Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Standards for False Claims Act Allegations: Riley v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital

Establishing Standards for False Claims Act Allegations: Riley v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital

Date: Jan 10, 2004
Establishing Standards for False Claims Act Allegations: Riley v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital Introduction Riley v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital is a significant case adjudicated by the United...
Establishing Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Young v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Establishing Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Young v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Date: Jan 10, 2004
Establishing Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Young v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Introduction Case: Edward Michael Young, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Doug Dretke, Director, Texas...
Establishing Standing in Federal Civil Rights Claims: Insights from Fredrick Pluet v. Frasier et al.

Establishing Standing in Federal Civil Rights Claims: Insights from Fredrick Pluet v. Frasier et al.

Date: Jan 10, 2004
Establishing Standing in Federal Civil Rights Claims: Insights from Fredrick Pluet v. Frasier et al. Introduction The case of Fredrick Pluet v. Margo Frasier et al. (355 F.3d 381) adjudicated by the...
Clarifying Sentencing Enhancements: Intentional Use of Force Under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2

Clarifying Sentencing Enhancements: Intentional Use of Force Under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2

Date: Jan 9, 2004
Clarifying Sentencing Enhancements: Intentional Use of Force Under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 1. Introduction The appellate case United States of America v. Enrique Vargas-Duran (356 F.3d 598) serves as a...
Salinas v. Dretke (2004): AEDPA's Statute of Limitations and Collateral Review in Texas

Salinas v. Dretke (2004): AEDPA's Statute of Limitations and Collateral Review in Texas

Date: Jan 8, 2004
Salinas v. Dretke (2004): AEDPA's Statute of Limitations and Collateral Review in Texas Introduction Gary J. Salinas v. Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment: Lack of State Action in School-Sponsored Assault - E v. Priester

Affirmation of Summary Judgment: Lack of State Action in School-Sponsored Assault - E v. Priester

Date: Jan 8, 2004
Affirmation of Summary Judgment: Lack of State Action in School-Sponsored Assault - E v. Priester Introduction The case Eve Priester v. Lowndes County School District et al. presents a significant...
Affirmation of Texas Insurable Interest Doctrine in Employer-Owned Life Insurance Policies

Affirmation of Texas Insurable Interest Doctrine in Employer-Owned Life Insurance Policies

Date: Jan 6, 2004
Affirmation of Texas Insurable Interest Doctrine in Employer-Owned Life Insurance Policies Introduction The case of Scott Mayo et al., Plaintiffs, Douglas Sims, by Deborah Sims, the independent...
Affirmation of Conviction and Upward Departure in United States v. Froman: A Comprehensive Analysis

Affirmation of Conviction and Upward Departure in United States v. Froman: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Jan 6, 2004
Affirmation of Conviction and Upward Departure in United States v. Froman: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction United States v. Robert Froman, 355 F.3d 882 (5th Cir. 2004), is a pivotal case that...
Clarifying Damages and Equitable Exceptions in Contractual Disputes: Insights from DP Solutions v. Rollins

Clarifying Damages and Equitable Exceptions in Contractual Disputes: Insights from DP Solutions v. Rollins

Date: Jan 1, 2004
Clarifying Damages and Equitable Exceptions in Contractual Disputes: Insights from DP Solutions v. Rollins Introduction The case of DP Solutions, Inc. v. Rollins, Inc., reported at 353 F.3d 421 (5th...
Martin v. Alamo Community College District: Defining 'Issued' and Its Impact on Statute of Limitations in EEOC Litigation

Martin v. Alamo Community College District: Defining 'Issued' and Its Impact on Statute of Limitations in EEOC Litigation

Date: Dec 31, 2003
Martin v. Alamo Community College District: Defining 'Issued' and Its Impact on Statute of Limitations in EEOC Litigation Introduction The case of Robin Martin v. Alamo Community College District was...
Affirming Standard Supervised Release Conditions: Torres-Aguilar Decision

Affirming Standard Supervised Release Conditions: Torres-Aguilar Decision

Date: Dec 31, 2003
Affirming Standard Supervised Release Conditions: Torres-Aguilar Decision Introduction The case of United States of America v. Augstin Torres-Aguilar (352 F.3d 934, 5th Cir. 2003) centers on the...
Fifth Circuit Establishes Individual Citizenship Sufficiency for Lloyd’s Underwriters in Diversity Jurisdiction

Fifth Circuit Establishes Individual Citizenship Sufficiency for Lloyd’s Underwriters in Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: Dec 30, 2003
Fifth Circuit Establishes Individual Citizenship Sufficiency for Lloyd’s Underwriters in Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction In the case of Liberty Corporate Capital Ltd. v. Dallas Glen Hills LP, the...
Evidentiary Discretion and Jury Selection Integrity Upheld in United States v. Butch Wilson

Evidentiary Discretion and Jury Selection Integrity Upheld in United States v. Butch Wilson

Date: Dec 23, 2003
Evidentiary Discretion and Jury Selection Integrity Upheld in United States v. Butch Wilson Introduction United States v. Butch Wilson (355 F.3d 358) is a significant case adjudicated by the United...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Reinforced in Class Action Dismissal: Richard v. Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Reinforced in Class Action Dismissal: Richard v. Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group

Date: Dec 20, 2003
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Reinforced in Class Action Dismissal: Richard v. Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group Introduction The case Richard R. Richard, Jr. v. Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group, Inc....
Establishing Qualified Immunity in Retaliation Claims Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981: Foley & Hutto v. University of Houston System

Establishing Qualified Immunity in Retaliation Claims Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981: Foley & Hutto v. University of Houston System

Date: Dec 19, 2003
Establishing Qualified Immunity in Retaliation Claims Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981: Foley & Hutto v. University of Houston System Introduction Foley & Hutto v. University of Houston System is a pivotal...
ERISA §502(a)(3) Expands Equitable Relief to Non-Fiduciary Defendants: Insights from Bombardier Aerospace Employee Welfare Benefits Plan v. Ferrer et al.

ERISA §502(a)(3) Expands Equitable Relief to Non-Fiduciary Defendants: Insights from Bombardier Aerospace Employee Welfare Benefits Plan v. Ferrer et al.

Date: Dec 18, 2003
ERISA §502(a)(3) Expands Equitable Relief to Non-Fiduciary Defendants: Insights from Bombardier Aerospace Employee Welfare Benefits Plan v. Ferrer et al. Introduction The case of Bombardier Aerospace...
Mandatory Victims Restitution Act Compliance in Plea Colloquy: An Analysis of United States v. Powell

Mandatory Victims Restitution Act Compliance in Plea Colloquy: An Analysis of United States v. Powell

Date: Dec 18, 2003
Mandatory Victims Restitution Act Compliance in Plea Colloquy: An Analysis of United States v. Powell Introduction United States v. Powell, 354 F.3d 362 (5th Cir. 2003), is a pivotal case that...
Clarifying the Interaction of Pro Rata and Escape "Other Insurance" Clauses Under Louisiana Law

Clarifying the Interaction of Pro Rata and Escape "Other Insurance" Clauses Under Louisiana Law

Date: Dec 16, 2003
Clarifying the Interaction of Pro Rata and Escape "Other Insurance" Clauses Under Louisiana Law Introduction The case of American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company v. Canal Indemnity...
Kunkle v. Dretke: Establishing Procedural Exhaustion in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Kunkle v. Dretke: Establishing Procedural Exhaustion in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Date: Dec 10, 2003
Kunkle v. Dretke: Establishing Procedural Exhaustion in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Introduction In the landmark case Troy Kunkle v. Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal...
Affirmation of the Family Business Exemption under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act: Garber Farms v. O. Malacara et al.

Affirmation of the Family Business Exemption under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act: Garber Farms v. O. Malacara et al.

Date: Dec 10, 2003
Affirmation of the Family Business Exemption under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act: Garber Farms v. O. Malacara et al. Introduction Garber Farms v. O. Malacara et al. is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert