Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhancing Sentences Under ACCA: The Precedent in United States v. Doctor

Enhancing Sentences Under ACCA: The Precedent in United States v. Doctor

Date: Nov 22, 2016
Enhancing Sentences Under ACCA: The Precedent in United States v. Doctor Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Kareem Antwan Doctor, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Discrimination Claims Against Charitable Organizations

Affirmation of Dismissal in Discrimination Claims Against Charitable Organizations

Date: Nov 9, 2016
Affirmation of Dismissal in Discrimination Claims Against Charitable Organizations Introduction In the case of Sharon T. Thomas v. The Salvation Army Southern Territory et al., the plaintiff, Sharon...
Affirming Due Process Rights of Pretrial Detainees: Insights from Dilworth v. New Hanover County

Affirming Due Process Rights of Pretrial Detainees: Insights from Dilworth v. New Hanover County

Date: Nov 8, 2016
Affirming Due Process Rights of Pretrial Detainees: Insights from Dilworth v. New Hanover County Introduction The case of Michael Anthony Dilworth v. New Hanover County (841 F.3d 246, 4th Cir. 2016)...
Deliberate Indifference to Medical Needs: 4th Circuit's Interpretation of the Eighth Amendment

Deliberate Indifference to Medical Needs: 4th Circuit's Interpretation of the Eighth Amendment

Date: Nov 5, 2016
Deliberate Indifference to Medical Needs: 4th Circuit's Interpretation of the Eighth Amendment 1. Introduction The case of Paul Scinto, Sr. v. Warden Patricia Stansberry et al. presents a significant...
Affirming Employer's Defense Against FMLA Retaliation Claims: Sharif v. United Airlines

Affirming Employer's Defense Against FMLA Retaliation Claims: Sharif v. United Airlines

Date: Nov 1, 2016
Affirming Employer's Defense Against FMLA Retaliation Claims: Sharif v. United Airlines Introduction Sharif v. United Airlines, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Political Question Doctrine and Unlawful Conduct: Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc.

Political Question Doctrine and Unlawful Conduct: Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc.

Date: Oct 22, 2016
Political Question Doctrine and Unlawful Conduct: Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc. Introduction Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc., 840 F.3d 147 (4th Cir. 2016), marks a...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Qualified Immunity and Monell Liability in Public Employee Retaliation Case

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Qualified Immunity and Monell Liability in Public Employee Retaliation Case

Date: Aug 18, 2016
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Qualified Immunity and Monell Liability in Public Employee Retaliation Case Introduction In the case of James Lane v. Sheriff John W. Anderson; Mayor & City Council of...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Eighth Amendment Analysis and Discovery Requirements in Prison Conditions Claims

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Eighth Amendment Analysis and Discovery Requirements in Prison Conditions Claims

Date: Jul 15, 2016
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Eighth Amendment Analysis and Discovery Requirements in Prison Conditions Claims Introduction In the case of Kory Putney v. R. Likin et al., the United States Court of...
Fourth Circuit Upholds Denial of Qualified Immunity in Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference Case

Fourth Circuit Upholds Denial of Qualified Immunity in Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference Case

Date: Jul 7, 2016
Fourth Circuit Upholds Denial of Qualified Immunity in Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference Case Introduction In the case of Dewayne Jackson Cox v. Officers Quinn, Pinkerman, Baxley, and Miles,...
Fourth Circuit Establishes Enhanced Protections Against Workplace Discrimination and Retaliation in Guessous v. Fairview Property Investments

Fourth Circuit Establishes Enhanced Protections Against Workplace Discrimination and Retaliation in Guessous v. Fairview Property Investments

Date: Jul 7, 2016
Fourth Circuit Establishes Enhanced Protections Against Workplace Discrimination and Retaliation in Guessous v. Fairview Property Investments Introduction In the landmark case of Monica Guessous v....
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond's Failure to Provide Adequate FMLA Notice Confirmed as Material Fact Issue in Vannoy v. FRBR

Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond's Failure to Provide Adequate FMLA Notice Confirmed as Material Fact Issue in Vannoy v. FRBR

Date: Jun 29, 2016
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond's Failure to Provide Adequate FMLA Notice Confirmed as Material Fact Issue in Vannoy v. FRBR Introduction The case of John Vannoy v. The Federal Reserve Bank of...
Thai Palace v. Board of License Commissioners: Redefining the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Federal Challenges to State Administrative Actions

Thai Palace v. Board of License Commissioners: Redefining the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Federal Challenges to State Administrative Actions

Date: Jun 29, 2016
Thai Palace v. Board of License Commissioners: Redefining the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Federal Challenges to State Administrative Actions Introduction In the landmark case Sutasinee Thana; Michael...
Fourth Circuit Establishes §2244(b)(3) Authorization Requirement for Habeas Petitions Challenging Sentence Execution Under §2254

Fourth Circuit Establishes §2244(b)(3) Authorization Requirement for Habeas Petitions Challenging Sentence Execution Under §2254

Date: Jun 22, 2016
Fourth Circuit Establishes §2244(b)(3) Authorization Requirement for Habeas Petitions Challenging Sentence Execution Under §2254 Introduction In the case In re: Terrence Leroy Wright (826 F.3d 774),...
Monroe v. Colvin: Reinforcing the Necessity of Function-by-Function Analysis in Social Security Disability Determinations

Monroe v. Colvin: Reinforcing the Necessity of Function-by-Function Analysis in Social Security Disability Determinations

Date: Jun 17, 2016
Monroe v. Colvin: Reinforcing the Necessity of Function-by-Function Analysis in Social Security Disability Determinations Introduction Monroe v. Colvin, 826 F.3d 176 (4th Cir. 2016), addresses the...
Fourth Circuit Reinforces Function-by-Function Analysis Requirement in RFC Assessments: Monroe v. Colvin

Fourth Circuit Reinforces Function-by-Function Analysis Requirement in RFC Assessments: Monroe v. Colvin

Date: Jun 17, 2016
Fourth Circuit Reinforces Function-by-Function Analysis Requirement in RFC Assessments: Monroe v. Colvin Introduction In the case of George G. Monroe, Plaintiff–Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting...
4th Circuit Sets Precedent for Successive §2255 Petitions Following Johnson Decision

4th Circuit Sets Precedent for Successive §2255 Petitions Following Johnson Decision

Date: Jun 9, 2016
4th Circuit Sets Precedent for Successive §2255 Petitions Following Johnson Decision Introduction In In re: Creadell Hubbard, Movant, 825 F.3d 225 (4th Cir. 2016), the United States Court of Appeals...
Enhanced Constitutional Protections for Inmates: Insights from King v. Rubenstein

Enhanced Constitutional Protections for Inmates: Insights from King v. Rubenstein

Date: Jun 8, 2016
Enhanced Constitutional Protections for Inmates: Insights from King v. Rubenstein Introduction King v. Rubenstein (825 F.3d 206, 4th Cir. 2016) is a pivotal case that underscores the extent of...
Enhanced Protections for Inmate Bodily Integrity: King v. Rubenstein

Enhanced Protections for Inmate Bodily Integrity: King v. Rubenstein

Date: Jun 8, 2016
Enhanced Protections for Inmate Bodily Integrity: King v. Rubenstein Introduction In the case of Adrian F. King, Jr. v. Jim Rubenstein, Commissioner, et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Fourth Amendment and the Third-Party Doctrine: Reinforcement in United States v. Graham

Fourth Amendment and the Third-Party Doctrine: Reinforcement in United States v. Graham

Date: Jun 1, 2016
Fourth Amendment and the Third-Party Doctrine: Reinforcement in United States v. Graham Introduction United States v. Graham is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ADEA Retaliation Claim: Buchhagen v. ICF International

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ADEA Retaliation Claim: Buchhagen v. ICF International

Date: Jun 1, 2016
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ADEA Retaliation Claim: Buchhagen v. ICF International Introduction Buchhagen v. ICF International, Inc.; ICF Z-Tech Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert