Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Fifth Circuit Expands Flexibility in Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the PLRA During Emergency Situations

Fifth Circuit Expands Flexibility in Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the PLRA During Emergency Situations

Date: Feb 5, 2010
Fifth Circuit Expands Flexibility in Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the PLRA During Emergency Situations Introduction The case of Keith Mark Dillon v. Brad Rogers et al. (596 F.3d 260)...
Menendez v. Wal-Mart Stores: Guidelines on Improper Joinder and Amending Removal Notices under Diversity Jurisdiction

Menendez v. Wal-Mart Stores: Guidelines on Improper Joinder and Amending Removal Notices under Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: Feb 2, 2010
Menendez v. Wal-Mart Stores: Guidelines on Improper Joinder and Amending Removal Notices under Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction In the appellate decision of Marla Melissa Menendez et al. v....
Reaffirmation of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under PLRA: Williams v. Henagan

Reaffirmation of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under PLRA: Williams v. Henagan

Date: Jan 29, 2010
Reaffirmation of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under PLRA: Williams v. Henagan Introduction John D. Williams, a former inmate in Louisiana, filed a lawsuit against several state officials and...
Duty of Care for Securities Intermediaries Under New York Law: Insights from Dreyfus Service Corp. v. Receivers

Duty of Care for Securities Intermediaries Under New York Law: Insights from Dreyfus Service Corp. v. Receivers

Date: Jan 26, 2010
Duty of Care for Securities Intermediaries Under New York Law: Insights from Dreyfus Service Corp. v. Receivers Introduction The case of Dreyfus Service Corporation (DSC) v. Receivers of Multiple...
Affirmation of Forum Non Conveniens in International Workplace Safety Litigation: Saqui v. Pride Central America

Affirmation of Forum Non Conveniens in International Workplace Safety Litigation: Saqui v. Pride Central America

Date: Jan 22, 2010
Affirmation of Forum Non Conveniens in International Workplace Safety Litigation: Saqui v. Pride Central America Introduction The case of Maria Luisa Sandria Saqui v. Pride Central America, LLC...
Capable of Repetition, Yet Evading Review: Insights from Libertarian Party v. Dardenne

Capable of Repetition, Yet Evading Review: Insights from Libertarian Party v. Dardenne

Date: Jan 22, 2010
Capable of Repetition, Yet Evading Review: Insights from Libertarian Party v. Dardenne Introduction The case of Libertarian Party; Libertarian Party of Louisiana; Bob Barr; Wayne Root; Socialist...
5th Circuit Affirms HECK v. HUMPHREY: Implications for §1983 Claims Arising from Prison Disciplinary Actions

5th Circuit Affirms HECK v. HUMPHREY: Implications for §1983 Claims Arising from Prison Disciplinary Actions

Date: Jan 21, 2010
5th Circuit Affirms HECK v. HUMPHREY: Implications for §1983 Claims Arising from Prison Disciplinary Actions Introduction The case of Alex Jackson v. Darryl Mizzel et al. adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of 'Repurchase or Substitute' Clauses as Exclusive Remedies in Mortgage-Backed Securities Transactions

Affirmation of 'Repurchase or Substitute' Clauses as Exclusive Remedies in Mortgage-Backed Securities Transactions

Date: Jan 12, 2010
Affirmation of 'Repurchase or Substitute' Clauses as Exclusive Remedies in Mortgage-Backed Securities Transactions Introduction The case of LONE STAR FUND V (U.S.), L.P.; LSF5 Bond Holdings LLC...
Amending Complaints Under Rule 15(c) in §1983 Actions: SANDERS-BURNS v. CITY OF PLANO

Amending Complaints Under Rule 15(c) in §1983 Actions: SANDERS-BURNS v. CITY OF PLANO

Date: Jan 12, 2010
Amending Complaints Under Rule 15(c) in §1983 Actions: SANDERS-BURNS v. CITY OF PLANO Introduction SANDERS-BURNS v. CITY OF PLANO is a pivotal case that explores the nuances of amending legal...
FRANKS INVESTMENT CO. v. UNION PACIFIC Railroad: Preemption of State Possessory Actions under ICCTA

FRANKS INVESTMENT CO. v. UNION PACIFIC Railroad: Preemption of State Possessory Actions under ICCTA

Date: Jan 7, 2010
FRANKS INVESTMENT CO. v. UNION PACIFIC Railroad: Preemption of State Possessory Actions under ICCTA Introduction In the landmark case Franks Investment Company LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., the...
Harmless Error and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Under Section 2254: Clifton Clark v. EPPS

Harmless Error and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Under Section 2254: Clifton Clark v. EPPS

Date: Jan 1, 2010
Harmless Error and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Under Section 2254: Clifton Clark v. EPPS Introduction In the case of Clifton Clark v. Christopher B. EPPS, Commissioner, Mississippi Department...
Handling Time-Barred Amendments under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Gonzalez Jr.

Handling Time-Barred Amendments under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Gonzalez Jr.

Date: Dec 30, 2009
Handling Time-Barred Amendments under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Gonzalez Jr. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Raul Gonzalez Jr., reported at...
Clarifying Quid Pro Quo Standards: Fifth Circuit's Decision in Alaniz et al. v. Zamora-Quezada

Clarifying Quid Pro Quo Standards: Fifth Circuit's Decision in Alaniz et al. v. Zamora-Quezada

Date: Dec 22, 2009
Clarifying Quid Pro Quo Standards: Fifth Circuit's Decision in Alaniz et al. v. Zamora-Quezada Introduction In the landmark case of Thelma Alaniz; Noelia Galvan-Santiago; Mary E. Tipton; Angelica...
Reaffirmation of Municipal Immunity: Town of Columbia Not Liable Under §1983 for Officer’s First Amendment Violations

Reaffirmation of Municipal Immunity: Town of Columbia Not Liable Under §1983 for Officer’s First Amendment Violations

Date: Dec 22, 2009
Reaffirmation of Municipal Immunity: Town of Columbia Not Liable Under §1983 for Officer’s First Amendment Violations Introduction The case of World Wide Street Preachers Fellowship; Kenneth Coleman,...
Shepherd v. Dallas County: Establishing Liability for Systemic Failure to Provide Adequate Medical Care in Pretrial Detention

Shepherd v. Dallas County: Establishing Liability for Systemic Failure to Provide Adequate Medical Care in Pretrial Detention

Date: Dec 19, 2009
Shepherd v. Dallas County: Establishing Liability for Systemic Failure to Provide Adequate Medical Care in Pretrial Detention Introduction In Shepherd v. Dallas County, the United States Court of...
Marathon Financial Insurance Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.: Clarifying the Burden of Proof in Tortious Interference with Contract under Illinois Law

Marathon Financial Insurance Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.: Clarifying the Burden of Proof in Tortious Interference with Contract under Illinois Law

Date: Dec 19, 2009
Marathon Financial Insurance Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.: Clarifying the Burden of Proof in Tortious Interference with Contract under Illinois Law Introduction The case of Marathon Financial Insurance,...
Hoog-Watson v. Guadalupe County: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Civil Proceedings and Limits Prosecutorial Immunity in §1983 Claims

Hoog-Watson v. Guadalupe County: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Civil Proceedings and Limits Prosecutorial Immunity in §1983 Claims

Date: Dec 17, 2009
Hoog-Watson v. Guadalupe County: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Civil Proceedings and Limits Prosecutorial Immunity in §1983 Claims Introduction In the case of Suzanne Hoog-Watson v. Guadalupe County,...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Child Protective Seizures: Wernecke v. Garcia

Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Child Protective Seizures: Wernecke v. Garcia

Date: Dec 16, 2009
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Child Protective Seizures: Wernecke v. Garcia Introduction The case of Edward Wernecke, Indi v. Garcia; Michelle Wernecke, Indi (591 F.3d 386) adjudicated by the...
Redefining Federal Program Bribery: Emphasizing Nexus Under 18 U.S.C. § 666 in Whitfield v. USA

Redefining Federal Program Bribery: Emphasizing Nexus Under 18 U.S.C. § 666 in Whitfield v. USA

Date: Dec 12, 2009
Redefining Federal Program Bribery: Emphasizing Nexus Under 18 U.S.C. § 666 in Whitfield v. USA Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. John H. Whitfield, Paul S. Minor, and...
Fifth Circuit Establishes Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Claims

Fifth Circuit Establishes Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Claims

Date: Dec 11, 2009
Fifth Circuit Establishes Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Claims Introduction In Merita Williams v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, 355 F. App'x 828 (5th Cir. 2009),...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert