Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

A Comprehensive Analysis of Shields v. Twiss: Upholding Grand Jury Secrecy in Civil Rights Litigation

A Comprehensive Analysis of Shields v. Twiss: Upholding Grand Jury Secrecy in Civil Rights Litigation

Date: Oct 23, 2004
A Comprehensive Analysis of Shields v. Twiss: Upholding Grand Jury Secrecy in Civil Rights Litigation Introduction In Shields v. Twiss, 389 F.3d 142 (5th Cir. 2004), the United States Court of...
Jurisdiction and Exhaustion Requirements in Asylum Appeals: Da v. Roy Decision

Jurisdiction and Exhaustion Requirements in Asylum Appeals: Da v. Roy Decision

Date: Oct 21, 2004
Jurisdiction and Exhaustion Requirements in Asylum Appeals: Da v. Roy Decision Introduction The case of Da v. Roy, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on October...
Younger Abstention Applied to Grand Jury Subpoenas in First Amendment Context—TAB v. Earle

Younger Abstention Applied to Grand Jury Subpoenas in First Amendment Context—TAB v. Earle

Date: Oct 19, 2004
Younger Abstention Applied to Grand Jury Subpoenas in First Amendment Context—TAB v. Earle Introduction In TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS and William O. Hammond v. Ronald Earle, the United States...
Cumulative Brady Violations Justify New Trial in Excessive Force Conviction

Cumulative Brady Violations Justify New Trial in Excessive Force Conviction

Date: Oct 16, 2004
Cumulative Brady Violations Justify New Trial in Excessive Force Conviction Introduction In United States of America v. David Sipe, 388 F.3d 471 (5th Cir. 2004), the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of De Minimis Fair Use and Enforcement of Alter Ego Sanctions in COMPAQ Computer Corp. v. Ergonome Inc.

Affirmation of De Minimis Fair Use and Enforcement of Alter Ego Sanctions in COMPAQ Computer Corp. v. Ergonome Inc.

Date: Oct 6, 2004
Affirmation of De Minimis Fair Use and Enforcement of Alter Ego Sanctions in COMPAQ Computer Corp. v. Ergonome Inc. Introduction The case of COMPAQ Computer Corporation v. Ergonome Incorporated...
Reaffirming Compactness and Opportunity Standards for Voting Rights Act §2: Sensley v. Albritton

Reaffirming Compactness and Opportunity Standards for Voting Rights Act §2: Sensley v. Albritton

Date: Sep 29, 2004
Reaffirming Compactness and Opportunity Standards for Voting Rights Act §2: Sensley v. Albritton Introduction The case of Sensley et al. v. Albritton et al. (385 F.3d 591, United States Court of...
Public Disclosure Bar Under the False Claims Act: Affirmation in Reagan v. East Texas Medical Center

Public Disclosure Bar Under the False Claims Act: Affirmation in Reagan v. East Texas Medical Center

Date: Sep 22, 2004
Public Disclosure Bar Under the False Claims Act: Affirmation in Reagan v. East Texas Medical Center Introduction In United States of America, ex rel., Sally A. Reagan v. East Texas Medical Center...
Protecting Unrepresented Corporate Plaintiffs: Fifth Circuit Reverses Dismissal with Prejudice

Protecting Unrepresented Corporate Plaintiffs: Fifth Circuit Reverses Dismissal with Prejudice

Date: Sep 18, 2004
Protecting Unrepresented Corporate Plaintiffs: Fifth Circuit Reverses Dismissal with Prejudice Introduction In the landmark case of Manzoor A. Memon; et al. v. Allied Domecq QSR; et al., the United...
Waiver of Arbitration Rights Through Judicial Process: Republic Insurance Co. v. PAICO Receivables, LLC

Waiver of Arbitration Rights Through Judicial Process: Republic Insurance Co. v. PAICO Receivables, LLC

Date: Sep 14, 2004
Waiver of Arbitration Rights Through Judicial Process: Republic Insurance Co. v. PAICO Receivables, LLC Introduction In Republic Insurance Company v. PAICO Receivables, LLC, the United States Court...
Redefining Improper Joinder in Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Smallwood v. Illinois Central RR Co.

Redefining Improper Joinder in Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Smallwood v. Illinois Central RR Co.

Date: Sep 11, 2004
Redefining Improper Joinder in Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Smallwood v. Illinois Central RR Co. Introduction SMALLWOOD v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COmpany, 385 F.3d 568 (5th Cir. 2004),...
Reasonable Grounds for Removal and the Reversal of Attorney Fee Awards: Hornbuckle v. State Farm Lloyds

Reasonable Grounds for Removal and the Reversal of Attorney Fee Awards: Hornbuckle v. State Farm Lloyds

Date: Sep 11, 2004
Reasonable Grounds for Removal and the Reversal of Attorney Fee Awards: Hornbuckle v. State Farm Lloyds Introduction Hornbuckle v. State Farm Lloyds, 385 F.3d 538 (5th Cir. 2004) is a pivotal case...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Qualified Immunity in Prisoner's §1983 Claims: Insights from Roderick Johnson v. Gary Johnson

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Qualified Immunity in Prisoner's §1983 Claims: Insights from Roderick Johnson v. Gary Johnson

Date: Sep 9, 2004
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Qualified Immunity in Prisoner's §1983 Claims: Insights from Roderick Johnson v. Gary Johnson Introduction The case of Roderick Keith Johnson v. Gary...
Res Judicata Applied to Title VII Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Davis v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Res Judicata Applied to Title VII Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Davis v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Date: Aug 28, 2004
Res Judicata Applied to Title VII Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Davis v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit Introduction In Davis v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, 383 F.3d 309 (5th Cir. 2004), the...
Broad Interpretation of "Direct Review" Under AEDPA: Insights from Foreman v. Dretke

Broad Interpretation of "Direct Review" Under AEDPA: Insights from Foreman v. Dretke

Date: Aug 28, 2004
Broad Interpretation of "Direct Review" Under AEDPA: Insights from Foreman v. Dretke Introduction Foreman v. Dretke is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit...
Vais Arms v. Vais: Strengthening Standards for Trademark Abandonment and Validating National Non-Compete Agreements

Vais Arms v. Vais: Strengthening Standards for Trademark Abandonment and Validating National Non-Compete Agreements

Date: Aug 27, 2004
Vais Arms v. Vais: Strengthening Standards for Trademark Abandonment and Validating National Non-Compete Agreements Introduction The case of Vais Arms, Inc. v. George Vais serves as a pivotal...
Qualified and Official Immunity Affirmed in Foster Care Liability Case: Hernandez v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Qualified and Official Immunity Affirmed in Foster Care Liability Case: Hernandez v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Date: Aug 26, 2004
Qualified and Official Immunity Affirmed in Foster Care Liability Case: Hernandez v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services Introduction In the landmark case Hernandez v. Texas...
Defining the Boundaries of 'Crime of Violence' Enhancements: Insights from United States v. Calderon-Pena

Defining the Boundaries of 'Crime of Violence' Enhancements: Insights from United States v. Calderon-Pena

Date: Aug 25, 2004
Defining the Boundaries of 'Crime of Violence' Enhancements: Insights from United States v. Calderon-Pena Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit's decision in United...
Assisting a Federal Officer: Fifth Circuit's Interpretation under 18 U.S.C. §§ 111 and 1114 in United States v. Reed

Assisting a Federal Officer: Fifth Circuit's Interpretation under 18 U.S.C. §§ 111 and 1114 in United States v. Reed

Date: Aug 24, 2004
Assisting a Federal Officer: Fifth Circuit's Interpretation under 18 U.S.C. §§ 111 and 1114 in United States v. Reed Introduction The case of United States of America v. Malich Chike Reed (375 F.3d...
NAICO v. Primrose Operating Co.: Fifth Circuit Affirms Insurer’s Duty to Defend in Pollution Litigation

NAICO v. Primrose Operating Co.: Fifth Circuit Affirms Insurer’s Duty to Defend in Pollution Litigation

Date: Aug 24, 2004
NAICO v. Primrose Operating Co.: Fifth Circuit Affirms Insurer’s Duty to Defend in Pollution Litigation Introduction In the case of Primrose Operating Company; CADA Operating, Inc. v. National...
Qualified Immunity in Checkpoint Operations: Collins v. Ainsworth

Qualified Immunity in Checkpoint Operations: Collins v. Ainsworth

Date: Aug 21, 2004
Qualified Immunity in Checkpoint Operations: Collins v. Ainsworth Introduction In Houston Collins et al. v. Frank Ainsworth et al., decided on August 20, 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert