Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Imposition of Lesser Sanctions for Counsel’s Failure to Attend Pretrial Conference in Employment Discrimination Case

Imposition of Lesser Sanctions for Counsel’s Failure to Attend Pretrial Conference in Employment Discrimination Case

Date: Jan 19, 1978
Imposition of Lesser Sanctions for Counsel’s Failure to Attend Pretrial Conference in Employment Discrimination Case Introduction The case of Herman T. Dove v. Codesco (569 F.2d 807) addresses...
Balancing Inmate Free Speech and Institutional Order: Insights from Durkin v. Taylor

Balancing Inmate Free Speech and Institutional Order: Insights from Durkin v. Taylor

Date: Nov 11, 1977
Balancing Inmate Free Speech and Institutional Order: Insights from Durkin v. Taylor Introduction In the landmark case Thomas H. Durkin v. John V. Taylor et al. (444 F. Supp. 879, U.S. District...
Judicial Review of Agency Denial of Statutory Preferential Rights: Fort Sumter Tours v. Secretary Andrus

Judicial Review of Agency Denial of Statutory Preferential Rights: Fort Sumter Tours v. Secretary Andrus

Date: Nov 4, 1977
Judicial Review of Agency Denial of Statutory Preferential Rights: Fort Sumter Tours v. Secretary Andrus Introduction The case of Fort Sumter Tours, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary, Department of...
Affirming the Denial of Class Certification in Antitrust Actions: Insights from WINDHAM v. AMERICAN BRANDS, INC.

Affirming the Denial of Class Certification in Antitrust Actions: Insights from WINDHAM v. AMERICAN BRANDS, INC.

Date: Oct 12, 1977
Affirming the Denial of Class Certification in Antitrust Actions: Insights from WINDHAM v. AMERICAN BRANDS, INC. Introduction WINDHAM v. AMERICAN BRANDS, INC., 565 F.2d 59 (4th Cir. 1977), is a...
Expanding Due Process Rights in Parole Proceedings: Franklin v. Shields

Expanding Due Process Rights in Parole Proceedings: Franklin v. Shields

Date: Sep 20, 1977
Expanding Due Process Rights in Parole Proceedings: Franklin v. Shields Introduction Franklin v. Shields is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, decided...
Adoption of the Normal Competency Standard for Effective Assistance of Counsel

Adoption of the Normal Competency Standard for Effective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Sep 3, 1977
Adoption of the Normal Competency Standard for Effective Assistance of Counsel Introduction The case of Victor Dennis Marzullo v. State of Maryland, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Wilson v. Volkswagen of America: A Landmark Ruling on Discovery Sanctions and Default Judgment

Wilson v. Volkswagen of America: A Landmark Ruling on Discovery Sanctions and Default Judgment

Date: Aug 16, 1977
Wilson v. Volkswagen of America: A Landmark Ruling on Discovery Sanctions and Default Judgment Introduction The case of John W. Wilson, Appellee v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., heard in the United...
Ripeness of Indemnification Claims in Admiralty Law: Insights from Lone Star Industries v. Mowinckles

Ripeness of Indemnification Claims in Admiralty Law: Insights from Lone Star Industries v. Mowinckles

Date: Aug 4, 1977
Ripeness of Indemnification Claims in Admiralty Law: Insights from Lone Star Industries v. Mowinckles Introduction The case of A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi, Apellee v. Tidewater Construction...
Exhaustion of State Remedies Affirmed in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Patterson v. Leeke

Exhaustion of State Remedies Affirmed in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Patterson v. Leeke

Date: Jun 14, 1977
Exhaustion of State Remedies Affirmed in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Patterson v. Leeke Introduction Patterson v. Leeke, consolidated with several other cases and decided by the United...
Bowring v. Godwin: Affirming the Right to Psychological Treatment for Inmates Under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments

Bowring v. Godwin: Affirming the Right to Psychological Treatment for Inmates Under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments

Date: Mar 19, 1977
Bowring v. Godwin: Affirming the Right to Psychological Treatment for Inmates Under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Introduction Bowring v. Godwin, 551 F.2d 44 (4th Cir. 1977), is a pivotal case...
Balance-of-Hardship Test Affirmed in Blackwelder Furniture Co. v. Seilig Manufacturing Co.

Balance-of-Hardship Test Affirmed in Blackwelder Furniture Co. v. Seilig Manufacturing Co.

Date: Feb 17, 1977
Balance-of-Hardship Test Affirmed in Blackwelder Furniture Co. v. Seilig Manufacturing Co. Introduction The case of Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company,...
Roman v. ESB, Inc.: Defining the Boundaries of Class Action in Employment Discrimination

Roman v. ESB, Inc.: Defining the Boundaries of Class Action in Employment Discrimination

Date: Dec 29, 1976
Roman v. ESB, Inc.: Defining the Boundaries of Class Action in Employment Discrimination Introduction The case of Miriam Conyers Roman et al. v. ESB, Incorporated, decided by the United States Court...
Preservation of Status Quo Pending Arbitration: Lever Brothers v. International Chemical Workers Union, Local 217

Preservation of Status Quo Pending Arbitration: Lever Brothers v. International Chemical Workers Union, Local 217

Date: Dec 1, 1976
Preservation of Status Quo Pending Arbitration: Lever Brothers v. International Chemical Workers Union, Local 217 Introduction The case of Lever Brothers Company v. International Chemical Workers...
Reversal of Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Upholding Rule 16 Standards in Pretrial Procedures

Reversal of Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Upholding Rule 16 Standards in Pretrial Procedures

Date: Nov 23, 1976
Reversal of Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Upholding Rule 16 Standards in Pretrial Procedures Introduction The case of Pauline McCargo v. Oley G. Hedrick et al. (545 F.2d 393) adjudicated by the...
Chiropractors' Antitrust Action Establishes Precedent on Interstate Commerce Impact and McCarran-Ferguson Act Limitations

Chiropractors' Antitrust Action Establishes Precedent on Interstate Commerce Impact and McCarran-Ferguson Act Limitations

Date: Oct 20, 1976
Chiropractors' Antitrust Action Establishes Precedent on Interstate Commerce Impact and McCarran-Ferguson Act Limitations Introduction In the landmark case of Herman L. Ballard et al. v. Blue Shield...
Unified Statutory Penalties and Rescission Conditions under the Truth-in-Lending Act: Powers v. Sims and Levin Realtors

Unified Statutory Penalties and Rescission Conditions under the Truth-in-Lending Act: Powers v. Sims and Levin Realtors

Date: Oct 2, 1976
Unified Statutory Penalties and Rescission Conditions under the Truth-in-Lending Act: Powers v. Sims and Levin Realtors Introduction Eugene Roosevelt Powers and Lila Virginia Powers, the appellants,...
Right to Severance in Joint Criminal Trials: Insights from United States v. Pembroick Edward Foutz, Jr.

Right to Severance in Joint Criminal Trials: Insights from United States v. Pembroick Edward Foutz, Jr.

Date: Aug 17, 1976
Right to Severance in Joint Criminal Trials: Insights from United States v. Pembroick Edward Foutz, Jr. Introduction United States v. Pembroick Edward Foutz, Jr., 540 F.2d 733 (4th Cir. 1976), is a...
Affirmation of Work Product Doctrine under Rule 26(b)(3) in Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken Inc.

Affirmation of Work Product Doctrine under Rule 26(b)(3) in Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken Inc.

Date: Jul 14, 1976
Affirmation of Work Product Doctrine under Rule 26(b)(3) in Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken Inc. Introduction The case of The Duplan Corporation et al. v. Deering Milliken, Inc., et al. (540 F.2d...
Defining De Minimis Interests in Judicial Recusal: The Virginia Electric v. Sun Shipbuilding Case

Defining De Minimis Interests in Judicial Recusal: The Virginia Electric v. Sun Shipbuilding Case

Date: May 25, 1976
Defining De Minimis Interests in Judicial Recusal: The Virginia Electric v. Sun Shipbuilding Case Introduction The case of Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO) v. Sun Shipbuilding and Dry Dock...
Piercing the Corporate Veil: Individual Liability Through Undercapitalization and Dominant Control – DeWITT Truck Brokers, Inc. v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Company

Piercing the Corporate Veil: Individual Liability Through Undercapitalization and Dominant Control – DeWITT Truck Brokers, Inc. v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Company

Date: May 14, 1976
Piercing the Corporate Veil: Individual Liability Through Undercapitalization and Dominant Control DeWITT Truck Brokers, Inc. v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Company and W. Ray Flemming 1. Introduction In...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert