Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Disparate Impact in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Frank v. Xerox Corp.

Establishing Disparate Impact in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Frank v. Xerox Corp.

Date: Oct 1, 2003
Establishing Disparate Impact in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Frank v. Xerox Corp. Introduction The case of Carol Frank et al. v. Xerox Corporation adjudicated by the United States Court...
Maritime Liens and Intervention in Admiralty Proceedings: Effjohn International Cruise Holdings v. AL Sales

Maritime Liens and Intervention in Admiralty Proceedings: Effjohn International Cruise Holdings v. AL Sales

Date: Sep 20, 2003
Maritime Liens and Intervention in Admiralty Proceedings: Effjohn International Cruise Holdings v. AL Sales Introduction The case of Effjohn International Cruise Holdings, Inc. v. AL Sales, Inc.,...
Deferential Review of Effective Assistance of Counsel in Pondexter v. Dretke

Deferential Review of Effective Assistance of Counsel in Pondexter v. Dretke

Date: Sep 17, 2003
Deferential Review of Effective Assistance of Counsel in Pondexter v. Dretke Introduction Pondexter v. Dretke, 346 F.3d 142 (5th Cir. 2003), is a pivotal case addressing the standards of federal...
Complete Preemption Under the Carmack Amendment: Hoskins v. Bekins Van Lines

Complete Preemption Under the Carmack Amendment: Hoskins v. Bekins Van Lines

Date: Sep 11, 2003
Complete Preemption Under the Carmack Amendment: Hoskins v. Bekins Van Lines Introduction In the case of Eugenia T. Hoskins v. Bekins Van Lines, 343 F.3d 769 (5th Cir. 2003), the United States Court...
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Arbitration Jurisdiction over Sovereign Non-Signatories

Fifth Circuit Clarifies Arbitration Jurisdiction over Sovereign Non-Signatories

Date: Sep 10, 2003
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Arbitration Jurisdiction over Sovereign Non-Signatories Introduction The case of Bridas S.A.P.I.C. et al. v. Government of Turkmenistan et al. represents a pivotal moment in...
Impact of Business Operations on Rural Homestead Exemptions: Perry v. Dearing

Impact of Business Operations on Rural Homestead Exemptions: Perry v. Dearing

Date: Sep 5, 2003
Impact of Business Operations on Rural Homestead Exemptions: Perry v. Dearing Introduction The case of Robert D. Perry v. Dennie and Ellen Dearing; The Bank and Trust, SSB explores the intricate...
Strengthening Age Discrimination Protections: Insights from Palasota v. Haggar Clothing Co.

Strengthening Age Discrimination Protections: Insights from Palasota v. Haggar Clothing Co.

Date: Sep 4, 2003
Strengthening Age Discrimination Protections: Insights from Palasota v. Haggar Clothing Co. Introduction The case of Jimmy Palasota v. Haggar Clothing Co., decided by the United States Court of...
Reversing Fraud and Breach of Contract Claims: Insights from Lewis v. Bank of America

Reversing Fraud and Breach of Contract Claims: Insights from Lewis v. Bank of America

Date: Sep 3, 2003
Reversing Fraud and Breach of Contract Claims: Insights from Lewis v. Bank of America Introduction The case of Billy Lewis v. Bank of America NA et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of the 'Reasonable Basis' Standard in Fraudulent Joinder under Diversity Jurisdiction: Ross et al. v. Citifinancial, Inc.

Affirmation of the 'Reasonable Basis' Standard in Fraudulent Joinder under Diversity Jurisdiction: Ross et al. v. Citifinancial, Inc.

Date: Aug 30, 2003
Affirmation of the 'Reasonable Basis' Standard in Fraudulent Joinder under Diversity Jurisdiction: Ross et al. v. Citifinancial, Inc. Introduction Ross et al. v. Citifinancial, Inc. is a seminal case...
Enhanced Pleading Standards for Reverse False Claims Act Actions: Analysis of DOE v. Dow Chemical Company

Enhanced Pleading Standards for Reverse False Claims Act Actions: Analysis of DOE v. Dow Chemical Company

Date: Aug 30, 2003
Enhanced Pleading Standards for Reverse False Claims Act Actions: Analysis of DOE v. Dow Chemical Company Introduction The case UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. John DOE v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY (343...
Dismissal with Prejudice in Securities Fraud Class Action: Alpert Group v. Physicians Resource Group Inc.

Dismissal with Prejudice in Securities Fraud Class Action: Alpert Group v. Physicians Resource Group Inc.

Date: Aug 30, 2003
Dismissal with Prejudice in Securities Fraud Class Action: Alpert Group v. Physicians Resource Group Inc. Introduction The case of Alpert Group, et al. v. Physicians Resource Group Inc. and Others,...
Recognition of Labor Obligations under Surety Bonds: Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.

Recognition of Labor Obligations under Surety Bonds: Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.

Date: Aug 28, 2003
Recognition of Labor Obligations under Surety Bonds: Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. Introduction The legal landscape surrounding surety bonds and their obligations towards...
Balancing Implied Licenses, Estoppel, and State Conversion Claims in Copyright Law: The Carson v. Dynegy Decision

Balancing Implied Licenses, Estoppel, and State Conversion Claims in Copyright Law: The Carson v. Dynegy Decision

Date: Aug 28, 2003
Balancing Implied Licenses, Estoppel, and State Conversion Claims in Copyright Law: The Carson v. Dynegy Decision Introduction The case of William C. Carson v. Dynegy, Inc. (344 F.3d 446, 2003)...
Establishing a Certificate of Appealability Under AEDPA: An In-Depth Analysis of Cotton v. Cockrell

Establishing a Certificate of Appealability Under AEDPA: An In-Depth Analysis of Cotton v. Cockrell

Date: Aug 22, 2003
Establishing a Certificate of Appealability Under AEDPA: An In-Depth Analysis of Cotton v. Cockrell Introduction The case Marcus Bridger Cotton v. Janie Cockrell, adjudicated by the United States...
Choice of Law Distinction in Contract and Tort Claims: Benchmark Electronics v. J.M. Huber Corp. Establishes Texas Law for Fraud and Misrepresentation Claims Despite Contractual Choice of New York Law

Choice of Law Distinction in Contract and Tort Claims: Benchmark Electronics v. J.M. Huber Corp. Establishes Texas Law for Fraud and Misrepresentation Claims Despite Contractual Choice of New York Law

Date: Aug 21, 2003
Choice of Law Distinction in Contract and Tort Claims: Benchmark Electronics v. J.M. Huber Corp. Establishes Texas Law for Fraud and Misrepresentation Claims Despite Contractual Choice of New York...
Establishing Limits on Judicial Consideration of External Reports in Section 1983 Claims: Scanlan v. Texas AM University

Establishing Limits on Judicial Consideration of External Reports in Section 1983 Claims: Scanlan v. Texas AM University

Date: Aug 20, 2003
Establishing Limits on Judicial Consideration of External Reports in Section 1983 Claims: Scanlan v. Texas AM University Introduction The case of Howard Scanlan; Denise Scanlan; and Lauren Scanlan v....
Sentencing Guidelines in Federal Bank Fraud: Clarifying Intended vs Actual Loss

Sentencing Guidelines in Federal Bank Fraud: Clarifying Intended vs Actual Loss

Date: Aug 19, 2003
Sentencing Guidelines in Federal Bank Fraud: Clarifying Intended vs Actual Loss Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Cecil Allen Sanders, Jr., the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations in §1981 Racial Discrimination Claims: Jones v. Alcoa, Inc.

Affirmation of Statute of Limitations in §1981 Racial Discrimination Claims: Jones v. Alcoa, Inc.

Date: Aug 19, 2003
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations in §1981 Racial Discrimination Claims: Jones v. Alcoa, Inc. Introduction In Jones, Sparks, and Parks v. Alcoa, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Brady Disclosure Obligations in Capital Cases: Analyzing Graves v. Cockrell

Brady Disclosure Obligations in Capital Cases: Analyzing Graves v. Cockrell

Date: Aug 16, 2003
Brady Disclosure Obligations in Capital Cases: Analyzing Graves v. Cockrell Introduction Graves v. Cockrell, 351 F.3d 143 (5th Cir. 2003), centers on the critical issue of the prosecution's...
Effectiveness of Appellate Counsel in Federal Habeas Relief: Schaetzle v. Cockrell

Effectiveness of Appellate Counsel in Federal Habeas Relief: Schaetzle v. Cockrell

Date: Aug 16, 2003
Effectiveness of Appellate Counsel in Federal Habeas Relief: Schaetzle v. Cockrell 343 F.3d 440 (5th Cir. 2003) Introduction Schaetzle v. Cockrell is a significant case adjudicated by the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert