Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Garcetti Principle Affirmed: Limits on First Amendment Protections for Public Employees

Garcetti Principle Affirmed: Limits on First Amendment Protections for Public Employees

Date: Feb 14, 2007
Garcetti Principle Affirmed: Limits on First Amendment Protections for Public Employees Introduction The case of Gregory D. Williams v. Dallas Independent School District (480 F.3d 689, 5th Cir....
Jenkins v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas: Clarifying Standards for Racial Discrimination Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981 and Rule 11 Sanctions for Legal Misrepresentation

Jenkins v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas: Clarifying Standards for Racial Discrimination Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981 and Rule 11 Sanctions for Legal Misrepresentation

Date: Feb 1, 2007
Jenkins v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas: Clarifying Standards for Racial Discrimination Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981 and Rule 11 Sanctions for Legal Misrepresentation Introduction Jenkins v....
Federal Question Jurisdiction Clarified in Hot-Hed Inc. v. Safe House Habitats

Federal Question Jurisdiction Clarified in Hot-Hed Inc. v. Safe House Habitats

Date: Jan 31, 2007
Federal Question Jurisdiction Clarified in Hot-Hed Inc. v. Safe House Habitats Introduction In the case of Hot-Hed Inc. v. Safe House Habitats (477 F.3d 320), the United States Court of Appeals for...
United States v. Finley: Affirmation on Lesser-Included Offense Instructions and Warrantless Cell Phone Searches

United States v. Finley: Affirmation on Lesser-Included Offense Instructions and Warrantless Cell Phone Searches

Date: Jan 27, 2007
United States v. Finley: Affirmation on Lesser-Included Offense Instructions and Warrantless Cell Phone Searches Introduction The case of United States v. Jacob Pierce Finley, 477 F.3d 250 (5th Cir....
Balancing Client Directives and Effective Counsel in Capital Cases: Sonnier v. Quarterman

Balancing Client Directives and Effective Counsel in Capital Cases: Sonnier v. Quarterman

Date: Jan 23, 2007
Balancing Client Directives and Effective Counsel in Capital Cases: Sonnier v. Quarterman Introduction Derrick Sonnier v. Nathaniel Quarterman is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Establishing Managerial Authority in Continuing Criminal Enterprise: Insights from United States v. Lewis et al.

Establishing Managerial Authority in Continuing Criminal Enterprise: Insights from United States v. Lewis et al.

Date: Jan 23, 2007
Establishing Managerial Authority in Continuing Criminal Enterprise: Insights from United States v. Lewis et al. Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Michael Curtis Lewis,...
Integrated-Enterprise Liability Under Title VII: Distinguishing Separate Entities in Employment Discrimination Cases

Integrated-Enterprise Liability Under Title VII: Distinguishing Separate Entities in Employment Discrimination Cases

Date: Jan 20, 2007
Integrated-Enterprise Liability Under Title VII: Distinguishing Separate Entities in Employment Discrimination Cases Introduction The case of Essie Turner v. Baylor Richardson Medical Center,...
Fifth Circuit Limits Class Certification for 401(k) Fiduciary Breach Claims Under ERISA §404(c): EDS Corp. Case Review

Fifth Circuit Limits Class Certification for 401(k) Fiduciary Breach Claims Under ERISA §404(c): EDS Corp. Case Review

Date: Jan 19, 2007
Fifth Circuit Limits Class Certification for 401(k) Fiduciary Breach Claims Under ERISA §404(c): EDS Corp. Case Review Introduction In the landmark case Richard Langbecker, et al. v. Electronic Data...
Enhancing Sentencing Standards in Medicare Fraud: Insights from United States v. Jedd P. Jones

Enhancing Sentencing Standards in Medicare Fraud: Insights from United States v. Jedd P. Jones

Date: Jan 17, 2007
Enhancing Sentencing Standards in Medicare Fraud: Insights from United States v. Jedd P. Jones Introduction The case of United States of America v. Jedd P. Jones, decided by the United States Court...
Defining 'Prisoner' Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Jackson v. Johnson

Defining 'Prisoner' Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Jackson v. Johnson

Date: Jan 4, 2007
Defining 'Prisoner' Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Jackson v. Johnson Introduction In the landmark case of Joseph E. Jackson v. Gary Johnson, the United States Court of Appeals...
Admissibility of Seatbelt Evidence in Secondary Collision Product Liability Cases: Fifth Circuit Establishes New Precedent

Admissibility of Seatbelt Evidence in Secondary Collision Product Liability Cases: Fifth Circuit Establishes New Precedent

Date: Dec 28, 2006
Admissibility of Seatbelt Evidence in Secondary Collision Product Liability Cases: Fifth Circuit Establishes New Precedent Introduction The appellate case of James Edwin Hodges; Beverly Hodges v....
Qualified Immunity in Prison Officials: Longoria v. Texas Establishes New Boundaries

Qualified Immunity in Prison Officials: Longoria v. Texas Establishes New Boundaries

Date: Dec 22, 2006
Qualified Immunity in Prison Officials: Longoria v. Texas Establishes New Boundaries Introduction Adam Longoria v. State of Texas et al. (473 F.3d 586) is a landmark case heard by the United States...
Affirmation of Mann Act Convictions: Implications for Evidence Sufficiency, Jury Conduct, and Victim Rights

Affirmation of Mann Act Convictions: Implications for Evidence Sufficiency, Jury Conduct, and Victim Rights

Date: Dec 14, 2006
Affirmation of Mann Act Convictions: Implications for Evidence Sufficiency, Jury Conduct, and Victim Rights Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Scott H. Hitt; William A....
Limits of the Good Faith Exception and Preservation of Suppression Issues: United States v. Pope

Limits of the Good Faith Exception and Preservation of Suppression Issues: United States v. Pope

Date: Dec 14, 2006
Limits of the Good Faith Exception and Preservation of Suppression Issues: United States v. Pope Introduction United States v. Cheryl Lea Pope, 467 F.3d 912 (5th Cir. 2006), is a significant...
Nelson v. Quarterman: Reinforcing the Full Effect Standard in Capital Sentencing

Nelson v. Quarterman: Reinforcing the Full Effect Standard in Capital Sentencing

Date: Dec 12, 2006
Nelson v. Quarterman: Reinforcing the Full Effect Standard in Capital Sentencing Introduction Nelson v. Quarterman is a pivotal decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit,...
Establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Seiferth v. Helicopteros Atuneros

Establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Seiferth v. Helicopteros Atuneros

Date: Dec 12, 2006
Establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Seiferth v. Helicopteros Atuneros, Inc. Introduction The case of Frederick M. Seiferth, Representative of the Heirs at Law of James A....
Strict Adherence to AEDPA Standards Affirmed in Death Penalty Habeas Petition

Strict Adherence to AEDPA Standards Affirmed in Death Penalty Habeas Petition

Date: Dec 8, 2006
Strict Adherence to AEDPA Standards Affirmed in Death Penalty Habeas Petition Introduction The case of Kenneth Parr v. Nathaniel Quarterman presents a significant examination of the standards set...
Affirming the Knowledge Requirement in Drug Trafficking Cases with Concealed Contraband: United States v. Mireles

Affirming the Knowledge Requirement in Drug Trafficking Cases with Concealed Contraband: United States v. Mireles

Date: Nov 30, 2006
Affirming the Knowledge Requirement in Drug Trafficking Cases with Concealed Contraband: United States v. Mireles Introduction United States v. Arnold Anthony Mireles is a significant case...
Comprehensive Commentary on Bornette v. Barnhart: Mandating Comprehensive Residual Functional Capacity Assessments in Disability Determinations

Comprehensive Commentary on Bornette v. Barnhart: Mandating Comprehensive Residual Functional Capacity Assessments in Disability Determinations

Date: Nov 29, 2006
Comprehensive Commentary on Bornette v. Barnhart: Mandating Comprehensive Residual Functional Capacity Assessments in Disability Determinations Introduction The case Ronney Bornette v. Jo Anne...
Establishing Rigorous Standards for Fraud Pleadings and Procedural Fairness in Sua Sponte Dismissals: An Analysis of Carroll v. Fort James Corp

Establishing Rigorous Standards for Fraud Pleadings and Procedural Fairness in Sua Sponte Dismissals: An Analysis of Carroll v. Fort James Corp

Date: Nov 28, 2006
Establishing Rigorous Standards for Fraud Pleadings and Procedural Fairness in Sua Sponte Dismissals: An Analysis of Carroll v. Fort James Corp Introduction The case of Gerald Carroll, et al. v. Fort...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert