Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

United States v. Ebron: Fifth Circuit Affirms Death Sentence, Refines Juror Dismissal and Admissibility of Statements Against Penal Interest

United States v. Ebron: Fifth Circuit Affirms Death Sentence, Refines Juror Dismissal and Admissibility of Statements Against Penal Interest

Date: May 31, 2012
United States v. Ebron: Fifth Circuit Affirms Death Sentence, Refines Juror Dismissal and Admissibility of Statements Against Penal Interest Introduction The case of United States of America,...
Fifth Circuit Upholds Exhaustion of Remedies in OCSLA Judicial Review: Gulf Restoration Network v. Salazar

Fifth Circuit Upholds Exhaustion of Remedies in OCSLA Judicial Review: Gulf Restoration Network v. Salazar

Date: May 31, 2012
Fifth Circuit Upholds Exhaustion of Remedies in OCSLA Judicial Review Introduction In the case of Gulf Restoration Network, Inc., Sierra Club, Inc., and the Center for Biological Diversity...
Affirming the Right to Self-Representation: Batchelor v. Cain and Its Implications

Affirming the Right to Self-Representation: Batchelor v. Cain and Its Implications

Date: May 30, 2012
Affirming the Right to Self-Representation: Batchelor v. Cain and Its Implications Introduction In Marshall Batchelor v. Burl Cain, 682 F.3d 400 (5th Cir. 2012), the United States Court of Appeals...
Patrick v. Wal-Mart: Establishing Timeliness in Bad Faith Workers' Compensation Claims

Patrick v. Wal-Mart: Establishing Timeliness in Bad Faith Workers' Compensation Claims

Date: May 18, 2012
Patrick v. Wal-Mart: Establishing Timeliness in Bad Faith Workers' Compensation Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Teresa G. Patrick v. Wal-Mart, Inc. Store #155; National Union Fire...
Affirmation of Procedural Default under AEDPA in Capital Habeas Corpus Cases

Affirmation of Procedural Default under AEDPA in Capital Habeas Corpus Cases

Date: May 16, 2012
Affirmation of Procedural Default under AEDPA in Capital Habeas Corpus Cases Introduction Roberts v. Thaler is a significant appellate decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Procedural Due Process in Administrative Permit Revocation: Analysis of Bowlbey v. City of Aberdeen, MS

Procedural Due Process in Administrative Permit Revocation: Analysis of Bowlbey v. City of Aberdeen, MS

Date: May 15, 2012
Procedural Due Process in Administrative Permit Revocation: Analysis of Bowlby v. City of Aberdeen, MS Introduction In the case of Bowlby v. City of Aberdeen, Mississippi, the United States Court of...
Affirming ADA Protections and Procedural Safeguards in EEOC v. Service Temps Inc.

Affirming ADA Protections and Procedural Safeguards in EEOC v. Service Temps Inc.

Date: Apr 27, 2012
Affirming ADA Protections and Procedural Safeguards in EEOC v. Service Temps Inc. Introduction In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Service Temps Incorporated, 679 F.3d 323 (5th Cir. 2012),...
Limits on Rule 60(b)(6) Relief in Post-Judgment Federal Habeas Proceedings: Beunka Adams v. Rick Thaler

Limits on Rule 60(b)(6) Relief in Post-Judgment Federal Habeas Proceedings: Beunka Adams v. Rick Thaler

Date: Apr 26, 2012
Limits on Rule 60(b)(6) Relief in Post-Judgment Federal Habeas Proceedings Introduction Beunka Adams v. Rick Thaler, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on April 25,...
5th Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity in Delay-Related Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment Claims

5th Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity in Delay-Related Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment Claims

Date: Apr 19, 2012
5th Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity in Delay-Related Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment Claims Introduction In the case of Clifton H. Jones and Jerry Dwayne Nance v. Lowndes County, Mississippi, the...
Establishing the Boundaries of Inventory Searches in Impounded Vehicles under the Community Caretaking Exception

Establishing the Boundaries of Inventory Searches in Impounded Vehicles under the Community Caretaking Exception

Date: Apr 19, 2012
Establishing the Boundaries of Inventory Searches in Impounded Vehicles under the Community Caretaking Exception Introduction The legal interplay between law enforcement procedures and Fourth...
Affirmation of Younger Abstention in Public Defender Funding Challenge

Affirmation of Younger Abstention in Public Defender Funding Challenge

Date: Apr 17, 2012
Affirmation of Younger Abstention in Public Defender Funding Challenge Introduction In the case of Steven Bice v. Louisiana Public Defender Board, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Judicial Estoppel in Bankruptcy Claims Nondisclosure: Insights from Love v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Affirmation of Judicial Estoppel in Bankruptcy Claims Nondisclosure: Insights from Love v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Date: Apr 13, 2012
Affirmation of Judicial Estoppel in Bankruptcy Claims Nondisclosure: Insights from Love v. Tyson Foods, Inc. Introduction The case of Willie E. Love v. Tyson Foods, Inc. (677 F.3d 258) adjudicated by...
ERISA Section 502(a)(3) Jurisdiction Over Equitable Relief Actions in Special Needs Trusts: Analysis of ACS Recovery Services, Inc. v. Griffin

ERISA Section 502(a)(3) Jurisdiction Over Equitable Relief Actions in Special Needs Trusts: Analysis of ACS Recovery Services, Inc. v. Griffin

Date: Apr 3, 2012
ERISA Section 502(a)(3) Jurisdiction Over Equitable Relief Actions in Special Needs Trusts: Analysis of ACS Recovery Services, Inc. v. Griffin Introduction The case of ACS Recovery Services, Inc. and...
Affirmation of Obstruction of Justice: United States v. Richardson

Affirmation of Obstruction of Justice: United States v. Richardson

Date: Mar 31, 2012
Affirmation of Obstruction of Justice: United States v. Richardson Introduction In United States v. Dale Allen Richardson, Jr., 676 F.3d 491 (5th Cir. 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Partial Grant of Rule 12(b)(6) Motion in Mortgage Foreclosure Lawsuit: Key Takeaways

Partial Grant of Rule 12(b)(6) Motion in Mortgage Foreclosure Lawsuit: Key Takeaways

Date: Mar 30, 2012
Partial Grant of Rule 12(b)(6) Motion in Mortgage Foreclosure Lawsuit: Key Takeaways Introduction In the case of Emma Hurd v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, adjudicated by the United States District...
5th Circuit Affirms Habeas Relief for Ineffective Assistance Due to Joint Representation in Salts v. Epps (2012)

5th Circuit Affirms Habeas Relief for Ineffective Assistance Due to Joint Representation in Salts v. Epps (2012)

Date: Mar 30, 2012
5th Circuit Affirms Habeas Relief for Ineffective Assistance Due to Joint Representation in Salts v. Epps (2012) Introduction In Salts v. Epps, 676 F.3d 468 (5th Cir. 2012), the United States Court...
Adams & Reese LLP Conflict of Interest and Fee Disgorgement: Establishing the Totality of Circumstances Standard in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Adams & Reese LLP Conflict of Interest and Fee Disgorgement: Establishing the Totality of Circumstances Standard in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Date: Mar 30, 2012
Adams & Reese LLP Conflict of Interest and Fee Disgorgement: Establishing the Totality of Circumstances Standard in Bankruptcy Proceedings Introduction The case of In the Matter of AMERICAN...
Affirmation and Reversal: Comprehensive Analysis of Turner v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

Affirmation and Reversal: Comprehensive Analysis of Turner v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

Date: Mar 24, 2012
Affirmation and Reversal: Comprehensive Analysis of Turner v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. Introduction Turner v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Affirming DeShaney: Public Schools Not Constitutionally Obligated to Protect Students from Private Harm

Affirming DeShaney: Public Schools Not Constitutionally Obligated to Protect Students from Private Harm

Date: Mar 24, 2012
Affirming DeShaney: Public Schools Not Constitutionally Obligated to Protect Students from Private Harm Introduction The case of Jane Doe, a Minor, By and Through Her Next Friends, Daniel Magee and...
Refining Class Certification Standards: Insights from M.D. v. Perry

Refining Class Certification Standards: Insights from M.D. v. Perry

Date: Mar 24, 2012
Refining Class Certification Standards: Insights from M.D., et al. v. Perry Introduction In M.D., et al. v. Perry, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit addressed critical issues...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert