Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Extension of Bankruptcy Court's Jurisdiction to Co-Defendants and Centralization of Mass Litigation: A New Precedent in Chapter 11 Proceedings

Extension of Bankruptcy Court's Jurisdiction to Co-Defendants and Centralization of Mass Litigation: A New Precedent in Chapter 11 Proceedings

Date: Apr 11, 1986
Extension of Bankruptcy Court's Jurisdiction to Co-Defendants and Centralization of Mass Litigation: A New Precedent in Chapter 11 Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case A.H. Robins Company,...
Roehling v. National Gypsum Company and Others: Establishing Precedents in Asbestos Exposure Liability

Roehling v. National Gypsum Company and Others: Establishing Precedents in Asbestos Exposure Liability

Date: Mar 29, 1986
Roehling v. National Gypsum Company and Others: Establishing Precedents in Asbestos Exposure Liability Introduction In the pivotal case of Grace A. Roehling, as Executrix of the Estate of Arthur J....
Limitations of North Carolina's Unfair Trade Practices Act in Securities Transactions

Limitations of North Carolina's Unfair Trade Practices Act in Securities Transactions

Date: Mar 21, 1986
Limitations of North Carolina's Unfair Trade Practices Act in Securities Transactions Introduction In the case of Weft, Inc., et al. v. G.C. Investment Associates, et al. (630 F. Supp. 1138), the...
Double Recovery in Breach of Contract: Johnson v. Oroweat Foods Co.

Double Recovery in Breach of Contract: Johnson v. Oroweat Foods Co.

Date: Mar 7, 1986
Double Recovery in Breach of Contract: Johnson v. Oroweat Foods Co. Introduction Johnson v. Oroweat Foods Co. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Hoots v. Allsbrough

Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Hoots v. Allsbrough

Date: Mar 6, 1986
Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Hoots v. Allsbrough Introduction The case of Richard Anthony Hoots v. Harry Allsbrough et al. (785 F.2d 1214) presents a critical...
Kellough v. Heckler: Establishing Procedural Standards for Disability Benefit Claims

Kellough v. Heckler: Establishing Procedural Standards for Disability Benefit Claims

Date: Feb 28, 1986
Kellough v. Heckler: Establishing Procedural Standards for Disability Benefit Claims Introduction The case of IRIS L. KELLOUGH v. MARGARET M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services (785 F.2d...
Deference to Appeals Council in Disability Benefits Determinations: Gross v. Heckler

Deference to Appeals Council in Disability Benefits Determinations: Gross v. Heckler

Date: Feb 28, 1986
Deference to Appeals Council in Disability Benefits Determinations: Gross v. Heckler Introduction In the landmark case Charles R. Gross v. Margaret Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services,...
Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies: HENDERSON v. UNITED STATES Establishes Strict Compliance with FTCA Requirements

Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies: HENDERSON v. UNITED STATES Establishes Strict Compliance with FTCA Requirements

Date: Feb 28, 1986
Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies: HENDERSON v. UNITED STATES Establishes Strict Compliance with FTCA Requirements Introduction The case of Anna Mae R. Henderson, Appellant versus the United...
Cook v. Heckler: Reinforcing Procedural Integrity and Combined Impairment Evaluation in Social Security Disability Benefits

Cook v. Heckler: Reinforcing Procedural Integrity and Combined Impairment Evaluation in Social Security Disability Benefits

Date: Feb 22, 1986
Cook v. Heckler: Reinforcing Procedural Integrity and Combined Impairment Evaluation in Social Security Disability Benefits Introduction In the landmark case Cook v. Heckler, the United States Court...
Affirmation of Local Rule Authority to Impose Jury Costs for Unjustified Settlement Delays

Affirmation of Local Rule Authority to Impose Jury Costs for Unjustified Settlement Delays

Date: Feb 22, 1986
Affirmation of Local Rule Authority to Impose Jury Costs for Unjustified Settlement Delays Introduction The case WHITE et al. v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. (783 F.2d 1175, United States Court of...
Isolated Transactions and Personal Jurisdiction: The Chung v. Nana Development Corp. Ruling

Isolated Transactions and Personal Jurisdiction: The Chung v. Nana Development Corp. Ruling

Date: Feb 20, 1986
Isolated Transactions and Personal Jurisdiction: The Chung v. Nana Development Corp. Ruling Introduction The case of Choon Young Chung v. Nana Development Corporation, adjudicated by the United...
Establishing Comprehensive Copyright and Trade Dress Protections for Video Games: A Commentary on M. Kramer Manufacturing Co. v. Andrews

Establishing Comprehensive Copyright and Trade Dress Protections for Video Games: A Commentary on M. Kramer Manufacturing Co. v. Andrews

Date: Feb 7, 1986
Establishing Comprehensive Copyright and Trade Dress Protections for Video Games: A Commentary on M. Kramer Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Andrews, et al. Introduction In M. Kramer Manufacturing Co.,...
Proper Classification of Past Employment in Social Security Disability Determinations: Smith v. Heckler

Proper Classification of Past Employment in Social Security Disability Determinations: Smith v. Heckler

Date: Feb 4, 1986
Proper Classification of Past Employment in Social Security Disability Determinations: Smith v. Heckler Introduction In the case of Thomas W. Smith v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and...
Establishing Substantial Causation in Asbestosis Claims: Insights from Lohrmann v. Raymark

Establishing Substantial Causation in Asbestosis Claims: Insights from Lohrmann v. Raymark

Date: Jan 31, 1986
Establishing Substantial Causation in Asbestosis Claims: Insights from Lohrmann v. Raymark Introduction Lohrmann v. Raymark Industries, Inc. et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Affirmation of Protective Custody Restrictions: Taylor v. Rogers and Colleagues

Affirmation of Protective Custody Restrictions: Taylor v. Rogers and Colleagues

Date: Jan 22, 1986
Affirmation of Protective Custody Restrictions: Taylor v. Rogers and Colleagues Introduction In the case of Enith Lester Taylor, Jr., Appellant, and Larry Parnell; Jerry Lee Beeson, Intervenor Ptfs....
Fourth Circuit Upholds Protections for Journalistic Confidential Sources in LaRouche v. NBC

Fourth Circuit Upholds Protections for Journalistic Confidential Sources in LaRouche v. NBC

Date: Jan 10, 1986
Fourth Circuit Upholds Protections for Journalistic Confidential Sources in LaRouche v. NBC Introduction In the landmark case of LaRouche v. National Broadcasting Company (NBC), decided by the United...
Reversing Social Security Disability Denial: Fourth Circuit Sets Precedent on Pain Evaluation and Residual Functional Capacity in Foster v. Heckler

Reversing Social Security Disability Denial: Fourth Circuit Sets Precedent on Pain Evaluation and Residual Functional Capacity in Foster v. Heckler

Date: Jan 8, 1986
Reversing Social Security Disability Denial: Fourth Circuit Sets Precedent on Pain Evaluation and Residual Functional Capacity in Foster v. Heckler Introduction The case of Ivan Ned Foster v....
Interpretation of Continuing Criminal Enterprise Under 21 U.S.C. § 848(b)(2)(A)

Interpretation of Continuing Criminal Enterprise Under 21 U.S.C. § 848(b)(2)(A)

Date: Dec 27, 1985
Interpretation of Continuing Criminal Enterprise Under 21 U.S.C. § 848(b)(2)(A) Introduction The case of United States of America v. James Alvin Rhodes, A/K/A Mickey Rhodes, decided on December 26,...
Implied Malice Standard Affirmed under Bankruptcy Code §523(a)(6)

Implied Malice Standard Affirmed under Bankruptcy Code §523(a)(6)

Date: Dec 27, 1985
Implied Malice Standard Affirmed under Bankruptcy Code §523(a)(6) Introduction In the landmark decision of St. Paul Fire Marine Insurance Company v. Roland C. Vaughn, the United States Court of...
Public Employers Cannot Restrict Employee Speech Based on Potential External Community Reaction

Public Employers Cannot Restrict Employee Speech Based on Potential External Community Reaction

Date: Dec 21, 1985
Public Employers Cannot Restrict Employee Speech Based on Potential External Community Reaction Introduction The case of Robert M. Berger v. Frank J. Battaglia et al. addresses the complex...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert