Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Southland Securities v. Inspire Insurance Solutions Inc.: Reinforcing PSLRA's Particularity in Securities Fraud Litigation

Southland Securities v. Inspire Insurance Solutions Inc.: Reinforcing PSLRA's Particularity in Securities Fraud Litigation

Date: May 26, 2004
Southland Securities Corporation v. Inspire Insurance Solutions Inc.: Reinforcing PSLRA's Particularity in Securities Fraud Litigation Introduction In the landmark case of Southland Securities...
Strict Application of AEDPA Standards in Denial of Certificate of Appealability: Medellin v. Dretke

Strict Application of AEDPA Standards in Denial of Certificate of Appealability: Medellin v. Dretke

Date: May 21, 2004
Strict Application of AEDPA Standards in Denial of Certificate of Appealability: Medellin v. Dretke Introduction Medellin v. Dretke is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Comprehensive Venue Transfer Standards Established in In re Volkswagen AG

Comprehensive Venue Transfer Standards Established in In re Volkswagen AG

Date: May 19, 2004
Comprehensive Venue Transfer Standards Established in In re Volkswagen AG Introduction The case of In re Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen of America, Inc., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmation of Deferential Standards in Prisoners' Religious Rights: Freeman v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Affirmation of Deferential Standards in Prisoners' Religious Rights: Freeman v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Date: May 8, 2004
Affirmation of Deferential Standards in Prisoners' Religious Rights: Freeman v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Introduction Freeman v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 369 F.3d 854 (5th...
Defining 'Firm Offer of Credit' Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act: Insights from Kennedy v. Chase Manhattan Bank USA

Defining 'Firm Offer of Credit' Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act: Insights from Kennedy v. Chase Manhattan Bank USA

Date: May 7, 2004
Defining 'Firm Offer of Credit' Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act: Insights from Kennedy v. Chase Manhattan Bank USA Introduction The case of Richard D. Kennedy and Sally S. Kennedy v. Chase...
Courts Uphold Prison Policies Requiring Judicial Authorization for Inmate Elective Medical Procedures

Courts Uphold Prison Policies Requiring Judicial Authorization for Inmate Elective Medical Procedures

Date: May 1, 2004
Courts Uphold Prison Policies Requiring Judicial Authorization for Inmate Elective Medical Procedures Introduction The case of Victoria W. v. Jerry J. Larpenter, et al. addresses the delicate balance...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Reinforced: Federal Courts Limited in Revising State Subpoena Orders

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Reinforced: Federal Courts Limited in Revising State Subpoena Orders

Date: Apr 30, 2004
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Reinforced: Federal Courts Limited in Revising State Subpoena Orders Introduction In the landmark case of Union Planters Bank National Association v. Salih et al., 369 F.3d...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Required for Contractor Claims Against Regional Transportation Authorities: Insights from Eby Construction Co. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Required for Contractor Claims Against Regional Transportation Authorities: Insights from Eby Construction Co. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Date: Apr 30, 2004
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Required for Contractor Claims Against Regional Transportation Authorities: Insights from Eby Construction Co. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit Introduction The case...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Soffar v. Dretke: Establishing New Precedents

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Soffar v. Dretke: Establishing New Precedents

Date: Apr 22, 2004
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Soffar v. Dretke: Establishing New Precedents Introduction Max Alexander Soffar appealed his conviction for capital murder to the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Convictions in United States v. Bell and Cotton: Confrontation Clause and Interpreter Standards

Affirmation of Convictions in United States v. Bell and Cotton: Confrontation Clause and Interpreter Standards

Date: Apr 21, 2004
Affirmation of Convictions in United States v. Bell and Cotton: Confrontation Clause and Interpreter Standards Introduction The case of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J.D. Bell and...
Fifth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Toxic Tort Case: Clarifying Standards for Rule 59(e) Reconsideration

Fifth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Toxic Tort Case: Clarifying Standards for Rule 59(e) Reconsideration

Date: Apr 21, 2004
Fifth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Toxic Tort Case: Clarifying Standards for Rule 59(e) Reconsideration Introduction In the landmark case of Lucien TEMPLET, Jr.; et al. v. HYDROCHEM INC. et...
Proper Filing of State Habeas Applications under AEDPA: Insights from Larry III v. Dretke

Proper Filing of State Habeas Applications under AEDPA: Insights from Larry III v. Dretke

Date: Apr 20, 2004
Proper Filing of State Habeas Applications under AEDPA: Insights from Larry III v. Dretke Introduction Julius James Larry, III v. Doug Dretke, 361 F.3d 890 (5th Cir. 2004), is a pivotal case that...
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses Under State Unconscionability: Banc One Acceptance Corp. v. Edith Hill

Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses Under State Unconscionability: Banc One Acceptance Corp. v. Edith Hill

Date: Apr 20, 2004
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses Under State Unconscionability: Banc One Acceptance Corp. v. Edith Hill Introduction Banc One Acceptance Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edith Hill; Deborah Brand,...
Affirmation of Due Process in Extended Pre-Indictment Delay: United States v. Avants

Affirmation of Due Process in Extended Pre-Indictment Delay: United States v. Avants

Date: Apr 20, 2004
Affirmation of Due Process in Extended Pre-Indictment Delay: United States v. Avants Introduction The case of United States of America v. Ernest Henry Avants, adjudicated by the United States Court...
5th Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity to Police Officials for Retaliatory Boycotts Against Expert Witnesses under 42 USC §1985(2) and First Amendment

5th Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity to Police Officials for Retaliatory Boycotts Against Expert Witnesses under 42 USC §1985(2) and First Amendment

Date: Apr 16, 2004
5th Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity to Police Officials for Retaliatory Boycotts Against Expert Witnesses under 42 USC §1985(2) and First Amendment Introduction In the case of Dean Kinney; David...
Fraud-on-the-Market Reliance Presumption Requires Causal Link Between Misstatements and Stock Price Movement: Greenberg v. Crossroads Systems

Fraud-on-the-Market Reliance Presumption Requires Causal Link Between Misstatements and Stock Price Movement: Greenberg v. Crossroads Systems

Date: Apr 15, 2004
Fraud-on-the-Market Reliance Presumption Requires Causal Link Between Misstatements and Stock Price Movement: Greenberg v. Crossroads Systems Introduction Greenberg v. Crossroads Systems, Inc., 364...
Fifth Circuit Establishes Pro Rata Apportionment Among Co-Insurers Based on Policy Limits and Clarifies Subrogation Entitlement in Maritime Insurance Cases

Fifth Circuit Establishes Pro Rata Apportionment Among Co-Insurers Based on Policy Limits and Clarifies Subrogation Entitlement in Maritime Insurance Cases

Date: Apr 15, 2004
Fifth Circuit Establishes Pro Rata Apportionment Among Co-Insurers Based on Policy Limits and Clarifies Subrogation Entitlement in Maritime Insurance Cases Introduction The appellate case Ste v. n...
Indictment Requirements for Aggravating Factors under the Federal Death Penalty Act: Clarifications from United States v. Robinson

Indictment Requirements for Aggravating Factors under the Federal Death Penalty Act: Clarifications from United States v. Robinson

Date: Apr 15, 2004
Indictment Requirements for Aggravating Factors under the Federal Death Penalty Act: Clarifications from United States v. Robinson Introduction United States v. Julius Omar Robinson, 367 F.3d 278...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for 911 Operators in Emergency Call Misclassification: Beltran v. City of El Paso

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for 911 Operators in Emergency Call Misclassification: Beltran v. City of El Paso

Date: Apr 15, 2004
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for 911 Operators in Emergency Call Misclassification: Beltran v. City of El Paso Introduction The case of Manuela Beltran v. City of El Paso revolves around a...
Permissive Pretext Jury Instruction in FLSA Retaliation Claims: Fifth Circuit Affirms District Court Despite Procedural Error

Permissive Pretext Jury Instruction in FLSA Retaliation Claims: Fifth Circuit Affirms District Court Despite Procedural Error

Date: Apr 8, 2004
Permissive Pretext Jury Instruction in FLSA Retaliation Claims: Fifth Circuit Affirms District Court Despite Procedural Error Introduction In the case of Loretha Kanida v. Gulf Coast Medical...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert