Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

CROSBY v. LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE and Indemnity Company: Expanding Discovery in ERISA Claims

CROSBY v. LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE and Indemnity Company: Expanding Discovery in ERISA Claims

Date: Jul 20, 2011
CROSBY v. LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE and Indemnity Company: Expanding Discovery in ERISA Claims Introduction CROSBY v. LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE and Indemnity Company is a significant appellate decision...
Substantial Evidence and Residual Functional Capacity Evaluation in Disability Claims: Giles v. Astrue

Substantial Evidence and Residual Functional Capacity Evaluation in Disability Claims: Giles v. Astrue

Date: Jul 19, 2011
Substantial Evidence and Residual Functional Capacity Evaluation in Disability Claims: Giles v. Astrue 1. Introduction The case of Bonnie Giles v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security...
Clarifying Title IX Standards for Student Harassment: Sanches v. Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD

Clarifying Title IX Standards for Student Harassment: Sanches v. Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD

Date: Jul 14, 2011
Clarifying Title IX Standards for Student Harassment: Sanches v. Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Introduction Samantha Sanches appealed a summary judgment decision by the United States District Court...
Affirmation of Upward Sentence Deviations in Controlled Substance Fraud: United States v. McElwee

Affirmation of Upward Sentence Deviations in Controlled Substance Fraud: United States v. McElwee

Date: Jul 13, 2011
Affirmation of Upward Sentence Deviations in Controlled Substance Fraud: United States v. McElwee Introduction United States of America v. Tandy W. McElwee, Jr.; Ava Cates McElwee, and Wendy Kathleen...
Interpretation and Enforceability of 'Best Efforts' Clauses under Texas Law: Insights from Ehringer v. McData

Interpretation and Enforceability of 'Best Efforts' Clauses under Texas Law: Insights from Ehringer v. McData

Date: Jul 12, 2011
Interpretation and Enforceability of 'Best Efforts' Clauses under Texas Law: Insights from Ehringer v. McData Introduction The case of Kevin M. Ehringer Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Data...
Pamlab v. Black: Affirming Damages Caps and Remand for Back Pay Recalculation

Pamlab v. Black: Affirming Damages Caps and Remand for Back Pay Recalculation

Date: Jul 12, 2011
Pamlab v. Black: Affirming Damages Caps and Remand for Back Pay Recalculation Introduction In Pamlab, L.L.C.; Pamlab, L.L.C. v. Carleen Black, 646 F.3d 254 (5th Cir. 2011), the United States Court of...
Defining the Scope of Plain-Error Review in Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from United States v. Muyaba and Mudekunye

Defining the Scope of Plain-Error Review in Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from United States v. Muyaba and Mudekunye

Date: Jul 12, 2011
Defining the Scope of Plain-Error Review in Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from United States v. Muyaba and Mudekunye Introduction In the case of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v....
Affirmation of Sentence Modification Denial in Drug Distribution Case Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Affirmation of Sentence Modification Denial in Drug Distribution Case Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Date: Jun 29, 2011
Affirmation of Sentence Modification Denial in Drug Distribution Case Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Introduction In the appellate case United States of America v. Jason Hernandez, 645 F.3d 709 (5th...
Fifth Circuit Limits Habeas Relief Under AEDPA: Upholding Strict Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Fifth Circuit Limits Habeas Relief Under AEDPA: Upholding Strict Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Jun 24, 2011
Fifth Circuit Limits Habeas Relief Under AEDPA: Upholding Strict Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Introduction In the landmark case Steven Jeffrey Pape v. Rick Thaler, adjudicated by...
Qualification Requirements in Pregnancy and Disability Discrimination Claims: Appel v. Inspire Pharmaceuticals

Qualification Requirements in Pregnancy and Disability Discrimination Claims: Appel v. Inspire Pharmaceuticals

Date: Jun 8, 2011
Qualification Requirements in Pregnancy and Disability Discrimination Claims: Appel v. Inspire Pharmaceuticals Introduction The case of Heather Appel versus Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. revolves...
Clarifying State Sovereign Immunity in ADA Title II Claims: HALE v. KING

Clarifying State Sovereign Immunity in ADA Title II Claims: HALE v. KING

Date: May 27, 2011
Clarifying State Sovereign Immunity in ADA Title II Claims: HALE v. KING Introduction In the landmark case HALE v. KING, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on May 26,...
Enforcement of Settlement Releases and the Burden of Proving Fraud in Summary Judgment: Tyler v. Cedar Hill ISD

Enforcement of Settlement Releases and the Burden of Proving Fraud in Summary Judgment: Tyler v. Cedar Hill ISD

Date: May 24, 2011
Enforcement of Settlement Releases and the Burden of Proving Fraud in Summary Judgment: Tyler v. Cedar Hill ISD Introduction In the case of Mary Tyler v. Cedar Hill Independent School District...
Affirmation of Jury Selection Process and Due Process Rights in Puckett v. Epps

Affirmation of Jury Selection Process and Due Process Rights in Puckett v. Epps

Date: May 20, 2011
Affirmation of Jury Selection Process and Due Process Rights in Puckett v. Epps Introduction Puckett v. Epps is a significant appellate case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Enochs v. Lampasas County: Redefining Supplemental Jurisdiction and Remand Standards for Pendent State Law Claims

Enochs v. Lampasas County: Redefining Supplemental Jurisdiction and Remand Standards for Pendent State Law Claims

Date: May 18, 2011
Enochs v. Lampasas County: Redefining Supplemental Jurisdiction and Remand Standards for Pendent State Law Claims Introduction The appellate decision in Clarence Enochs v. Lampasas County, 641 F.3d...
Maddox v. Townsend Sons: Establishing Boundaries in Premises Liability

Maddox v. Townsend Sons: Establishing Boundaries in Premises Liability

Date: Apr 19, 2011
Maddox v. Townsend Sons: Establishing Boundaries in Premises Liability Introduction Maddox v. Townsend and Sons, Inc. is a pivotal case that redefines the parameters of premises liability within...
Non-Dischargeability of Debts Under Section 523(a)(4) in Fiduciary Misconduct: Insights from IN RE HARWOOD

Non-Dischargeability of Debts Under Section 523(a)(4) in Fiduciary Misconduct: Insights from IN RE HARWOOD

Date: Apr 6, 2011
Non-Dischargeability of Debts Under Section 523(a)(4) in Fiduciary Misconduct: Insights from IN RE HARWOOD Introduction In the appellate case In the Matter of Da v. d S. Harwood, Debtor. FNFS, Ltd.;...
Strict Adherence to AEDPA's Statute of Limitations: Limitations on Equitable Tolling in Michael A. Krause v. Thaler

Strict Adherence to AEDPA's Statute of Limitations: Limitations on Equitable Tolling in Michael A. Krause v. Thaler

Date: Apr 5, 2011
Strict Adherence to AEDPA's Statute of Limitations: Limitations on Equitable Tolling in Michael A. Krause v. Thaler Introduction The case of Michael Alvin Krause v. Rick Thaler, decided by the United...
Affirmation of Non-Guidelines Sentencing in United States v. Rhine: Implications for Sentencing Discretion

Affirmation of Non-Guidelines Sentencing in United States v. Rhine: Implications for Sentencing Discretion

Date: Mar 31, 2011
Affirmation of Non-Guidelines Sentencing in United States v. Rhine: Implications for Sentencing Discretion Introduction United States of America v. Curtis Oneal Rhine, 637 F.3d 525 (5th Cir. 2011),...
5th Circuit Affirms Legitimate RIF Reason in Employment Discrimination Case

5th Circuit Affirms Legitimate RIF Reason in Employment Discrimination Case

Date: Mar 29, 2011
5th Circuit Affirms Legitimate Reduction-in-Force Reason in Employment Discrimination Case Introduction In the case of Kathryn Baumsteiger v. AIG Global Investment Corporation, the United States...
Fifth Circuit Establishes Duty to Reevaluate §3553(a) Factors in §3582(c)(2) Sentencing Reduction Motions

Fifth Circuit Establishes Duty to Reevaluate §3553(a) Factors in §3582(c)(2) Sentencing Reduction Motions

Date: Mar 25, 2011
Fifth Circuit Establishes Duty to Reevaluate §3553(a) Factors in §3582(c)(2) Sentencing Reduction Motions Introduction In the consolidated appeals of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert