Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Exhaustion of Administrative Procedures Required Before Involuntary Medication: U.S. v. White

Exhaustion of Administrative Procedures Required Before Involuntary Medication: U.S. v. White

Date: Nov 22, 2005
Exhaustion of Administrative Procedures Required Before Involuntary Medication: United States v. Dedrick Reginald White Introduction In the landmark case United States v. Dedrick Reginald White,...
Enforcement of Statute of Frauds and Summary Judgment Affirmed in Harrell Equipment Co. v. SunTrust Bank

Enforcement of Statute of Frauds and Summary Judgment Affirmed in Harrell Equipment Co. v. SunTrust Bank

Date: Nov 11, 2005
Enforcement of Statute of Frauds and Summary Judgment Affirmed in Harrell Equipment Co. v. SunTrust Bank Introduction In Harrell Equipment Company, Inc. v. SunTrust Bank of Georgia, et al., 431 F.3d...
Reinforcing the Burden-Shifting Framework in Age Discrimination Cases: American Airlines v. Baker

Reinforcing the Burden-Shifting Framework in Age Discrimination Cases: American Airlines v. Baker

Date: Nov 10, 2005
Reinforcing the Burden-Shifting Framework in Age Discrimination Cases: American Airlines v. Baker Introduction The case of Christine A. Baker v. American Airlines, Inc. (430 F.3d 750) adjudicates key...
Fifth Circuit Affirms: Fair Housing Act §3604(a) Does Not Cover Discrimination Affecting Property Values

Fifth Circuit Affirms: Fair Housing Act §3604(a) Does Not Cover Discrimination Affecting Property Values

Date: Nov 10, 2005
Fifth Circuit Affirms: Fair Housing Act §3604(a) Does Not Cover Discrimination Affecting Property Values Introduction In the case of Harold Cox; Shirley Davidson; Robert Stubblefield; Cynthia...
Supervisory Liability and Qualified Immunity Under §1983: Insights from Selden ATTEBERRY v. NOCONA GENERAL HOSPITAL

Supervisory Liability and Qualified Immunity Under §1983: Insights from Selden ATTEBERRY v. NOCONA GENERAL HOSPITAL

Date: Nov 4, 2005
Supervisory Liability and Qualified Immunity Under §1983: Insights from Selden ATTEBERRY v. NOCONA GENERAL HOSPITAL Introduction The case of Selden Atteberry, Indi v. Nocona General Hospital (430...
Condrey v. SunTrust: Enforcing Integration Clauses and Limiting Parol Evidence in Licensing Disputes

Condrey v. SunTrust: Enforcing Integration Clauses and Limiting Parol Evidence in Licensing Disputes

Date: Nov 2, 2005
Condrey v. SunTrust: Enforcing Integration Clauses and Limiting Parol Evidence in Licensing Disputes Introduction In Condrey v. SunTrust Bank of Georgia, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Finality of Deferred Adjudication and Straight Probation in AEDPA's Statute of Limitations: Caldwell v. Dretke

Finality of Deferred Adjudication and Straight Probation in AEDPA's Statute of Limitations: Caldwell v. Dretke

Date: Oct 27, 2005
Finality of Deferred Adjudication and Straight Probation in AEDPA's Statute of Limitations: Caldwell v. Dretke Introduction In the landmark case of Robert F. Caldwell, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Doug...
Permissible Joinder of Unrelated Criminal Counts and Use of Institutional Policies in Fraud Cases: United States v. Butler

Permissible Joinder of Unrelated Criminal Counts and Use of Institutional Policies in Fraud Cases: United States v. Butler

Date: Oct 26, 2005
Permissible Joinder of Unrelated Criminal Counts and Use of Institutional Policies in Fraud Cases: United States v. Butler Introduction United States v. Thomas Campbell Butler, MD is a significant...
Affirmation of Class Certification in Feder v. EDS: Enhancing Class Action Standards

Affirmation of Class Certification in Feder v. EDS: Enhancing Class Action Standards

Date: Oct 25, 2005
Affirmation of Class Certification in Feder v. EDS: Enhancing Class Action Standards Introduction In Michael Feder, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation; James E. Daley,...
No Jury Trial Required for Supervised Release Revocation: United States v. Hinson

No Jury Trial Required for Supervised Release Revocation: United States v. Hinson

Date: Oct 22, 2005
No Jury Trial Required for Supervised Release Revocation: United States v. Hinson Introduction United States v. Pepper Sue Hinson is a seminal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Secondary Meaning and Res Judicata in Trademark Infringement: Analysis of Testmasters Educational Services, Inc. v. Singh

Secondary Meaning and Res Judicata in Trademark Infringement: Analysis of Testmasters Educational Services, Inc. v. Singh

Date: Oct 19, 2005
Secondary Meaning and Res Judicata in Trademark Infringement: Analysis of Testmasters Educational Services, Inc.; Vivek Israni v. Robin Singh Introduction The case of Testmasters Educational...
Reaffirming ADA Protections: Interactive Process and Disability Status – Cutrera v. LSU Board

Reaffirming ADA Protections: Interactive Process and Disability Status – Cutrera v. LSU Board

Date: Oct 19, 2005
Reaffirming ADA Protections: Interactive Process and Disability Status – Cutrera v. LSU Board Introduction The case of Barbara Cutrera v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University addresses...
Bankruptcy Stay Protections Extended to Arguable Property in Chesnut v. Templeton Mortgage Corp.

Bankruptcy Stay Protections Extended to Arguable Property in Chesnut v. Templeton Mortgage Corp.

Date: Oct 18, 2005
Bankruptcy Stay Protections Extended to Arguable Property in Chesnut v. Templeton Mortgage Corp. Introduction Chesnut v. Templeton Mortgage Corp. (422 F.3d 298) is a significant appellate decision by...
Denial of CoA on Lesser Included Offense and Procedural Defaults in Aguilar v. Dretke

Denial of CoA on Lesser Included Offense and Procedural Defaults in Aguilar v. Dretke

Date: Oct 13, 2005
Denial of CoA on Lesser Included Offense and Procedural Defaults in Aguilar v. Dretke Introduction Aguilar v. Dretke is a significant appellate case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Reduced Attorneys' Fees in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: Walker Patterson, P.C. v. Cahill

Affirmation of Reduced Attorneys' Fees in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: Walker Patterson, P.C. v. Cahill

Date: Oct 13, 2005
Affirmation of Reduced Attorneys' Fees in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: Walker Patterson, P.C. v. Cahill Introduction In the appellate case Walker Patterson, P.C., Appellant v. In the Matter of Bobby...
Direct Evidence of Racial Discrimination in Employment Decisions: Jones v. Robinson Property Group

Direct Evidence of Racial Discrimination in Employment Decisions: Jones v. Robinson Property Group

Date: Oct 12, 2005
Direct Evidence of Racial Discrimination in Employment Decisions: Jones v. Robinson Property Group Introduction Jones v. Robinson Property Group, L.P., d/b/a Horseshoe Casino Hotel is a pivotal case...
Application of Federal Evidence Rules: Best Evidence Rule and Authentication Standards in Assignment Agreements - Railroad Management Co. v. CFS Louisiana Midstream Co.

Application of Federal Evidence Rules: Best Evidence Rule and Authentication Standards in Assignment Agreements - Railroad Management Co. v. CFS Louisiana Midstream Co.

Date: Oct 8, 2005
Application of Federal Evidence Rules: Best Evidence Rule and Authentication Standards in Assignment Agreements Introduction Railroad Management Company, L.L.C.; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. CFS...
Timely Removal of Corporate Defendants in Federal Court: Insights from City of Clarksdale v. BellSouth Telecommunications

Timely Removal of Corporate Defendants in Federal Court: Insights from City of Clarksdale v. BellSouth Telecommunications

Date: Oct 6, 2005
Timely Removal of Corporate Defendants in Federal Court: Insights from City of Clarksdale v. BellSouth Telecommunications Introduction City of Clarksdale, Acting by and through the Clarksdale Public...
Clarifying "Corruptly" under 26 U.S.C. § 7212: Saldana v. United States

Clarifying "Corruptly" under 26 U.S.C. § 7212: Saldana v. United States

Date: Oct 1, 2005
Clarifying "Corruptly" under 26 U.S.C. § 7212: Saldana v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Samuel Saldana, Jr. and Saul Saldana (427 F.3d 298) is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Affirmed Obscenity Convictions in Ragsdales Case

Affirmed Obscenity Convictions in Ragsdales Case

Date: Sep 28, 2005
Affirmed Obscenity Convictions in Ragsdales Case Introduction The case of United States v. Garry Layne Ragsdale; Tamara Michelle Ragsdale (426 F.3d 765, 5th Cir. 2005) marks a significant judicial...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert