Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Ensuring Evidentiary Sufficiency for Bodily-Injury Enhancements: Insights from United States v. Zuniga

Ensuring Evidentiary Sufficiency for Bodily-Injury Enhancements: Insights from United States v. Zuniga

Date: Jun 21, 2013
Ensuring Evidentiary Sufficiency for Bodily-Injury Enhancements: Insights from United States v. Zuniga Introduction United States of America v. Edmundo Zuniga, 720 F.3d 587 (5th Cir. 2013), serves as...
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Interpretation of 'Calculate and Pay' Clauses in Overriding Royalty Interests

Fifth Circuit Clarifies Interpretation of 'Calculate and Pay' Clauses in Overriding Royalty Interests

Date: Jun 21, 2013
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Interpretation of 'Calculate and Pay' Clauses in Overriding Royalty Interests Introduction The case of Total E & P USA, Inc. v. Statoil Gulf of Mexico, L.L.C. addressed a...
Mandamus Relief and Intra-District Venue Transfer: Analysis of In re RADMAX, Limited (720 F.3d 285)

Mandamus Relief and Intra-District Venue Transfer: Analysis of In re RADMAX, Limited (720 F.3d 285)

Date: Jun 19, 2013
Mandamus Relief and Intra-District Venue Transfer: Analysis of In re RADMAX, Limited (720 F.3d 285) Introduction In the appellate decision In re RADMAX, Limited, 720 F.3d 285 (5th Cir. 2013), the...
Reaffirming AEDPA's Deference: Denial of Certificate of Appealability in Trottie v. Stephens

Reaffirming AEDPA's Deference: Denial of Certificate of Appealability in Trottie v. Stephens

Date: Jun 15, 2013
Reaffirming AEDPA's Deference: Denial of Certificate of Appealability in Trottie v. Stephens Introduction In the case of Willie Tyrone Trottie v. William Stephens, the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirming Timeliness of Removal and Improper Joinder Standards in Retaliation Claims: Mumfrey v. CVS Pharmacy

Affirming Timeliness of Removal and Improper Joinder Standards in Retaliation Claims: Mumfrey v. CVS Pharmacy

Date: Jun 11, 2013
Affirming Timeliness of Removal and Improper Joinder Standards in Retaliation Claims: Mumfrey v. CVS Pharmacy Introduction The case of Tony Mumfrey v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. examined critical aspects of...
Reed v. United States: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Plea Negotiations

Reed v. United States: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Plea Negotiations

Date: Jun 7, 2013
Reed v. United States: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Plea Negotiations Introduction Reed v. United States, 719 F.3d 369 (5th Cir. 2013), is a pivotal case that...
Qualified Immunity Upholding School Officials’ Right to Discuss Student Conduct with Parents: Wyatt v. Fletcher/Newell

Qualified Immunity Upholding School Officials’ Right to Discuss Student Conduct with Parents: Wyatt v. Fletcher/Newell

Date: Jun 1, 2013
Qualified Immunity Upholding School Officials’ Right to Discuss Student Conduct with Parents: Wyatt v. Fletcher/Newell Introduction In Barbara Wyatt, Plaintiff–Appellee v. Rhonda Fletcher; Cassandra...
Establishing the Threshold-Remuneration Test for Volunteers under Title VII: Juino v. Livingston Parish Fire District No.5

Establishing the Threshold-Remuneration Test for Volunteers under Title VII: Juino v. Livingston Parish Fire District No.5

Date: May 31, 2013
Establishing the Threshold-Remuneration Test for Volunteers under Title VII: Juino v. Livingston Parish Fire District No.5 Introduction In Juino v. Livingston Parish Fire District No.5, the United...
Leave to Amend Civil Rights Claims Under Rule 15 When Partial Dismissals Lack Rule 54(b) Certification: A Fifth Circuit Analysis

Leave to Amend Civil Rights Claims Under Rule 15 When Partial Dismissals Lack Rule 54(b) Certification: A Fifth Circuit Analysis

Date: May 30, 2013
Leave to Amend Civil Rights Claims Under Rule 15 When Partial Dismissals Lack Rule 54(b) Certification: A Fifth Circuit Analysis Introduction In the case of Ryan Crostley; Shannon Finley,...
Fifth Circuit Affirms Jury's Findings on Tortious Interference and Civil Conspiracy in Global Check Services Litigation

Fifth Circuit Affirms Jury's Findings on Tortious Interference and Civil Conspiracy in Global Check Services Litigation

Date: May 29, 2013
Fifth Circuit Affirms Jury's Findings on Tortious Interference and Civil Conspiracy in Global Check Services Litigation Introduction In the case of Global Check Services (GCS) v. EPS and Conversion...
Defendants' Summary Judgment Upheld in FMLA Interference and Retaliation Case

Defendants' Summary Judgment Upheld in FMLA Interference and Retaliation Case

Date: May 24, 2013
Defendants' Summary Judgment Upheld in FMLA Interference and Retaliation Case Introduction In the case of Angelia Smith and Kelvin Smith v. CVS Caremark Corp., et al., filed on May 23, 2013, the...
Establishing Pretext and the Cat's Paw Theory in Gender Discrimination: Haire v. LSU Appeals Court Commentary

Establishing Pretext and the Cat's Paw Theory in Gender Discrimination: Haire v. LSU Appeals Court Commentary

Date: May 22, 2013
Establishing Pretext and the Cat's Paw Theory in Gender Discrimination: Haire v. LSU Appeals Court Commentary Introduction In Martha Helen Haire v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University...
Age-Based Restrictions on Handgun Carry: Comprehensive Analysis of NRA v. McCraw

Age-Based Restrictions on Handgun Carry: Comprehensive Analysis of NRA v. McCraw

Date: May 21, 2013
Age-Based Restrictions on Handgun Carry: Comprehensive Analysis of NRA v. McCraw Introduction The case National Rifle Association of America, Inc. et al. v. Steven C. McCraw (719 F.3d 338)...
Enhanced Supervised Release Conditions in Child Pornography Cases: An Analysis of United States v. Ellis

Enhanced Supervised Release Conditions in Child Pornography Cases: An Analysis of United States v. Ellis

Date: May 21, 2013
Enhanced Supervised Release Conditions in Child Pornography Cases: An Analysis of United States v. Ellis Content Warning: This analysis discusses legal proceedings involving child pornography charges...
Qualified and Official Immunity in Excessive Force Cases: Ramirez v. Martinez

Qualified and Official Immunity in Excessive Force Cases: Ramirez v. Martinez

Date: May 16, 2013
Qualified and Official Immunity in Excessive Force Cases: Ramirez v. Martinez Introduction In the landmark case of Reynaldo Ramirez v. Jose “Taser Joe” Martinez, the United States Court of Appeals...
Dormant Commerce Clause and Prudential Standing in Cibolo Waste v. City of San Antonio

Dormant Commerce Clause and Prudential Standing in Cibolo Waste v. City of San Antonio

Date: May 16, 2013
Dormant Commerce Clause and Prudential Standing: An Analysis of Cibolo Waste v. City of San Antonio Introduction The case Cibolo Waste, Incorporated et al. v. City of San Antonio revolves around the...
Trade Secret Misappropriation: Welogix v. Accenture Establishes Critical Precedents

Trade Secret Misappropriation: Welogix v. Accenture Establishes Critical Precedents

Date: May 16, 2013
Trade Secret Misappropriation: Welogix v. Accenture Establishes Critical Precedents Introduction In the landmark case Welogix, Inc. v. Accenture, L.L.P., 716 F.3d 867 (5th Cir. 2013), the United...
Res Judicata Affirmed in COMER v. MURPHY OIL USA

Res Judicata Affirmed in COMER v. MURPHY OIL USA

Date: May 15, 2013
Res Judicata Affirmed in COMER v. MURPHY OIL USA Introduction In the case of Ned Comer et al. v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., the plaintiffs, a group of Mississippi Gulf Coast residents and property owners,...
Clarifying Removal Jurisdiction for Admiralty Claims: Insights from Jonnie Ryan v. Hercules Offshore, Inc.

Clarifying Removal Jurisdiction for Admiralty Claims: Insights from Jonnie Ryan v. Hercules Offshore, Inc.

Date: May 14, 2013
Clarifying Removal Jurisdiction for Admiralty Claims: Insights from Jonnie Ryan v. Hercules Offshore, Inc. Introduction The case of Jonnie Ryan, et al. v. Hercules Offshore, Inc., et al. (945 F....
Reaffirmation of Stream-of-Commerce Jurisdiction Post-McIntyre: Ainsworth v. Moffett Engineering

Reaffirmation of Stream-of-Commerce Jurisdiction Post-McIntyre: Ainsworth v. Moffett Engineering

Date: May 10, 2013
Reaffirmation of Stream-of-Commerce Jurisdiction Post-McIntyre: Ainsworth v. Moffett Engineering Introduction In the case of Mary P. Ainsworth, Widow and Personal Representative of James T....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert