Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Fourth Circuit Mandates Strict Scrutiny for State Assault Weapons Bans under the Second Amendment

Fourth Circuit Mandates Strict Scrutiny for State Assault Weapons Bans under the Second Amendment

Date: Feb 5, 2016
Fourth Circuit Mandates Strict Scrutiny for State Assault Weapons Bans under the Second Amendment Introduction In the landmark case of Kolbe v. Hogan, decided on February 4, 2016, the United States...
Farhan Warfaa v. Yusuf Ali: Establishing Limits on the Alien Tort Statute in Extraterritorial Applications

Farhan Warfaa v. Yusuf Ali: Establishing Limits on the Alien Tort Statute in Extraterritorial Applications

Date: Feb 2, 2016
Farhan Warfaa v. Yusuf Ali: Establishing Limits on the Alien Tort Statute in Extraterritorial Applications Introduction The case of Farhan Mohamoud Tani Warfaa v. Yusuf Abdi Ali (811 F.3d 653) heard...
Affirmation of Feres 'Incident to Service' Doctrine Applies to §1983 Claims against State Officials: Aikens v. Ingram

Affirmation of Feres 'Incident to Service' Doctrine Applies to §1983 Claims against State Officials: Aikens v. Ingram

Date: Jan 30, 2016
Affirmation of Feres 'Incident to Service' Doctrine Applies to §1983 Claims against State Officials: Aikens v. Ingram Introduction In Frederick Aikens v. William E. Ingram, Jr., the United States...
Clarifying the Reviewability of Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Sentences under Section 3742 – United States v. Williams

Clarifying the Reviewability of Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Sentences under Section 3742 – United States v. Williams

Date: Jan 29, 2016
Clarifying the Reviewability of Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Sentences under Section 3742 – United States v. Williams Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Williams, decided by the United...
Retaliation Under the Fair Housing Act and Conversion: Insights from L. Hall v. Greystar Management Services

Retaliation Under the Fair Housing Act and Conversion: Insights from L. Hall v. Greystar Management Services

Date: Jan 22, 2016
Retaliation Under the Fair Housing Act and Conversion: Insights from L. Hall v. Greystar Management Services Introduction L. Hall v. Greystar Management Services, L.P. is a notable case adjudicated...
Affirmation of Design Defect and Punitive Damages in In re C.R. Bard, Inc.

Affirmation of Design Defect and Punitive Damages in In re C.R. Bard, Inc.

Date: Jan 15, 2016
Affirmation of Design Defect and Punitive Damages in In re C.R. Bard, Inc. Introduction The case of In re C.R. Bard, Incorporated, MDL No. 2187 addresses significant issues in product liability law,...
Excessive Force in Seizing Mentally Ill Individuals: A Fourth Amendment Analysis

Excessive Force in Seizing Mentally Ill Individuals: A Fourth Amendment Analysis

Date: Jan 12, 2016
Excessive Force in Seizing Mentally Ill Individuals: A Fourth Amendment Analysis Introduction The case of The Estate of Ronald H. Armstrong v. The Village of Pinehurst et al. addresses the critical...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Intent Requirements for 18 U.S.C. §875(b) and §875(c) in the Wake of Elonis Decision

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Intent Requirements for 18 U.S.C. §875(b) and §875(c) in the Wake of Elonis Decision

Date: Jan 8, 2016
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Intent Requirements for 18 U.S.C. §875(b) and §875(c) in the Wake of Elonis Decision Introduction In the case of United States of America v. William A. White, 810 F.3d 212...
Affirmation of Strickland Prejudice Standards in §2255 Motions: United States v. Santiago

Affirmation of Strickland Prejudice Standards in §2255 Motions: United States v. Santiago

Date: Dec 23, 2015
Affirmation of Strickland Prejudice Standards in §2255 Motions: United States v. Santiago Introduction The case of United States of America v. Ishmael Avive Santiago (632 F. App'x 769) presents a...
Fourth Circuit Upholds Exemption Classification in Williams v. Genex Services

Fourth Circuit Upholds Exemption Classification in Williams v. Genex Services

Date: Dec 19, 2015
Fourth Circuit Upholds Exemption Classification in Williams v. Genex Services Introduction In Williams v. Genex Services, LLC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit addressed...
Strengthening ALJ Responsibilities: Independent Identification and Resolution of Conflicts in Social Security Disability Determinations

Strengthening ALJ Responsibilities: Independent Identification and Resolution of Conflicts in Social Security Disability Determinations

Date: Dec 18, 2015
Strengthening ALJ Responsibilities: Independent Identification and Resolution of Conflicts in Social Security Disability Determinations Introduction In the landmark case of Jeffrey Pearson v. Carolyn...
Enhanced Judicial Review Standards in Disability Claims: Fox v. Colvin

Enhanced Judicial Review Standards in Disability Claims: Fox v. Colvin

Date: Dec 18, 2015
Enhanced Judicial Review Standards in Disability Claims: Fox v. Colvin Introduction In the case of Garrett W. Fox v. Carolyn W. Colvin, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Williams v. United States: Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Boundaries on Traffic Stop Extensions

Williams v. United States: Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Boundaries on Traffic Stop Extensions

Date: Dec 15, 2015
Williams v. United States: Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Boundaries on Traffic Stop Extensions Introduction In the case of Williams v. United States (808 F.3d 238, 4th Cir. 2015), the United States...
Appealability of Dismissals Without Prejudice: Goode v. Central Virginia Legal Aid Society Establishes Key Jurisdictional Standards

Appealability of Dismissals Without Prejudice: Goode v. Central Virginia Legal Aid Society Establishes Key Jurisdictional Standards

Date: Dec 10, 2015
Appealability of Dismissals Without Prejudice: Goode v. Central Virginia Legal Aid Society Establishes Key Jurisdictional Standards Introduction Goode v. Central Virginia Legal Aid Society (807 F.3d...
LexisNexis Class Action Settlement Reinforces FCRA Applicability to Data Brokers

LexisNexis Class Action Settlement Reinforces FCRA Applicability to Data Brokers

Date: Dec 5, 2015
LexisNexis Class Action Settlement Reinforces FCRA Applicability to Data Brokers Introduction In the landmark decision Berry v. LexisNexis Risk & Information Analytics Grp., Inc., the United States...
Affirming the Heck Bar: Limitations on §1983 Brady Claims in Griffin v. Baltimore Police Department

Affirming the Heck Bar: Limitations on §1983 Brady Claims in Griffin v. Baltimore Police Department

Date: Oct 28, 2015
Affirming the Heck Bar: Limitations on §1983 Brady Claims in Griffin v. Baltimore Police Department Introduction In Griffin v. Baltimore Police Department, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
4th Circuit Sets Precedent: State-Created Entities with Financial Independence Are Persons Under the False Claims Act

4th Circuit Sets Precedent: State-Created Entities with Financial Independence Are Persons Under the False Claims Act

Date: Oct 22, 2015
4th Circuit Sets Precedent: State-Created Entities with Financial Independence Are Persons Under the False Claims Act Introduction In the landmark decision of United States ex rel. Jon H. OBERG v....
Establishing Appellate Jurisdiction Standards in Habeas Corpus: The Porter v. Davis Case

Establishing Appellate Jurisdiction Standards in Habeas Corpus: The Porter v. Davis Case

Date: Oct 21, 2015
Establishing Appellate Jurisdiction Standards in Habeas Corpus: The Porter v. Davis Case Introduction Porter v. Davis, 803 F.3d 694 (4th Cir. 2015), represents a significant case in the realm of...
Reaffirmation of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel: United States v. Ductan

Reaffirmation of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel: United States v. Ductan

Date: Sep 3, 2015
Reaffirmation of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel: United States v. Ductan Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Phillip Ductan, decided on September 2, 2015, by the United States...
Fourth Circuit Establishes Sex Trafficking by Force, Fraud, or Coercion Is Not Categorically a Crime of Violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

Fourth Circuit Establishes Sex Trafficking by Force, Fraud, or Coercion Is Not Categorically a Crime of Violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

Date: Aug 19, 2015
Fourth Circuit Establishes Sex Trafficking by Force, Fraud, or Coercion Is Not Categorically a Crime of Violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Kevin...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert