Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Extraterritorial Application of 8 U.S.C. §1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) in Alien Smuggling Conspiracy

Affirmation of Extraterritorial Application of 8 U.S.C. §1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) in Alien Smuggling Conspiracy

Date: Apr 28, 2005
Affirmation of Extraterritorial Application of 8 U.S.C. §1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) in Alien Smuggling Conspiracy Introduction The case of United States of America v. Cesar Augusto Villanueva et al. revolves...
New Century Financial Corp. v. England: Establishing the Bounds of Collective Action under the FLSA

New Century Financial Corp. v. England: Establishing the Bounds of Collective Action under the FLSA

Date: Apr 27, 2005
New Century Financial Corp. v. England: Establishing the Bounds of Collective Action under the FLSA Introduction In Kimberly A. England, et al v. New Century Financial Corporation, et al.,...
Proper Application of Vulnerable Victim Adjustments in Sentencing: Insights from UNITED STATES v. Daniel Angeles-Mendoza et al.

Proper Application of Vulnerable Victim Adjustments in Sentencing: Insights from UNITED STATES v. Daniel Angeles-Mendoza et al.

Date: Apr 27, 2005
Proper Application of Vulnerable Victim Adjustments in Sentencing: Insights from UNITED STATES v. Daniel Angeles-Mendoza et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Daniel...
Strengthening Securities Fraud Litigation: Insights from Plotkin v. IPaxess

Strengthening Securities Fraud Litigation: Insights from Plotkin v. IPaxess

Date: Apr 22, 2005
Strengthening Securities Fraud Litigation: Insights from Plotkin v. IPaxess Introduction The case of Plotkin v. IPaxess addressed critical issues in securities fraud litigation, particularly focusing...
Appeal Waiver in Federal Sentencing: United States v. McKinney Analysis

Appeal Waiver in Federal Sentencing: United States v. McKinney Analysis

Date: Apr 16, 2005
Appeal Waiver in Federal Sentencing: United States v. McKinney Analysis Introduction In the case United States v. McKinney, 406 F.3d 744 (5th Cir. 2005), the defendant, Aundre McKinney, challenged...
Affirmation of Mail and Healthcare Fraud Convictions with Resentencing for Okoro under Booker Decision

Affirmation of Mail and Healthcare Fraud Convictions with Resentencing for Okoro under Booker Decision

Date: Apr 15, 2005
Affirmation of Mail and Healthcare Fraud Convictions with Resentencing for Okoro under Booker Decision Introduction The case of UNITED STATES of America v. Ernest Nda Akpan and Chijioke Victor Okoro,...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in National Origin Discrimination Case: Keelan v. Majesco Software

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in National Origin Discrimination Case: Keelan v. Majesco Software

Date: Apr 13, 2005
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in National Origin Discrimination Case: Keelan v. Majesco Software Introduction The case of Keelan and Sullivan v. Majesco Software, Inc. addresses allegations of...
Boundaries of Supervisory Liability and Qualified Immunity under Section 1983: Insights from ESTATE OF Troy DAVIS v. s, Indi

Boundaries of Supervisory Liability and Qualified Immunity under Section 1983: Insights from ESTATE OF Troy DAVIS v. s, Indi

Date: Apr 12, 2005
Boundaries of Supervisory Liability and Qualified Immunity under Section 1983: Insights from ESTATE OF Troy DAVIS v. s, Indi Introduction In the landmark case ESTATE OF Troy DAVIS, By and through its...
Dischargeability of Personal Guarantees in Bankruptcy: Insights from Acosta v. GE Capital

Dischargeability of Personal Guarantees in Bankruptcy: Insights from Acosta v. GE Capital

Date: Apr 9, 2005
Dischargeability of Personal Guarantees in Bankruptcy: Insights from Acosta v. GE Capital Introduction The case In the Matter of Guilford Joseph Acosta, Debtor versus General Electric Capital...
Admissibility of Co-Conspirator's Civil Deposition under Confrontation Clause: Insights from United States v. Holmes, III

Admissibility of Co-Conspirator's Civil Deposition under Confrontation Clause: Insights from United States v. Holmes, III

Date: Apr 7, 2005
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for advice on legal issues. Admissibility of...
Affirmation of Felon Firearm Possession Under 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1): A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Guidry

Affirmation of Felon Firearm Possession Under 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1): A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Guidry

Date: Apr 7, 2005
Affirmation of Felon Firearm Possession Under 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1): A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Guidry Introduction United States of America v. Donald Paul Guidry (406 F.3d 314) is a...
Inclusion of Appeals Council Evidence in Final Decisions: Higginbotham v. Barnhart

Inclusion of Appeals Council Evidence in Final Decisions: Higginbotham v. Barnhart

Date: Apr 1, 2005
Inclusion of Appeals Council Evidence in Final Decisions: Higginbotham v. Barnhart Introduction Higginbotham v. Barnhart is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Enhancement of Sentencing for Sexual Abuse of a Minor: United States v. Izaguirre-Flores

Enhancement of Sentencing for Sexual Abuse of a Minor: United States v. Izaguirre-Flores

Date: Apr 1, 2005
Enhancement of Sentencing for Sexual Abuse of a Minor: United States v. Izaguirre-Flores 1. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Juan Raul Izaguirre-Flores revolves around the...
Qualified and Official Immunity in Juvenile Confession Cases: Murray v. Earle et al.

Qualified and Official Immunity in Juvenile Confession Cases: Murray v. Earle et al.

Date: Apr 1, 2005
Qualified and Official Immunity in Juvenile Confession Cases: Murray v. Earle et al. Introduction The case of LaCresha Murray, et al. v. Ronnie Earle, et al. presents a significant examination of...
Metro's Reinstatement Agreement Requirement Does Not Constitute Title VII Discrimination: Fifth Circuit Decision

Metro's Reinstatement Agreement Requirement Does Not Constitute Title VII Discrimination: Fifth Circuit Decision

Date: Mar 29, 2005
Metro's Reinstatement Agreement Requirement Does Not Constitute Title VII Discrimination: Fifth Circuit Decision Introduction In the case of Antonio Abarca v. Metropolitan Transit Authority (Metro),...
Enforcement of International Arbitration Clauses in Employment Contracts: Lim v. Offshore Specialty Fabricators, Inc.

Enforcement of International Arbitration Clauses in Employment Contracts: Lim v. Offshore Specialty Fabricators, Inc.

Date: Mar 25, 2005
Enforcement of International Arbitration Clauses in Employment Contracts: Lim v. Offshore Specialty Fabricators, Inc. Introduction In Lim v. Offshore Specialty Fabricators, Inc., the United States...
Fifth Circuit Upholds PLRA Bar on Mental and Emotional Injuries in First Amendment Prison Claims: Geiger v. Jowers

Fifth Circuit Upholds PLRA Bar on Mental and Emotional Injuries in First Amendment Prison Claims: Geiger v. Jowers

Date: Mar 22, 2005
Fifth Circuit Upholds PLRA Bar on Mental and Emotional Injuries in First Amendment Prison Claims: Geiger v. Jowers Introduction In the landmark case of Michael Eugene Geiger v. Nancy Jowers et al.,...
Conflict of Interest in Criminal Defense: The Infante Case Analysis

Conflict of Interest in Criminal Defense: The Infante Case Analysis

Date: Mar 22, 2005
Conflict of Interest in Criminal Defense: The Infante Case Analysis Introduction The case United States of America v. Ricardo M. Infante, 404 F.3d 376 (5th Cir. 2005), serves as a significant...
Affirmation of the Collective Knowledge Doctrine in Plain View Seizure

Affirmation of the Collective Knowledge Doctrine in Plain View Seizure

Date: Mar 19, 2005
Affirmation of the Collective Knowledge Doctrine in Plain View Seizure Introduction The case of United States of America v. Robert Nathaniel Waldrop (404 F.3d 365) presents a pivotal examination of...
United States v. Villegas: Limiting the Application of §2K2.1(b)(5) for Firearm Possession in Connection with Prior Felonies

United States v. Villegas: Limiting the Application of §2K2.1(b)(5) for Firearm Possession in Connection with Prior Felonies

Date: Mar 18, 2005
United States v. Villegas: Limiting the Application of §2K2.1(b)(5) for Firearm Possession in Connection with Prior Felonies Introduction United States v. Fortino Saucedo Villegas, 404 F.3d 355 (5th...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert