Circuit Establishes Limits on Direct Liability of Third-Party Defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 14(c) in Maritime Contract Disputes Introduction The case of TEXAS AM RESEARCH FOUNDATION v. MAGNA...
ERISA Fiduciary Duty on Disclosure of Benefit Plan Changes: Martinez v. Schlumberger

ERISA Fiduciary Duty on Disclosure of Benefit Plan Changes: Martinez v. Schlumberger

Date: Jul 10, 2003
ERISA Fiduciary Duty on Disclosure of Benefit Plan Changes: Martinez v. Schlumberger Introduction The case of William Martinez, Frank Ditta, and Lafayette Kirksey v. Schlumberger, Ltd., adjudicated...
Fifth Circuit Upholds Mobil's Subscriber Status, Dismisses RICO Claims, and Rules Judicial Recusal as Harmless Error

Fifth Circuit Upholds Mobil's Subscriber Status, Dismisses RICO Claims, and Rules Judicial Recusal as Harmless Error

Date: Jul 9, 2003
Fifth Circuit Upholds Mobil's Subscriber Status, Dismisses RICO Claims, and Rules Judicial Recusal as Harmless Error Introduction In the landmark case of PATTERSON v. MOBIL OIL CORPoration, decided...
Reaffirming Exhaustion of State Remedies and Strickland Standards in Anderson v. Johnson

Reaffirming Exhaustion of State Remedies and Strickland Standards in Anderson v. Johnson

Date: Jul 9, 2003
Reaffirming Exhaustion of State Remedies and Strickland Standards in Anderson v. Johnson 1. Introduction Anderson v. Johnson, 338 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2003), is a significant appellate decision by the...
Trademark Infringement Excluded from "Advertising Injury" in Insurance Coverage: Sport Supply Group, Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Co.

Trademark Infringement Excluded from "Advertising Injury" in Insurance Coverage: Sport Supply Group, Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Co.

Date: Jul 8, 2003
Trademark Infringement Excluded from "Advertising Injury" in Insurance Coverage: Sport Supply Group, Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Co. Introduction The case of Sport Supply Group, Inc. v. Columbia...
Fifth Circuit Clarifies MSP Statute's Applicability to Tort Settlements

Fifth Circuit Clarifies MSP Statute's Applicability to Tort Settlements

Date: Jul 8, 2003
Fifth Circuit Clarifies MSP Statute's Applicability to Tort Settlements Introduction In the landmark case of Tommy Thompson, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services v. Ces, the United...
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Extended Traffic Stops: United States v. Sanchez-Pena

Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Extended Traffic Stops: United States v. Sanchez-Pena

Date: Jun 28, 2003
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Extended Traffic Stops: United States v. Sanchez-Pena Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Fidencio Sanchez-Pena, the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Dismissal Under FCA: High Standards for Fraud Allegations

Affirmation of Dismissal Under FCA: High Standards for Fraud Allegations

Date: Jun 27, 2003
Affirmation of Dismissal Under FCA: High Standards for Fraud Allegations Introduction In the case of UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Ir v. n WILLARD, 336 F.3d 375 (5th Cir. 2003), the Fifth Circuit...
Secured Lender Classification in PACA Claims: Reaves Brokerage Co. v. Fidelity Factors LLC

Secured Lender Classification in PACA Claims: Reaves Brokerage Co. v. Fidelity Factors LLC

Date: Jun 27, 2003
Secured Lender Classification in PACA Claims: Reaves Brokerage Co. v. Fidelity Factors LLC Introduction The case of Reaves Brokerage Company, Inc. v. Sunbelt Fruit Vegetable Company, Inc. et al.,...
Commerce Clause and State Economic Discrimination: Affirmation in Dickerson v. Bailey

Commerce Clause and State Economic Discrimination: Affirmation in Dickerson v. Bailey

Date: Jun 27, 2003
Commerce Clause and State Economic Discrimination: Affirmation in Dickerson v. Bailey Introduction The case of Dickerson v. Bailey, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Third-Party Collateral Attacks on Final Criminal Judgments Lack Standing: Ste v. McClure

Third-Party Collateral Attacks on Final Criminal Judgments Lack Standing: Ste v. McClure

Date: Jun 21, 2003
Third-Party Collateral Attacks on Final Criminal Judgments Lack Standing: Ste v. McClure Introduction In Ste v. McClure; Clayton Smith; Michael Behan, Plaintiffs-Appellees, (335 F.3d 404), the United...
Becker v. Tidewater: Clarifying Seaman Status Under the Jones Act

Becker v. Tidewater: Clarifying Seaman Status Under the Jones Act

Date: Jun 20, 2003
Becker v. Tidewater: Clarifying Seaman Status Under the Jones Act Introduction Becker v. Tidewater is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on June 19,...
Antisuit Injunctions under the New York Convention: Insights from Karaha Bodas Co. v. Pertamina

Antisuit Injunctions under the New York Convention: Insights from Karaha Bodas Co. v. Pertamina

Date: Jun 19, 2003
Antisuit Injunctions under the New York Convention: Insights from Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara Introduction The case of Karaha Bodas Company, L.L.C. (KBC) v....
Enforcement of Non-Disclosure and Non-Solicitation Agreements under Texas Law: Insights from Guy Carpenter Co., Inc. v. Anthony Provenzale

Enforcement of Non-Disclosure and Non-Solicitation Agreements under Texas Law: Insights from Guy Carpenter Co., Inc. v. Anthony Provenzale

Date: Jun 18, 2003
Enforcement of Non-Disclosure and Non-Solicitation Agreements under Texas Law: Insights from Guy Carpenter Co., Inc. v. Anthony Provenzale Introduction The case of Guy Carpenter Company, Inc. v....
Domicile Determination in Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Acridge v. Good Samaritan Society

Domicile Determination in Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Acridge v. Good Samaritan Society

Date: Jun 17, 2003
Domicile Determination in Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Acridge v. Good Samaritan Society Introduction The case of Mary Virginia Acridge, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the...
Inadequate Prison Law Libraries as State-Created Impediments under AEDPA

Inadequate Prison Law Libraries as State-Created Impediments under AEDPA

Date: Jun 14, 2003
Inadequate Prison Law Libraries as State-Created Impediments under AEDPA Introduction The case of Jack Donald Egerton, Jr. v. Janie Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice addresses...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert